| تعداد نشریات | 24 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 851 |
| تعداد مقالات | 7,575 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 13,413,795 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 11,580,476 |
Optimal Experiment Selection in Hydroforming Process of Bimetallic Sheets Using CRITIC, MEREC and TOPSIS Techniques | ||
| Iranian Journal of Materials Forming | ||
| مقاله 2، دوره 10، شماره 1، فروردین 2023، صفحه 13-25 اصل مقاله (1.72 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22099/ijmf.2023.46579.1247 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| S. Yaghoubi1؛ M. Seidi* 2؛ F. Fereshteh-Saniee3 | ||
| 1Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran | ||
| 2Department of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran | ||
| 3Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan 65178, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| The present research work is related to the optimal experiment selection of the bimetallic sheet hydroforming process using multi-attribute decision making (MADM) techniques. The numerical simulation of the operation has been done by applying the ABAQUS software. The studied geometrical variables include the punch tip radius (Rp), the die entrance radius (Rd) and the clearance between the punch and matrix (CL), and the target parameters are the maximum thickness reduction and thickness variation of the final product. In order to calculate the weight of the objective function in sheet hydroforming process, criteria importance through inter-criteria correlation (CRITIC) and method based on the removal effects of criteria (MEREC) techniques were employed. In the following research, a technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) has been used to evaluate the numerical test and assess the best case. The results demonstrated that the weighting coefficients of the two objective functions, namely thickness reduction and thickness variation obtained from CRITIC and MEREC methods, was almost the same. Their values were calculated at approximately 0.6 and 0.4, respectively. Based on the optimization outcomes, the optimal values of Rd, Rp, and CL gained were 6 mm, 4 mm, and 2.2 mm, respectively. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Sheet hydroforming process؛ MADM؛ CRITIC؛ MEREC؛ TOPSIS | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
[1] H. Amino, K. Nakamura, T. Nakagawa, Counter-pressure deep drawing and its application in the forming of automobile parts, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 23(3) (1990) 243-265.
[2] L.H. Lang, Z.R. Wang, D.C. Kang, S.J. Yuan, S.H. Zhang, J. Danckert, K.B. Nielsen, Hydroforming highlights: sheet hydroforming and tube hydroforming, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 151(1-3) (2004) 165-177.
[3] S.H. Zhang, Z.R. Wang, Y. Xu, Z.T. Wang, L.X. Zhou, Recent developments in sheet hydroforming technology, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 151(1-3) (2004) 237-241.
[4] S.I. Oh, B.H. Jeon, H.Y. Kim, J.B. Yang, Applications of hydroforming processes to automobile parts, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 174(1-3) (2006) 42-55.
[5] S. Abrate, Impact on laminated composite materials, Applied Mechanics Reviews, 44(4) (1991) 155-190.
[6] R.H.W. Ten Thije, R. Akkerman, A multi-layer triangular membrane finite element for the forming simulation of laminated composites, Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 40(6-7) (2009) 739-753.
[7] Z. Sun, L. Lang, Effect of stress distribution on springback in hydroforming process, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 93 (2017) 2773-2782.
[8] M. Sadegh-Yazdi, M. Bakhshi-Jooybari, M. Shakeri, H. Gorji, M. Khademi, Optimization of pressure paths in hydrodynamic deep drawing assisted by radial pressure with inward flowing liquid using a hybrid method, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 97 (2018) 2587-2601.
[9] S. Yaghoubi, F. Fereshteh-Saniee, An investigation on the effects of the process parameters of hydro-mechanical deep drawing on manufacturing high-quality bimetallic spherical-conical cups, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 110 (2020) 1805-1818.
[10] G. Cai, J. lin Yang, Y. Yuan, X. Yang, L. Lang, S. Alexandrov, Mechanics analysis of aluminum alloy cylindrical cup during warm sheet hydromechanical deep drawing, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 174 (2020) 105556.
[11] M. Türköz, Ö.N. Cora, H. Gedikli, M. Dilmeç, H.S. Halkacı, M. Koc, Numerical optimization of warm hydromechanical deep drawing process parameters and its experimental verification, Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 57 (2020) 344-353.
[12] G. Hu, C. Pan, Investigation on deformation behavior of magnesium alloy sheet AZ31B in pulsating hydroforming, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 235(1-2) (2021) 198-206.
