| تعداد نشریات | 24 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 859 |
| تعداد مقالات | 7,641 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 13,554,819 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 11,668,019 |
The Role of ChatGPT-based Instruction and Flipped Language Learning in Metadiscourse Use in EFL Learners’ Argumentative Writing and their Perceptions of the two Instructional Methods | ||
| Teaching English as a Second Language Quarterly (Formerly Journal of Teaching Language Skills) | ||
| دوره 43، شماره 3، آبان 2024، صفحه 27-52 اصل مقاله (944.34 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22099/tesl.2024.49975.3277 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Rajab Esfandiari* 1؛ Omid Allaf-Akbary2 | ||
| 1Imam Khomeini International University | ||
| 2Department of English Language, Faculty of Humanities, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| The advent of ChatGPT, an all-purpose intelligent Chabot created by Open AI, has created a multitude of prospects and opportunities within the realm of language education. Owing to its exceptional capacity to produce a wide range of textual outputs, ChatGPT responds to queries in a matter of seconds. The present study aimed to examine the appropriateness of ChatGPT-based instruction and flipped language learning instruction (FLLI) in classrooms in terms of enhancing EFL learners’ interactional metadiscourse realization across language proficiency levels. Sixty-three English language learners were divided into four distinct groups: 16 in the advanced and 16 in the intermediate FLLI group, 15 in the advanced, and 16 in the intermediate ChatGPT group. Before initiating the study, all participants were given a pretest that specifically assessed the use of interactional metadiscourse markers (IMMs) in argumentative writing. The four experimental groups were separately exposed to ChatGPT-based instruction and FLLI during eight sessions. Results from a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) procedure through SPSS (version 25) revealed that the ChatGPT-based instruction was more effective than FLLI, and both intermediate and advanced language learners following the ChatGPT-based instruction used IMMs in argumentative writing more successfully. Moreover, the participants’ perceptions of ChatGPT and FLLI were analyzed through MAXQDA (version 2020), showing more positive attitudes towards using ChatGPT in language learning in general and IM realization in particular. The findings have the potential to provide advantages for teacher educators in terms of utilizing ChatGPT learning approaches. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| ChatGPT-based Instruction؛ Flipped Language Learning Instruction؛ Interactional Metadiscourse | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Ädel, A. (2023). Adopting a “move” rather than a “marker” approach to metadiscourse: A taxonomy for spoken student presentations. Journal of English for Specific Purposes, 69(2), 4-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2022.09.001
Al-Subhi, A. (2022). Metadiscourse in online advertising: Exploring linguistic and visual metadiscourse in social media advertisements. Journal of Pragmatics, 187(3), 24-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.10.027
Aryadoust, V., & Raquel, M. (2019). Quantitative data analysis for language assessment volume II. Routledge.
Baig, M, I., & Yadegaridehkordi, E. (2023). Flipped classroom in higher education: a systematic literature review and research challenges. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(2), 53-83. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00430-5
Chen Hsieh, J. S., Huang, Y. M., & Wu, C. V. (2017). Technological acceptance of LINE in flipped EFL oral training. Computers in Human Behavior, 70(5), 178-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.066
Chen, L., & Li, C. (2023). Interactional metadiscourse in news commentaries: A corpus-based study of China Daily and the New York Times. Journal of Pragmatics, 212(2), 29-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2023.04.018
Chen, M. R. A., & Hwang, G. J. (2020). Effects of a concept mapping‐ based flipped learning approach on EFL students’ English-speaking performance, critical thinking awareness and speaking anxiety. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(3), 817-834. https://doi:10.1111/bjet.12887
Chen, X., Zou, D., Xie, H., Cheng, G., & Liu, C. (2022). Two decades of artificial intelligence in education: Contributors, collaborations, research topics, challenges, and future directions. Educational Technology & Society, 25(1), 28–47. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48647028
Chen, Z., Weichao C., Jiyou J., & Huixiao L. (2022). Exploring AWE-supported writing process: An activity theory perspective. Language Learning & Technology 26, 129–48.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale.
Dörnyei, S. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford University Press.
