| تعداد نشریات | 24 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 934 |
| تعداد مقالات | 8,383 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 16,981,307 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 14,371,047 |
Evaluating the Environmental and Socioeconomic Costs of International Trade: Insights from Iran's Carbon Emissions | ||
| Iranian Journal of Economic Studies | ||
| مقاله 9، دوره 12، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 24، 2023، صفحه 495-514 اصل مقاله (689.09 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22099/ijes.2025.50267.1963 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Mohammad Rahimi Ghasemabadi1؛ Reza Zeinalzadeh* 1؛ Zeinolabedin Sadeghi2؛ Mohsen Zayandehroodi1 | ||
| 1Department of Economics, Islamic Azad University, kerman Branch. Kerman. Iran. | ||
| 2Department of Economics, Shahid Bahonar University, Kerman. Iran. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| In the modern era, heightened awareness of environmental conservation has spurred countries and corporations to adopt ecological initiatives aimed at improving environmental performance. This study examines the environmental and socioeconomic costs tied to carbon emissions from activities related to Iran’s exports. By focusing on the financial damages caused by air pollution, the research employs monetary values to comparisons these damages with the economic effects of trade, pinpoint industries that contribute to pollution, and calculate trade balance indicators from a more comprehensive viewpoint. Using the input-output tables, pollution levels in different industries were calculated. The findings reveal that the losses caused by international trade are significant and cannot be ignored. Iran’s 2015 economic data indicate that importing goods avoided 2,432million USA $ in damages, while export caused 3,448 million USA $ in damages. Had imports been produced domestically, 2,439 million USA $ damages and 2,049 million USA $ value added would have been created. Net damages generated by the trade amounted to $1008 million, which accounts for 0.84 % of the net value added created by the trade of Agriculture. This implied that the net effect of trade was a $1016-million increase in damages caused by CO2 in 2015. Furthermore, the results show that every $1 million of net value added generated by trade caused emission-related net damages of $0.321 million overall. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| International Trade؛ Export؛ Import؛ Air Pollution | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Balsalobre-Lorente, D., Driha, O. M., Leitão, N. C., & Murshed, M. (2021). The Carbon Dioxide Neutralizing Effect of Energy Innovation on International Tourism in EU-5 Countries Under the Prism of the EKC Hypothesis. Journal of Environmental Management, 298(15), 113513. British Petroleum (BP) (2022) statistical review of world energy 2022.
Buterbaugh, K. (2022), Trade and the Environment, Elsevier, Academic Press, 831-840. Harati, J., Taghizadeh, H., & Amini, T. (2015). Investigating the Impacts of Trade and Political Variables on Environmental Performance Index: A Dynaminc Panel Analysis, The Journal of Economic Policy, 7(14),, 129-157. Ma, T., & Wang, Y. (2021). Globalization and Environment: Effects of International Trade on Emission Intensity Reduction of Pollutants Causing Global and Local Concerns. Journal of Environmental Management, 297(1), 113249. Miller, R. E., & Blair, P. D. (2009). Input-Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions (2nd ed.), Cambridge University press. Muller, N. Z., Mendelsohn, R., & Nordhaus, W. (2011). Environmental Accounting for Pollution in the United States Economy. American Economic Review, 101(5), 1649-1675. Naeimifar and Abedi (2020), International Trade and Air Pollution Damages in Iran, Agricultural Economics, 14(3), 27-57. Ortiz-Boba, A., Ault. T. R., Carrillo, C. M., & Ghambers, R. G (2021). Antropogenic Climate Change Has Slowed Global Agricultural Productivity Growth. Natural Cilimatr Change, 11(4), 306-312. Sorroche del Rey, Y., Piedra Muñoz, L., & Galdeano‐Gómez, E. (2022). Interrelationship between International Trade and Environmental Performance: Theoretical Approaches and Indicators for Sustainable Development. Business Strategy and the Environment. 32(6), 2789-2805. Taghavee, V. M., Aloo, A. S., & Shirazi, J. K. (2016). Energy, Environment, and Economy Interactions in Iran with Cointegrated and ECM Simultaneous Model. Procedia Economics and Finance, 36, 414-424. Trademap, I. T. C. (2022). List of Importing Markets for a Product Exported by Colombia-Product: 2701 Coal; Briquettes, Ovoids and Similar Solid Fuels Manufactured from Coal. online: https://www. trademap. org/, viewed in June. Xu, Y., Dietzenbacher, E., & Los, B. (2020). International Trade and Air Pollution Damages in the United States. Ecological Economics, 171, 1-10, 106599. Yu, P., Cai, Z., & Sun, Y. (2021). Does the Emissions Trading System in Develping Countries Accelerate Carbon Leakage Through OFDI? Evidence from China. Energy Economics, 101, 1-20. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 425 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 481 |
||