Unmasking Inconsistency in Relative Clause Ambiguity Research: A Systematic Methodological Review

Ackerman, L. M. (2019). Syntactic and cognitive issues in investigating gendered coreference. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 4(1),117. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.721 

Acuña-Fariña, J. C. (2016). (A few) psycholinguistic properties of the NP. In K. Davidse (Ed.), The structure of the English NP: Synchronic and diachronic explorations. Functions of language, (pp. 120-141). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.23.1.01acu  

Aguilar, M., Ferré, P., Hinojosa, J. A., Gavilán, J. M., & Demestre, J. (2022). Locality and attachment preferences in preverbal versus post-verbal Relative Clauses. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 37(10), 1303-1310. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2022.2066701

Alonso-Pascua, B. (2020). New evidence on the pseudorelative-first hypothesis: Spanish attachment preferences revisited. Topics in Linguistics, 21(1), 15-44. https://doi.org/10.2478/topling-2020-0002

American Educational Research Association. (2006). Standards for reporting on empirical social science research in AERA publications. Educational Researcher, 35(6), 33-40. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X035006033

Amini Farsani, M., & Babaii, E. (2020). Applied linguistics research in three decades: A methodological synthesis of graduate theses in an EFL context. Quality & Quantity, 54(4), 1257-1283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-020-00984-w

Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Irvine, C. K., & Walker, D. A. (2019). Introduction to research in education (10^th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Azadnia, M. (2024). ChatGPT-assisted language learning and teaching: A Scoping review of research on ChatGPT use in L2 pedagogy and education. Teaching English as a Second Language Quarterly (Formerly Journal of Teaching Language Skills), 43(2), 49-85. https://doi.org/10.22099/tesl.2024.49169.3250

Bakken, S. (2019). The journey to transparency, reproducibility, and replicability. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 26(3), 185-187. http://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocz007

Ballot, C., Robert, C., & Mathey, S. (2022). Word imageability influences the emotionality effect in episodic memory. Cognitive Processing, 23(4), 655-660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-022-01102-4

Başer, Z. (2018). Syntactic priming of relative clause attachment in monolingual Turkish speakers and Turkish learners of English [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Middle East Technical University. https://open.metu.edu.tr/bitstream/handle/11511/27252/index.pdf 

Başer, Z. (2019). A universal parser or language specific parsing strategies: A study on relative clause attachment preference in Turkish. RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, (16), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.648403 

Başer, Z., & Hohenberger, A. (2020). Is there a particular RC attachment preference in Turkish? Negotiating the effects of semantic factors. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 49(4), 511–539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-020-09698-4

Bezerra, G. B., Leitão, M. M., & Medeiros, L. D. S. N. (2017). The influence of referentiality on relative clause processing in Brazilian Portuguese. Revista de Estudos da Linguagem, 25(3), 1397-1431. http://oaji.net/articles/2019/3404-1557494834.pdf

Bidaoui, A., Foote, R., & Abunasser, M. (2016). Relative clause attachment in native and L2 Arabic. International Journal of Arabic Linguistics, 2(2), 75-95.

Boegle, R., Gerb, J., Kierig, E., Becker-Bense, S., Ertl-Wagner, B., Dieterich, M., & Kirsch, V. (2021). Intravenous delayed gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging of the endolymphatic space: a methodological comparative study. Frontiers in Neurology, 12, 360. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.647296

Brooks, J. L. (2012). Counterbalancing for serial order carryover effects in experimental condition orders. Psychological Methods, 17(4), 600–614. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029310

Brysbaert, M. (2019). How many participants do we have to include in properly powered experiments? A tutorial of power analysis with reference tables. Journal of Cognition, 2(1), 16. http://doi.org/10.5334/joc.72

Byrnes, H. (2013). Notes from the editor. Modern Language Journal, 97, 825–827. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12051.x

Caplan, D., Alpert, N., & Waters, G. (1998). Effects of syntactic structure and propositional number on patterns of regional cerebral blood flow. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10(4), 541-552. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892998562843 

Carreiras, M., & Clifton, C. (1993). Relative clause interpretation preferences in Spanish and English. Language and Speech, 36(4), 353-372. https://doi.org/10.1177/002383099303600401 

Carreiras, M., & Clifton, C. (1999). Another word on parsing relative clauses: Eyetracking evidence from Spanish and English. Memory & Cognition, 27(5), 826-833. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03198535 

Carreiras, M., Betancort, M., & Meseguer, E. (2001, March). Relative clause attachment in Spanish: Do readers use different strategies when disambiguating by gender and number [Poster presentation]. Presented at the 14^th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.

