Peer Modeling of Collaborative Writing: Effects on Language and Pair Dynamics

Amirkhiz, S. Y. Y., Bakar, K. A., Abd Samad, A., Baki, R., & Mahmoudi, L. (2013). EFL/ESL learners' language-related episodes (LREs) during performing collaborative writing tasks. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(3), 473–479. https:// doi:10.4304/jltr.4.3.473-479

Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs.

Basterrechea, M., & Leeser, M. J. (2019). Language-related episodes and learner proficiency during collaborative dialogue in CLIL. Language Awareness, 28(2), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2019.1606229

Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36(2), 81–109. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444803001903

Chen, W. (2016). The effect of conversation engagement on L2 learning opportunities. ELT Journal, 71(3), 329–340. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccw075

Chen, W. (2018). Patterns of pair interaction in communicative tasks: The transition process and effect on L2 teaching and learning. ELT Journal, 72(4), 425–434. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccy015

Chen, W., & Hapgood, S. (2019). Understanding knowledge, participation and learning in L2 collaborative writing: A metacognitive theory perspective. Language Teaching Research, 25(2), 256–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168819837560

Chen, W., & Yu, S. (2019). A longitudinal case study of changes in students' attitudes, participation, and learning in collaborative writing. System, 82, 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.03.005

Choi, H., & Iwashita, N. (2016). Interactional behaviours of low-proficiency learners in small group work. In S. Ballinger, & M. Sato (eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp.113–134). John Benjamins.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.

Crookes, G., Chaudron, C. (2001). Guidelines for language classroom instruction. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 29–42). Heinle & Heinle, Boston.

Dao, P., & McDonough, K. (2017). The effect of task role on Vietnamese EFL learners' collaboration in mixed proficiency dyads. System, 65, 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.12.012

Dao, P., & McDonough, K. (2018). Effect of proficiency on Vietnamese EFL learners' engagement in peer interaction. International Journal of Educational Research, 88, 60–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2018.01.008

de la Colina, A. A. & García Mayo, M. (2007). Attention to form across collaborative tasks by low-proficiency learners in an EFL setting. In M. García Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp. 91–116). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853599286-008

Fernandez Dobao, A. F. (2012). Collaborative writing tasks in the L2 classroom: Comparing group, pair, and individual work. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 40–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2011.12.002

Firth, A., & Wagner, J. (1997). On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research. The Modern Language Journal, 81(3), 285–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1997.tb05480.x

Galton, M. & Williamson, J. (1992). Group work in the primary classroom. Routledge.

Garcı´a Mayo, M. P. (2002). The effectiveness of two form-focused tasks in advanced EFL pedagogy. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(2), 156–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/1473-4192.t01-1-00029

Gibbons, P. (2002). Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning: Teaching second language learners in the mainstream classroom. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Kachur, R., & Prendergast, C. (1997). A closer look at authentic interaction: Profiles of teacher–student talk in two classrooms. In M. Nystrand (Ed.), Opening dialogue: Understanding the dynamics of language and learning in the English classroom (pp. 75–88). Teachers College Press.

Kim, Y. (2008). The contribution of collaborative and individual tasks to the acquisition of L2 vocabulary. The Modern Language Journal, 92, 114–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00690.x

Kim, Y. (2013). Effects of pretask modeling on attention to form and question development. TESOL Quarterly, 47(1), 8–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.52

Kim, Y. H. (2020). Willingness to engage: The importance of what learners bring to pair work. Language let

, 29(2), 134–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2020.1743712

Kim, Y., & McDonough, K. (2008). The effect of interlocutor proficiency on the collaborative dialogue between Korean as a second language learners. Language Teaching Research, 12(2), 211–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168807086288

Kim, Y., & McDonough, K. (2011). Using pretask modelling to encourage collaborative learning opportunities. Language Teaching Research, 15(2), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810388711

Kowal, M., & Swain, M. (1994). Using collaborative language production tasks to promote students' language awareness. Language Awareness, 3(2), 73–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.1994.9959845

Kowal, M., & Swain, M. (1997). From semantic to syntactic processing: How can we promote metalinguistic awareness in the French immersion classroom? In R. Johnson & M. Swain (Eds.), Immersion education: International perspectives (pp. 284–309). Cambridge University Press.

Kramsch, C. J. (1985). Classroom interaction and discourse options. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7(2), 169–183. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100005350

Leeser, M. J. (2004). Learner proficiency and focus on form during collaborative dialogue. Language Teaching Research, 8, 55–81. https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168804lr134oa

Li, N., & Liu, Y. (2022). Effects of dyadic patterns and proficiency pairing on Chinese EFL learners' second language learning in collaborative writing. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1004924. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1004924

Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). Academic Press.

