Implementation of Task-based Collaborative Dialogues in EFL Speaking Classes: Focus on Achievements and Perceptions | ||
| Teaching English as a Second Language Quarterly (Formerly Journal of Teaching Language Skills) | ||
| مقاله 6، دوره 41، شماره 3، آبان 2022، صفحه 155-195 اصل مقاله (394.23 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22099/tesl.2021.39105.2916 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Haniyeh Shirazifard1؛ Gholam Reza Abbasian* 2؛ Ahmad Mohseni3؛ Mojgan Rashtchi4 | ||
| 1Islamic Azad University, south Tehran branch | ||
| 2Imam Ali University | ||
| 3Department of Foreign Languages, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 4Islamic Azad University, North Tehran Branch | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Collaborative dialogue (CD) in developing L2 skills known as ‘knowledge-building dialogue’, in spite of its momentum in foreign language acquisition, has rarely been conjoined and empirically investigated with a Task-based approach. To this end, the present research was conducted with a two-fold aim: firstly, investigating the effect of task-based collaborative dialogue on English as a foreign language (EFL) learners’ speaking ability, and secondly, exploring teachers’ and learners’ perceptions of the exercised treatment process. The participants of the study consisted of 100 Iranian B.A. TEFL and Translation Studies students were identified as relatively homogeneous with regard to their language proficiency through administering Oxford Placement Test (OPT) and ten Iranian EFL teachers. The experimental group was exposed to task-based collaborative dialogues, while the control group experienced conventional mainstream teaching the speaking skill. Upon completing the treatment, CD questionnaires were administered to the experimental group of learners and teachers to investigate their perceptions of implementing CDs in speaking classes. Subsequently, the teachers and 12 students from the experimental group attended the semi-structured interview sessions to explore their views regarding the efficiency of task-based CDs. The findings indicated that the experimental group outperformed the control one regarding speaking skill. The results of the questionnaires and the semi-structured interviews complemented each other and indicated that the teachers and the learners adopted positive views toward applying the task-based CD. The findings offer some implications for the stakeholders, including material developers, EFL learners, and teachers, to incorporate task-based collaborative dialogues in second language education. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Collaborative Dialogue؛ Speaking Skill؛ Task-based Language Teaching | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abahussain, M. O. (2020). Investigating EFL learners’ perceptions of collaborative writing. International Journal of English Linguistics, 10(3), 32-47.
Abrami, P. C., Poulsen, C., & Chambers, B. (2004). Teacher motivation to implement an educational innovation: Factors differentiating users and non-Users of cooperative learning. Educational Psychology, 24(2), 201-216.
Abvali, P., Mohammadi, M. (2016). The affordances of collaborative dialouges: The case of EFL learners’ speaking performance. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods, 6(2), 124-133.
Ahangari, S., & Abdi, M. (2011). The effect of pre-task planning on the accuracy and complexity of Iranian EFL learners’ oral performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 1950-1959.
Ahmadi, N., Motallebzade, K., & Fatemi, M. (2014). The effect of cooperative learning strategies on Iranian intermediate students’ writing achievement. Open Access Library Journal, 1(09), 1–9.
Ahmadian, M., Amerian, M., & Tajabadi, A. (2014). The effect of collaborative dialogue on EFL learner’s vocabulary acquisition and retention. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 3(4), 38-45.
Aiken, R. M., Bessagnet, M., & Israel. J. (2005). Interaction and collaboration using an intelligent collaborative learning environment. Education and Information Technologies, 10(1), 67-82.
Aleksius, M., Widiati, U., Suharmanto. & Prayogo, J. A. (2021). Task-based assessment in using other-initiated repair strategies of the pre-service EFL teachers. International Journal of Instruction, 14(1),761-778.
Alizaded Tabaqi, A., Yaqubi, B., & Abadikhah, S. (2019). The effect of collaborative dialogue on EFL learners’ noticing of pragmatic forms. Journal of English language Teaching and Learning, 11(24), 1-28.
Ashraf Ganjouee, A., Ghonsooly, B., Hosseini Fatemi, A. (2018). The impact of task-based instruction on the enhancement of Iranian intermediate EFL learners’ speaking skill and emotional intelligence. Applied Research on English Language, 7(2), 196-214.