Chaix-Couturier, C., Durand-Zaleski, I., Jolly, D., & Durieux, P. (2000). Effects of financial incentives on medical practice: results from a systematic review of the literature and methodological issues. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 12(2), 133-142.

Clahsen, H., & Felser, C. (2006). Grammatical processing in language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27(1), 3-42. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716406060024

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539

Cooke, R. (2024). Meta-Analysis for Psychologists. Springer Nature Switzerland.

Cotter, B.T., Ferreira, F. (2024). The relationship between working memory capacity, bilingualism, and ambiguous relative clause attachment. Memory and Cognition, 52, 1530–1547. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-024-01561-4  

Crowther, D., Kim, S., Lee, J., Lim, J., & Loewen, S. (2021). Methodological synthesis of cluster analysis in second language research. Language Learning, 71(1), 99-130. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12428

Cuetos, F., & Mitchell, D. C. (1988). Cross-linguistic differences in parsing: Restrictions on the use of the late closure strategy in Spanish. Cognition, 30(1), 73-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(88)90004-2

De Vincenzi, M., & Job, R. (1995). An investigation of late closure: The role of syntax, thematic structure, and pragmatics in initial interpretation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(5), 1303. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.21.5.1303

DeKeyser, R. M. (2005). What makes learning second-language grammar difficult? A review of issues. Language learning, 55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00294.x

Delle Luche, C., van Gompel, R. P., Gayraud, F., & Martinie, B. (2006, August). Effect of relative pronoun type on relative clause attachment [Paper presentation]. Presented at the Ambiguity in Anaphora Workshop Proceedings, Málaga, Spain.

Deniz, N. D. (2022). Processing syntactic and semantic information in the L2: Evidence for differential cue-weighting in the L1 and L2. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 25(5), 713-725. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728921001140

Desmet, T., & Declercq, M. (2006). Cross-linguistic priming of syntactic hierarchical configuration information. Journal of Memory and Language, 54(4), 610–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.12.007

Desmet, T., De Baecke, C., & Brysbaert, M. (2002). The influence of referential discourse context on modifier attachment in Dutch. Memory & Cognition, 30(1), 150-157. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195274

Desmet, T., De Baecke, C., Drieghe, D., Brysbaert, M., & Vonk, W. (2006). Relative clause attachment in Dutch: On-line comprehension corresponds to corpus frequencies when lexical variables are taken into account. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21(4), 453-485. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960400023485

Dhivyadeepa, E. (2015). Sampling techniques in educational research. Lulu.

Dinçtopal-Deniz, N. (2010). Relative clause attachment preferences of Turkish L2 speakers of English. In B. VanPatten, & J. Jegerski (Eds.), Research in second language processing and parsing, (pp. 27-63). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.53.02din

Dussias, P. E. (2003). Syntactic ambiguity resolution in L2 learners: Some effects of bilinguality on L1 and L2 processing strategies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25(4), 529-557. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263103000238 

Dussias, P. E., & Sagarra, N. (2007). The effect of exposure on syntactic parsing in Spanish–English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(1), 101-116. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728906002847 

Errichiello, D. (2021). Shall I take the high node? Cross-linguistic structural priming of relative clause attachment in Italian-English late bilinguals [Master’s thesis]. Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.

