Foreign Language Education Policy (FLEP) in Iran: Unpacking State Mandates in Major National Policy Documents | ||
| Teaching English as a Second Language Quarterly (Formerly Journal of Teaching Language Skills) | ||
| دوره 39، شماره 3.1، دی 2020، صفحه 185-215 اصل مقاله (494.78 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22099/jtls.2021.38870.2904 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Zia Tajeddin* 1؛ Fariba Chamani2 | ||
| 1Tarbiat Modares University | ||
| 2Allameh Tabataba'i University | ||
| چکیده | ||
| The worldwide spread of English as the dominant language of globalization has accelerated the development and implementation of Foreign Language Education Policy (FLEP) in many countries. However, Iranian macro policymakers seem to be reluctant to develop an overt FLEP due to ideologized agendas. This study employs document analysis to explore FLEP in eight major national policy documents in Iran including, inter alia, National Vision 2025, Comprehensive Scientific Roadmap, and National Document of Education. This analysis was based on Kaplan and Baldauf’s (1997, 2003) framework for language-in-education planning, which covers Access, Curriculum, Methods and Materials, Evaluation, Personnel, and Resourcing policy as its major components. The data, coded through MAXQDA Software, revealed that the documents relatively deal with almost all components of FLEP excluding the Resourcing policy. Curriculum policy and Methods and materials policy receive the highest attention. Further, some contradictions, conflicts of interest, and gaps are observed in the documents regarding FLEP. Although these documents deemed English necessary for the development of the country, there are worries that it may lead to Westernization. The findings also show that FLEP in Iran is top-down and hardly reflects the needs and attitudes of the community. This has resulted in the failure of ELT in public schools and, in turn, its boom in the private sectors. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| English Language Teaching؛ Foreign Language Education Policy (FLEP)؛ National Policy Documents؛ Document Analysis؛ Globalization | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abiria, D. M., Early, M., & Kendrick, M. (2013). Plurilingual pedagogical practices in a policy-constrained context: A Northern Ugandan case study. TESOL Quarterly, 47(3), 567-590. Aghagolzadeh, F., & H. Davari (2017). English education in Iran: From ambivalent policies to paradoxical practices. In R. Kirkpatrick (Ed.), English language education policy in the Middle East and North Africa (pp. 47-62). Amsterdam: Springer.
Al-Issa, A. S. (2013). The implications of expanding the instruction time for the English language teaching policy implementation in the Sultanate of Oman: A qualitative study. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 10(4), 311-333.
Ardavani, S., & Durrant, P. (2015). How have political and socio-economic issues impacted on the motivation of Iranian students to learn English? In C. Kennedy (Ed.), English language teaching in the Islamic Republic of Iran: Innovations, trends and challenges (pp. 35-48). London: British Council.
Atai, M. R., & Mazlum, F. (2012). English language teaching curriculum in Iran: Planning and practice. The Curriculum Journal, 24(3), 389-411.
Barabadi, E., & Razmjoo, S. A. (2016). The emergence of various contradictions in Iranian high school English education under the new CLT-based curriculum. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 35(3), 41-64.
Borjian, M. (2013). English in post-revolutionary Iran. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40.
Cooper, R. L. (1989). Language planning and social change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Crandall, J. J., & Bailey, K. M. (Eds.). (2018). Global perspectives on language education policies. London: Routledge.
Davari, H., & Aghagolzadeh, F. (2015).To teach or not to teach? Still an open question for the Iranian education system. In C. Kennedy (Ed.), English language teaching in the Islamic Republic of Iran: Innovations, trends and challenges (pp. 10-19). London: British Council.
De Costa, P. I. (2016). The power of identity and ideology in language learning. Switzerland: Springer.
Foroozandeh, E., & Forouzani, M. (2015). Developing school English materials for the new Iranian educational system. In C. Kennedy, English language teaching in the Islamic Republic of Iran: Innovations, trends and challenges (pp. 59-72). London: British Council.
Gorter, D., & Cenoz, J. (2017). Language education policy and multilingual assessment. Language and Education, 31(3), 231-248.
Hamid, M. O., & Erling, E. (2016). English-in-Education Policy and Planning in Bangladesh: A Critical Examination. InR. Kirkpatrick (Ed.), English language education policy in Asia (pp. 25-48). New York, NY: Springer.
Hanewald, R. (2016). The impact of English on educational policies and practices in Malaysia. In R. Kirkpatrick (Ed.), English language education policy in Asia (pp. 181-198). New York, NY: Springer.
Hayati, M., & Mashhadi, A. (2010). Language planning and language-in-education policy in Iran. Language Problems and Language Planning, 34(1), 24-42.
