نقش سلاح‌های خودکار مبتنی بر هوش مصنوعی و کنترل انسانی در حقوق بین‌الملل بشردوستانه: چالش یا تعامل؟

منابع

References

af Jochnick, C., & Normand, R. (1994). The impact of technology on international humanitarian law. International Review of the Red Cross, 76(835), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020860400089648

Akerson, D. (2013). The illegality of offensive lethal autonomy. In D. Saxon (Ed.), International humanitarian law and the changing technology of war (pp. 65–87). Leiden: Brill Nijhoff.

Alaee, Saber & Hosseinzadeh, Javad (2022). Analysis of the Independence of Black Box Algorithms in Algorithmic Contracts and Its Legal Consequences. Journal of Legal Studies, 14(1), 251-278. DOI: 10.22099/jls.2022.40211.4340 [In Persian]

Article 36. (2013, April). Killer robots: UK government policy on fully autonomous weapons. London: Article 36. (Retrieved 10 Aban 1402) from: http://www.article36.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Policy_Paper1.pdf

Bhuta, N., Beck, S., & Geiss, R. (2016). Present futures: Concluding reflections and open questions on autonomous weapons systems. In N. Bhuta, S. Beck, R. Geiss, H.-Y. Liu, & C. Kreß (Eds.), Autonomous weapons systems: Law, ethics, policy (pp. 347–375). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bishop, C. M. (2006). Pattern recognition and machine learning. New York: Springer.

Boulanin, V., & Verbruggen, M. (2017). Mapping the development of autonomy in weapon systems. Stockholm: Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.22719.41127

Cummings, M. L. (2006). Automation and accountability in decision support system interface design. Journal of Technology Studies, 32(1), 23–31. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43604352

Curtis E. LeMay Center for Doctrine Development and Education. (2019). Volume 1: Basic doctrine. Montgomery: Curtis E. LeMay Center. (Retrieved 10 Aban 1402) from: https://www.doctrine.af.mil/Portals/61/documents/AFDP_3-0/3-0-AFDP-BASIC-DOCTRINE.pdf

de Spiegeleire, S., Maas, M., & Sweijs, T. (2017). Artificial intelligence and the future of defense: Strategic implications for small- and medium-sized force providers. The Hague: Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI).

Deeks, A., Lubell, N., & Murray, D. (2019). Machine learning, artificial intelligence, and the use of force by states. Journal of National Security Law & Policy, 10(1), 1–34. https://jnslp.com/2019/12/02/machine-learning-artificial-intelligence-and-the-use-of-force-by-states/

Esmaeili, Morteza (2024). The Interplay of Power and the Responsibility to Protect Doctrine; A Case Study of the 2023 Hamas-Israel Conflict. Journal of Legal Studies, 16(1), 43-74. [In Persian]

Gill, T., Fleck, D., Boothby, W., & Vanheusden, A. (2014). Autonomous weapons and international humanitarian law: Challenges and perspectives. Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 19(1), 15–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcsl/kru001

Goose, S. (2014). Autonomous weapons and international humanitarian law: A policy perspective. Geneva: United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR).

Gretton, A. (2017). Legal and ethical issues in AI and autonomous weapons. London: Routledge.

Grut, C. (2013). The challenge of autonomous lethal robotics to international humanitarian law. Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 18(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcsl/krs026

Hassabis, D., & Silver, D. (2017, October 18). AlphaGo Zero: Learning from scratch. DeepMind Blog. (Retrieved 10 Aban 1402) from: https://deepmind.com/blog/alphago-zero-learning-scratch/

Henckaerts, J.-M., & Doswald-Beck, L. (2005). Customary international humanitarian law: A contribution to the understanding and respect for the rule of law in armed conflict. International Review of the Red Cross, 87(857), 51–80. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1816383100181130

Host, P. (2016, November 5). Deep learning analytics develops DARPA deep machine learning prototype. Defense Daily. (Retrieved 10 Aban 1402) from: https://www.defensedaily.com/

