Abbasian, G. R., & Moeenian, S. (2015). Validation and Investigation of Sentence Parsing Strategies: a Study of EFL Learners Psych and Language Processing. Journal of social science research, 6(3), 1099-1122.

Abrahams, V. C., & Rose, P. K. (1975). Sentence perception as an interactive parallel process. Science, 189, 226–228.

Allbritton, D. W., McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1996). Reliability of prosodic cues for resolving syntactic ambiguity. Journal of experimental psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(3), 714.

Barahuyee, G., Khaghaninejad, M. S., & Moloodi, A. (2019). An Investigation into the Effective Factors in Comprehending English Garden-Path Sentences by EFL Learners. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 38(1), 79-118.

Betzel, D. (2015). Zum weiterführenden Erwerb der satzinternen Großschreibung. Eine leistungsgruppendifferenzierte Längsschnittstudie in der Sekundarstufe I. Baltmannsweiler: Schneider Hohengehren.

Bosman, A. M. (2005). Development of rule-based verb spelling in Dutch students. Written language & literacy, 8(1), 1-18.

Brown, H. D., & Lee, H. (2015). Teaching principles. P. Ed Australia.

Carlson, K. (2009). How prosody influences sentence comprehension. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3(5), 1188-1200.

Carroll, J., Minnen, G., Canning, Y., Devlin, S., & Tait, J. (1998). Practical simplification of English newspaper text to assist aphasic readers. In Proceedings of the AAAI-98 Workshop on Integrating Artificial Intelligence and Assistive Technology, 7-10.

Chambers, C. G., Tanenhaus, M. K., Eberhard, K. M., Filip, H., & Carlson, G. N. (2002). Circumscribing referential domains during real-time language comprehension. Journal of memory and language, 47(1), 30-49.

Choi, Y. & Trueswell, J. C. (2010). Referential and syntactic processes: what develops? The Processing and Acquisition of Reference, 65-108.

Chomsky, N. (1965). Persistent topics in linguistic theory. Diogenes, 13(51), 13-20.

Chomsky, Noam (1957). Logical Structures in Language, American Documentation, 8(4), 284-291.

Christianson, K., Hollingworth, A., Halliwell, J. F., & Ferreira, F. (2001). Thematic roles assigned along the garden path linger. Cognitive Psychology, 42(4), 368-407.

Christianson, K., Williams, C. C., Zacks, R. T., & Ferreira, F. (2006). Younger and older adults' ‘good-enough’ interpretations of garden-path sentences. Discourse Processes, 42(2), 205-238.

Clifton Jr, C. (2000). Evaluating models of human sentence processing.  In Crocker, M. W., Pickering, M., & Clifton, C. (Eds.), Architectures and mechanisms for language processing (pp.31-55). New work: Cambridge University Press.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Academic.

Cosmides, L. & J. Tooby (1994). Origins of domain specificity: The evolution of functional organization. In L. A. Hirschfeld & S. A. Gelman (eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 85-116). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Cough, H., & St Heilbrun, A. (1965). The adjective checklist manual. California: Palo Alto.

Cowles, H. W. (2011). Psycholinguistics 101. New York: Springer Publishing Company.

            Elman, J. L. (1990). Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science, 14, 179–211.

Elman, J. L. (1993). Learning and development in neural networks: The importance of starting small. Cognition, 48, 71–99.

Elman, J. L. (1995). Language as a dynamical system. In R. Port & T. van Gelder (Eds.), Mind as Motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Elman, J. L., Hare, M., & McRae, K. (2004). Cues, constraints, and competition in sentence processing. In M. Tomasello & D. Slobin (Eds.), Beyond nature-nurture: Essays in honor of Elizabeth Bates (pp. 111-138). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Engelhardt, P. E. (2014). Children’s and adolescents’ processing of temporary syntactic ambiguity: An eye movement study. Child Development Research, 6, 56-78.

