مداخله دولت‌ها در بحران‌های زیست‌محیطی: از اصل عدم‌ مداخله تا همبستگی جهانی برای حفاظت از محیط‌زیست

آقایی، قاسم (1383). مداخله بشردوستانه؛ از ممنوعیت تا ضرورت، مجله پژوهش حقوق عمومی، 6(11)، 55-111.

امینیان، محمدرضا (1397). مداخله بشردوستانه شورای امنیت در محیط‌زیست از منظر حقوق بین‌الملل، پژوهش‌نامه حقوق بشری، (14)، 105-132.

پورهاشمی، سیدعباس و پرنده مطلق، اعظم (1396). روش‌های مواجهه با عدم قطعیت علمی در اصل احتیاطی از منظر حقوق بین‌الملل محیط‌زیست، نشریه علوم و تکنولوژی محیط‌زیست، 19(2)، 179-188.

زینالی، بتول، صلاحی، برومند، نوروز پرست، هاجر و مینایی، سمیرا (1400). بررسی ارتباط نوسانات چرخندگی تغییرات اقلیمی بارش‌های شمال غرب ایران (مطالعه موردی: ایستگاه سردشت)، نشریه پژوهش‌های تغییرات آب و هوایی، 2(8)، 35-54.

سالاری، اسما (1399). ارزیابی اثرات زیست‌محیطی فرامرزی در حقوق بین‌الملل، فصلنامه مطالعات حقوق عمومی، 50(4)، 1331-1355.

سلیمی ترکمانی، حجت (1397). از مسئولیت حقوقی دولت‌ها تا مسئولیت اخلاقی آن‌ها در زمینه مقابله با تغییرات آب و هوایی، مجله مطالعات حقوقی، 10(2)، 105-133.

ضیایی، سید یاسر و رشیدی، مهناز (1400). ماهیت و محتوای تعهد به ارزیابی آثار زیست‌محیطی در پرتو رویه قضایی دیوان بین‌المللی دادگستری، مجله مطالعات حقوقی، 13(3)، 131-160.

فرخنده نژاد، سما (1397). تحلیلی بر مبانی فلسفی حقوق بین‌الملل محیط‌زیست، مجله شناخت، 11(2)، 247-262.

فریادی، مسعود (1402). کاهش تولید پسماند در حقوق محیط‌زیست ایران، مجله مطالعات حقوقی، 15(1)، 263-296.

فرزانه، محمدرضا و بنی مصطفی عرب، فائزه (1402). تحلیل قوانین سازگاری با تغییر اقلیم در کشورهای درحال‌توسعه، نشریه پژوهش‌های تغییرات آب و هوایی، 4(13)، 35-54.

محمدی، سیامک، جعفری، محمدجواد و آزاد بخت، فرید (1399). بررسی اصول حقوق بین‌الملل محیط‌زیست در پرتو اختلافات زیست‌محیطی، مجله پژوهش‌های سیاسی و بین‌المللی، 11(45)، 303-323.

نوروزی، میثم و اسکندری خوشگو، مهدی (1403). تبیین کارکرد فناوری بلاک چین در حقوق بین‌الملل محیط‌زیست با تأکید بر مقابله با تغییرات آب و هوایی، مجله مطالعات حقوقی، 16(3)، 425-462.

نوروزی، میثم (1404). مناسبات متقابل حقوق بین‌الملل بشردوستانه و حقوق بین‌الملل کیفری، همدان: مرکز نشر دانشگاه بوعلی سینا.

 

References

Aghaei, G. (2004). Humanitarian intervention from prohibition to necessity, Journal of Public Law Research, 6(11), 55-111. [In Persian]

Aminian, M. R. (2018). Security council humanitarian intervention in the environment from the perspective of International law, Journal of Human Rights Research, (14), 105-132. [In Persian]

Barral, V. (2016). National sovereignty over natural resources: environmental challenges and sustainable development. In: Morgera, E, Kulovesi, K (eds) Research handbook on international law and natural resources, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.

