Ansari, M. (2015). Translation and description of al-Makasab, translated by Mohiuddin Fazel Harandi, Qom, Bostan Ketab Institute, [In Persian].

Ardebili, A. (1403 AH). Majma al-Faidah wa Al-Barhan fi Sharh Irshad al-Azhan, Qom, Islamic Publications Office affiliated with the Qom Theological Seminary Society, [In Arabic].

Bagley, M. A. (2016). Digital DNA: "The Nagoya Protocol, intellectual property treaties, and synthetic biology. Intellectual Property Treaties, and Synthetic Biology", Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper, (11), 1-37, DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2725986.

Bond, M. R., & Scott, D. (2020). Digital biopiracy and the (dis) assembling of the Nagoya Protocol. Geoforum,(117), 24–32, DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.09.001.

Brooks, S. M., & Alper, H. S. (2021). Applications, challenges, and needs for employing synthetic biology beyond the lab. Nature Communications, 12(1), 1–16, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-21740-0.

Cabrera Medaglia, J. (2015). Access and Benefit Sharing: North–South Challenges in Implementing the Convention on Biological Diversity and its Nagoya Protocol, in International Environmental Law and the Global South, Shawkat A., et al, 192-213, DOI: 10.1017/cbo9781107295414.010.

Cambridge Dictionary. (2022). Functional. Cambridge University Press.

Chen, X. (2019). Analysis on the Protection of Genetic Resources from the Perspective of Intellectual Property. Advances in Applied Sociology, 09(06), 163–178. DOI: 10.4236/aasoci.2019.96014.

Chiarolla, C. (2013). The role of private international law under the Nagoya Protocol, In The 2010 Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit-sharing in Perspective, Elisa, M., Matthias Buck , and Elsa Tsioumani,  423–449, Brill Nijhoff Netherlands , DOI: 10.1163/9789004217201_016

Davis, K., Holanda, P., Lyal, C., Silva, M., & Fontes, E. (2016). Implementation of the Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit Sharing: Dialogue between Brazil and the European Union, Source: ResearchGate, 1-53, DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.36253.31201

De Jonge, B. (2011). What is fair and equitable benefit-sharing? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 24(2), 127–146. DOI: 10.1007/s10806-010-9249-3

Deplazes-Zemp, A. (2018). Genetic resources, an analysis of a multifaceted concept. Biological Conservation, 222, 86–94. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.03.031

Dutfield, G., & Suthersanen, U. (2019). Traditional knowledge and genetic resources: Observing legal protection through the lens of historical geography and human rights. 399-447. Research Paper No. 286/2018, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3282818

Gepts, P. (2004). Who owns biodiversity, and how should the owners be compensated? Plant Physiology, 134(4), 1295–1307. DOI: 10.1104/pp.103.038885

Harlan, J. R. (1975). Our Vanishing Genetic Resources: Modern varieties replace ancient populations that have provided genetic variability for plant breeding programs. Science, 188(4188), 618–621. DOI: 10.1126/science.188.4188.618

Heinrich, M., & Hesketh, A. (2019). 25 years after the `Rio Convention’––Lessons learned in the context of sustainable development and protecting indigenous and local knowledge. Phytomedicine, 53, 332–343. DOI: 10.1016/j.phymed.2018.04.061

Kamau, E. C., & Winter, G. (Eds.). (2009). Genetic resources, traditional knowledge and the law: Solutions for access and benefit sharing. London, Routledge

Kharb, D. (2022). Sharing genetic resources fairly between nations. Medico-Legal Journal, 90(2), 104–105. DOI: 10.1177/00258172211031697

Kingston, D. G. (2011). Modern natural products drug discovery and its relevance to biodiversity conservation. Journal of Natural Products, 74(3), 496–511. DOI: 10.1021/np100550t

Lawson, C. (2009). The role of patents in biodiversity conservation. Nature Biotechnology, 27(11), 994–995, DOI: 10.1038/nbt1109-994

McManis, C. R. (1998). The interface between international intellectual property and environmental protection: Biodiversity and biotechnology, 76, 255-279, )View date2023/09/07) Available at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview/vol76/iss1/18

Muller, M. R. (2015). Genetic resources as natural information: Implications for the Convention on Biological Diversity and Nagoya Protocol, London, Routledge.

Najafi, M. (1404 AH). Javaher al-Kalam fi Sharh Shariah al-Islam, 7th edition, Beirut, Dar Ihya Tarath al-Arabi, [In Arabic].

Naraghi, A. (1417 AH), Awaed Al-Ayyam fi Bayan Qa'aa al-Ahkam, Qom, Publications of the Islamic Propaganda Office of Qom Seminary, [In Arabic].