Fayol, M., Largy, P., & Lemaire, P. (1994). Cognitive overload and orthographic errors: When cognitive overload enhances subject-verb agreement errors. A study in French written language. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47(2), 437-464.

Ferreira, F. (2003). The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 47(2), 164-203.

Ferreira, F., & Clifton, C. (1986). The independence of syntactic processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 348–368.

Ferreira, F., & Çokal, D. (2016). Neurobiology of language. Academic Press.

Ferreira, F., & Henderson, J. M. (1990). Use of verb information in syntactic parsing: Evidence from eye movements and word-by-word self-paced reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(4), 555.

Ferreira, F., & Henderson, J. M. (1990). Use of verb information in syntactic parsing: Evidence from eye movements and word-by-word self-paced reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 555–568.

Ferreira, F., Foucart, A., & Engelhardt, P. E. (2013). Language processing in the visual world: Effects of preview, visual complexity, and prediction. Journal of Memory and Language, 69(3), 165-182.

Fodor, J. (2000). The mind doesn’t work that way: The scope and limits of computational psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Frazier, L. (1979). On comprehending sentences: Syntactic parsing strategies (Doctoral dissertation). Ph. D. thesis, UMass at Amherst.

Frazier, L. (1987). Sentence processing: A tutorial review. In M. Coltheart (Ed.) Attention and Performance XII: The Psychology of Reading (pp. 559-586). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Frazier, L. (1995). Constraint satisfaction as a theory of sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 24, 437-468.

Frazier, L., & Clifton, Jr. C. (1997). Construal: Overview, motivation, and some new evidence. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 26(3), 277-295.

Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. (1987). Resolution of syntactic category ambiguities: Eye movements in parsing ambiguous sentences. Journal of memory and language, 26(5), 505-526.

Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. (1990). Taking on semantic commitments: Processing multiple meanings vs. multiple senses. Journal of Memory and Language, 29(2), 181-200.

Frenck-Mestre, C. (2005). Eye-movement recording as a tool for studying syntactic processing in a second language: A review of methodologies and experimental findings. Second Language Research, 21(2), 175-198.

Friederici, A. D. (2002). Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends in cognitive sciences, 6(2), 78-84.

Frisson, S., & Pickering, M. J. (2001). Obtaining a figurative interpretation of a word: Support for underspecification. Metaphor and Symbol, 16(3-4), 149-171.

Gaines, N. D., Runyan, C. M., & Meyers, S. C. (1991). A comparison of young stutterers’ fluent versus stuttered utterances on measures of length and complexity. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 34(1), 37-42.

Garrett, M. (2000). Remarks on the architecture of language processing systems. In Y. Grodzinsky, & L. Shapiro (Eds.), Language and the Brain: Representation and Processing (pp. 31-69). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Gibson, E., Bergen, L., & Piantadosi, S. T. (2013). Rational integration of noisy evidence and prior semantic expectations in sentence interpretation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(20), pp. 8051-8056.

Grant, M. A. (2013). The parsing and interpretation of comparatives: More than meets the eye. CUP.

Grimshaw, J. (1990). Argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Huettig, F., Rommers, J., & Meyer, A. S. (2011). Using the visual world paradigm to study language processing: A review and critical evaluation. Acta psychologica, 137(2), 151-171.

Jackendoff, R. S. (1990). Semantic structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87(4), 329.

Kaplan, R. B. (2010). The Oxford handbook of applied linguistics. Oxford University Press.

Kemp, N., Mitchell, P., & Bryant, P. (2017). Simple morphological spelling rules are not always used: Individual differences in children and adults. Applied Psycholinguistics, 38(5), 1071-1094.

Kennedy, A., Murray, W. S., Jennings, F., & Reid, C. (2009). Parsing complements: Comments on the generality of the principle of minimal attachment. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4(3-4), SI51-SI76.