Farsani, M. A., Jamali, H. R., Beikmohammadi, M., Ghorbani, B. D., & Soleimani, L. (2021). Methodological orientations, academic citations, and scientific collaboration in applied linguistics: What do research synthesis and bibliometrics indicate?. System, 100, 102547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102547

Felser, C., Roberts, L., Marinis, T., & Gross, R. (2003). The processing of ambiguous sentences by first and second language learners of English. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24(3), 453-489. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716403000237

Fernández, E. M. (1999). Processing strategies in second language acquisition: Some preliminary results. In E. C. Klein & G. Martohardjono (Eds.), The development of second language grammars: A generative approach (pp. 217-239). Amsterdam, NL: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.18.12fer 

Fernández, E. M. (2003). Bilingual sentence processing: Relative clause attachment in English and Spanish. John Benjamins. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263104320048 

Ferreira, F., & Clifton Jr, C. (1986). The independence of syntactic processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 25(3), 348-368. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(86)90006-9

Fine, A. B., Jaeger, T. F., Farmer, T. A., & Qian, T. (2013). Rapid expectation adaptation during syntactic comprehension. PloS One, 8(10), e77661. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077661

Fitzner, K. (2007). Reliability and validity a quick review. The Diabetes Educator, 33(5), 775-780. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145721707308172

Frenck-Mestre, C., & Pynte, J. (1997). Syntactic ambiguity resolution while reading in second and native languages. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 50(1), 119-148.

García-Orza, J., Gavilán, J. M., Fraga, I., & Ferré, P. (2017). Testing the online reading effects of emotionality on relative clause attachment. Cognitive Processing, 18(4), 543-553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-017-0811-z 

Gardini, S., De Beni, R., & Cornoldi, C. (2003). Can we have an image of a concept? The generation process of general and specific mental images. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 23(2), 193–200. https://doi.org/10.2190/j7qc-t5cg-5fkw-xcmx

Gilboy, E., Sopena, J. M., Clifton Jr., C., & Frazier, L. (1995). Argument structure and association preferences in Spanish and English complex NPs. Cognition, 54(2), 131-167.

Gorgolewski, K. J., & Poldrack, R. A. (2016). A practical guide for improving transparency and reproducibility in neuroimaging research. PLoS Biology, 14(7), e1002506.

Grillo, A., Tomaz, M., Gomes, M. D. C. L., & Santi, A. (2013). Pseudo Relatives vs. Relative Clauses [Poster presentation]. Presented at the 19^th Annual Conference on Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing (AMLaP), Marseille, France.

Hansen, M., & Hessmann, J. (2015). Researching linguistic features of text genres in a DGS corpus: The case of finger loci. Sign Language & Linguistics, 18(1), 1-40. http://doi.org/10.1075/sll.18.1.01han 

Havik, E., Roberts, L., Van Hout, R., Schreuder, R., & Haverkort, M. (2009). Processing subject‐object ambiguities in the L2: A self‐paced reading study with German L2 learners of Dutch. Language Learning, 59(1), 73-112. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00501.x  

He, X., Chen, P., Wu, J., & Dong, Z. (2021). Deep learning-based teaching strategies of ideological and political courses under the background of educational psychology. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 731166. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.731166 

Hemforth, B., Fernández, S., Clifton Jr., C., Frazier, L., Konieczny, L., & Walter, M. (2015). Relative clause attachment in German, English, Spanish and French: Effects of position and length. Lingua, 166, 43-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2015.08.010 

Hopp, H. (2020). Morphosyntactic adaptation in adult L2 processing: Exposure and the processing of case and tense violations. Applied Psycholinguistics, 41(3), 627-656. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716420000119

Hou, Z., & Aryadoust, V. (2021). A review of the methodological quality of quantitative mobile-assisted language learning research. System, 100, 102568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102568

Huang, Y., & Ferreira, F. (2020). The application of signal detection theory to acceptability judgments. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 73. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00073 

Igoa, J. M., Carreiras, M., & Meseguer, E. (1998). A study on late closure in Spanish: Principle-grounded vs. frequency-based accounts of attachment preferences. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 51(3), 561-592. https://doi.org/10.1080/713755775

James, A. N., Fraundorf, S. H., Lee, E. K., & Watson, D. G. (2018). Individual differences in syntactic processing: Is there evidence for reader-text interactions?. Journal of Memory and Language, 102, 155-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2018.05.006

Jegerski, J. (2014). Self-Paced Reading. In B. VanPatten & J. Jegerski (Eds.), Research methods in second language psycholinguistics (pp. 20–49). Routledge.