Bendel, J., & Harrison, J. (2017). Determining the legal nature and content of EIAs in International Environmental Law: What does the ICJ decision in the joined Costa Rica v Nicaragua/Nicaragua v Costa Rica cases tell us? QIL, 42, 13-21.

Birnie, P., Boyle, A., & Redgwell, C. (2009). International Law & the Environment, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bogdanova, I. (2022). Unilateral sanctions in international law and the enforcement of human rights: the impact of the principle of common concern of humankind, Leiden: Brill Nijhoff.

Brunnée, J. (2008). Common areas, common heritage, and common concern. In: Bodansky D, Brunnée J, Hey E (eds) The Oxford handbook of international environmental law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Buchan R, & Tsagourias, N. (2017). The crisis in Crimea and the principle of non-intervention, Int Community Law Rev, 19(2–3),165–193.

Corthay, E. (2016). The ASEAN doctrine of non-interference in light of the fundamental principle of non-intervention, Asian-Pacific Law Policy, 17(2),1–41.

Cottier, T. (2021). The principle of common concern of humankind. In: Cottier, T., Ahmad, Z., (eds), The prospects of common concern of humankind in international law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cottier, T., & Matteotti-Berkutova, S. (2009). International environmental law and the evolving concept of ‘common concern of mankind’. In: Cottier, T., Nartova, O., Bigdeli, S., (eds) International trade regulation and the mitigation of climate change: World Trade Forum, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dawidowicz, M. (2007). Public law enforcement without public law safeguards? An analysis of state practice on third-party countermeasures and their relationship to the UN Security Council, Br Yearb Int Law, 77(1),333–418.

Dupuy, P., & Vinuales, J., (2018). International environmental law, 2nd edn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Duvic-Paoli, L., Vinuales, J. (2015). Principle 2. In: Vi ٌ uales J (ed) The Rio Declaration on Environment and Development: a commentary, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Farkhondehnejad, S., Arashpour, A., & Raeisi, L. (2018). An analysis of the philosophical foundations of international environmental law, Philosophical Journal of Knowledge, (79), 247-262. [In Persian]

Faryadi, M. (2023). Minimization of waste production in Iran's environmental law, Journal of LegalStudies, 15(1), 263-296. [In Persian]

Farzaneh, M.R., & Bani Mustafa Arab, F. (2023). Analysis of climate change adaptation laws in developing countries, Climate Change Research Journal, 4(13), 35-54. [In Persian]

Henderson, S. (2019). The evolution of the principle of non-intervention? R2P and overt assistance to opposition groups, GR2P, 11(4), 365–393.

Higgins, P., et al (2013). Protecting the planet: a proposal for a law of ecocide, Crime Law Soc Change, 59(3), 251–266.

Hofer, A., (2017). The developed/developing divide on unilateral coercive measures: legitimate enforcement or illegitimate intervention? Chin J Int Law, 16(2), 175–214.

Jamnejad, M., & Wood, M. (2009). The principle of non-intervention, Leiden J Int Law, 22(2), 345–381.

Joyner, C. (2006). Coercion. Max Planck encyclopaedia of international law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Koivurova, T. (2011). Transboundary Environmental Impact assessment in International Law in Marsden, S. & Koivurova, T. (eds.), Transboundary Environmental Impact Assessment in the European Union: The Espoo Convention and its Kiev Protocol on Strategic Environmental Assessment, London: Earthscan.

Lieblich, E. (2013). International law and civil wars: intervention and consent, London: Routledge.

Mashadi, A., & Kovsari, V. (2020). global environmental pact; From resource inconsistency to the development of UN environmental norms, Journal of Legal Research, 23(90), 59-80. [In Persian]

Milanovic, M. (2023). Revisiting coercion as an element of prohibited intervention in international law, Am J Int Law, 117(4), 601–650.

