Enhancing Students' Growth in Productive Skills through Standardized Grading Procedures and Customized Constructive Feed-Forward | ||
| Teaching English as a Second Language Quarterly (Formerly Journal of Teaching Language Skills) | ||
| دوره 43، شماره 1، اردیبهشت 2024، صفحه 59-93 اصل مقاله (750.36 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22099/tesl.2024.48797.3241 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| Mimoun Meliiti* | ||
| University of Kairouan, Tunisia | ||
| چکیده | ||
| This research investigated the effects of applying standardized grading procedures and tailored constructive feedback on the development of students' productive skills, with a specific focus on writing and speaking abilities in the Deanship of Preparatory Year students at the University of Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal, Saudi Arabia. The study introduced two programs: a writing portfolio program and a speaking remedial program. These programs aimed to assess students' strengths and weaknesses in these skills before offering individualized feedback from teachers between two assessment points. Pre- and post-program scores were compared, and teachers' reflections were gathered. The results demonstrate that students experienced substantial improvements in their scores, with progress ranging from 29% to 66% following the implementation of these initiatives. Additionally, the study revealed that teachers also benefited from these programs, leading to a reevaluation of the quality and quantity of their feedback and an adjustment in their teaching approaches to better support their students. These findings underscore the significance of providing constructive feedback in higher education institutions. They highlight the necessity of implementing feedback systematically and methodically to cater to the needs of struggling students, enhance the learning experiences of high-achieving students, and professionalize the processes of learning, assessment, and student support. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Constructive Feedforward؛ Remedial Program؛ Grading Standardization؛ Productive Skills؛ Foundation Program | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Ali, N., Rose, S., & Ahmed, L. (2015). Psychology students’ perception of and engagement with feedback as a function of year of study. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(4), 574–586. http://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.936355.
Allen, R., & Bentley, S. (2012). Feedback Mechanisms: Efficient and Effective Use of Technology or Waste of Time and Effort. In STEM Annual Conference 2012, London.
Andrade, H., & Ying, D. (2005). Student perspectives on rubric-referenced assessment. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10(3), 1-11.
Arter, J., & McTighe, J. (2001). Scoring Rubrics in the Classroom. Corwin Press.
Ashford-Rowe, K., Herrington, J., & Brown, C. (2014). Establishing the critical elements that determine authentic assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(2), 205–222. doi:10.1080/02602938.2013.819566.
Basso, D., & Belardinelli, O. M. (2006). The role of the feedforward paradigm in cognitive psychology. Cognitive Processing, 7(2), 73-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10339-006-0034-1.
Bates, T. (2011). Understanding Web 2.0 and Its Implications for e-Learning. In Lee, M. and McCoughlin, C. (eds.). Web 2.0-Based E-Learning. Information Science Reference.
Beatty, I. D. (2013). Standards-based grading in introductory university physics. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 13(2), 1-22. Retrieved from http://josotl.indiana.edu/article/view/3264.
Belcher, D. D. (2013). The Future of ESP Research: Resources for Access and Choice. In: B. Paltridge, & S. Starfield (eds.) Handbook of English for Specific Purposes. New York: Wiley-Blackwell, 592-610.
Bennett, R. E. (2011). Formative assessment: a critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 18(1), 5–25. http://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2010.513678.
Benta, D., Bologa, G., & Dzitac, I. (2014). E-learning Platforms in Higher Education. Case Study. Procedia Computer Science, 31. 10.1016/j.procs.2014.05.373.
Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing Teaching through Constructive Alignment. Higher Education, 32(3), 347–364.
Biggs, J. (2003). Aligning teaching for constructing learning. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/John_Biggs3/publication/255583992_Aligning_Teaching_for_Constructing_Learning/links/5406ffe70cf2bba34c1e8153.pdf.
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student Does (4th Ed.). Open University Press/McGraw Hill.
Boix Mansilla, V., Duraisingh, D. E., Wolfe, C. R., & Haynes, C. (2009). Targeted assessment rubric: An empirically grounded rubric for interdisciplinary writing. Journal of Higher Education, 80(3), 334–353.
Brookhart, S., Guskey, T. R., McTighe, J., & William, D. (2020). Eight Essential Principles for Improving Grading. Educational Leadership, 78(1). http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/sept20/vol78/num01/Eight-Essential-Principles-for-Improving-Grading.aspx.
Brophy, J. (2006). History of research on classroom management. In C. M. Evertson & C. S. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of Classroom Management: Research, Practice, and Contemporary Issues (pp. 17–43). Erlbaum.
Burchell, H., Dyson, J., & Rees, M. (2002). Making a Difference: a study of the impact of Continuing Professional Development on professional practice. Journal of In-Service Education, 28(2), 219-229.
Cox, K. B. (2011). Putting classroom grading on the table: A reform in progress. American Secondary Education, 40(1), 67-87.
De Angelis, G., & Selinker, L. (2001). Interlanguage transfer and competing linguistic systems. In J. Cenoz, B. Hufeisen, & U. Jessner (Eds.), Cross-linguistic Influence in Third Language Acquisition: Psycholinguistic Perspectives (pp. 42-58). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Delpit, L. (1988). The Silenced Dialogue: Power and Pedagogy in Educating Other People’s Children. Harvard Educational Review, 58(3), 280-298.
Espasa, A., & Meneses, J. (2010). Analyzing feedback processes in an online teaching and learning environment: an exploratory study. Higher education, 59, 277-292.
