The Comparative Impacts of Modified Visual and Oral Input on the Vocabulary Retention of Iranian EFL Undergraduate Students | ||
| Teaching English as a Second Language Quarterly (Formerly Journal of Teaching Language Skills) | ||
| دوره 43، شماره 1، اردیبهشت 2024، صفحه 121-150 اصل مقاله (541.37 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22099/tesl.2023.47566.3193 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Hossein Bakhshi* 1؛ Mahdieh Mohebbati2 | ||
| 1Farhangian University | ||
| 2English Language Department, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Poor vocabulary retention is one of the major difficulties experienced by English as a foreign (second) language (EFL/ESL) students. To tackle this problem, the current study explored the impacts of the modified visual input and the modified oral input on the short-term and long-term vocabulary retention of Iranian EFL students and their perceptions regarding implementing these two types of input in their classes. The initial population consisted of 90 male and female students from Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch in Tehran, Iran. The convenience sampling method was implemented to select the participants. After administering the Oxford Placement Test (OPT), 60 students were chosen to serve as the participants, and they were randomly divided into two groups of 30 learners, namely the experimental groups A and B, which received instructions based on the modified visual input and the modified oral input, respectively. Later, the participants received ten 60-minute treatment sessions. Next, the learners' short-term vocabulary retention was assessed using the same vocabulary test as the posttest. One month later, the same test was given to students to check their long-term vocabulary retention as the delayed posttest. The results showed that the two types of input had significant impacts on the vocabulary short-term and long-term retention of the Iranian EFL students to varying degrees. Moreover, the qualitative findings indicated that the learners adopted a significantly positive view toward implementing oral and visual input modifications in their classes. In the end, the implications of the study are provided. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| EFL Learners؛ Modified Oral Input؛ Modified Visual Input؛ Retention؛ Vocabulary | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abbasi Bagherian Poor, A., & Serati, E. (2021). The effect of post-teaching techniques on the English vocabulary recall and retention of Iranian students with learning disability. Teaching English as a Second Language Quarterly (Formerly Journal of Teaching Language Skills), 40(1), 117-152. https://doi.org/10.22099/jtls.2021.38334.2878
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen Irvine, C. K., & Walker, D. (2018). Introduction to research in education. Cengage Learning.
Bakhshi, H., Weisi, H., & Yousofi, N. (2019). Challenges of qualitative inquiries in the Iranian ELT higher education context: Ph.D. students’ and faculty members’ voices. Teaching English as a Second Language Quarterly (Formerly Journal of Teaching Language Skills), 38(1), 37-78. https://doi.org/10.22099/jtls.2019.34516.2725
Barcroft, J. (2003). Distinctiveness and bidirectional effects in input enhancement for vocabulary learning. Applied Language Learning, 13, 133-159.
Brown, H. D. (2004). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. Pearson Education.
Chapelle, A.C. (2013). The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics (1st ed.). Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Chaudron, C. (1988). Second language classrooms research on teaching and learning. Cambridge University Press.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson.
Dastjerdi, H. V., & Farshid, M. (2011). The role of input enhancement in teaching compliments. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(2), 460-466. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.2.2.460-466
Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (1998). Pedagogical choices in focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 197-261). Cambridge University Press.
Ellis, R. (1997). Second language acquisition research and language teaching. Oxford University Press.
Ertürk, N. O. (2013). Effects of visually enhanced input, output processing and pushed output on grammar teaching. Porta Linguarum, 20, 153-167.
Fahim, M., & Vaezi, R. (2011). Investigating the effect of visually-enhanced input on the acquisition of lexical collocations by Iranian intermediate EFL learners: A case of verb-noun lexical collocations. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(3), 552-560. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.2.3.552-560
Fazlali, B., & Shahini, A. (2019). The effect of input enhancement and consciousness-raising techniques on the acquisition of lexical and grammatical collocation of Iranian EFL learners. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 24(2), 1-21.
Gairns, R., & Redman, S. (1986). Working with words: A guide to teaching and learning vocabulary. Cambridge University Press.