Oberthür, S. , G. Rosendal. (2014). Global governance of genetic resources. London, Routledge.

Richter, H., & Klünker, I. (2022). Digital Sequence Information between Benefit-Sharing and Open Data–How to Advance the Legal Framework. Max Planck Institute for Innovation & Competition Research Paper, Journal of Law and the Biosciences,9(2), 1-29, 
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4135144

Sarnoff, J. D., & Correa, C. M. (2006). Analysis of Options for Implementing Disclosure of Origin Requirements in Intellectual Property Applications-A Contribution to UNCTAD’s Response to the Invitation of the Seventh Conference of the Parties of the Convention on Biological Diversity. Seventh Conference of the Parties of the Convention on Biological Diversity, UNCTAD/DITC/TED/2004/14 (2006). DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2278629

Schei, P. J., & Tvedt, M. W. (2010). Genetic Resources’ in the CBD: The Wording, the Past, the Present and the Future. Fridtjof Nansen Institute, Norway. (report)

Smyth, S. J., Macall, D. M., Phillips, P. W., & de Beer, J. (2020). Implications of biological information digitization: Access and benefit sharing of plant genetic resources. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 23(3–4), 267–287. DOI: 10.1111/jwip.12151

Stone, C. D. (1994). What to do about biodiversity: Property rights: public goods, and the Earth’s biological riches. Southern California Law Review, 68(3), 577 - 620.

Tabatabaei Yazdi, Seyyed Mohammad Kazem (1421 AH), Hashiatol al-Makasab, second edition, first volume, Qom: Ismailian Institute, [In Arabic].

Tang, T.-C., An, B., Huang, Y., Vasikaran, S., Wang, Y., Jiang, X., Lu, T. K., & Zhong, C. (2021). Materials design by synthetic biology. Nature Reviews Materials, 6(4), 332–350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-020-00265-w

Tvedt, M. W., & Schei, P. J. (2013). The term ‘genetic resources’Flexible and dynamic while providing legal certainty?, In Global Governance of Genetic Resources, Sebastian Oberthür, G. Rosendal (38–52), London, Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203078020-11

Tvedt, M. W., & Young, T. R. (2007). Beyond access: Exploring implementation of the fair and equitable sharing commitment in the CBD, bonn, IUCN.

Vogel, J. H. (1994). Genes for sale: Privatization as a conservation policy. Oxford University Press.

Voigt, C. A. (2020). Synthetic biology 2020–2030: Six commercially-available products that are changing our world. Nature Communications, 11(1), 1–6. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-20122-2

WIPO. (2004). TECHNICAL STUDY ON DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS IN PATENT SYSTEMS RELATED TO GENETIC RESOURCES AND TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE, wipo.

Ziyai, S. and Javadi, S. (2018). Protection of Intellectual Property in International Law of Foreign Investment, Shiraz Legal Studies, 11(2), 155-127. doi: 10.22099/jls.2019.5328

Access to the biodiversity, LAW No 13,123 (2015).

THE BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY ACT, 18 OF 2003 (2002).

Bonn guidelines on access to genetic resources and fair and equitable sharing of the benefits arising out of their utilization. (2002). Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, DOI: 10.1163/2211-4394_rwilwo_sim_033034

CBD. (2009). THE ROLE OF COMMONS/OPEN SOURCE LICENCES IN THE INTERNATIONAL REGIME ON ACCESS TO GENETIC RESOURCES AND BENEFIT-SHARING. (report)

National Environmental Management Laws, REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA 530 (2013).

UNEP. (2002). DECISIONS ADOPTED BY THE CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES TO THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY AT ITS SIXTH MEETING. CBD; )View date2023/09/07) in https://www.cbd.int/decisions/cop/?m=cop-06.

UNEP. (2008). DECISION ADOPTED BY THE CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES TO THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY AT ITS NINTH MEETING. CBD; )View date2023/09/07) in https://www.cbd.int/doc/decisions/cop-09/cop-09-dec-12-en.pdf.

UNEP. (2010). REPORT OF THE THIRD PART OF THE NINTH MEETING OF THE AD HOC OPEN-ENDED WORKING GROUP ON ACCESS AND BENEFIT-SHARING. CBD; )View date 2023/09/07) in https://www.cbd.int/decisions/cop/10/1/5.

Unit, B. (n.d.). COP Decision. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. Retrieved September 19, 2022, )View date2023/09/07)  in https://www.cbd.int/decision/cop/?id=7084