Jessen, F., Heun, R., Erb, M., Granath, D. O., Klose, U., Papassotiropoulos, A., & Grodd, W. (2000). The concreteness effect: Evidence for dual coding and context availability. Brain and Language, 74(1), 103-112. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.2000.2340 

Just, M. A., & Brownell, H. H. (1974). Retrieval of concrete and abstract prose descriptions from memory. Canadian Journal of Psychology / Revue Canadienne de Psychologie, 28(3), 339-350. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0082000 

Kaan, E., & Chun, E. (2018). Syntactic adaptation. In K. D. Federmeier & D. G. Watson (Eds.), Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 68, pp. 85-116). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.plm.2018.08.003

Kane, J. E., & Webster, G. D. (2013). Heuristics and biases that help and hinder scientists: toward a psychology of scientific judgment and decision making. In G. J. Feist, & M. E. Gorman (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of science, (pp. 437-459). Springer Publishing Company.

Kantola, L., van Gompel, R. P., & Wakeford, L. J. (2023). The head or the verb: Is the lexical boost restricted to the head verb?. Journal of Memory and Language, 129, 104388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2022.104388   

Karimi, M. N., Samadi, E., & Babaii, E. (2021). Relative Clause Attachment Ambiguity Resolution in L1-Persian Learners of L2 English: The Effects of Semantic Priming and Proficiency. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, 8(3), 153-185. http://doi.org/10.30479/jmrels.2020.13469.1666 

Keating, G. D., & Jegerski, J. (2015). Experimental designs in sentence processing research: A methodological review and user’s guide. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37(1), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263114000187 

Keleş, U. (2022). Autoethnography as a recent methodology in applied linguistics: A methodological review. Qualitative Report, 27(2). https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5131

Kim, J. H., & Christianson, K. (2013). Sentence complexity and working memory effects in ambiguity resolution. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 42(5), 393-411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-012-9224-4 

Kim, J. H., & Christianson, K. (2017). Working memory effects on L1 and L2 processing of ambiguous relative clauses by Korean L2 learners of English. Second Language Research, 33(3), 365-388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658315623322 

Kotek, H., Babinski, S., Dockum, R., & Geissler, C. (2020). Gender representation in linguistic example sentences. Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America, 5(1), 514-528. http://doi.org/10.3765/plsa.v5i1.4723 

Kristjansson, A., & Sigurdardottir, H. M. (2022). The role of visual factors in dyslexia. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/n8xer 

Kwon, N., Ong, D., Chen, H., & Zhang, A. (2019). The role of animacy and structural information in relative clause attachment: evidence from Chinese. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1576. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01576 

Lee, E. K., & Garnsey, S. M. (2015). An ERP study of plural attraction in attachment ambiguity resolution: Evidence for retrieval interference. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 36, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2015.04.004 

Li, S., & Wang, H. (2018). Traditional literature review and research synthesis. In A. Phakiti, P. De Costa, L. Plonsky, & S. Starfield (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of applied linguistics research methodology (pp. 123-144). Springer.

Lim, J. H., & Christianson, K. (2013). Second language sentence processing in reading for comprehension and translation. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(3), 518-537. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728912000351 

Lindsay, D. S. (2020). Seven steps toward transparency and replicability in psychological science. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 61(4), 310-317. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000222 

Liu, Q., & Brown, D. (2015). Methodological synthesis of research on the effectiveness of corrective feedback in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 30, 66-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.08.011

Logačev, P., & Vasishth, S. (2016). A multiple‐channel model of task‐dependent ambiguity resolution in sentence comprehension. Cognitive Science, 40(2), 266-298. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12228 

Lowder, M. W., & Gordon, P. C. (2021). Relative clause effects at the matrix verb depend on type of intervening material. Cognitive Science, 45(9), e13039. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13039

