| تعداد نشریات | 24 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 887 |
| تعداد مقالات | 7,912 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 14,910,631 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 12,671,160 |
Test Fairness in Online Assessment: Insights from Iranian EFL Teachers' Perspective | ||
| Teaching English as a Second Language Quarterly | ||
| دوره 45، شماره 1، 2026، صفحه 81-108 اصل مقاله (1.38 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22099/tesl.2025.52797.3395 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Mohammad Ahmadi Safa* ؛ Fatemeh Ansari | ||
| Department of English, Humanities faculty, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| The widespread integration of technology into education has led to significant reliance on online assessment. Despite its prevalence, concerns about the fairness of online assessment persist. While this issue has attracted considerable attention, empirical investigations, particularly those exploring teachers' perceptions of fairness in online assessment, remain scarce. Additionally, existing frameworks for assessing fairness in an online context seem inadequate. To address these concerns, the current study investigated Iranian English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teachers' perceptions of fairness in online assessment. Moreover, the study aimed to develop a valid scale to measure the fairness of assessment practices in the online context. Employing a mixed-methods approach, the study conducted a structured interview with 20 EFL teachers, and the resulting data were transcribed and analyzed qualitatively. Ten major codes or themes derived from the data were access, knowledge, personal factors, clear criteria, item quality, safety, policies, teaching quality, assessment type, and administration. The codes were subsequently classified into three overarching categories: student level, teacher level, and organizational level. Then, based on the interview findings and the existing literature, an online assessment fairness questionnaire was developed and administered to a sample of 100 EFL teachers, whose results verified five core factors of online assessment fairness. The study's findings offer a novel understanding of teachers' perspectives on the fairness of online assessment and the factors that contribute to its fairness or unfairness. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Online assessment؛ Fairness؛ EFL teachers؛ Iran | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Allen, S., & Kizilcec, R. F. (2023). A systemic model of academic (mis)conduct to curb cheating in higher education. Higher Education, 87(5), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01077-x
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: Author.
Aryadoust, V., Goh, C. C. M, & Kim, L. O. (2011). An investigation of differential item functioning in the MELAB listening test. Language Assessment Quarterly, 8(4), 361–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2011.628632
Azizi, Z. (2022). Fairness in assessment practices in online education: Iranian University English teachers' perceptions. Language Testing in Asia, 12 (14), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-022-00164-7
Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (2010). Language assessment in practice: Developing language assessments and justifying their use in the real world. Oxford University Press.
Beheshti, Sh., & Ahmadi Safa, M. (2023). Reconceptualization of test fairness model: A Grounded Theory approach. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research 11(2),119-146. DOI: 10.30466/ijltr.2023.121333
Bretag, T., Harper, R., Burton, M., Ellis, C., Newton, P., Saddiqui, S., Rozenberg, P., & van Haeringen, K. (2018). Contract cheating: A survey of Australian university students. Studies in Higher Education, 44 (1), 1-20.DOI:10.1080/03075079.2018.1462788
Camilli, G. (2006). Test fairness. In R. L. Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed., pp. 221–256). Praeger
Camilli, G. (2013). Ongoing issues in test fairness. Educational Research and Evaluation, 19(2-3), 104-120. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2013.767602
Cole, N.S., & Zieky, M. J. (2001). The new faces of fairness. Journal of Educational Measurement, 38(4), 369–382. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1111/j.1745-3984.2001.tb01132.x
Comrey, A.L., & Lee, H.B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum
Creswell, J.W., & Poth, C.N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.
Davies, A. (2010). Test fairness: A response. Language Testing, 27(2), 171–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532209349466
Dawson, P., Sutherland-Smith, W., & Dullaghan, K. (2020). CRADLE suggests… academic integrity, assessment security and digital assessment. Centre for Research in Assessment and Digital Learning, Deakin University. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12585443
Denisova-Schmidt, E. (2017). The challenges of academic integrity in higher education: Current trends and prospects. CIHE Perspectives No. 5. The Boston College Center. International Higher Education.
Deygers, B. (2017). Just testing: Applying theories of justice to high-stakes language tests. ITL: International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 168(2), 143–163.
Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methodologies. Oxford University Press.
Eckes, T. (2005) Examining rater effects in Test DaF writing and speaking performance assessments: a many-facet Rasch analysis. Language Assessment Quarterly 2(3), 197–221. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15434311laq0203 2
Educational Testing Service. (2002). ETS standards for quality and fairness. Author.