Eghtesadi Roudi, A. R. (2020). The Effectiveness of flipped learning in a testing university classroom: students’ perceptions, the role of personality traits, and successful intelligence. Applied Research on English Language, 9(3), 349-364. https://doi: 10.22108/are.2020.119039.1494
El-Dakhs, D.A.S., Yahya, N., & Pawlak, M. (2022). Investigating the impact of explicit and implicit instruction on the use of interactional metadiscourse markers. Asian. J. Second. Foreign. Lang. Educ., 7, 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-022-00175-0
Esfandiari, R., & Allaf-Akbary, O. (2022). Metadiscursive features in research articles: The role of stimulated recall. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 14(29), 245-263. https://doi.org/10.22034/elt.2022.51232.2487
Fan, X. (2022). The development of EFL learners’ willingness to communicate and self-efficacy: The role of flipped learning approach with the use of social media. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(4), 25-37. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1001283
Fatemeh, K., Mahmoud, A., & Roman, K. (2020). Using interactive e-based flipped learning
Han, C., & Gardener, S. (2024). “How can I add an argument appropriately in English?” Addition markers in Chinese L1 and English L1 university student writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 67(4), 232-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2023.101332
Herriman, J. (2022). Metadiscourse in English instruction manuals. Journal of English for Specific Purposes, 65(2), 120-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2021.10.003
Ho, V., & Li, C. (2018). The use of metadiscourse and persuasion: An analysis of first year university students’ timed argumentative essays. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 33(3), 53-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.02.001
Hsieh, J. S. C., Wu, W. C. V., & Marek, M. W. (2017). Using the flipped classroom to enhance EFL learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(1-2), 1-21.
Huang W, Hew K. F., & Fryer L. K. (2022). Chatbots for language learning – are they really useful? A systematic review of chatbot-supported language learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(1): 237–257.
Hyland, K. (2019). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing (2nd edition). Continuum.
Izquierdo, M., & Blanco, M. (2023). Interactional metadiscourse: Building rapport and solidarity in informational-persuasive discourse. An English-Spanish case study. Journal of Pragmatics, 216(3), 106-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2023.08.005
Kartal, G. (2023). Transforming the language teaching experience in the age of AI. IGI Global.
Kashyap, P. (2023). Applied quantum computers: Learn about the concept, architecture, tools, and adoption strategies for quantum computing and artificial intelligence. Bpb Publications.
Kaviani, H., Liaghatdar, M., Zamani, B., & Abediny, Y. (2018). Curriculum design in the flipped classroom: The research synthesis methods. Journal of Theory & Practice in Curriculum, 11(6), 203-271.
Khodabandeh, F., & Hemmati, F. (2022). Comparing the effect of peer assessment in blended, flipped and face-to-face classes: The case of argumentative essays. Iranian Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(1), 1-12. https:// doi:20.1001.1.24763187.2022.11.1.1.2
Khoshsima, H. (2021). The comparison of the use of data-driven learning in flipped, blended and conventional classes on students’ grammar learning. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 13(28), 285-296. https://doi: 10.22034/ELT.2021.48829.2462
Khoshsima, H., Talati-Baghsiahi, A., Zare-Behtash, E., & Safaie-Qalati, M. (2018). Interactional metadiscourse in the writings of novice vs. established members of academic communities. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 10(22), 63-86.
Kim, M., & Adlof, L. (2024). Adapting to the Future: ChatGPT as a means for supporting constructivist learning environments. TechTrends, 68(2), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-023-00899-x
Kim, N. (2018). Chatbots and Korean EFL students’ English vocabulary learning. Journal of Digital Convergence, 1(3), 1–7.
Kirmizi, Ö., & Kömeç, F. (2019). The impact of the flipped classroom on receptive and productive vocabulary learning. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 15(2), 437-449. https:// doi:10.17263/jlls.586096
Kohnke, L. (2022). A pedagogical chatbot: A supplemental language learning tools. RELC Journal, 54(3), 203-225. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882211067054
Kohnke, L. Luke Moorhouse, B., & Zou, D. (2023). ChatGPT for language teaching and learning. RELC Journal, 54(2), 537-550. https://doi: 10.1177/00336882231162868
Kondowe, W. (2014). Hedging and boosting as interactional metadiscourse in literature doctoral dissertation abstracts. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 5(3), 214-221.
Kuhail, M., Alturki, N., Alramlawi, S., & Alhejori, K. (2023). Interacting with educational chatbots: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 28(5), 97-1018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11177-3
Lawson-Tancred, H. (2020). (Ed.). Aristotle: The art of rhetoric. Arcturus Publishing.
Lee Wang, F., Cheong Li, K., Phusavat, K., Paoprasert, N., Charnsethikul, P., & Cheung, S. (2023). Technology in education. Innovative practices for the new normal. Springer Nature Singapore.