McDonough, K. (2004). Learner-learner interaction during pair and small group activities in a Thai EFL context. System, 32(2), 207–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.01.003

McDonough, K. & Sunitham, W. (2009). Collaborative dialogue between Thai EFL learners during self-access computer activities. TESOL Quarterly, 43(2), 231–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2009.tb00166.x

Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children's thinking: A sociocultural approach. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203946657

Nassaji, H., & Tian. J. (2010). Collaborative and individual output tasks and their effects on learning English phrasal verbs. Language Teaching Research, 14, 397–419. doi:10.1177/1362168810375364.

Philp, J., Walter, S., & Basturkmen, H. (2010). Peer interaction in the foreign language classroom: What factors foster a focus on form? Language Awareness, 19, 261–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2010.516831

Rostami Darounkola, E., Yaqubi, B., & Khonamri, F. (2022). Teaching collaborative ground rules through peer modeling: Changes in pair participatory patterns. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 10(1), 57–79. https://doi.org./ https://doi.org/10.30466/ijltr.2022.121122

Rostami Darounkola, E., Yaqubi, B., & Khonamri, F. (2024). Cultivating active engagement in pair work through peer modelling. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 34(3), 972–990. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12545

Schunk, D. H. (1987). Peer modeling. In K. Topping, & S. Ehly, (Eds.), Peer-assisted learning (pp.185–198). Routledge.

Storch, N. (2001). How collaborative is pair work? ESL tertiary students composing in pairs. Language Teaching Research, 5, 29–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/136216880100500103

Storch, N. (2002a). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52, 119–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00179

Storch, N. (2002b). Relationships formed in dyadic interaction and an opportunity for learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 37 (3–4), 305–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00007-7

Storch, N. (2004). Using activity theory to explain differences in patterns of dyadic interactions in an ESL class. Canadian Modern Language Review, 60(4), 457–480. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.60.4.457

Storch, N. (2008). Metatalk in a pair work activity: Level of engagement and implications for language development. Language Awareness, 17 (2), 95–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410802146644

Storch, N., & Aldosari, A. (2013). Pairing learners in a pair work activity. Language Teaching Research, 17(1), 31–48. https://doi.org/: 10.1177/1362168812457530

Suzuki, W. & Itagaki, N. (2007). Learner metalinguistic reflections following output-oriented and reflective activities. Language Awareness, 16(2), 131–46. https://doi.org/10.2167/la392.0

Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–53). Newbury House.

Swain, M. (1998). Focus on form through conscious reflection. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 64–81). Cambridge University Press.

Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 320–337. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01209.x

Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2002). Talking it through: Two French immersion learners' response to reformulation. International journal of educational research, 37(3–4), 285–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00006-5

Swain, M., & Watanabe, Y. (2013). Languaging: Collaborative dialogue as a source of second language learning. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, 3218–3225.

Tharp, R. G., & Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning, and schooling in a social context. Cambridge University Press.

Thornbury, S. (2005). How to teach speaking. Pearson Education Limited.

Van Lier, L. (1996). Interaction in the language curriculum: Awareness, autonomy, and authenticity. Longman.

Wegerif, R., & Mercer, N. (1996). Using computer-based text analysis to integrate qualitative and quantitative methods in research on collaborative learning. Language and Education, 11(4), 271-286. doi:10.1080/09500789708666733

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Walsh, S. (2011). Exploring classroom discourse: Language in action. Routledge.

Watanabe, Y. (2008). Peer–peer interaction between L2 learners of different proficiency levels: Their interactions and reflections. Canadian Modern Language Review, 64, 605–635. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.64.4.605

Watanabe, Y., & Swain, M. (2007). Effects of proficiency differences and patterns of pair interaction on second language learning: Collaborative dialogue between adult ESL learners. Language Teaching Research, 11, 121–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/136216880607074599

Williams, J. (1999). Learner-generated attention to form. Language Learning, 49 (4), 303–346. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00103

Yule, G., & Macdonald, D. (1990). Resolving referential conflicts in L2 interaction: The effect of proficiency and interactive role. Language Learning, 40(4), 539–556. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1990.tb00605.x

Zabihi, R. (2022). The effects of task type on the resolution of grammatical cognitive conflict episodes and grammar learning. The Language Learning Journal, 50(3), 297–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2020.1795913

Zabihi, R., & Ghahramanzadeh, B. (2022). Proficiency pairing and engagement with language in L2 peer interaction. System, 105, 102725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102725

Zhang, M. (2019). A re-examination of pair dynamics and L2 learning opportunities in collaborative writing. Language Teaching Research, 26(1), 10–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168819890949