Human Rights Watch. (2015). Mind the gap: The lack of accountability for killer robots. New York: Human Rights Watch. (Retrieved 10 Aban 1402) from: https://www.hrw.org/report/2015/04/09/mind-gap/lack-accountability-killer-robots

International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). (2014). Autonomous weapon systems: Technical, military, legal and humanitarian aspects. Geneva: ICRC. (Retrieved 10 Aban 1402) from: https://www.icrc.org/en/document/report-icrc-meeting-autonomous-weapon-systems-26-28-march-2014

Kania, E. B. (2017, June 8). China's quest for an AI revolution in warfare. The Strategy Bridge. (Retrieved 10 Aban 1402) from: https://thestrategybridge.org/the-bridge/2017/6/8/chinas-quest-for-an-ai-revolution-in-warfare

Keller, J. (2015, July 24). DARPA TRACE program using advanced algorithms. Military Aerospace. (Retrieved 10 Aban 1402) from: https://www.militaryaerospace.com/articles/2015/07/hpec-radar-target-recognition.html

Knight, W. (2017). The dark secret at the heart of AI. MIT Technology Review. (Retrieved 10 Aban 1402) from: https://www.technologyreview.com/s/604087/the-dark-secret-at-the-heart-of-ai/

Lant, K. (2017, September 12). China, Russia and the US are in an artificial intelligence arms race. Futurism. (Retrieved 10 Aban 1402) from: https://futurism.com/china-russia-and-the-us-are-in-an-artificial-intelligence-arms-race

Margulies, P. (2017). Making autonomous weapons accountable: Command responsibility for computer-lethal force in armed conflicts. In J. D. Ohlin (Ed.), Research handbook on remote warfare (pp. 405–442). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Marra, W. C., & McNeil, S. K. (2013). Understanding "the loop": Regulating the next generation of war machines. Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 36(3), 1139–1186. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/hjlpp36&i=1153

Matthias, A. (2004). The responsibility gap: Ascribing responsibility for the actions of learning automata. Ethics and Information Technology, 6(3), 175–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-004-3422-1

Mittelstadt, B. D., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S., & Floridi, L. (2016). The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679679

Mosier, K. L., Skitka, L. J., Heers, S., & Burdick, M. (2001). Aircrews and automation bias: The advantages of teamwork? The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 11(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327108IJAP1101_1

Neslage, K. (2015). Does "meaningful human control" have potential for the regulation of autonomous weapon systems? National Security and Armed Conflict Law Review, 6, 151–180. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/nsecar6&i=155

Parsa, Nahid (2024). Inefficiency of Existing Insurance Laws in Accidents Caused by the Independence of Artificial Intelligence (A Case Study of Fully Self-Driving Cars). Journal of Legal Studies, 16(4), 75-108. [In Persian]

Pilloud, C., de Preux, J., Swinarski, C., & Zimmermann, B. (Eds.). (1987). Commentary on the Additional Protocols of 8 June 1977 to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949. Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004277285

Program on Humanitarian Policy and Conflict Resolution. (2010). Autonomous weapons systems: Legal and ethical issues. Cambridge: Harvard University.

Protective Edge. (2015). Report on military operations in Gaza. New York: United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA).

Roff, H. M., & Moyes, R. (2016, April). "Meaningful human control, artificial intelligence and autonomous weapons": Briefing paper prepared for the informal meeting of experts on lethal autonomous weapons systems. London: Article 36. (Retrieved 10 Aban 1402) from: http://www.article36.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/MHC-AI-and-AWS-FINAL.pdf

Scharre, P. (2016, February). Autonomous weapons and operational risk. Washington, D.C.: Center for a New American Security (CNAS). (Retrieved 10 Aban 1402) from: https://s3.amazonaws.com/files.cnas.org/documents/CNAS_Autonomous-weapons-operational-risk.pdf

Scherer, M. U. (2016). Regulating artificial intelligence systems: Risks, challenges, competencies, and strategies. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 29(2), 353–400. https://jolt.law.harvard.edu/assets/articlePDFs/v29/29HarvJLTech353.pdf