Khodadady, E., Alavi, M. & Khaghaninezhad, M. S., (2012). Schema-based instruction: A novel approach of teaching English to Iranian University students. Ferdowsi review, 5, 3-21.

Lany, J., Gómez, R. L., & Gerken, L. A. (2007). The role of prior experience in language acquisition. Cognitive Science, 31(3), 481-507.

Levy, R., Roger, K., Slattery, T., & Rayner, K. (2010). Eye movement evidence that readers maintain and act on uncertainty about past linguistic input. Cognitive Science, 34(3), 401-412.

MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1994). The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review, 101(4), 676-703.

Mayberry, M. R., Crocker, M. W., & Knoeferle, P. (2009). Learning to attend: A connectionist model of situated language comprehension. Cognitive Science, 33(3), 449-496.

McRae, K., & Matsuki, K. (2013). Constraint-based models of sentence processing. In R. P. G. van Gompel (Ed.), Sentence processing (pp. 51-77). New York: Psychology Press.

Miao, Y., Lin, G., Hu, Y., & Miao, C. (2019). Reading Comprehension Ability Test-A Turing Test for Reading Comprehension. Computation and language, 39(2), 476-496

Millotte, S., Wales, R., & Christophe, A. (2007). Phrasal prosody disambiguates syntax. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22(6), 898-909.

Nakamura, C., Arai, M., & Mazuka, R. (2012). Immediate use of prosody and context in predicting a syntactic structure. Cognition, 125(2), 317-325.

Nitschke, S., Kidd, E., & Serratrice, L. (2010). First language transfer and long-term structural priming in comprehension. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(1), 94-114.

Otero, J., & Kintsch, W. (1992). Failures to detect contradictions in a text: What readers believe versus what they read. Psychological Science, 3(4), 229-235.

Pakulak, E., & Neville, H. J. (2011). Maturational constraints on the recruitment of early processes for syntactic processing. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 23(10), 2752-2765.

Parpanchi, Z. S. (2014). The Comprehension of Garden-Path Structures by Iranian EFL Learners. Iranian EFL Journal, 34, 54-78.

Paterson, K. B., Liversedge, S. P., & Underwood, G. (1999). The influence of focus operators on syntactic processing of short relative clause sentences. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52(3), 717-737.

Patson, N. D., & Ferreira, F. (2009). Conceptual plural information is used to guide early parsing decisions: Evidence from garden-path sentences with reciprocal verbs. Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 464-486.

Pesetsky, D. (1995). Zero Syntax. Experiencers and Cascades. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Price, P. J., Ostendorf, M., Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., & Fong, C. (1991). The use of prosody in syntactic disambiguation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 90, 2956-2970.

Protopapas, A., Fakou, A., Drakopoulou, S., Skaloumbakas, C., & Mouzaki, A. (2013). What do spelling errors tell us? Classification and analysis of errors made by Greek schoolchildren with and without dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 26(5), 615-646.

Rayner, K. (2009). The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly journal of experimental psychology, 62(8), 1457-1506.

Rayner, K., & Frazier, L. (1987). Parsing temporarily ambiguous complements. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39(4), 657-673.

Rayner, K., Kambe, G., & Duffy, S. A. (2000). The effect of clause wrap up on eye movements during reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: 53(4), 1061-1080.

Reisberg, J. (2010). Seven principles of surface structure parsing in natural language. Cognition, 2(1), 15-47.

Robbins, P. (2007). Minimalism and modularity. In G. Preyer and G. Peter (Eds), Context-Sensitivity and Semantic Minimalism (pp. 303–319). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Roberts, L. (2012). Individual differences in second language sentence processing. Language Learning, 62, 172-188.Cognition, 2(1), 15-47.

Rumelhart, D. E. & McClelland, J.L. (1986). PDP Models and general issues in cognitive science. In D. E. Rumelhart, J. L. McClelland, & the PDP Research Group (Eds.), Parallel Distributed Processing (pp.111-146). Cambridge: MIT Press.