Mahmoodi, M. H., & Sheykholmoluki, H. (2022). Working Memory Capacity and Semantic-Morphosyntactic Competition: A Comparison of L1 and L2 Sentence Processing. Two Quarterly Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning University of Tabriz, 14(29), 79-98. http://doi.org/10.22034/elt.2022.50559.2481

Mahmoodi, M. H., Sheykholmoluki, H., Zoghipaydar, M. R., & Shahsavari, S. (2022). Working memory capacity and relative clause attachment preference of Persian EFL learners: Does segmentation play any role? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 51, 683–706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-021-09825-9

Malone, A., & Mauner, G. (2020). Syntactic adaptation for reduced relative clauses is not reducible to task adaptation [Poster presentation]. Presented at the 33^rd annual CUNY Conference, Davis, California, USA. https://osf.io/wq2g7/download 

Mardani, M., & Modarres, M. (2023). The effects of age, presentation mode (online, offline), and segmentation of ambiguous sentences on attachment preferences of female EFL learners. European Journal of English Language Teaching, 8(1). http://doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v8i1.4695

Marefat, H., & Abdollahnejad, E. (2014). Acquisition of English relative clauses by adult Persian learners: Focus on resumptive pronouns. Teaching English as a Second Language Quarterly (Formerly Journal of Teaching Language Skills), 32(4), 19-40. https://doi.org/10.22099/jtls.2014.1858

Marefat, H., & Farzizadeh, B. (2018). Relative clause ambiguity resolution in L1 and L2: Are processing strategies transferred? Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics (IJAL), 21(1), 125-161.

Marefat, H., Samadi, E., & Yaseri, M. (2015). Semantic priming effect on relative clause attachment ambiguity resolution in L2. Applied Research on English Language, 4(2), 78-95. https://doi.org/10.22108/are.2015.15504 

Marinis, T. (2010). Using on-line processing methods in language acquisition research. In E. Blom & S. Unsworth (Eds.), Experimental methods in language acquisition research (pp. 139-162). John Benjamins.

Maroof, D. A. (2012). Statistical methods in neuropsychology: Common procedures made comprehensible. Springer.

Marsden, E. (2020). Methodological transparency and its consequences for the quality and scope of research. In J. McKinley & H. Rose (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of research methods in applied linguistics (pp. 15-28). Routledge.

Marsden, E., Plonsky, L., Gudmestad, A., & Edmonds, A. (2018). Data, open science, and methodological reform in second language acquisition research. In C. G. Mayo (Ed.), Critical reflections on data in second language acquisition (pp. 219-228). Multilingual Matters.

Marsden, E., Thompson, S., & Plonsky, L. (2017). Open science in second language acquisition research:  The IRIS repository of research materials and data. In C. Granget, M-A. Dat, D. Guedat-Bittighof- fer, & C. Cuet (Eds.), Connaissances et Usages en L2/Knowledge and usage in L2: SHS web of conferences (Vol. 38). https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20173800013

Marsden, E., Thompson, S., & Plonsky, L. (2018). A methodological synthesis of self-paced reading in second language research. Applied Psycholinguistics, 39(5), 861-904. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716418000036

Matić, A., & Kovačević, M. (2022). Challenges of Different Approaches and Methodologies in Psycholinguistics: The Example of an RC Attachment Preference Study in Croatian. In J. Gervain, G. Csibra, K. Kovács (Eds.), A Life in Cognition: Studies in Cognitive Science in Honor of Csaba Pléh (pp. 125-136). Springer.

Mellor, D., Vazire, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (2018). Transparent science: A more credible, reproducible, and publishable way to do science. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Guide to publishing in psychology journals (pp. 219-237). Cambridge University Press.

Melnyk, B. M., & Morrison-Beedy, D. (2012). Intervention research: Designing, conducting, analyzing, and funding. Springer.

Mendelsohn, A., & Pearlmutter, N. J. (1999). Individual differences in relative clause attachment ambiguities [Poster presentation]. Presented at the 12^th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, New York City, USA.

