بهمئی، محمدعلی و باستانی نامقی، رضا (1399). اصل حاکمیت اراده و محدودیتهای آن در تحصیل دلیل در داوریهای تجاری و سرمایهگذاری بینالمللی، مجله حقوقی بینالمللی، 37(63)، 110-73.
ردفرن، آلن، هانتر، مارتین، بلکابی، نایجل و پارتسایدز، کنستانتین (1400). داوری بینالمللی، مترجم: امیرحسین کوشا، چاپ اول، انتشارات مجد.
سربازیان، مجید، رنجبری، سهیلا (1395)، تعمیم قلمرو موافقتنامه داوری به شخص ثالث و آثار آن، مطالعات حقوقی، 8(2)، 85-59.
صمدی مله، صاحبه و مافی، همایون (1400). کشف حقیقت در داوری تجاری بینالمللی با تکیهبر قواعد پراگ (2018)، مجله حقوق تطبیقی، 8(2)، 258-237.
عابدی، محمدتقی (1385). صلاحیت قضائی و صلاحیت داوری (تحلیلی بر یک رأی صادره در مسئله صلاحیت)، مجله حقوقی، 23(35).
کریمی، محمد، نصیران، داود (1403). تأملی بر نظریه غیر ملی سازی در داوری تجاری بینالمللی، مطالعات حقوقی، 16(2).404-371.
لیو، جولیان دی. ام، مستلیس، لوکاس ای و کرول، استفان ام. (1391). داوری تجاری بینالمللی تطبیقی، ترجمه محمد حبیبی مجنده، چاپ اول، انتشارات دانشگاه مفید.
مافی، همایون و تقیپور، محمدحسین (1396). ماهیت حقوقی نهاد داوری، فصلنامه پژوهش حقوق خصوصی،6(21)، 205-177.
مافی، همایون، فتاحی، علیرضا (1401). اختیارات ذاتی داوران در داوری تجاری بینالمللی، مطالعات حقوقی، 14(3)، 414-385.
محسنی، حسن (1387). عدالت آیینی: پژوهشی پیرامون نظریههای دادرسی عادلانه مدنی، مطالعات حقوق خصوصی، 38(1)، 319-285.
میرشاه پناه، زهرا، مافی، همایون و دارویی، عباسعلی (1402). مطالعه تطبیقی تحصیل دلیل از سوی داور در نظام حقوقی ایران و آمریکا و قواعد کانون وکلای بینالمللی، مجله مطالعات حقوق تطبیقی، 14(1)، 562-540.
References
Abedi, M.T., (2006). Judicial jurisdiction and arbitral jurisdiction (An analysis of a decision on competence). Legal Journal, 23(35), 89-146. [In Persian]
Barto, Jazmyne R., Limiting 28 U.S.C. § 1782: A Changed Landscape for Discovery in Private Commercial Arbitration Abroad, 17 Brook. J. Corp. Fin. & Com. L., 17(2). 57-79.
Behmaei, M.A. & Bastanine-Magham, R., (2020). The principle of party autonomy and its limitations in evidence taking in international commercial and investment arbitration. International Legal Journal, 37(63), pp.73–110. [In Persian]
Bone, Robert G. (2011), Discovery, Procedural Law and Economics (Edward Elgar), 2012, University of Texas Law, Law and Econ Research, No. 208.
Bradshaw, R. (2019), How to Obtain Evidence from Third Parties: A Comparative View, Journal of International Arbitration, 36(5), 629 – 658.
Cordero-Moss, Giuditta, Limits on Party Autonomy in International Commercial Arbitration, Penn State Journal of Law & International Affairs, 4, issue 1, 2015.
Fortese, F. & Hemmi, L. (2015), Procedural Fairness and Efficiency in International Arbitration, Groningen Journal of International Law, 3(1), 110-124.
Holtzoff, A. (1942), Instruments of Discovery Under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Michigan Law Review, 41(2), 205-224.
Junita, F. (2012), Public Policy Exception in International Commercial Arbitration – Promoting Uniform Model Norms, Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal, 5(1), 45-81.
Kankkunen, J. (2014), Document Production under the IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence in International, Master Thesis. University of Helsinki.