Mohamadi, S., Jafari, M.J., & Azadbakht, F. (2020). Examining the principles of international environmental law in the light of environmental disputes, Journal of Political and International Research, 11(45), 303-323. [In Persian]

Nakavukaren Schefer, K., & Cottier, T. (2014). Responsibility to protect (R2P) and the emerging principle of common concern. In: Hilpold P (ed) Responsibility to protect: a new paradigm of international law, Leiden: Brill Nijhoff.

Norouzi, M., & Eskandari Khoshguo, M. (2024). Explaining the function of blockchain technology in international environmental law with an emphasis on dealing with climate change, Journal of Legal Studies, 16(3), 425-462. [In Persian]

Norouzi, M. (2025). The interrelationship between international humanitarian law and international criminal law, Hamedan: Bu-Ali Sina University Publishing Center.

O’Connell, M.E. (1992). Enforcing the new international law of the environment, Ger Yearb Int Law, 35, 293–332.

O’Connell, M. E. (2011). The power and purpose of international law: insights from the theory and practice of enforcement, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Proukaki, E. K. (2009). The problem of enforcement in international law: countermeasures, the noninjured state and the idea of international community, London: Routledge.

Pourhashemi, S. A., & Parandeh Mutlaq, A. (2017). Methods of dealing with scientific uncertainty in the precautionary principle from the perspective of international environmental law, environmental science and technology, 19(2), 179-188. [In Persian]

Ruozzi, E., (2017). The Obligation to Undertake an Environmental Assessment in the Jurisprudence of the ICJ: A Principle in Search of Autonomy” European Journal of Risk Regulation, 8(1), 158-169.

Ruys, T. (2017). Sanctions, retortions and countermeasures: concepts and international legal framework, In: Van den Herik L (ed) Research handbook on UN sanctions and international law, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.

Salari, A. (2020). Transboundary Environmental Impact Assessment in International Environmental Law, Public Law Studies Quarterly, 50(4), 1331-1355. [In Persian]

Salimi Torkamani, H. (2017). From the legal responsibility of governments to their moral responsibility in dealing with climate change, Journal of Legal Studies, 10(2), 105-133. [In Persian]

Saluzzo, S. (2021). The principle of non-intervention and the battle over Hong Kong, Quest Int Law, 79:27–51.

Sand, P. (2013). Enforcing CITES: the rise and fall of trade sanctions, Rev Eur Comp Int Environ Law, 22(3):251–263.

Sands, Ph., & Peel, J. (2012). Principles of International Environmental Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tams, C. (2005). Enforcing obligations erga omnes in international law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tams, C. (2011). Individual states as guardians of community interests. In: Fastenrath U, Geiger R, Khan DE, Paulus A, Von Schorlemer S, Vedder C (eds) From bilateralism to community interest: essays in honour of Bruno Simma, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Tay, X. (2022). Reconstructing the principle of non-intervention and non-interference—electoral disinformation, Nicaragua, and the Quilt-work approach, Berkeley J Int Law, 40(1), 39–94.

Tzanakopoulos, A. (2015). The right to be free from economic coercion, Camb Int Law J, 4(3), 616–633.

Valdez, A.I. (2019). Beyond the Arbitral Ruling: A Trans boundary Environmental Impact Assessment in the South China Sea, Asian Journal of International Law, 9, 251-274.

Watts, S. (2015). Low-intensity cyber operations and the principle of non-intervention, Baltic Yearb Int Law Online, 14(1), 137–161

Yang, T. (2019). The Emergence of the Environmental Impact Assessment Duty as a Global Legal Norm and General Principle of Law, HASTINGS LAW JOURNAL, 70, 525-572.

Ziaee, S.Y., & Rashidi, M. (2021). The nature and content of the obligation to environmental impact assessment in the light of the ICJ case law, Journal of Legal Studies, 13(3), 131-160. [In Persian]

Zeinali, B., Salahi, B., & Norouzparast, H. (2021). Investigating the relationship between rotation fluctuations and climatic changes of precipitation in northwest Iran (case study: Sardasht station), Climate Change Research Journal, 2(8), 35-54. [In Persian]

Ziegler, K. (2013). Domaine réservé. Max Planck encyclopaedia of international law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.