Ashton-Hay, S., & Pillay, H. (2010). Case study of collaborative learning in two contexts: what do English language learners gain. Collaborative Learning: Methodology, Types of Interactions and Techniques. Education in a Competitive and Globalizing World. Nova Publishers, New York.
Beheshti, S., & Ahmadi Safa, M. (2020). Effects of audio-visually prompted collaborative dialogue on EFL learners' listening comprehension development. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 39(2), 1-42.
Birjandi, P., & Ahangari, S. (2008). Effects of task repetition on the fluency, complexity and accuracy of Iranian EFL learners’ oral discourse. Asian EFL Journal, 10(3), 28-52.
Biria, R., & Jafari, S. (2013). The impact of collaborative writing on the writing fluency of Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(1), 164–175.
Bonk, C. J., & King, K. S. (2012). Searching for learner-centered, constructivist, and sociocultural components of collaborative educational learning tools. In Electronic collaborators (pp. 61-86). Routledge.
Christie, D., Tolmie, A., Thurston, A., Howe, C., & Topping, K. (2009). Supporting group work in Scottish primary classrooms: improving the quality of collaborative dialogue. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(1), 141-156.
Conzemius, A., & O'Neill, J. (2001). Building shared responsibility for student learning. Alexandria, Va: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Creswell, J.W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed-methods research (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Los Angeles.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
Derakhshan, A. (2018). The effect of task-based language teaching instruction on the Iranian intermediate EFL learners’ writing performance. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 527-544.
Dobao, A. F. (2012). Collaborative dialogue in learner–learner and learner–native speaker interaction. Applied linguistics, 33(3), 229-256.
Donato, R. (2004). Aspects of collaboration in pedagogical discourse. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24(1), 284-302.
Ellis, R. (2000). Task-based research and language pedagogy. Language Teaching Research, 4(3), 193-220.
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford: University Press.
Ellis, R. (2009). Task‐based language teaching: Sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19(3), 221-246.
Ellis, R., & Shintani, N. N. (2014). Exploring language pedagogy through second language acquisition research. New York, NY: Routledge.
Erten, İ. H., & Altay, M. (2009). The effects of task-based group activities on students’ collaborative behaviors in EFL speaking classes. Journal of Theory & Practice in Education (JTPE), 5(1), 33-52.
Fakhar Ajabshir, Z., & Panahifar, F. (2020). The effect of teachers' scaffolding and peers' collaborative dialogue on speech act production in symmetrical and asymmetrical groups. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 8(1), 45-61.
Gamba, A. (2013). Enhancing fluency in speaking through the use of collaborative and self- directed speaking tasks. Master thesis, Universidad de La Sabana, Department of Foreign Languages and Cultures.
Geng, X., & Ferguson, G. (2013). Strategic planning in task-based language teaching: The effects of participatory structure and task type. System, 41(4), 982-993.
Green, J. M. (1993). Student attitudes toward communicative and non‐communicative activities: Do enjoyment and effectiveness go together? The Modern Language Journal, 77(1), 1-10.
Howe, C., & Abedin, M. (2013). Classroom dialogue: A systematic review across four decades of research. Cambridge journal of education, 43(3), 325-356.
Jacobs, G. M. (2004). Cooperative learning: Theory, principles, and techniques. Paper presented at the First International Online Conference on Second and Foreign Language Teaching and Research.
Kim, A. H., Vaughn, S., Klingner, J. K., Woodruff, A. L., Klein Reutebuch, C., & Kouzekanani, K. (2006). Improving the reading comprehension of middle school students with disabilities through computer-assisted collaborative strategic reading. Remedial and special education, 27(4), 235-249.
Kim, Y., & McDonough, K. (2008). The effect of interlocutor proficiency on the collaborative dialogue between Korean as a second language learners. Language teaching research, 12(2), 211-234.
Kirschner, P. A. (2004). Design, development, and implementation of electronic learning environments for collaborative learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(3), 39-46.
Khabiri, M., Firooz, M. (2012). The comparative effect of practicing cooperative learning and critical thinking on EFL learners’ writing. Issues in Language Teaching (ILT), 1 (2), 371-394.
