PooryazdanpanahKermani, Arezu. (1405). Pathology of Comparative Articles in the Field of Sustainability Literature. , (), -. doi: 10.22099/jps.2026.56568.1134
Arezu PooryazdanpanahKermani. "Pathology of Comparative Articles in the Field of Sustainability Literature". , , , 1405, -. doi: 10.22099/jps.2026.56568.1134
PooryazdanpanahKermani, Arezu. (1405). 'Pathology of Comparative Articles in the Field of Sustainability Literature', , (), pp. -. doi: 10.22099/jps.2026.56568.1134
PooryazdanpanahKermani, Arezu. Pathology of Comparative Articles in the Field of Sustainability Literature. , 1405; (): -. doi: 10.22099/jps.2026.56568.1134
Pathology of Comparative Articles in the Field of Sustainability Literature
Associate Professor, Department of Persian Language and Literature, Yazd University
چکیده
With the growth and expansion of sustainability literature after the victory of the Islamic Revolution, the attention of many researchers was drawn to this literary field, paving the way for the writing of numerous scientific articles in this field. Improving the quality of these articles depends on scientific pathology and expressing their strengths and weaknesses. Articles written with a comparative approach in the field of sustainability literature require more serious pathology than other articles in this field. In this study, 83 scientific articles published in scientific research journals were examined using an analytical-descriptive method. The research findings indicate that the thematic weakness of these articles is the most important disadvantage that these articles face. Lack of a theoretical framework, lack of innovation and problem solving, unfamiliarity with the correct method of comparison and adaptation, failure to observe intercultural and international conditions, generalizations, and failure to address details are other weaknesses of these articles.The research findings indicate that the thematic weakness of these articles is the most important disadvantage that these articles face. Lack of a theoretical framework, lack of innovation and problem solving, unfamiliarity with the correct method of comparison and adaptation, failure to observe intercultural and international conditions, generalizations, and failure to address details are other weaknesses of these articles.