Aghmesheh, A. & Salmanpour, A. (2015). The Media's Right to Access Judicial Information (With a Comparative Study in Iran, France and America), News Sciences, 4(15), 117-140. [In Persian]

Ansari, B. (2011). A Comparative Study of the Right of Media Access to Judicial Proceedings and Information, Public Law Research, 13(35), 269-308. [In Persian]

Barrett, J. (2009). Protecting Court: A Practitioner's Guide to Court Security, Florida: Mill City Press, Inc.

Bicskei, T.; Csizmár, A. & Kotsis, J. (2018). Content Creators v. Judges, (How Open Can a Courtroom be in the Information Age?), EJTN Themis Semi-Final D - Judicial Ethics and Professional Conduct, 1(2), 1-19.

Carter, R. & Harris, R. (2018). Court Security For Judges, Officers and Court Personnel, Park City: Blue360 Media.

Dick, T. (2010). Open Justice and Closed Courts: Media Access in Criminal Proceedings in NSW, Journal Criminal Law, 34(6), 1-20.

Fazaeli, M. (2018). Fair Trial; International Criminal Courts, Tehran: Shahre Danesh. [In Persian]

Hashemi, S. M. (2019), Fundamental Rights of the Islamic Republic, Vol. 2, Tehran: Mizan. [In Persian]

Judicial Research and Investigation Office (2013). Set of Judicial Meetings; Issues of Criminal Procedure, Vol. 1, Tehran: Javadaneh. [In Persian]

Khaleghi, A. (2004). Publicity of Proceedings in the Light of International Documents and Domestic Law, Legal Research, 3(5), 29-49. [In Persian]

Khaleghi, A. (2021). Brief Commentaries on: Code of Criminal Procedure, Tehran: Shahre Danesh. [In Persian]

Lepofsky, D. (2009). “Cameras in the Courtroom — Not Without My Consent”, in Media Freedom and Contempt of Court, Eric Barendt, London: Routledge.

Marder, N. (2013). The Conundrum of Cameras in the Courtroom, Arizona State Law Journal, 44(6), 1490-1574.

National System of Judicial Judgments (2020). Disturbance in the Order of the Prosecutor's Office or Court, (View Date: 02/05/2023) In: https://ara.jri.ac.ir/Judge/Text/1593 [In Persian]

Nowak, M. & Schabas, W. (2019). UN Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: CCPR Commentary, Kehl: N.P. Engel Publisher.

OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR) (2012). Legal Digest of International Fair Trial Rights, Warsaw: Agencja Karo.

Rasteh, M.; Tavajohi, A. & Nemati, M. (2023). Comparison of the Components of the Public Hearing in the International Human Rights System and Iranian Criminal Proceeding System, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 10(20), 209-241. [In Persian]

Rasteh, M.; Moazenzadegan, H.A. & Dolatkhah Pashaki, P. (2023). Comparative Study of Exceptions to the Attendance the People in Criminal Hearing; International Human Right System and Iranian Criminal System, Criminal Law and Criminology Studies, 52(2), 195-222. [In Persian]

Robinson, M. (2009). Trial Observation Manual for Criminal Proceedings: Practitioners Guide No.5, Geneva: International Commission of Jurists.

Shahidi, M. (2002). Judicial Standards (Legal, Criminal, Administrative, Lawyers' Affairs) of Justice; Judges High Disciplinary Court, Tehran: Raham. [In Persian]

Shamloo, B. (2022). Pathology of Advocacylaws in Realization of Fair Trial, Legal Research Quarterly, 25(Attorney Standards), 11-36. [In Persian]

Stepniak, D. (2014). The Therapeutic Value of Open Justice, Melbourne: The University of Western Australia.

Uka, M. (2019). The Right of the Defendant for Public Hearing and the Role of Media in this Publicity, Acta Universitatis Danubius, 15(1), 214-228.

Wayne, M. (2009). Improving Access to Justice, The Role of the Media, Curtin University, School of Media, Culture and Creative Arts.

Zera'at, A. & Ashrafi, M. (2018). The Principle of Adversary in Criminal Proceedings in Iranian Law, The Judiciary Law Journal, 82(101), 11-35. [In Persian]

Zera'at, A. & Mohajeri, A. (2006). Criminal Procedure Code, Vol. 2, Tehran: Fekrsazan. [In Persian]

- Judicial Cases

Case of Antonov v. Russia (Application No. 72900/11). ECtHR: Judgement of 24 February 2022.

Case of Chaushev and Others v. Russia (Application Nos. 37037/03, 39053/03 and 2469/04). ECtHR: Judgement of 25 October 2016.

Case of Idalov v. Russia (Application No. 5826/03). ECtHR: Judgement of 22 May 2012.

Case of Kartoyev and Others v. Russia (Application No. 9418/13, 9421/13 and 49007/13). ECtHR: Judgement of 19 October 2021.

Case of Riepan v. Austria (Application No. 35115/97). ECtHR: Judgement of 14 November 2000.

Case of Stanford v. United Kingdom, (Application No. 16757/90). ECtHR: Judgment of 23 February 1994.

Case of Vasilyev v. Russia (Application No. 28