اختیارات ذاتی داوران در داوری تجاری بین المللی

• Bishop, Doak, and Margrete Stevens (2011) “The Compelling Need for a Code of Ethics in International Arbitration: Transparency, Integrity and Legitimacy, In Arbitration Advocacy in Changing Times, ICCA Congress Series, No. 15.
• Bjorklund, Andrea, & Jonathan Brosseau (2018) “Sources of Inherent Powers in International Adjudication”, European International Arbitration Review, Vol. 6, Issue 2.
• Black, Henry Campbell (1990) Black's Law Dictionary, Definitions of the Terms and Phrases of American, Ninth Edition, West Publishing Co, Minnesota.
• Blankley, Kristen (2013) “Lying, Stealing, and Cheating: The Role of Arbitrators as Ethics Enforcers”, University of Louisville Law Revew. Vol. 52, pp. 443- 496.
• Born, Gary (2020) International Commercial Arbitration, Kluwer Law International BV, Third Edition.
• Brown, Chester (2006) “The Inherent Powers of International Courts and Tribunals”, The British Yearbook of International Law. Vol. 76, Issue 1, pp. 195- 244
• Cantelmo, Tobia (2017) “The Inherent Power of Reconsideration in Recent ICSID Case Law”, The Journal of World Investment & Trade, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 232 -270.
• Caron, David (1986) “Interim Measures of Protection: Theory and Practice in Light of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal”, Zeitschrift, Vol. 46, pp.445 -518.
• Gaeta, Paola (2003) Inherent Powers of International Courts and Tribunals, In Man's Inhumanity to Man: Essays on International Law in Honour of Antonio Cassese.
• Lauterpacht, Elihu (2008) Iran-US Claims Tribunal Report. Vol. 7, Cambridge University Press.
• Moore, John Bassett (1898) History and Digest of the International Arbitrations to which the United States Has Been a Party, together with Appendices Containing the Treaties Relating to Such Arbitrations, and Historical and Legal Notes, Vol. 5. US Government Printing Office.
• Mantakou, Anna (2014) The Misadventures of the Principle Jura Novit Curia in International Arbitration-A Practitioner’s Approach, Essays in Honor of Spyridon Vl.
• Mitchell, Andrew David. and David Heaton (2009) “The Inherent Jurisdiction of WTO Tribunals: The Select Application of Public International Law Required by the Judicial Function”, Michigan Journal of International Law, 31, Issue 3, pp. 559- 619.
• Moses, Margaret (2016) “The Role of the Arbitrator: Adjudicator or Service Provider?” World Arbitration and Mediation Review, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 3-17.
• Moses, Margaret (2017) The Principles and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration, Third Edition, Cambridge University Press, New York.
• Paparinskis, Martin (2011) Inherent Powers of ICSID Tribunals, Broad and Rightly So, Investment Treaty Arbitration and International Law
• Rocha, Caio Cesar & Fávero, Gustavo (2018) “Guerrilla Tactics: Breaking Ethical Patterns in International Arbitration?”, International Bar Association Legal Practice Division.
• Salazar, Andrés Felipe Celis (2007) “Can WTO Members Rely on Non-WTO Law to Justify a Violation of WTO Law?”, International Law: Revista Colombiana de Derecho Internacional 5, No. 10.
• Sandberg, David (2012) Jura Novit Arbiter? How to Apply and Ascertain the Content of the Applicable Law in International Commercial Arbitration in Sweden, Master Thesis, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg.
• Sussman, Edna, & Ebere, Solomon (2011) “All’s Fair in Love and War–or Is It? Reflections on Ethical Standards for Counsel in International Arbitration”, The American Review of International Arbitration, Vol 22, No. 4, pp. 611-623.
• Tang, Zheng Sophia (2014) Jurisdiction and Arbitration Agreements in International Commercial Law, Published by Routledge, London & New York.
• Vandensande, Els (2018) The Inherent Powers of Courts, Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Laws (PHD), Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven.