Miguel, E., Camerer, C., Casey, K., Cohen, J., Esterling, K. M., Gerber, A., Glennerster, R., Green, D. P., Humphreys, M., Imbens, G., Laitin, D., Madon, T. Nelson, L., Nosek, B. A., Petersen, M., Sedlmayr, R., Simmons, J. P., Simonsohn, U., Van der Laan. M. (2014). Promoting transparency in social science research. Science, 343(6166), 30-31. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1245317 

Miller, S. D., & Smith, D. E. P. (1985). Differences in literal and inferential comprehension after reading orally and silently. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(3), 341–348.

Miller, S. D., & Smith, D. E. P. (1990). Relations among oral reading, silent reading and listening comprehension of students at differing competency levels. Reading Research and Instruction, 29(2), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388079009558006

Miyao, M., & Omaki, A. (2006). No ambiguity about it: Korean learners of Japanese have a clear attachment preference [Paper presentation]. Presented at the 30^th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Boston, USA.

Moon, N., & Yun, H. (2021). The Role of Honorific Agreement in the Resolution of Relative Clause Attachment Ambiguity. 영어영문학, 26(4), 23-53. https://doi.org/10.46449/MJELL.2021.11.26.4.23

Morea, N., & Ghanbar, H. (2024). Q methodology in applied linguistics: A systematic research synthesis. System, 120, 103194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103194  

Nakanishi, T. (2015). A meta‐analysis of extensive reading research. TESOL Quarterly, 49(1), 6-37. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.157

Nakano, Y. (2009). The influence of proficiency levels on resolving ambiguous relative-clause attachments in German as a second language. 言語と文化, (12), 55-69.

Nestor, P. G., & Schutt, R. K. (2018). Research methods in psychology: Investigating human behavior. Sage Publications.

Norouzian, R. (2021). Interrater reliability in second language meta-analyses: The case of categorical moderators. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43(4), 896-915. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263121000061 

Nosek, B. A., Hardwicke, T. E., Moshontz, H., Allard, A., Corker, K. S., Dreber, A., Fidler, F., Hilgard, J., Struhl, M. K., Nuijten, M. B., Rohrer, J. M., Romero, F., Scheel, A. M., Scherer, L. D., Schönbrodt, F. D., & Vazire, S. (2022). Replicability, robustness, and reproducibility in psychological science. Annual Review of Psychology, 73, 719-748. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-020821-114157

O’Brien, B. A., Wallot, S., Haussmann, A., & Kloos, H. (2014). Using complexity metrics to assess silent reading fluency: A cross-sectional study comparing oral and silent reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(4), 235-254. http://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.862248 

Omaki, A. (2005). Working memory and relative clause attachment in first and second language processing [Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of Hawaii.

Øby, E. (2024). Assessing transparency and methodological precision in variable measurement within organizational research: implications for validity. Quality & Quantity, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-024-01991-x

Osterlind, S. J., & Everson, H. T. (2009). Differential item functioning (2^nd ed.). Sage Publications.

Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie, 45(3), 255–287. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0084295 

Papadopoulou, D. (2006). Cross-linguistic variation in sentence processing: Evidence from RC attachment preferences in Greek. Springer.

Papadopoulou, D., & Clahsen, H. (2003a). Parsing strategies in L1 and L2 sentence processing: A study of relative clause attachment in Greek. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25(4), 501-528. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263103000214

Papadopoulou, D., & Clahsen, H. (2003b). The role of lexical and contextual information in parsing ambiguous sentences in Greek. Working Paper. Essex Research Reports in Linguistics, University of Essex, Colchester, UK. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228362839 

Pigott, T. (2012). Advances in meta-analysis. Springer Science & Business Media.