Karimi, M. & Nasiran, D., (2024). A reflection on the theory of denationalization in international commercial arbitration. Legal Studies, 16(2), pp.371–404. [In Persian]
Lew, J.D.M., Mistelis, L.A. & Kröll, S.M., (2012). Comparative international commercial arbitration. Translated by M.H. Majandeh. 1st ed. Qom: Mofid University Press. [In Persian]
Mafi, H. & Fattahi, A., (2022). Inherent powers of arbitrators in international commercial arbitration. Legal Studies, 14(3), pp.385–414. [In Persian]
Mafi, H. & Taghipour, M.H., (2017). The legal nature of the institution of arbitration. Quarterly Journal of Private Law Research, 6(21), pp.177–205. [In Persian]
Mafi, H., (2018). A commentary on the Iranian International Commercial Arbitration Act. 2nd ed. Tehran: Judicial Sciences University Press. [In Persian]
Meshel, T. (2021), Closing the Enforcement Gap: Third-Party Discovery Under the FAA and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Niversity of Kansas Law Review, 70(1).
Mirshahpanah, Z., Mafi, H. & Darouei, A., (2023). A comparative study of evidence taking by arbitrators in Iranian and American legal systems and IBA rules. Comparative Legal Studies Journal, 14(1), pp.540–562. [In Persian]
Mohseni, H., (2008). Procedural justice: A study on theories of fair civil trial. Private Law Studies, 38(1), 285–319. [In Persian]
Mu, K. (2022). A Comparative Study on Obtaining Third-Party Evidence in International Arbitration: Taking England and China for Example, Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal, 15(2), 283-328.
Neuhaus, Jospeh E, Finn Andrew J & Blackman, David S. (2023), The 2020 IBA Rules on The Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration: A History and Discussion of the 2020 Revisions, Guide to Evidence in International Arbitration - Second Edition.
O'Malley, Nathan D. & Conway, Shawn C. (2005), Document Discovery in International Arbitration-Getting the Documents You Need, 18(2), 371-383.
Patocchi, P., Party autonomy vs. case management in international arbitration, Banka ve Ticaret Hukuku Araştırma Enstitüsü 2013, 29(2), 127-163.
Pryles, M. (2007). Limits to Party Autonomy in Arbitral Procedur, 24. 3, 327 – 339.
Raess, L. (2020). Court Assistance in the Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration, Ph.D Thesis, University of Freiburg.
Redfern, A., Hunter, M., Blackaby, N. & Partasides, C., (2021). International arbitration. Translated by A. Kousha. 1st ed. Tehran: Mofid Publications. [In Persian]
Rosenberg, S. (2011). Toward a Functional Alternative to Courtroom Adjudication: The Federal Arbitration Act and Third-Party Document Discovery, 79(3), 1333-1365.
Salomon, Claudia T & Fridrich, S. (2018), Witnesses, Subpoenas, Documents and the Relationship Between the FAA and State Law International Arbitration in the United States. Kluwer Law International, 317-357.
Samadi Maleh, S. & Mafi, H., (2021). Fact-finding in international commercial arbitration with an emphasis on the Prague Rules (2018). Comparative Law Journal, 8(2), 237–258. [In Persian]
Sarbazian, M. & Ranjbari, S., (2016). Extension of the scope of arbitration agreement to third parties and its effects. Legal Studies, 8(2), 59–85. [In Persian]
Shapiro, Cliford, J. (2022). Third-Party Discovery in Arbitration. American College of Coverage Counsel 2022 Annual Meeting.
Silberman, L. (2021), Discovery, Arbitration, and 28 U.S.C. §1782, Rules or Standards, NYU School of Law, Public Law Research, 21-21, 293-316.
Smit, Robert H. & Whittaker, Janet M. (2008), 28 U.S.C. § 1782 as A Means of Obtaining Discovery in Aid of International Commercial Arbitration—Applicability and Best Practices, New York City Bar Association, International Commercial Disputes Committee.
Smit, Robert H. & Whittaker, Janet M. (2010). Obtaining Evidence from Non-Parties in International Arbitration in The United States, The American Review of International Arbitration. 20(4).
Speller, D., Schrader, M., Wachtel, S., Dietrich, M., Davies, J., Li, J., Feldner, M. (2022). Obtaining Evidence from Non-Parties in International Arbitration: A Comparative Analysis, Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP.
Vallejo, D. & Romay, E. (2023). Perspectives on Document Disclosure, The Guide to Evidence in International Arbitration - Second Edition.
Weinöhrl-Brüggemann, R., & Catelli, C. (2024). Evidentiary Objections. The Guide to Evidence in International Arbitration - Second Edition.
Wigwe, C. (2012), Commercial Arbitration: Powers and Duties of Arbitrators in Arbitral Proceedings, Port Harcourt Law Journal, 4(2), 242-249.
Wolff, M. (1950). Private International Law, Oxford: Clarendon Press