The Rhetoric of Research Gaps across Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed-Methods Traditions in Iranian Applied Linguistics Articles

Alvesson, M., & Sandberg, J. (2013). Constructing research questions: Doing interesting research. SAGE Publications.

Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2009). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Amini Farsani, M., & Babaii, E. (2018). Mapping past, current and future TEFL research trends in Iran: A synthetic review of topics and paradigms in three decades. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, 5(4), 81–108. https://doi.org/10.30479/jmrels.2019.10434.1299

Bacchi, C. (2009). Analyzing policy: What's the problem represented to be? Pearson Education.

Barley, S. R. (2006). When I write my masterpiece: Thoughts on what makes a paper
interesting. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 16–20.

Bhattacharya, K. (2017). Fundamentals of qualitative research: A practical guide. Routledge.

Bryman, A. (2007). The research question in social research: What is its role? International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 10(1), 5–20.

Chatterjee, S., & Davison, R. (2020). The need for compelling problematization in research: The prevalence of the gap-spotting approach and its limitations. Information Systems Journal, 31(2), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12316

Chu, J. S. G., & Evans, J. A. (2021). Slowed canonical progress in large fields of science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(41), Article e2021636118.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge.

Conway, K. (2023). Introduction to section I: research topics, problems, and questions. In A. L. Terosky, V. L. Baker, & J. C. Sun (Eds.), A Practical Guide to Teaching Research Methods in Education: Lesson Plans and Advice from Faculty (pp. 9–10). Routledge.

Coombe, C. (2021). Volume introduction: Research questions in language education and applied linguistics: Strategies for their conceptualization and development. In H. Mohebbi & C. Coombe (Eds.), Research questions in language education and applied linguistics (pp. 1–8). Springer.

Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2011). Building theory about theory building: What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 12–32.

Creswell, J. W. (2011). Controversies in mixed methods research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 269–284). SAGE Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1988). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. University of Minnesota Press.

Ding, D., Nguyen, B., Gebel, K., Bauman, A., & Bero, L. (2020). Duplicate and salami publication: A prevalence study of journal policies. International Journal of Epidemiology, 49(1), 281–288. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyz187

Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford University Press.

Ellis, R. (1997). SLA research and language teaching. Oxford University Press.

Farzaneh, N., & Rezvani, R. (2026). The dominance of gap-spotting in Iranian applied linguistics research: Epistemological orientations and knowledge production. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, 13(3), 125−147. https://doi.org/10.30479/jmrels.2026.23545.2614

Fox, N. J. (2024). Rhizomatic review: A materialist minor science approach to research evaluation. Qualitative Research, 24(5), 1101–1120. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941231216632

Ghanbar, H., & Rezvani, R. (2023). Research questions in applied linguistics research: A microscopic analysis of their distributional and syntactical aspects. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 156–167. https://doi.org/10.22055/RALS.2023.18074

Gillespie, A., Glăveanu, V. P., & de Saint-Laurent, C. (2024). Pragmatism and methodology: Doing research that matters with mixed methods. Cambridge University Press.

Hacking, I. (1983). Representing and intervening: Introductory topics in the philosophy of natural science. Cambridge University Press.

Hallgren, M. (2012). The construction of research questions in project management. International Journal of Project Management, 30(7), 804–816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.01.005

Hashemi, M. R., & Babaii, E. (2013). Mixed methods research: Toward new research designs in applied linguistics. The Modern Language Journal, 97(4), 828–852. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12049.x

Hempel, S., Gore, K., & Belsher, B. (2019). Identifying research gaps and prioritizing psychological health evidence synthesis needs. Medical Care, 57(10), S259–S264.

Hulstijn, J. H., Young, R. F., Ortega, L., Bigelow, M., DeKeyser, R., Ellis, N. C., Lantolf, J. P., Mackey, A., & Talmy, S. (2014). Bridging the gap: Cognitive and social approaches to research in second language learning and teaching. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36(3), 361–421.

