دیالکتیک «رفتار عادلانه و منصفانه» و «توسعه پایدار» در رویه داوری سرمایه‌گذاری بین‌المللی

پیری، مهدی، آزادی، یاسمن (1401). تعامل و تقابل توسعه پایدار با معیار رفتار منصفانه در رویه داوری‌های سرمایه‌گذاری بین‌المللی، مطالعات حقوق عمومی، (4)52، 1799-1817.
 doi: 10.22059/jplsq.2022.325999.2806

رشوند بوکانی، مهدی و همکاران (1401). تأثیر دیدگاه‌های تفسیری هرمنوتیکی بر تفسیر قضایی قراردادها. مطالعات حقوقی، (2)14، 176-207. doi: 10.22099/jls.2022.39101.4180

شهابی، مهدی (1404). تحلیل چگونگی تعامل حقوق طبیعی کلاسیک و حقوق طبیعی مدرن؛ تأملی بر گذار از حق کانتی به حق ارسطویی. مطالعات حقوقی، (1)17، 233-272.
 doi: 10.22099/jls.2024.48515.5025

محمدی مقدم، پریسا، بادینی، حسن و نیک نژاد، جواد (1404). تفسیر قانون از منظر دکترین «انکار عدالت». مطالعات حقوقی، 17(1)، 313-348. doi: 10.22099/jls.2024.48758.5041

حسن فرج مهرابی (1399). تحلیل اقتصادی تعیین خسارت در داوری‌های مبتنی بر معاهدات سرمایه‌گذاری بین‌المللی، رساله دکتری در حقوق نفت و گاز، به راهنمایی دکتر محمدعلی بهمئی، دانشکده حقوق دانشگاه شهید بهشتی.

 

References

Cordonier Segger, M., Khalfan, A. (2005). Sustainable Development Law. Oxford University Press.

Dolzer, R. and Sevens, M. (2009). Bilateral investment treaties. Cambridge University Press.

Dolzer, R., Schreuer, C. (2012). Principle of International investment law. Oxford University Press.

Faraj Mehrabi, H. (2019). Economic Analysis of Damage Determination in Arbitrations Based on International Investment Treaties, PhD Thesis in Oil and Gas Law, supervised by Dr. Mohammad Ali Bahmai, Faculty of Law, Shahid Beheshti University. [In Persian]

Forji, A (2010). Drawing the Right Lessons from ICSID Jurisprudence on The Doctrine of Necessity. The International Journal of Arbitration, Mediation and Dispute Management, 76(1), 44-57. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1768266

Franck, S (2007). Empirically Evaluating Claims about Investment Treaty Arbitrations. North Carolina Law Review. 86, 1-88. https://ssrn.com/abstract=969257

Kläger, R (2011). Fair and Equitable Treatment in International Investment Law. Cambridge.

Kläger, R (2010). Fair and Equitable Treatment: A Look at the Theoretical Underpinnings of Legitimacy and Fairness. The Journal of World Investment & Trade: law, economics, politics. 11(3), 435-455. Doi: 10.1163/221190010X00121

Mohammadi Moghaddam, P., Badini, H and Niknejad, J. (1404). Interpretation of Law from the Perspective of the Doctrine of Denial of Justice. Legal Studies, 17(1), 313-348. doi: 10.22099/jls.2024.48758.5041 [In Persian]

Piri, M & Azadi, Y. (1401). Interaction and Contrast of Sustainable Development with Fair Treatment Criteria in International Investment Arbitration Procedure, Public Law Studies, (4)52, 1799-1817. doi: 10.22059/jplsq.2022.325999.2806 [In Persian]

Rashvand Boukani, M., Mohammadi, P., Khosravi, H. and Sardouei, A. (1401). The Effect of Hermeneutic Interpretative Perspectives on Judicial Interpretation of Contracts. Legal Studies (2)14, 176-207. doi: 10.22099/jls.2022.39101.4180 [In Persian]

Shahabi, M. (1404). Analysis of the Interaction of Classical Natural Law and Modern Natural Law; A Reflection on the Transition from Kantian Law to Aristotelian Law. Legal Studies (1)17, 233-272. doi:10.22099/jls.2024.48515.5025 [In Persian]

Schreur, C (2005). Fair and Equitable Treatment in Arbitral Practice. The Journal of World Investment & Trade: law, economics, politics. 6(3), 357-386. DOI:10.1163/221190005X00118

Tudor, I (2008). The Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard in the International Law of Foreign Investment. Oxford University Press.