Plonsky, L. (2013). Study quality in SLA: An assessment of designs, analyses, and reporting practices in quantitative L2 research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(4), 655-687. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263113000399

Plonsky, L. (2014). Study quality in quantitative L2 research (1990–2010): A methodological synthesis and call for reform. The Modern Language Journal, 98(1), 450-470. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2014.12058.x

Plonsky, L., & Gonulal, T. (2015). Methodological synthesis in quantitative L2 research: A review of reviews and a case study of exploratory factor analysis. Language Learning, 65(S1), 9-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12111 

Plonsky, L., & Kim, Y. (2016). Task-based learner production: A substantive and methodological review. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 73-97. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190516000015

Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L. (2015). Meta-analyzing second language research. In L. Plonsky (Ed.), Advancing quantitative methods in second language research (pp. 106-128). Routledge.

Plonsky, L., Hu, Y., Sudina, E., & Oswald, F. L. (2023). Advancing Meta-Analytic Methods in L2 Research. In A. Mackey, S. M. Gass (Eds.), Current Approaches in Second Language Acquisition Research: A Practical Guide (pp. 304-333). John Wiley & Sons.

Plonsky, L., Marsden, E., Crowther, D., Gass, S. M., & Spinner, P. (2020). A methodological synthesis and meta-analysis of judgment tasks in second language research. Second Language Research, 36(4), 583-621. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658319828413

Prasad, G., & Linzen, T. (2021). Rapid syntactic adaptation in self-paced reading: Detectable, but only with many participants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001046 

Price, K. W., Meisinger, E. B., Louwerse, M. M., & D’Mello, S. (2016). The contributions of oral and silent reading fluency to reading comprehension. Reading Psychology, 37(2), 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2015.1025118 

Prior, S. M., Fenwick, K. D., Saunders, K. S., Ouellette, R., O’Quinn, C., & Harvey, S. (2011). Comprehension after oral and silent reading: Does grade level matter?. Literacy Research and Instruction, 50(3), 183-194. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2010.497202 

Pynte, J., & Colonna, S. (2001). Competition between primary and non-primary relations during sentence comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30, 569-599. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014278905819

Rah, A. (2009). Sentence processing in a second language: Ambiguity resolution in German learners of English [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Universität zu Köln.

Reifegerste, J., Jarvis, R., & Felser, C. (2020). Effects of chronological age on native and nonnative sentence processing: Evidence from subject-verb agreement in German. Journal of Memory and Language, 111, 104083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2019.104083 

Riazi, A. M., & Amini Farsani, M. (2024). Mixed-methods research in applied linguistics: Charting the progress through the second decade of the twenty-first century. Language Teaching, 57(2), 143-182. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444823000332

Robinson, M. F., Meisinger, E. B., & Joyner, R. E. (2019). The influence of oral versus silent reading on reading comprehension in students with reading disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 42(2), 105-116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948718806665 

Rosenthal, R. (1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 638. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638

Ross, J. A. (2006). The reliability, validity, and utility of self-assessment. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 11(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.7275/9wph-vv65

Samadi, E., Karimi, M. N., & Babaii, E. (2022). The role of semantic priming in relative clause attachment ambiguity resolution in Persian. Journal of Language Horizons, 6(1), 247-261. https://journal.alzahra.ac.ir/article_5221.html

Scheepers, C., Raffray, C. N., & Myachykov, A. (2017). The lexical boost effect is not diagnostic of lexically-specific syntactic representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 95, 102-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2017.03.001 

Schimmel, N., & Ness, M. (2017). The effects of oral and silent reading on reading comprehension. Reading Psychology, 38(4), 390–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2016.1278 

Siriwittayakorn, T., Miyamoto, E. T., Ratitamkul, T., & Cho, H. (2014, December). A Non-local Attachment Preference in the Production and Comprehension of Thai Relative Clauses [Paper presentation]. Presented at the 28^th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computing (pp. 575-584). https://aclanthology.org/Y14-1066.pdf

Siriwittayakorn, T., Miyamoto, E. T., & Ratitamkul, T. (2015). Contextual effects and locality preferences in relative clause attachment in Thai [Paper presentation]. Presented at the EuroAsianPacific joint conference on cognitive science, Torino, Italy.