Jacobs, R. L. (2011). Developing a research problem and purpose statement. In T. S. Rocco & T. G. Hatcher (Eds.), The handbook of scholarly writing and publishing (pp. 125–142). Jossey-Bass.

Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26.

Kilduff, M. (2006). Editor's comments: Publishing theory. Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 252–255.

Kross, J., & Giust, A. (2019). Elements of research questions in relation to qualitative inquiry. The Qualitative Report, 24(1), 24–30. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2019.3426

Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.

Lim, J. M.-H. (2014). Formulating research questions in experimental doctoral dissertations on Applied Linguistics. English for Specific Purposes, 35, 66–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2014.02.003

Lipowski, E. E. (2008). Developing great research questions. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 65(17), 1667–1670.

Mackey, A., & Gass, S. (2016). Second language research: Methodology and design. Routledge.

Mirhosseini, S. A. (2018). Mixed methods research in TESOL: Procedures combined or epistemology confused? TESOL Quarterly, 52(2), 468–478. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.427

Moreno, A. I., & Swales, J. M. (2018). Strengthening move analysis methodology towards bridging the function-form gap. English for Specific Purposes, 50, 40–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2017.11.006

Morley, C. (2023). The systemic neoliberal colonisation of higher education: A critical analysis of the obliteration of academic practice. The Australian Educational Researcher. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-023-00613-z

Müller-Bloch, C., & Kranz, J. (2015). A framework for rigorously identifying research gaps in qualitative literature reviews. In Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2015). https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2015/proceedings/ResearchMethods/2/

Norman, I., & Griffiths, P. (2008). Duplicate publication and 'salami slicing': Ethical issues and practical solutions. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 45(6), 1257–1260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2008.04.003

Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2006). Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching. John Benjamins.

Nyanchoka, L., Tudur-Smith, C., Thu, V. N., Iversen, V., Tricco, A. C., & Porcher, R. (2019). A scoping review describes methods used to identify, prioritize and display gaps in health research. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 109, 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.01.005

Ozturk, I. (2007). The textual organization of research article introductions in applied linguistics: Variability within a single discipline. English for Specific Purposes, 26, 25–38.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2005.12.003

Robinson, K. A., Saldanha, I. J., & Mckoy, N. A. (2011). Development of a framework to identify research gaps from systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 64(12), 1325–1330.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.06.009

Sandberg, J., & Alvesson, M. (2011). Ways of constructing research questions: Gap-Spotting or problematization? Organization, 18(1), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508410372151

Sheldon, E. (2011). Rhetorical differences in RA introductions written by English L1 and L2 and Castilian Spanish L1 writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10, 238–251.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.08.004

Shore, C., & Wright, S. (2015). Audit culture revisited: Rankings, ratings, and the reassembling of society. Current Anthropology, 56(3), 421–444. https://doi.org/10.1086/681534

St. Pierre, E. A. (2016). The long reach of logical positivism/logical empiricism. In N. K. Denzin, & M. Giardina (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry through a critical lens (pp. 19-29). Routledge.

Sunderland, J. (2010). Research questions in linguistics. In L. Litosseliti (Ed.), Research methods in linguistics (pp. 9–28). Continuum.

Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.

Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genres: Exploration and applications. Cambridge University Press.

Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. SAGE Publications.

Wald, N., Harland, T., & Daskon, C. (2024). The gap statement and justification in higher education research: An analysis of published articles. European Journal of Higher Education, 14(2), 308–323.  https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2023.2189132

Wang, S., Guan, B., & Schlagwein, D. (2025). Developing research agendas in IS literature review. Proceedings of the 36th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, 97. https://aisel.aisnet.org/acis2025/97

Younas, A., Durante, A., & Fabregues, S. (2023). Understanding the nature of and identifying and formulating "research problems" in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 18(4), 479–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898231163748