Kaplan, R. B., & Baldauf, Jr. R. B. (1997). Language planning: From practice to theory. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Kaplan, R. B., & Baldauf, Jr. R. B. (2003). Language and Language-in-Education Planning in the Pacific Basin. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Kaplan, R. B., & Baldauf, Jr. R. B. (2005). Language-in-education policy and planning. In E. Hinkle (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 1037-1058). London: Routledge.
Kiany, G. R., Mirhosseini, S. A., & Navidinia, H. (2010). Foreign language education policies in Iran: Pivotal macro considerations. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 2 (222), 49-70.
Kirkgoz, Y. (2009). Globalization and English language policy in Turkey. Educational Policy, 23(5), 663-684.
Kubota, R. (2002). The impact of globalization on language teaching in Japan. In D. Block & D. Cameron (Eds.), Globalization and language teaching (pp. 23-38). London: Routledge.
Liddicoat, A. J. (2013). Language-in-education policies: The discursive construction of intercultural relations. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Mirhosseini, S. A., & Khodakarami. S. (2015). A glimpse of contrasting de jure-de facto policies in Iran. In C. Kennedy (Ed.), English language teaching in the Islamic Republic of Iran: Innovations, trends and challenges (pp. 23-34). London: British Council.
Morady Moghadam, M., & Murray, N. (2019). English language teaching in Iran: A case of shifting sands, ambiguity, and incoherent policy and practice. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language, 7(1), 96-105.
Moser, A., & Kletzenbauer, P. (2019). Thinking outside the box: The impact of globalization on English language teachers in Austria. In A. Kostoulas (Ed.), Challenging boundaries in language education (pp. 165-181). Cham: Springer.
Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
O'Leary, Z. (2004). The essential guide to doing research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Omoniyi, T. (2007). Alternative contexts of language policy and planning in Sub-Saharan Africa. TESOL Quarterly, 41(3), 533-549.
Payne, M. (2007). Foreign language planning: Towards a supporting framework. Language Problems and Language Planning, 31(3), 235-256.
Payne, M., & Almansour, M. (2014). Foreign language planning in Saudi Arabia: Beyond English. Current Issues in Language Planning, 15(3), 327-342.
Pennycook, A. (2017). The cultural politics of English as an international language. New York, NY: Routledge.
Phillipson, R. (2016). Native speakers in linguistic imperialism. The Journal of Critical Education Policy Studies, 14(3), 80-96.
Rasti, A. (2018). Iranian EFL teachers’ sense-making of policy reforms: The case of the new communicative-based curriculum. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 37(2), 169-193.
Sadeghi, K., & Richards, J. C. (2015). The idea of English in Iran: An example from Urmia. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 37(4), 419-434.
Scarino, A. (2014). Situating the challenges in current languages education policy in Australia-unlearning monolingualism. International Journal of Multilingualism, 11(3), 289-306.
Seargeant, P., & Erling, E. J. (2011). The discourse of ‘English as a language for international development’: Policy assumptions and practical challenges. In H. Coleman (Ed.), Dreams and realities: Developing countries and the English language (pp. 255-274). London: British Council.
Siiner, M., Hult, F. M., & Kupisch, T. (2018). Situating language acquisition planning. In M. Siiner, F. M. Hult & T. Kupisch (Eds.), Language policy and language acquisition planning (pp. 1-10). Cham: Springer.
Spolsky, B. (2017). Language policy in education: Practices, ideology and management. In T. L. McCarty & S. May (Eds.), Language policy and political issues in education (pp. 3-16). New York, NY: Springer.
Tajeddin, Z., & Bahrebar, S. (2017). Sociological and aesthetic senses of culture represented in global and localized ELT textbooks. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 36(3), 119-143.
Tinsley, T. (2019). Language trends 2019: language teaching in primary and secondary schools in England survey report. London: British Council.
Tollefson, J. W. (2017). Language planning in education. In T. L. McCarty & S. May (Eds.), Language policy and political issues in education (pp. 17-29). New York, NY: Springer.
Van Els, T. (2005). Status planning for learning and teaching. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language acquisition (pp. 995-1016). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Vogl, U. (2017). Standard language ideology and multilingualism: Results from a survey among European students. European Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 1-26.
Yarmohammadi, L. (2002). The evaluation of pre-university textbooks. The Newsletter of the Iranian Academy of Science, 18, 70-87.
Zarrinabadi, N., & Mahmoudi-Gahrouei, V. (2018). English in contemporary Iran. Asian Englishes, 20(1), 81-94. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 702 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,091 |
||