گفت‌وگو، آیرونی و همبستگی در منظومه دموکراسی ریچارد رورتی

References

Aslani, F., Sajjadi, S. (2020). The theory of "self-limitation of power" and the study of the relationship between the state and law, Journal of Legal Studies, 12(3), 1-28, [In Persian]

Abers, R., Brandao, I., King, R., Votto, D. (2018). Porto Alegre: Participatory Budgeting and the Challenge of Sustaining Transformative Change [Research Report]. Porto Alegre Participatory Budgeting Project.

Alibeglou, H. (2021). The Relationship between Philosophy and Democracy in Richard Rorty’s Thought. M.A. Thesis, Faculty of Humanities, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin. [In Persian]

Bernstein, R. J. (2010). The Pragmatic Turn, Cambridge: Polity Press.

Fishkin, J. S. (1991), Democracy and Deliberation: New Directions for Democratic Reform, New Haven: Yale University Press.

Fung, A. (2003), Empowered Participation: Reinventing Urban Democracy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Hosseini, S. L (2018). A critical review of recent decisions of the European Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights regarding freedom of religion within the framework of the margin of discretion doctrine, Journal of Legal Studies, 10(2), 79-103. [In Persian]

Habermas, J. (1996). Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Koukab, S. (2006). Epistemology from the Viewpoint of Richard Rorty. Ph.D. Dissertation, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Tehran. [In Persian]

Koukab, S. (2010). Truth and Justification, Philosophy, 38, 137–174. [In Persian]

Mousazadeh, I., Asghari, M., & Abdollahnejad, M. (2021). “The Linguistic Structure of Reality in Richard Rorty’s Thought”, Philosophical–Theological Research Journal, No 90, 105–119. [In Persian]

Moradkhani, F. (2020). The concept of constitutional law in the thought of John Rawls, Journal of Legal Studies, 12(1), 247-273. [In Persian]

Nouri, M. (2022). Pragmatism, Naturalism, and the Challenge of Preserving Normativity: The Debate between Richard Rorty and Hilary Putnam, Javidan Kherad Journal, 42, 97–122. [In Persian]

Pendashteh-Pour, M. (2024). An Evaluation of the Epistemological Foundations of American Pragmatism: ‘The Priority of Democracy over Philosophy’ in Rorty’s Thought. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Management and Humanities in Iran, Tehran, May 30–31: 1301–1316. [In Persian]

Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Romana, R. (2014). The Philosophy of Richard Rorty, Trans. M. Nouri, Tehran: Elm Publications. [In Persian]

Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Rorty, R. (1982). Consequences of Pragmatism, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rorty, R. (1991). Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth: Philosophical Papers, Volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rorty, R. (1993). Human Rights, Rationality, and Sentimentality, In Truth and Progress: Philosophical Papers, Volume 3, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rorty, R. (2006). Contingency, Game, and Solidarity, Trans. P. Yazdanjoo, Tehran: Nashr-e Markaz. [In Persian]

Rorty, R. (2013). Postmodern Truth, Trans. M. Asghari, Tehran: Elham Publications. [In Persian]

Rorty, R. (2020). An Introduction to the Linguistic Turn, Trans. S. M. H. Ayatollahzadeh Shirazi & P. Panahi, Tehran: Nashr-e Shabkhiz. [In Persian]

Rorty, R., & Angel, P. (2019). What Is Truth For? A Debate between Richard Rorty and Pascal Engel, Trans. R. Mahmoudi, Tehran: Kargadan Publications. [In Persian]

Rorty, R., & Searle, J. (2022). Rorty and Searle: A Philosophical Debate, Trans. B. Elmi, Tehran: Kargadan Publications. [In Persian]

Strauss, D. A. (1996). Common Law Constitutional Interpretation, University of Chicago Law Review, 63, 877–935.

Sunstein, C. R. (1995). Incompletely Theorized Agreements, Harvard Law Review, 108(7), 1733–1772.

Simayi-Sarraf, H., & Mo’tamedi, J. (2017). The Impact of Pragmatism on Legal Interpretation, Legal Research Quarterly, 81, 265–287. [In Persian]

Soleimani, N., & Asghari, M. (2015). The Concept of Truth in Rorty’s Philosophy, Philosophical–Theological Research Journal,2(1), 138–164. [In Persian]

Soodmandi, A. M. (2016). Components of the Right to Expression in the International Human Rights System, Journal of Legal Studies, 8(2), 87-114. [In Persian]

Voparil, C. J. (2013). Reconstructing Pragmatism: Richard Rorty and the Classical Pragmatists, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Zolghadri, M. (2018). Human Rights, Rationality, and Sentimentality, In Mother Tongue: Essays on Human Rights, Trans. E. Nikouy-Bandari, Tehran: Tarjoman Institute for Humanities Translation. [In Persian]

Cases & Decisions

Barcelona City Council / Decidim Project (2018). Decidim: A Platform for Participatory Democracy. Barcelona: Ayuntamiento de Barcelona. Available at: https://decidim.org/docs/

Council of Europe (2018). Protocol No. 16 to the European Convention on Human Rights (Advisory Opinions). Strasbourg: Council of Europe. Available at: https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/treaty/214

European Union / European Economic and Social Committee (2017). Reports on Participatory Governance. Brussels: EESC.Available at: https://www.eesc.europa.eu/en/our-work/publications-other-work/reports/participatory-governance

European Court of Human Rights (1978), Tyrer v. United Kingdom, App. No. 5856/72, Judgment of 25 April 1978. Available from: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/

European Court of Human Rights (1976), Handyside v. United Kingdom, App. No. 5493/72, Judgment of 7 December 1976.Available from: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/

Open Government Partnership (OGP) (2021). Global Report: Democracy Beyond the Ballot. Washington, DC: Open Government Partnership Secretariat. Available at: https://www.opengovpartnership.org/reports/global-report-democracy-beyond-the-ballot/

U.S. Supreme Court (2005), Roper v. Simmons, in United States Reports, 543 U.S. 551. Available from: https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/USREPORTS

U.S. Supreme Court (1958), Trop v. Dulles, in United States Reports, 356 U.S. 86. Available from: https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/USREPORTS