Elder, C., Knoch, U., Barkhuizen, G., & von Randow, J. (2005). Individual feedback to enhance rater training: Does it work? Language Assessment Quarterly 2 (3), 175–196. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15434311laq0203_1
Fulcher, G. (2009). Test use and political philosophy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 29, 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190509090023
García-Peñalvo, F. J., Corell, A., Abella-García, V., & Grande-de-Prado, M. (2021). Recommendations for mandatory online assessment in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic. In D. Burgos, A. Tlili, & A. Tabacco (Eds.), Radical solutions for education in a crisis context (pp. 85–98). Springer: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7869-4_6
Ghanbari, N., & Nowroozi, S. (2022). Iranian EFL teachers' challenges and coping strategies during COVID-19 pandemic: A case study. The Qualitative Report, 27(3), 605-625. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5066
Hamp-Lyons, L. (2001). Ethics, fairness, and developments in language testing. In C. Elder, A. Brown, E. Grove, K. Hill, N. Iwashita, T. Lumley, T. McNamara, & K. O'Loughlin (Eds.), Experimenting with uncertainty: Essays in honor of Allan Davies (pp. 222-227). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hamp-Lyons, L. (2007). The impact of testing practices on teaching: Ideologies and alternatives. In J. Cummins & C. Davison (Eds.), The international handbook of English language teaching (pp. 487–504). Springer.
Heissel, J. A., Adam, E. K., Doleac, J. L., Figlio, D. N., & Meer, J. (2021). Testing, stress, and performance: How students respond physiologically to high-stakes testing. Education Finance and Policy. 16(2). 183-208. 10.1162/edfp_a_00306.
International Language Testing Association. (2018). Code of ethics for ILTA. http://www.iltaonline.com/code.pdf
Kunnan, A. J. (2000). Fairness and justice for all. In A. J. Kunnan (Ed.), Fairness and validation in language assessment (pp. 1-13). Cambridge University Press.
Kunnan, A. J. (2004). Test fairness. In M. Milanovic & C. Weir (Eds.), European language testing in a global context (pp. 27–48). Cambridge University Press.
Kunnan, A. J. (2008). Towards a model of test evaluation: Using the test fairness and test context frameworks. In L. Taylor & C. Weir (Eds.), Multilingualism and assessment: Achieving transparency, assuring quality, sustaining diversity (pp. 229–251). Cambridge University Press.
Kunnan, A. J. (2010). Test fairness and Toulmin's argument structure. Language Testing, 27(2), 183–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532209349468
Kunnan, A. J. (2018). Evaluating language assessment. Routledge.
Lam, T. C. M. (1995). Fairness in performance assessment (ERIC Digest No. ED391982). ERIC. http://www.ericdigests.org/1996–4/fairness.htm
McMillan, J. H. (2011). Classroom assessment: Principles and practice for effective standards-based instruction (5th ed.). Pearson Education.
McNamara, T., & Roever, C. (2006). Language testing: The social dimension. Blackwell Publishing.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Momeni, A. (2022). Online assessment in times of COVID-19 Lockdown: Iranian EFL teachers' perceptions. International Journal of Language Testing, 12(2), 1-24. doi: 10.22034/ijlt.2022.157122
Mulaik, S. A., James, L. R., Van Alstine, J., Bennett, N., Lind, S., & Stilwell, C. D. (1989). Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. Psychological Bulletin, 105(3), 430-445.
Murdock, T., Miller, A., & Goetzinger, A. (2007). Effects of classroom context on university students' judgments about cheating: Mediating and moderating processes. Social Psychology of Education, 10(2), 141–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-007-9015-1.
Newton, P. M., & Essex, K. (2023). How common is cheating in online exams and did it increase during the COVID-19 pandemic? A systematic review. Journal of Academic Ethics, 22(3), 323-343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-023-09485-5
Perkins, M., Roe, J., Chonua, G. K., & Bhatia, A. (2020). Student perceptions of peer cheating behavior during COVID-19 induced online teaching and assessment. Higher Education Research & Development, 43(6), 966-1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2023.2258820
Rawls, J. (2001) Justice as fairness: A restatement (2nd ed.). Belknap Press.
Russell, M. K., & Airasian, P. W. (2012). Classroom assessment: Concepts and applications (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Sen, A. (2010). The idea of justice. Penguin Books.
Stein, Z. (2016). Social justice and educational measurement: John Rawls, the history of testing and the future of education (1st ed.). Routledge.
Suskie, L. (2002). Fair assessment practices: Giving students equitable opportunities to demonstrate learning. Adventures in Assessment 14, 5-10.
Tierney, R. (2014). Fairness as a multifaceted quality in classroom assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 43, 55-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.12.003
Tierney, R. D. (2016). Fairness in educational assessment. In M. A. Peters (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_400
Tofighi, S., & Ahmadi Safa, M. (2023). Fairness in classroom language assessment from EFL teachers' perspective. Teaching English as a Second Language Quarterly, 42(2), 81-110. Https://doi.org/10.22099/tesl.2023.46825.3173
Volante, L. (2006). Principles for effective classroom assessment. Brock Education Journal, 15(2), 134-147.
Xi, X. (2010). How do we go about investigating test fairness? Language Testing, 27(2), 147–170. http://doi.org/10.1177/0265532209349465 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 385 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 23 |
||