Gascoigne, C. (2006). Explicit input enhancement: Effects on target and non-target aspects of second language acquisition. Foreign Language Annals, 39(4), 551-564. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2006.tb02275.x
Ghafouri, A., & Masoomi, M. (2016). The effect of visual and auditory input enhancement on vocabulary acquisition of Iranian EFL University students. International Journal of English Linguistics, 6(7), 81-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v6n7p81
Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Pieper, T. M., & Ringle, C. M. (2012). The use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in strategic management research: a review of past practices and recommendations for future applications. Long Range Planning, 45(5/6), 320-340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2012.09.008
Homayounmehr, F., & Pishdadi Motlagh, S. F. (2015). Investigating the effectiveness of input enhancement in relation to L2 vocabulary learning. International journal of language and linguistics, 4(2), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.s.2016040201.11
Hughes, A. (2003). Testing for language teachers. Cambridge University Press.
Javadi, Y., & Cheraghi Shehni, M. (2020). The role of auditory input enhancement through Whatsapp in EFL learners’ vocabulary learning and retention. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 10 (12), 1576-1586. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1012.10
Kargar Behbahani, H., & Razmjoo, S. A. (2023). The contribution of working memory and language proficiency to lexical gain: Insights from the involvement load hypothesis. Teaching English as a Second Language Quarterly (Formerly Journal of Teaching Language Skills), 42(3), 117-146. https://doi.org/10.22099/tesl.2023.48255.3220
Khodashenas Tavakoly, M., Kiany, Gh., & Hashemi, S. M. R. (2018). The effects of VAK learning style and input type on causative construction development by Iranian EFL learners. Issue in Language Teaching (ILT), 7(2), 61-89. https://doi.org/10.22054/ilt.2019.44501.406
Kim, Y. (2006). Effects of input elaboration on vocabulary acquisition through reading by Korean learners of English as a foreign language. TESOL Quarterly, 40, 341-373. https://doi.org/10.2307/40264526
Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis, issues and implications. Longman.
Lane, H.B., & Allen, S.A. (2010). The vocabulary-rich classroom: Modeling sophisticated word use to promote word consciousness and vocabulary growth. The reading teacher, 63(5), 362-370. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.63.5.2
Laufer, B. (2007). CATSS: The Computer Adaptive Test of Size and Strength. Computer program. Available online at http://hcc.haifa.ac.il/~blaufer/
Lee, J., & Benati, A. (2007). Delivering processing instruction in classrooms and virtual contexts: Research and practice. Equinox.
Lee, Y. H., & Lee, H. K. (2012). Effects of input enhancement techniques on word learning of Korean elementary learners. Primary English Education, 18(3), 381-398.
Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (1990). Focus on form and corrective feedback in communicative language teaching: Effects on second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12(5), 429-448. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100009517
Loewen, L., & Inceoglu, S. (2016). The effectiveness of visual input enhancement on the noticing and L2 development of the Spanish past tense. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching (SSLLT), 6(1), 89-110. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2016.6.1.5
Long, M. (1982). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation in the second language classroom. In M. Long & C. Richards (Eds.), Methodology in TESOL: A book of readings (pp. 339-354). Newbury House.
Lujan, H., G., & DiCarlo, S., E. (2006). First-year medical students prefer multiple learning styles. Advances in Physiology Education, 30(1), 13-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/advan.00045.2005
Mackey, A. (2012). Input, interaction, and corrective feedback in L2 learning. Oxford Applied Linguistics.
Mayén, R. S. (2013). Effects of input enhancement and visual prompts in children’s L2 acquisition of Spanish verbal morphology. Estudios de lingüística inglesa aplicada, 13(1), 83-111. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12795/elia.2013.i13.03
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Miller P. (2006). Learning styles: the multimedia of the mind. Educational Resources Information Center. ED 451140.
Milton, J. (2013). Measuring the contribution of vocabulary knowledge to proficiency in the four skills. In C. Bardel, C. Lindqvist & B. Laufer (Eds.), L2 vocabulary acquisition, knowledge and use: New perspectives on assessment and corpus analysis (pp. 57-78). European Second Language Association.
Mohammadi, T., & Amjadiparvar, A. (2022). The contributions of input enhancement of collocations to the reading comprehension of Iranian field-dependent and field-independent learners. Research in English Language Pedagogy, 10(1), 53-75. https://doi.org/10.30486/relp.2021.1927845.1262
Namaziandost, E., Rezvani, E., & Polemikou, A. (2020). The impacts of visual input enhancement, semantic input enhancement, and inputflooding on L2 vocabulary among Iranian intermediate EFL learners. Cogent Education, 7, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1726606
Naseri, E., & Khodabandeh, F. (2019). Comparing the impact of audio-visual input enhancement on collocation learning in traditional and mobile learning contexts. Applied Research on English Language, 8(3), 383-422. https://doi.org/10.22108/ARE.2019.115716.1434
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524759
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta‐analysis. Language Learning, 50(3), 417-528. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00136
Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45, 255–287.
