Interrelationships among oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) grain yield and weed growth under different nitrogen levels | ||
| Iran Agricultural Research | ||
| مقاله 5، دوره 35، شماره 1، شهریور 2016، صفحه 33-38 اصل مقاله (327.38 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Full Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22099/iar.2016.3588 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| R. Naderi* 1؛ H. Ghadiri2؛ M. Edalat2 | ||
| 1Department of Agroecology, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources of Darab, Shiraz University, I. R. Iran | ||
| 2Department of Crop Production and Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, I. R. Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Management of nitrogen fertilization in crops is one of the most important components of integrated weed management. A two-year field experiment was conducted to determine the direct effects of wild mustard aboveground biomass and N content of wild mustard on oilseed rape yield. A set of factorial treatments was arranged in a randomized complete block design with four replications. Treatments were various wild mustard densities (0, 10, 20, 30, and 40 plant m-2) and nitrogen (N) rates (0, 50, 100, 150, and 200 kg N ha-1). Increased wild mustard densities from 10 wild mustard m-2 caused a decrease of 27 % in oilseed rape N content of shoot. Increase in nitrogen fertilizer caused an increase in N content of oilseed rape shoot up to 150 kg N ha-1, but no significant difference was found between 150 (0.88 %) and 200 (0.89%) kg N ha-1. Correlation analysis showed that there was a negative significant correlation between oilseed rape grain yield and weed biomass (r=-0.60, p≤0.05) and weed nitrogen content (r=-0.81, p≤0.01). Path analysis showed a highly negative significant direct effect (direct path: -0.88, p≤0.01) between weed biomass and oilseed rape grain yield. Correlation and path analyses indicated that the main factor which could cause oilseed rape yield loss was weed biomass and the second factor was N content in wild mustard. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Keywords:؛ oilseed crop؛ path analysis؛ competition؛ weed | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
AmpongNyarko, K., & Datta, S.K. (1993). Effects of nitrogen application on growth, nitrogen use efficiency and rice-weed interaction. Weed Research, 33, 269–276.
Andreasen, C., Litz, A.S., & Streibig, J.C. (2006). Growth response of six weed species and spring barley (Hordeumvulgare) to increasing levels of nitrogen and phosphorus. Weed Research, 46, 503–512.
Bijanzadeh, E., Naderi, R., & Behpoori, A. (2010). Interrelationships between oilseed rape yield and weeds population under herbicides application. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 4, 155-162.
Blackshaw, R.E., & Brandt, R.N. (2008). Nitrogen fertilizer rate effects on weed competitiveness is species dependent. Weed Science, 56, 743-747.
Blackshaw, R.E., Anderson, G.W., & Dekker, J. (1987). Interference of Sinapis arvensisL. and Chenopodium album L. in Spring Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Weed Research, 27, 207-213.
Bosnic, A.C., & Swanton, C.J. (1997). Influence of barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) time of emergence and density on corn (Zea mays). Weed Science, 45, 276-282.
Carlson, H.L., & Hill, J.E. (1985). Wild oat (Avenafatua) competition with spring wheat: effects of nitrogen fertilization. Weed Scince, 34, 29–33.
Dhima, K.V., & Eleftherohorinos, I.G. (2001). Influence of nitrogen on competition between winter cereals and sterile oat. Weed Science, 49, 77–82.
Gaudet, C.L., & Keddy, P.A. (1988). A comparative approach to predicting competitive ability from plant traits. Nature, 334, 242–243.
Khachatourians, G.G., Summer, A.K., & Phillips, P.W.B. (2001). An introduction to the history of canola and the scientific basis for innovation. CABI, London, 493p.
Maftoun, M., Moshiri, F., Karimian, N., & Ronaghi, A. (2004). Effects of two organic wastes in combination with phosphorus on growth and chemical composition of spinach and soil properties. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 271, 651-1635.
Mamolos, A.P., & Kalburtji, K.L. (2000). Competition between Canada thistle and winter wheat. Weed Science, 49, 755-759.
McMullan, P.M., Daun, J.K., & Declercq, D.R. (1994). Effect of wild mustard (Brassica kaber) competition on yield and quality of triazine-tolerant and triazine-susceptible canola (Brassica napus and Brassica rapa). Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 74, 369-374.
Mohammadi, S.A., Prasanna, B.M., & Singh, N.N. (2003). Sequential path model for determining interrelationships among grain yield and related characters in maize. Crop Science, 43, 1690–1697
Narits, L. (2010). Effect of nitrogen rate and application time to yield and qualityof winter oilseed rape (Brassicanapus L. var. oleifera subvar. Biennis). Agronomy Research, 8, 671-686.
Ni, H., Moody, K., Robles, R.P., Paller, E.C., & Lales, J.S. (2000). Oryza sativa plant traits conferring competitive ability against weeds. Weed Science, 48, 200-2004.
Rose, S.P., & Bell, J.M. (1982). Reproduction of micefed low erucic acid rapeseed oil contaminated with weed seed oils. Canadian Journal Animal Science, 62, 617-624.
Santos, B.M., Morales Payan, J.P., Stall, W.M., & Bewick, T.A. (1998). Influence of purple nutsedge (Cyperu srotundus) density and nitrogen rate on radish (Raphanus sativus) yield. Weed Science, 46, 661–664.
Shires, A., Bell, J.M., Keith, M.O., & McGregor, D.I. (1982). Rapeseed dockage.Effect of feeding raw and processed wild mustard and stinkweed on growth and feed utilization of mice. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 62, 275-285.
Warwick, S.I., Beckie, H.G.,Thomas, A.G., & Donald, T.M. (2000). The biology of Canadian weeds. 8. Sinapi sarvensis L. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 82, 473-480.
Zhang, H., Schroder, J.L., Fuhrman, J.K., Basta, N.T., Storm, D.E., & Payton, M.E. (2005). Path and multiple regression analysis of phosphorus sorption capacity. Soil Science Society of American Journal, 69, 96–106. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,898 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,876 |
||