Lee, W. W. L. (2021). Emotion in business communication: A comparative study of attitude markers in the discourse of U.S. and mainland Chinese corporations. Discourse & Communication, 15(6), 629-649. https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813211026541
Liu, Y., & Buckingham, L. (2018). The schematic structure of discussion sections in applied linguistics and the distribution of meta-discourse markers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 34(4), 97-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.04.002
Lockwood, R. B. (2023). Flipping the classroom: What every ESL teacher should know. University of Michigan Press.
Mauranen, A. (2023). Reflexively speaking: Metadiscourse in English as a lingua Franca. de Gruyter.
McCourt, M. D. (2023). The new constructivism in international relations theory. Bristol University Press.
Moorhouse, B. L. (2023). Teachers’ digital technology use after a period of online teaching. ELT Journal, 77(4), 445-457. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccac050
Namaziandost, E., Rezaei, Z., Etemadfar, P., & Alekasir, S. (2020). Implementing a flipped model of instruction in the EFL listening classroom: Impact on comprehension. Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 10(2), 385-401. https://doi.org/10.23971/jefl.v10i2.2065
Öztürk, M., & Çakıroglu, Ü. (2021). Flipped learning design in EFL classrooms: Implementing self-regulated learning strategies to develop language skills. Smart Learning Environment, 8, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-021-00146-x
Peachey, N. (2023). ChatGPT in the language classroom. Peachey Publications Ltd.
Pearson, S. W., & Abdollahzadeh, E. (2023). Metadiscourse in academic writing: A systematic review. Lingua, 293, 103561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2023.10356
Phakiti, A. (2003). A closer look at gender and strategy use in L2 reading. Language Learning, 53(4), 649-702.
Qiu, X., Wang, Y., Dartey, E., & Kim, M. (2024). Interactional metadiscourse in expert and student disciplinary writing: Exploring intrageneric and functional variation, Journal of English for Specific Purposes, 73(5), 124-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2023.10.007
Qiu, X., Wang, Y., Dartey, E. A., & Kim, M. (2024). Interactional metadiscourse in expert and student disciplinary writing: Exploring intrageneric and functional variation. Journal of English for Specific Purposes, 73(5), 124-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2023.10.007
Rezaei Fard, Z., Shahrokhi, M., & Talebinejad, M. R. (2021). The effect of the flipped classroom on Iranian ESP students’ vocabulary learning, retention and attitude. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 9(35), 115-129.
Sengul, F., Bensen Bostanci, H., & Kurt, M. (2022). Online in-class vs. out-of-class flipped learning models in English as foreign language writing classes. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(14), 25-39. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1009800
Shobha, J. M., & Anbu, T. (2023). Global trends in teaching English language and literature. Alborear (OPC) Pvt. Ltd.
Spivey, N. N. (2023). The constructivist metaphor: Reading, writing and the making of meaning. Brill.
Vaezi, R., Afghari, A., & Lotfi, A. (2019). Flipped teaching: Iranian students’ and teachers’ perceptions. Applied Research on English Language, 8(1), 139-164. https://doi.org/ 10.22108/ARE.2019.114131.1382
Voss, E., & Kostka, I. (2019). Flipping academic English language learning: Experiences from an American university. Springer nature.
Walker, Z., Tan, D., & Koh, N. (2020). Flipped classrooms with diverse learners’ international perspectives. Springer Nature.
Wu, W. C. V., Yang, J. C., Scott Chen Hsieh, J., & Yamamoto, T. (2020). Free from demotivation in EFL writing: the use of online flipped writing instruction. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(4), 353-387. https:// doi:10.1080/09588221.2019.1567556
Wu, Y. Y., Liu, S., Man, Q., Luo, F. L., Zheng, Y. X., Yang, S., Ming, X., & Zhang, F. Y. (2022). Application and evaluation of the flipped classroom based on micro-video class in pharmacology teaching. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 22-34 e838900. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.838900
Xiao Y., & Zhi Y. (2023). An exploratory study of EFL learners’ use of ChatGPT for language learning tasks: Experience and perceptions. Languages, 8(3), 212-234. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8030212
Yan, D. (2023). Impact of ChatGPT on learners in a L2 writing practicum: An exploratory investigation. Education and Information Technologies, 28(2), 13943-13967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11742-4
Yang, H., Kim, H., Lee, J. H., & Shin. D. (2022). Implementation of an AI chatbot as an English conversation partner in EFL speaking classes. ReCALL, 34, 327-343. https://doi:10.1017/S0958344022000039 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,152 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 604 |
||