Khatib, M., Dehghankar, A. (2018). The impact of task-based language teaching on ESP learners’ productive skills: From task-based instruction to investigation of learners’ and instructors’ attitudes toward the course. Issue in Language Teaching (ILT), 7(2), 1-28.
khodabakhshzadeh, H., Samadi, F. (2017). The effect of collaborative writing on Iranian EFL learners’ task achievement in writing and their perception. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 7(1), 113-119.
Khodamoradi, A., Iravani, H., & Jafarigohar, M. (2013). The effect of teacher’s scaffolding and peers’ collaborative dialogue on the acquisition of English tenses in the Zone of Proximal Development: A sociocultural perspective. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 2(2s), 336-346.
Kouros, C., & Abrami, P. C. (2006). How do students really feel about working in small groups? The role of student attitudes and behaviours in cooperative classroom settings. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. Longman, New York.
Laal, M., Geranpaye, L., & Daemi, M. (2013). Individual accountability in collaborative learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 286-289.
Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Little, D. (1995). Learning as Dialogue: The dependence of learner autonomy on teacher autonomy. System, 23(2), 175-182.
Littlewood, W. (2011). Communicative language teaching: An expanding concept for a changing world. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Vol. II, pp. 541–557). London, England: Routledge.
Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W.C.Ritchie & T.K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 413–468). Academic Press, San Diego.
Madarsara, M. A., & Rahimy, R. (2014). Examining the effect of task complexity and sequence on speaking ability of Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 4(1), 247-254.
Marashi, H. & Gholami, M. (2020). Applying cooperative and individual offline planning in speaking classes: A comparison of impulsive and reflective EFL learners. Journal of Teaching Language Skills (JTL), 39(3.2), 1-34.
McDonough, K. (2004). Learner-learner interaction during pair and small group activities in a Thai EFL context. System, 32(2), 207-224.
Mishra, S., & Oliver, R. (1998). Secondary school ESL learners’ perceptions of pair work in Australian classrooms. TESOL in Context, 8(2), 19-23.
Naserpour A. , Zarei, A. & Esfandiari, R., (2020). The Effects of Task Orientation and Involvement Load on Learning Collocations. Journal of Teaching Language Skills (JTLS), 39(1), 71-114.
Nunan, D. (2006). Task-based language teaching in the Asia context: Defining’task’. Asian EFL Journal, 8(3), 12-18.
Pattanpichet, F. (2011). The effects of using collaborative learning to enhance students English speaking achievement. Journal of College Teaching & Learning (TLC), 8(11), 1-10.
Payant, C., & Kim, Y. (2019). Impact of task modality on collaborative dialogue among plurilingual learners: a classroom-based study. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(5), 614-627.
Pham, V. P. H., & Nguyen, T. B. (2014). The effects of communicative grammar teaching on students’ achievement of grammatical knowledge and oral production. English Language Teaching. 7(6), 74-86.
Poupore, G. (2004). Quality interaction and types of negotiation in problem-solving and jigsaw tasks. In C. Edwards & J. Willis (Eds.), Teachers exploring tasks in English language teaching (pp. 242-255). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Rajablou, F., & Shirvan, M. E. (2017). Iranian English language learners’ attitude towards their accent in English language: An ecological approach. Englishes in Practice, 4(1), 1-30.
Razmjoo, S. A, & Riazi, M. (2006). Do high schools or private institutes practice communicative language teaching? A case study of Shiraz teachers in high schools and institutes. The Reading Matrix, 6(3), 340-363.
Saeedy Robat, E., Khodabakhshzadeh, H., & Ashraf, H. (2021). The effectiveness of English language teaching methods: A meta-analysis in pursuit for "the Best Method", Journal of Teaching Language Skills (JTL), 40(1), 187-235.
Salimi, E.A., & Karimabadi, M. (2020). The efficacy of classroom flipping on Iranian intermediate EFL learners’ engagement and their perception of the flipped classroom model. Journal of Teaching Language Skills (JTL), 39(3.2), 143-180.
Seba, R. G. (2008). From collaborative writing to reading comprehension: a case study on focus on form through collaborative dialogue as a means to enhance reading comprehension in English. Doctoral dissertation, Dissertação, Univ. Federal Fluminense, Rio de Janeiro.