Sandra, D., & Van Abbenyen, L. (2009). Frequency and analogical effects in the spelling of full-form and sublexical homophonous patterns by 12 year-old children. The Mental Lexicon, 4(2), 239-275.

Sandra, D., Frisson, S., & Daems, F. (1999). Why simple verb forms can be so difficult to spell: The influence of homophone frequency and distance in Dutch. Brain and language, 68(1-2), 277-283.

Sanford, A. J., & Sturt, P. (2002). Depth of processing in language comprehension: Not noticing the evidence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(9), 382-386.

Sawyer, J., Chon, H., & Ambrose, N. G. (2008). Influences of rate, length, and complexity on speech disfluency in a single-speech sample in preschool children who stutter. Journal of fluency disorders, 33(3), 220-240.

Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological review, 96(4), 523.

Siddharthan, A. (2006). Syntactic simplification and text cohesion. Research on Language and Computation, 4(1), 77-109.

Spivey, M. J., Tanenhaus, M. K., Eberhard, K. M., & Sedivy, J. C. (2002). Eye movements and spoken language comprehension: Effects of visual context on syntactic ambiguity resolution. Cognitive Psychology, 45(4), 447-481.

Spivey-Knowlton, M. (1996). Integration of linguistic and visual information: Human data and model simulations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Rochester.

Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Trueswell, J. C., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2013). 8 Context Effects in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution: Discourse and Semantic Influences in Parsing Reduced Relative Clauses. Reading and language processing, 148, 23-54.

Townsend, D. J., & Bever, T. G. (2001). Sentence comprehension: The integration of habits and rules (Vol. 1950). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Traxler, M. J. (2014). Trends in syntactic parsing: Anticipation, Bayesian estimation, and good-enough parsing. Trends in cognitive sciences, 18(11), 605-611.

Traxler, M. J., & Tooley, K. M. (2007). Lexical mediation and context effects in sentence processing. Brain research, 46, 59-74.

Trueswell, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Garnsey, S. M. (1994). Semantic influences on parsing: Use of thematic role information in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of memory and language, 33(3), 285-318.

Truss, L. (2004). Eats, Shoots & Leaves: The Zero Tolerance Approach to Publication. Penguin Publications.

Van Berkum, J. J., Brown, C. M., & Hagoort, P. (1999). Early referential context effects in sentence processing: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of memory and language, 41(2), 147-182.

Van Berkum, J. J., Brown, C. M., Hagoort, P., & Zwitserlood, P. (2003). Event‐related brain potentials reflect discourse‐referential ambiguity in spoken language comprehension. Psychophysiology, 40(2), 235-248.

Van Gompel, R. P., Pickering, M. J. (2006). The activation of inappropriate analyses in garden-path sentences: Evidence from structural priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 55(3), 335- 362.

Van Gompel, R. P., Pickering, M. J., Pearson, J., & Liversedge, S. P. (2005). Evidence against competition during syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 52(2), 284-307.

Warren, P. (2013). Introducing psycholinguistics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Waters, G., Caplan, D., Alpert, N., & Stanczak, L. (2003). Individual differences in rCBF correlates of syntactic processing in sentence comprehension: effects of working memory and speed of processing. NeuroImage, 19(1), 101-112.

Xu, W., & Grishman, R. (2009). A parse-and-trim approach with information significance for Chinese sentence compression. In Proceedings of the 2009 Workshop on Language Generation and Summarization (pp. 48-55). UCLNG.

Yoo, H., & Dickey, M. W. (2011). Aging Effects and Working Memory in Garden-Path Recovery. Clinical Archives of Communication Disorders, 2(2), 91-102.

Zackheim, C. T., & Conture, E. G. (2003). Childhood stuttering and speech disfluencies in relation to children’s mean length of utterance: A preliminary study. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 28(2), 115-142.