Fluke, S., O’Connor, A., Hoff, N., & Peterson, R. L. (2014, September). Academic Support, Strategy Brief. Lincoln, NE: Student Engagement Project, University of Nebraska-Lincoln and the Nebraska Department of Education. Retrieved from http://k12engagement.unl.edu/academic-supports.
Gao, L. (2011). Eclecticism or Principled Eclecticism. Creative Education, 2(4), 363-369.
Guskey, T. R. (2001). Helping standards make the grade. Educational Leadership, 59(1), 20-27.
Guskey, T. R. (2011). Five obstacles to grading reform. Educational Leadership, 69(3), 16-21.
Guskey, T. R. (2014). On your mark: Challenging the conventions of grading and reporting.
Guskey, T. R., & Bailey, J. M. (2001). Developing grading and reporting systems for student learning. Corwin.
Hafner, J. C., & Hafner, P. M. (2004). Quantitative analysis of the rubric as an assessment tool: An empirical study of student peer-group rating. International Journal of Science Education, 25(12), 1509-1528.
Hamid, Y., & Mahmood, S. (2010). Understanding constructive feedback: a commitment between teachers and students for academic and professional development. J Pak Med Assoc, 60(3), 224-227.
Harmer, J. (2004). How to Teach Writing. Longman.
Hattie, J. (1999). Influences on Student Learning. University of Auckland.
Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with Words. Cambridge University Press.
Henderson, M., Selwyn, N., Finger, G., & Aston, R. (2015). Students’ everyday engagement with digital technology in university: exploring patterns of use and “usefulness”. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 37(3), 308–319. http://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2015.1034424.
Hendry, G. D., Armstrong, S., & Bromberger, N. (2012). Implementing standards-based assessment effectively: incorporating discussion of exemplars into classroom teaching. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(2), 149–161. http://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2010.515014.
Hirsch, J. (2017). The Feedback Fix: Dump the Past, Embrace the Future, and Lead the Way to Change. Rowman & Littlefield.
Kalra, R., Sundrarajun, C., & Komintarachat, H. (2017). Using portfolio as an alternative assessment tool to enhance Thai EFL students' writing skill. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume, 8.
Marzano, R. (2000). Transforming Classroom Grading. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
McMillan, J. H. (2001). Classroom Assessment: Principles and Practice for Effective Instruction. Allyn and Bacon.
Molloy, E. K., & Boud, D. (2014). Feedback models for learning, teaching and performance. In Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, 413-424.
Nasab, F. G. (2015). Alternative versus traditional assessment. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 2(6), 165-178.
Neimeyer, G. J., & Merluzzi, T. V. (1982). Group situation and group process: Personal construct theory and group development. Small Group Behavior, 13, 150–164.
Nicol, D. (2010). From monologue to dialogue: improving written feedback processes in mass higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 501–517.
O’Connor, K. (2009). How to Grade for Learning, K-12 (3rd ed.). Corwin.
Ovando, M. N. (1994). Constructive feedback: A key to successful teaching and learning. International Journal of Educational Management, 8(6), 19-22.
Ozdamli, F., & Asiksoy, G. (2016). Flipped classroom approach. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 8(2), 98-105.
Reeves, D. B. (2008). Effective grading practices. Educational Leadership, 65(5), 85-87. Retrieved from http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/feb08/vol65/num05/Effective-Grading-Practices.aspx.
Rhodes, T. L. (2016). Assessment: Growing up is a many-splendored thing. Journal of Assessment and Institutional Effectiveness, 5(2), 101. http://doi.org/10.5325/jasseinsteffe.5.2.0101.
Sadler, D. R. (2014). The futility of attempting to codify academic achievement standards. Higher Education, 67(3), 273–288. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9649-1.
Sambell, K., McDowell, L., & Montgomery, C. (2013). Assessment for Learning in Higher Education. Routledge.
Scoles, J., Huxham, M., & McArthur, J. (2013). No longer exempt from good practice: using exemplars to close the feedback gap for exams. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6), 631–645. http://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.674485.
Scott, S. (2008). Improving Student Satisfaction with Feedback: Report on a Project Undertaken in the Faculties of Arts & Social Sciences and of Law at UNSW.
Siemens, G. (2004). Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age. Retrieved from: http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/connectivism.htm.
Simonez, T. J. (2016). Remedial Education Programs and Student Success: Perceptions of Faculty and Administrators at HBCUs. Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 1485. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/etd/1485.
Sparks, D. (2002). Designing powerful staff development for teachers and principals. National Staff Development Council.
Stiggins, R. (2001). Student-Involved Classroom Assessment (3rd ed.). New York: Merrill.
Stobart, G. (2008). Testing Times: The Uses and Abuses of Assessment. Routledge.
Vatterott, C. (2015). Rethinking Grading. ASCD.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.
Wimshurst, K., and Manning, M. (2013). Feed-forward assessment, exemplars and peer marking: evidence of efficacy. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(4), 451–465. http://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2011.646236.
Wolf, K., & Stevens, E. (2007). The role of rubrics in advancing and assessing student learning. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 7, 3-14. Retrieved from Wolf.doc (ed.gov).
Wormeli, R. (2006). Accountability: Teaching through assessment and feedback, not grading. American Secondary Education, 34(3), 14-27.
Yorke, M. (2003). Formative assessment in higher education: Moves towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogic practice. Higher Education, 45, 477–501.
Zoeckler, L. G. (2007). Moral aspects of grading: A study of high school English teachers’ perceptions. American Secondary Education, 35(2), 83-102. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 127 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 182 |
||