Shehadeh, A. (2011). Effects and student perceptions of collaborative writing in L2. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20(4), 286-305.
Shirbagi, N. (2010). An exploration of undergraduate students’ motivation and attitudes towards English language acquisition. Journal of Behavioural Sciences, 20(2), 1-14 .
Skehan, P., (1996). Second language acquisition research and task-based instruction. Readings in Methodology, 3, 13-23.
Sorensen, P. (2014). Collaboration, dialogue and expansive learning: The use of paired and multiple placements in the school practicum. Teaching and Teacher Education, 44(1), 128-137.
Storch, N. (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52(1), 119-158.
Storch, N. (2005). Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’ reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3), 153–173.
Storch, N. (2013). Collaborative writing in L2 classrooms. Bristol, England: Multilingual Matters.
Sun, Y. C., & Chang, Y. J. (2012). Blogging to learn: Becoming EFL academic writers through collaborative dialogues. Language Learning & Technology, 16(1), 43-61.
Swain, M. (1997). Collaborative dialogue: Its contribution to second language learning. Revista canaria de estudios ingleses, 34, 115-132.
Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97–114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Swain, M. (2001). Examining dialogue: Another approach to content specification and to validating inferences drawn from test scores. Language Testing, 18, 319-346.
Swain, M.& Lapkin, S. (2001). Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task effects. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan& M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 99–118). London: Longman.
Swain, M. (2006). Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced language proficiency. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 95–108). New York, NY: Continuum.
Swain, M., Brooks, L., & Toealli-Bcller, A. (2002). Peer-Peer dialogue as a means of second language. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 171-185.
Swain, M., & Watanabe, Y. (2013). Languaging: Collaborative dialogue as a source of second language learning. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, 3218-3225.
Taguchi, N., & Kim, Y. (2014). Collaborative dialogue in learning pragmatics: Pragmatic related episodes as an opportunity for learning request-making. Applied Linguistics,37(3), 1-23.
Trinder, R. (2013). Business students’ beliefs about language learning in a university context. English for Specific Purposes, 32(1), 1–11.
Vaughn, S., Klingner, J. K., & Bryant, D. P. (2001). Collaborative strategic reading as a means to enhance peer-mediated instruction for reading comprehension and content-area learning. Remedial and Special Education, 22(2), 66-74.
Vaughn, S., Klingner, J. K., Swanson, E. A., Boardman, A. G., Roberts, G., Mohammed, S. S., & Stillman-Spisak, S. J. (2011). Efficacy of collaborative strategic reading with middle school students. American Educational Research Journal, 48(4), 938-964.
Vick, R. M., Crosby, M. E., & Ashworth, D. E. (2000). Japanese and American students meet on the web: Collaborative language learning through everyday dialogue with peers. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13(3), 199-219.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. Readings on the development of children, 23(3), 34-41.
Watanabe, Y., & Swain, M. (2007). Effects of proficiency differences and patterns of pair interaction on second language learning: Collaborative dialogue between adult ESL learners. Language Teaching Research, 11(2), 121-142.
Weissberg, R. (2006). Scaffolded feedback: Tutorial conversations with advanced L2 writers. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing, contexts and issues. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Wistner, B., Sakai, H. & Abe, M. (2009). An analysis of the Oxford Placement Test and the Michigan Placement Test as L2 proficiency tests. Hosei University Repository, 58, 33-44.
Yilmaz, Y. (2008). Collaborative dialouges during tasks in Synchronous Computer-mediated Communication. Doctoral dissertation, Florida State University, College of Education.
Yumi, F., & Erina, S. (2015). Effects of cooperative learning on writing activity of English for special purposes in Japanese university students. Journal of Academic Society for Quality Life, 1(1), 32–39.
Zeng, G., & Takatsuka, S. (2009). Text-based peer-peer collaborative dialogue in a computer-mediated learning environment in the EFL context. System, 37(3), 434-446.
Zohrabi, M., Torabi, M. A., & Baybourdiani, P. (2012). Teacher-centered and/or student-centered learning: English language in Iran. English Language and Literature Studies, 2(3), 18-30. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 617 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 466 |
||