[13] F. Fereshteh-saniee, S. Yaghoubi, S. Ghorbanhosseini, Microstructural studies and mechanical properties of Hydroforming process of AZ31B magnesium and AA 2024 aluminum alloys sheets at elevated temperatures, Iranian Journal of Manufacturing Engineering, 8(10) (2021) 39-48.
[14] S. Yaghoubi, F. Fereshteh-Saniee, A comprehensive study on soundness, microstructure, and uniformity of 2024 aluminum cups hydro-mechanically drawn at elevated temperatures, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 120(11-12) (2022) 7905-7917.
[15] Q.Q. Zhu, S. Huang, D.X. Wang, J.P. Li, F.A. Hua, P. Yang, Numerical simulation and experimental study of warm hydro-forming of magnesium alloy sheet, Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 80 (2022) 43-53.
[16] S. Yaghoubi, F. Fereshteh-Saniee, Effects of process variables on the uniformity of Al-St and Al-Mg laminated composite cups produced by hydro-mechanical deep drawing operation, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 237 (3) (2023) 424-434.
[17] C. Pradeep Raja, T. Ramesh, P. Paavai, M. Amal Jerald Joseph, Numerical and experimental study on hydroforming of thin metallic sheets, In Advances in Forming, Machining and Automation: Select Proceedings of AIMTDR 2021, Springer Nature, Singapore, 2022, pp. 97-114.
[18] O. Öztürk, M.A. Şen, M. Kalyoncu, H.S. Halkacı, An application of the bees algorithm to pulsating hydroforming, In Intelligent Production and Manufacturing Optimisation- The Bees Algorithm Approach, Springer International Publishing, 2022, pp.79-93.
[19] Y.J. Lai, T.Y. Liu, C.L. Hwang, Topsis for MODM, European Journal of Operational Research, 76(3) (1994) 486-500.
[20] M. Akbari, M.H. Shojaeefard, P. Asadi, A. Khalkhali, Hybrid multi-objective optimization of microstructural and mechanical properties of B4C/A356 composites fabricated by FSP using TOPSIS and modified NSGA-II, Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 27(11) (2017) 2317-2333.
[21] A. Shukla, P. Agarwal, R.S. Rana, R. Purohit, Applications of TOPSIS algorithm on various manufacturing processes: a review, Materials Today: Proceedings, 4(4) (2017) 5320-5329.
[22] A. Visagan, P. Ganesh, Parametric optimization of two point incremental forming usnin GRA and TOPSIS, International Journal of Simulation Modelling (IJSIMM), 21(4) (2022) 615-626.
[23] Y. Houqiang, L. Ling, Five kinds of enterprise comprehensive evaluation based on the entropy value method and the CRITIC method, Journal of Hubei Institute of Technology, 32 (2012) 83-84.
[24] D. Wang, J. Zhao, Design optimization of mechanical properties of ceramic tool material during turning of ultra-high-strength steel 300M with AHP and CRITIC method, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 84 (2016) 2381-2390.
[25] Y. Xie, Z.J. Li, Z. Xu, Evaluation on spontaneous combustion trend of sulfide ores based on the method of CRITIC and TOPSIS testing method, Journal of Safety and Environment, 14(1) (2014) 122-125.
[26] Q.H. Zhao, X. Zhou, R.F. Xie, Z.C. Li, Comparison of three weighing methods for evaluation of the HPLC fingerprints of cortex fraxini, Journal of Liquid Chromatography & Related Technologies, 34(17) (2011) 2008-2019.
[27] H.W. Wu, J. Zhen, J. Zhang, Urban rail transit operation safety evaluation based on an improved CRITIC method and cloud model, Journal of Rail Transport Planning & Management, 16 (2020) 100206.
[28] M. Keshavarz-Ghorabaee, M. Amiri, E.K. Zavadskas, Z. Turskis, J. Antucheviciene, Determination of objective weights using a new method based on the removal effects of criteria (MEREC), Symmetry, 13(4) (2021) 525-544.
[29] Y. Aue-U-Lan, G. Ngaile, T. Altan, Optimizing tube hydroforming using process simulation and experimental verification, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 146(1) (2004) 137-143.
[30] S. Yaghoubi, F. Fereshteh-saniee, An investigation on the effects of optimum forming parameters in hydro-mechanical deep drawing process using the genetic algorithm, Journal of Computational Applied Mechanics, 49(1) (2018) 54-62. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 409 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 365 |
||