Waibel, M (2007). Two Words of Necessity in Icsid Arbitration: Cms and LG&E. Leiden Journal of International Law.20(3), 637-648. DOI:10.1017/S0922156507004293

 

Documents

UN Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development, Paragraph 2, UN DOC.A/RES/42/187 (1987)

UN, Johannesburg Declaration on Sustainable Development, UN Doc. A/CONF.199/20 (2002).

New Delhi Declaration of Principles of International Law Relating to Sustainable Development, 70th ILA Conference (2-6 April, 2002) published as Annex to UN Document A/57/329 (2002).

ILA, Final Conference Report New Delhi 8-12 (2002).

 

Decisions and awards

Alex Genin, Eastern Credit Ltd Inc. and AS Baltoil v. Estonia, ICSID Case No. ARB/99/2 (Award of 25 June 2001).

Biwater Guff (Tanzania) Ltd. vs United Republic of Tanzania, ICSID Case No.ARB/05/22 at Para 592 (Award 24 July 2008).

Duke Energy Electroquil Partners vs Republic of Ecuador, ICSID Case No. ARB/04/19, (Award August 18, 2008).

Eudoro Armando Olguín vs Republic of Paraguay, ICSID Case No. ARB/98/5 (Award 26 July, 2001).

Eiser Infrastructure Limited and Energía Solar Luxembourg S.à r.l. v. Kingdom of Spain, ICSID Case No. ARB/13/36.

Emilio Augustin Maffezini v. Spain, ICSID Case No. ARB/97/7 (Award of 13 November 2000).

EDF (Services) Ltd. vs Romania, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/13, (Award 2 October, 2009).

Genin, Eastern Credit Ltd., Inc. and AS Baltoil vs Republic of Estonia (Genin), (Award 25 June, 2001).

Inceysa Vallisoletane SL v. El Salvador, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/26 (Award of 2 August 2006).

Mondev International Ltd vs United States of America, ICSID Case No. ARB (AF)/99/2, (Award 11 October, 2002)

Metaclad Corporation vs Mexico, ICSID Case No. ARB (AF)/97/1, (Award 30 August, 2000).

MTD Equity Sdn. Bhd. And MTD Chile S.A vs Republic of Chile, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/7 (Award 25 May, 2004).

Neer and Neer (U.S.A.) v. United Mexican States, General Claims Commission US-Mexico, 15 October 1926.

LG&E Energy Corp. vs The Republic of Argentina, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/1, Decision on Liability, (Award October 3, 2006).

Pantechniki SA Contractors and Engineers v. Albania, ICSID Case No. ARB/07/21 (Award of 28 July 2009).

Rumeli Telekom A.S. and Telsim Mobil Telekomikasyon Hizmetleri A.S. vs Kazakhstan, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/16 (Award July 29, 2008).

Robert Azanian vs Mexico, ICSID Case No. ARB (AF)/97/2, (Award 1 November, 1999).

Saluka Investments BV vs Czech Republic, UNCITRAL, at Para 302 (Partial Award 17 March, 2006).

Robert Azinian, Kenneth Davitian, & Ellen Baca v. The United Mexican States, ICSID Case No. ARB (AF)/97/2.

S.D Myers vs Government of Canada, 40 I.L.M 1408, UNCITRAL (Partial Award 12 November, 2000).

Sempra Energy International vs Republic of Argentina, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/16 (Award 28 September, 2007).

Técnicas Medioambientales Tecmed, S.A. vs United Mexican States, ICSID Case No. ARB (AF)/00/02, (Award 29 May, 2003).

The Loewen Group Inc and Raymond L. Loewen vs United States, (Final Award 26 June, 2003).

Urbaser S.A. and Consorcio de Aguas Bilbao Bizkaia, Bilbao Biskaia Ur Partzuergoa v. The Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/07/26.

X vs Central European Republic, Stockholm Chamber of Commerce Case 49/2002, Final Award.