Cases

• Belgium v. Bulgaria, 1939 P.C.I.J. (ser A/B) 79 (1939).
• Biwater Gauff (Tanzania) Ltd. v. United Republic of Tanzania, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/22, Procedural Order No. 3 (29 Sept. 2006).
• Commerce Group Corp. & San Sebastian Gold Mines, Inc. v. Republic of El Salvador, ICSID Case No. ARB/09/17 (Annulment Proceeding), Decision on El Salvador’s Application for Security for Costs (20 Sept. 2012).
• Conocophillips Petrozuata B.V. Conocophillips Hamaca B.V. Conocophillips Gulf of Paria B.V. The Claimants V. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela the Respondent Icsid Case No. Arb/07/30, Dissenting Opinion of Georges Abi-Saab (Decision on Respondent's Request for Reconsideration).
• Dames & Moore v. The Islamic Republic of Iran, The Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, The National Iranian Steel Company, The Iranian Medical Center and The National Iranian Gas Company, IUSCT Case No. 54. Decision (Decision No. DEC 36-54-3) - 23 Apr 1985.
• Dobbins, Jeffrey C, The Inherent and Supervisory Power, Ga. L. Rev. 54, 2019.
• E-Systems, Inc. v. Islamic Republic of Iran, 491 F. Supp. 1294 (N.D. Tex. 1980).
• Genie Lacayo Case, 1997 Inter-Am. Ct. H.R. (ser. C) 30 (1997).
• Hrvatska Elektroprivreda d.d. v. Republic of Slovenia, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/24, Order Concerning the Participation of Counsel, 6 May 2008.
• ICC Case No. 10596, Interlocutory Award, 2000, in XXX Y.B. COMM. ARB. 2005 66.
• La Grand Case (Germany v United States of America), I.C.J. (2002) ICLQ 449
• Larsen v. Hawaiian Kingdom, PCA Case No. 1999-01.
• Libananco Holdings Co. Limited v. Republic of Turkey, ICSID Case No. ARB/06/8, Decision on Preliminary Issues (23 June 2008).
• M & C Corporation v. Erwin Behr BmbH & Company KG and Dr. Heinz Etzel, ICC Case No. 7453/FMS, Award - 1 Mar 1994
• Nuclear Tests (Austl. v. Fr.), 1974 I.C.J. 253 (Dec. 20).
• Perenco Ecuador Ltd v. The Republic of Ecuador and Empresa Estatal Petróleos del Ecuador (Petroecuador), ICSID Case No ARB/08/6, Decision on Ecuador’s Reconsideration Motion (10 April 2015).
• Queen Mary University of London and White & Case LLP (2015), International Arbitration Survey: Improvements and Innovations in International Arbitration.
• ReliaStar Life Ins. Co. NY v. EMC Nat. Life Co. 564 F.3d 81 (2d Cir. 2009).
• Sabotage Cases, Lehigh Valley Railroad Company (U.S.A.) v. Germany. Award - 9 Nov 1934.
• Seagate Technology v. Western Digital Corp., 834 NW 2d 555 - Minn: Court of Appeals 2013.
• The Islamic Republic of Iran v. The United States of America, IUSCT Case No. B61. Partial Award (Award No. 601-A3/A8/A9/A14/B61-FT) - 17 July 2009.
• The Rompetrol Group N.V. v. Romania, ICSID Case No. ARB/06/3, Decision of the Tribunal on the Participation of a Counsel - 14 June. 2010.
• United States v. Rio Grande Irrigation and Land Company, Ltd. (Great Britain), Arbitrage ad hoc, Sentence - 28 Nov. 1923.

Reports

• ICC Commission Report on Controlling Time and Costs in Arbitration. (2012)
• International Law Association (2014), Report for the Biennial Conference in Washington DC.

Sites

• 1-http://www.worldcourts.com (Last visited 16 July, 2021)
• https://legal.un.org (Last visited 4 Oct, 2021)
• https://jusmundi.com (Last visited 19 Aug, 2021)
• https://www.italaw.com (Last visited 27 May, 2021)
• https://iccwbo.org (Last visited 13 Sep, 2021)
• https://www.icj-cij.org (Last visited 19 May, 2021)
• https://casetext.com (Last visited 6 Aug, 2021)
• http://www.arbitration.qmul.ac.uk (Last visited 20 Apr, 2021)
• https://pcacases.com (Last visited 11 Oct, 2021)
• https://iusct.com (Last visited 3 Sep, 2021)
• http://hrlibrary.umn.edu (Last visited 19 Aug, 2021)
• https://www.ila-hq.org (Last visited 17 May, 2021)

https://caselaw.findlaw.com (Last visited 24 July, 2021)