| تعداد نشریات | 24 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 935 |
| تعداد مقالات | 8,388 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 16,989,011 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 14,377,515 |
Finite Element Evaluation of Silicone Rubber Composites for Metacarpophalangeal Joint Implants | ||
| Iranian Journal of Materials Forming | ||
| دوره 14، شماره 1، فروردین 2027، صفحه 96-111 اصل مقاله (1.9 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22099/ijmf.2026.56939.1390 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| sahar Ziraki* 1؛ Amir Ali Ashraf2؛ Seyed Mojtaba Zebarjad2؛ Mohammad Jafar Hadianfard2 | ||
| 1Department of Materials Science and Engineering, School of Engineering, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran | ||
| 2Department of Materials Science and Engineering, School of Engineering, Shiraz University, Shiraz, | ||
| چکیده | ||
| The metacarpophalangeal joint is one of the most important and highly mobile joints in the hand, and if it is affected by disease, it may need to be replaced with a prosthesis. However, implant fracture and mechanical degradation are important concerns. Therefore, it is important to investigate the implant’s behavior. Finite element analysis (FEA) has been widely used to study the biomechanics of joints and is an effective method to predict joint motion and failure. In this study, metacarpophalangeal joint implants made from different types of silicone rubber composites, including silica nanoparticles/silicone rubber composites, polypropylene fibers/silicone rubber composites, and a hybrid composite of silica/polypropylene fibers /silicone rubber, were simulated using Abaqus to investigate stress distribution and the range of motion of the implants under specific flexion and loading conditions. The implant was subjected to flexion up to 70̊ and to a 0.5 N external load. The finite element analysis showed that stress in the central regions was higher than in other regions, and stress increased with increasing flexion and extension angles. Under a constant external load of 0.5 N, the P2 composite exhibited the lowest displacement, strain, and stress, with values of 3.31, 0.11, and 0.33 MPa, respectively, compared with 12.92, 0.41, and 0.55 MPa for pure silicone. The results indicate that reinforcement of silicone rubber can substantially reduce implant deformation under load, which may contribute to a longer implant lifespan. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Metacarpophalangeal joint implant؛ Silicone rubber composite؛ Finite element analysis (FEA)؛ Abaqus | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
[1] Thoene, M., Bejer-Olenska, E., & Wojtkiewicz, J. (2023). The current state of osteoarthritis treatment options using stem cells for regenerative therapy: A review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(10), 8925. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24108925
[2] Peck, J., Slovek, A., Miro, P., Vij, N., Traube, B., Lee, C., Berger, A. A., Kassem, H., Kaye, A. D., Sherman, W. F. & Abd-Elsayed, A. (2021). A Comprehensive review of viscosupplementation in osteoarthritis of the knee. Orthopedic Reviews, 13(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.52965/001C.25549
[3] Biddiss, E. A., Bogoch, E. R., & Meguid, S. A. (2005). Three-dimensional finite element analysis of prosthetic finger joint implants. International Journal of Mechanics and Materials in Design, 1(2004), 317–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10999-005-3308-3
[4] Vranis, N. M., Marascalchi, B., & Melamed, E. (2020). Trends in proximal interphalangeal and metacarpophalangeal joint arthroplasty utilization using statewide databases. The Journal of Hand Surgery (Asian-Pacific Volume), 25(01), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424835520500058
[5] Paesa, M., Alejo, T., Garcia-Alvarez, F., Arruebo, M., & Mendoza, G. (2023). New insights in osteoarthritis diagnosis and treatment: Nano-strategies for an improved disease management. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology, 15(2), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/wnan.1844
[6] Stokoe, S. M. (1990). A finger function simulator and surface replacement prosthesis for the metacarpophalangeal joint. Durham University.
[7] Koenuma, N., Ikari, K., Oh, K., Iwakura, N., & Okazaki, K. (2024). Long-term implant fracture rates following silicone metacarpophalangeal joint arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis. Journal of Hand Surgery, 49(5), 443–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.01.009
[8] Iwamoto, T., Ishii, K., Suzuki, T., Kimura, H., Matsumura, N., & Sato, K. (2021). Risk factors contributing to early implant fracture in silicone metacarpophalangeal joint arthroplasty for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Journal of Hand Surgery, 46(3), 243.e1-243.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2020.09.002
[9] Heller, M. O. (2022). Finite element analysis in orthopedic biomechanics. In Human orthopaedic biomechanics (pp. 637–658). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824481-4.00026-3
[10] Verma, A., Jain, A., Sekhar Sethy, S., Verma, V., Goyal, N., Vathulya, M., & Kandwal, P. (2024). Finite element analysis and its application in orthopaedics: A narrative review. Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma, 58, 102803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102803
[11] Kadir, M. R. A., Kamsah, N., & Aminullah, M. A. (2008). Finite element study of metacarpophalangeal joint silicone implants. In 4th Kuala Lumpur International Conference on Biomedical Engineering (pp. 420–423).
[12] S. Soman, M. A. (2011). Finite element analysis of fractured finger with Implant fixation using MIMICS. In 3rd International Conference on Electronics Computer Technology (ICECT) (pp. 380–385).
[13] Completo, A., Semitela, A., Fonseca, F., & Nascimento, A. (2023). The silicone metacarpophalangeal joint arthroplasty: An in-vitro analysis. Clinical Biomechanics, 110, 106120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2023.106120
[14] Kim, Y. J., Bae, H. ah, & Hong, S. W. (2023). Biomechanical comparative finite element analysis between a conventional proximal interphalangeal joint flexible hinge implant and a novel implant design using a rolling contact joint mechanism. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 18(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04477-y
[15] Pankaj, P. (2013). Patient‐specific modelling of bone and bone‐implant systems: the challenges. International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering, 29(2), 233–249. https://doi.org/10.1002/cnm.2536
[16] Ziraki, S., Zebarjad, S. M., & Hadianfard, M. J. (2016). A study on the role of polypropylene fibers and silica nanoparticles on the compression properties of silicone rubber composites as a material of finger joint implant. International Journal of Polymeric Materials and Polymeric Biomaterials, 66(1), 48–52. https://doi.org/https:/doi.org/10.1080/00914037.2016.1180623
[17] Ziraki, S., Mojtaba, S., & Hadianfard, M. J. (2016). A study on the tensile properties of silicone rubber/polypropylene fibers/silica hybrid nanocomposites. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 57, 289–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.01.019
[18] Pylios, T. (2010). A new metacarpophalangeal joint replacement prosthesis. University of Birmingham.
[19] Salamat, A. H., & Shepherd, D. E. T. (2010). Modelling silicone finger joint implant. In 17th Iranian Conference of Biomedical Engineering (ICBME) (pp. 1–4).
[20] Hu, D., Howard, D., & Ren, L. (2014). Biomechanical analysis of the human finger extensor mechanism during isometric pressing. Public Library of Science One, 9(4), e94533. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094533
[21] Butz, K. D., Merrell, G., & Nauman, E. A. (2012). A three-dimenional finite element analysis of finger joint stresses in the MCP joint while performing common tasks. Hand, 7(3), 341–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11552-012-9430-4 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 7 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 8 |
||