Slaghuis, W. L., Lovegrove, W. J., & Davidson, J. A. (1993). Visual and language processing deficits are concurrent in dyslexia. Cortex, 29(4), 601-615. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(13)80284-5 

Soares, S. M. P., Kupisch, T., & Rothman, J. (2022). Testing potential transfer effects in heritage and adult L2 bilinguals acquiring a mini grammar as an additional language: An ERP approach. Brain Sciences, 12(5), 669. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12050669

Sokolova, M., & Slabakova, R. (2019). L3 Sentence Processing: Language-Specific or Phenomenon-Sensitive?. Languages, 4(3), 54. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages4030054

Sokolova, M., & Slabakova, R. (2021). Processing similarities between native speakers and non-balanced bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism, 25(6), 1655-1679. https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069211033647 

Son, M. (2020). Subject-verb agreement in written English by L1 Norwegian university students: Error patterns, causes, and implication for teaching [Unpublished master’s thesis]. UiT The Arctic University of Norway. https://munin.uit.no/bitstream/handle/10037/20511/thesis.pdf

Spitschan, M., Schmidt, M. H., & Blume, C. (2020). Principles of open, transparent and reproducible science in author guidelines of sleep research and chronobiology journals. Wellcome Open Research, 5. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16111.2  

Stetie, N. A., & Zunino, G. M. (2021). Revisiting attachment preferences in Spanish: is there a high attachment bias? [Poster presentation]. Presented at the 34^th CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing. University of Pennsylvania. USA.

Swets, B., Desmet, T., Hambrick, D. Z., & Ferreira, F. (2007). The role of working memory in syntactic ambiguity resolution: A psychometric approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(1), 64. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.136.1.64 

Tan, M., & Foltz, A. (2020). Task sensitivity in L2 English speakers’ syntactic processing: Evidence for Good-Enough processing in self-paced reading. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 575847. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.575847 

Traxler, M. J., & Tooley, K. M. (2007). Lexical mediation and context effects in sentence processing. Brain Research, 1146, 59-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2006.10.010   

Urdan, T. C. (2022). Statistics in plain English. Routledge.

Vafaee Seresht, K., & Marefat, H. (2022). Methodological synthesis of working memory capacity measures in relative clause attachment ambiguity resolution studies. Teaching English as a Second Language Quarterly (Formerly Journal of Teaching Language Skills), 41(4), 113-172. https://doi.org/10.22099/tesl.2022.42703.3084

van Gompel, R. P. G., Wakeford, L. J., & Kantola, L. (2022). No looking back: The effects of visual cues on the lexical boost in structural priming. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 37(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2022.2036782 

Vannoy, S. A., Medlin, B. D., & Chen, C. C. (2011). Enhancing the trust of members in online social networks: An integrative technical and marketing perspective. International Journal of Virtual Communities and Social Networking (IJVCSN), 3(4), 15-31. http://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-4022-1.ch014 

Wang, S. V., Sreedhara, S. K., & Schneeweiss, S. (2022). Reproducibility of real-world evidence studies using clinical practice data to inform regulatory and coverage decisions. Nature communications, 13(1), 5126. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-32310-3

Weiner, M. J. (1980). The effect of incentive and control over outcomes upon intrinsic motivation and performance. The Journal of Social Psychology, 112(2), 247-254.

Yao, B., & Scheepers, C. (2018). Direct speech quotations promote low relative-clause attachment in silent reading of English. Cognition, 176, 248-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.03.017 

Zedeck, S. (2014). APA dictionary of statistics and research methods. American Psychological Association.

Zhang, M., & Plonsky, L. (2020). Collaborative writing in face-to-face settings: A substantive and methodological review. Journal of Second Language Writing, 49, 100753.

Ziegler, N. (2016). Synchronous computer-mediated communication and interaction: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(3), 553-586. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226311500025X

Zogmaister, C., Vezzoli, M., Facchin, A., Conte, F.P., Rizzi, E., Giaquinto, F., Cavicchiolo, E., Fusco, G., Pegoraro, S. and Simioni, M. (2024). Assessing the Transparency of Methods in Scientific Reporting. Collabra: Psychology, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.121243