Pallant, J. (2011). SPSS survival manual: A step-by-step guide to data analysis using the SPSS program (4th ed.). Allen & Unwin.
Petchko, K. (2011). Input enhancement, noticing, and incidental vocabulary acquisition. The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly, 3(4), 228-255.
Rashtchi, M., & Porkar, R. (2019). Vocabulary learning via reading: Is input modification useful? Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(5), 1103-1110. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1005.25
Rezvani, R., & Khanzadeh, M. (2022). A study of comparative effects of textual enhancement techniques on Iranian EFL learners’ vocabulary noticing. Research in English Language Pedagogy, 10(1), 96-121. https://doi.org/10.30486/relp.2021.1933155.1289
Richards, J., & Schmidt, R. (2010). Longman dictionary of language teaching and Applied Linguistics. Pearson Education.
Robinson, P. (2003). The cognition hypothesis, task design, and adult task-based language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(2), 45–105.
Rott, S. (2007). The effect of frequency of input‐enhancements on word learning and text comprehension. Language Learning, 57(2), 165-199. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00406.x
Sadoski, M., & Paivio, A. (2013). Imagery and text: A dual coding theory of reading and writing. Routledge. Safdari, M. (2019). Input flooding, input enhancement, and writing performance: Effects and percepts. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 281-296. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12418a
Salehpour, S., Behnam, B., & Seifoori, Z. (2022). Enhancing English vocabulary retention among Iranian trainee teachers through literature-based interactive input-output tasks. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Applied Literature: Dynamics and Advances, 10(1), 57-78. https://doi.org/10.22049/jalda.2022.27233.1315
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129-158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.129
Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3-32). Cambridge University Press.
Schmidt, R. (1995). Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 1-65). University of Hawaii Press.
Seyedtajaddini, K. (2014). The impact of audio input enhancement on EFL learners’ grammar learning from varying proficiency levels. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 86 (2), 342-551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.597
Sharwood Smith, M. (1981). Consciousness-raising and second language acquisition theory. Applied Linguistics, 7, 239-256.
Sharwood Smith, M. (1991). Speaking to many different minds: On the relevance of different types of language information for the L2 learner. Second Language Research, 72, 118-132.
Sharwood Smith, M. (1993). Input enhancement in instructed SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15(2), 165-179. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100011943
Shin, D., & Nation, P. (2007). Beyond single words: The most frequent collocations in spoken English. English Language Teaching Journal, 62(4), 339–348. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccm091
Shook, D. J. (1994). FL/L2 Reading, grammatical Information, and the input-to-intake phenomenon. Applied Language Learning, 5(2), 57-93.
Simard, D. (2009). Differential effects of textual enhancement formats on intake. System, 37(1), 124-135.
Stahl, S. (1990). Beyond the instrumentalist hypothesis: Some relations between word meanings and comprehension. Center of the Study of Reading, University of Illinois.
Su, E. X. L., Ting, M. L. C., & Yunus, M. M. (2021). Improving lower primary students’ vocabulary retention through interactive storyboard game (ISG). International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(6), 1514–1526. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i6/10056
Sulaiman, N. A., & Salehuddin, K. (2022). The effects of input enhancement on incidental academic word learning. Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 30(3), 1245-1262. doi: https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.30.3.17
Wei, M. (2007). An examination of vocabulary learning of college-level learners of English in China. Asian EFL Journal, 9 (2), 88-96.
Wistner, B., Sakai, H. & Abe, M. (2009). An analysis of the Oxford Placement Test and the Michigan Placement Test as L2 proficiency tests. Hosei University Repository, 58, 33-44. http://doi.org/10.15002/00004453
Zarei, A. A., & Esfandiari, R. (2016). The effects of input enhancement techniques on the comprehension and production of English lexical collocations. Iranian Journal of Language Issues, 2(1), 1–21.
Zoghi, M., & Mirzaei M. (2014). A comparative study of textual and visual contextualization on Iranian EFL learners' vocabulary learning. International Journal of Basic and Applied Science, 2(3), 31-40. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 180 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 199 |
||