Schmitt, M. N. (2013). The use of autonomous weapons systems under international law. Harvard National Security Journal, 4(1), 20–55. https://harvardnsj.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/13/2013/01/Schmitt_Final.pdf

Schmitt, M. N. (2017). Autonomous weapon systems and international humanitarian law: A reconceptualization. Harvard National Security Journal, 8, 1–12. https://harvardnsj.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/13/2017/06/Schmitt-Autonomous-Weapon-Systems-and-IHL.pdf

Schmitt, M. N. (Ed.). (2017). Tallinn manual 2.0 on the international law applicable to cyber operations (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schuller, A. L. (2017). At the crossroads of control: The intersection of artificial intelligence in autonomous weapon systems with international humanitarian law. Harvard National Security Journal, 8(2), 379–435. https://harvardnsj.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/13/2017/11/Schuller-Final.pdf

Silver, D., & Hassabis, D. (2017). AlphaGo Zero: Learning from scratch. DeepMind Blog. (Retrieved 10 Aban 1402) from: https://deepmind.com/blog/alphago-zero-learning-scratch/

Silver, D., Hubert, T., Schrittwieser, J., Antonoglou, I., Lai, M., Guez, A., Lanctot, M., Sifre, L., Kumaran, D., Graepel, T., Lillicrap, T., Simonyan, K., & Hassabis, D. (2018, December 6). AlphaZero: Shedding new light on chess, shogi, and Go. DeepMind Blog. (Retrieved 10 Aban 1402) from: https://deepmind.com/blog/article/alphazero-shedding-new-light-grand-games-chess-shogi-and-go

Simonite, T. (2017, July 19). AI could revolutionize war as much as nukes. WIRED. (Retrieved 10 Aban 1402) from: https://www.wired.com/story/ai-could-revolutionize-war-as-much-as-nukes/

Smith, B. W. (2016). Lawyers and engineers should speak the same robot language. In R. Calo, A. M. Froomkin, & I. Kerr (Eds.), Robot law (pp. 98–117). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Stensmo, M., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1996). Neural networks, autonomous agents, and the law of armed conflict. Journal of Law, Information and Science, 6(2), 45-60. https://doi.org/10.5778/JLIS.1996.6.stensmo.45

Switzerland, Permanent Mission of Switzerland to the United Nations Office and other international organizations in Geneva. (2016, March 30). Towards a "compliance based" approach to LAWS. Geneva: Permanent Mission of Switzerland. (Retrieved 10 Aban 1402) from: https://documents.unoda.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/20160330_Switzerland.pdf

The Economist. (2018, March 15). America v China—The battle for digital supremacy. The Economist. (Retrieved 10 Aban 1402) from: https://www.economist.com/leaders/2018/03/15/the-battle-for-digital-supremacy

Trapp, K. (2013). Great resources mean great responsibility: A framework of analysis for assessing compliance with API obligations in the information age. In D. Saxon (Ed.), International humanitarian law and the changing technology of war (pp. 159–180). Leiden: Brill Nijhoff.

Turner, J. (2018). Robot rules: Regulating artificial intelligence. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Wagner, M. (2014). The dehumanization of international humanitarian law: Legal, ethical, and political implications of autonomous weapon systems. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 47(5), 1371–1424. https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vjtl/vol47/iss5/3 /

Treaties & Judicial

Convention on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Certain Conventional Weapons Which May Be Deemed to Be Excessively Injurious or to Have Indiscriminate Effects (CCW), Protocol III on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Incendiary Weapons, October 10, 1980, 1342 U.N.T.S. 171.

Hague Convention (IV) respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land and its annex: Regulations concerning the Laws and Customs of War on Land, October 18, 1907, 205 Consol. T.S. 277.

International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia. (2000, November 16). Prosecutor v. Delalić et al. (Case No. IT-96-21-T), Judgment.

Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion, 1996 I.C.J. 226 (July 8).

Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Additional Protocol I), June 8, 1977, 1125 U.N.T.S. 3.

Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, July 17, 1998, 2187 U.N.T.S. 90.