| تعداد نشریات | 24 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 851 |
| تعداد مقالات | 7,575 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 13,413,800 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 11,580,478 |
بررسی دشواری درک جملات معلوم و انواع جملات مجهول انگلیسی در بین فراگیران سطح متوسط زبان انگلیسی به عنوان زبان خارجی | ||
| پژوهش‌های برنامه درسی | ||
| دوره 12، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 23، شهریور 1401، صفحه 290-313 اصل مقاله (583.27 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22099/jcr.2022.6773 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| محمد هادی ایل1؛ محمد صابر خاقانی نژاد* 2 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکتری آموزش زبان انگلیسی، بخش زبان های خارجی و زبان شناسی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز ، ایران | ||
| 2دانشیار بخش زبان‌های خارجی و زبان‌شناسی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| پژوهش‌های زیادی به بررسی درک جملات معلوم و مجهول توسط بزرگسالان سالم، کودکان در حال یادگیری زبان اول و افراد دارای مشکل تکلم پرداخته‌‌اند. موضوعی که احتمالاً به پژوهش های بیشتری نیاز دارد بررسی چالش‌های درک جملات معلوم و انواع مختلف جملات مجهول برای فراگیران زبان‌های خارجی است. این پژوهش به بررسی و مقایسه درک جملات معلوم و انواع جملات مجهول انگلیسی در بین فراگیران سطح متوسط انگلیسی به عنوان زبان خارجی در ایران پرداخته است. به همین منظور 224 شرکت کننده با روش انتخاب نمونه غیرتصادفی در دسترس از بین دانشجویان مقطع کارشناسی انتخاب و خواسته شد تا جملات را روی صفحه رایانه خوانده و در بازه زمانی محدود به پرسش های چهارگزینه‌ای پاسخ دهند. پاسخ‌ها از نظر زمان سپری شده و درصد موفقیت مورد تحلیل قرار گرفتند. نتایج حاکی از آن بود که درک جملات معلوم به زمان کمتری نیاز دارد و میزان موفقیت بالاتری نسبت به جملات مجهول دارند. نتایج همچنین نشان داد که انواع مختلف جمله مجهول (افعال با قاعده، بی قاعده، افعال حرکتی، افعال حالتی، افعال دو مفعولی، جملات منفی، و سوالی) درجات متفاوتی از دشواری به فراگیران زبان انگلیسی تحمیل می‌کنند. جملات مجهول با افعال با قاعده کمترین دشواری را داشتند و به دنبال آن افعال بی قاعده و افعال حرکتی، سپس جملات سوالی و منفی، و جملات با افعال حالتی و در نهایت افعال دو مفعولی دارای بیشترین سطح دشواری بودند. نتایج این پژوهش می‌تواند برای مدرسان زبان های خارجی و مولفان کتب آموزشی جهت اولویت بخشی و در نظر گرفتن زمان بیشتر برای تدریس و تمرین جملات مجهول دشوارتر مفید باشد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| ساختارهای معلوم و مجهول جملات؛ انواع مختلف جملات مجهول؛ دشواری درک جملات؛ زبان انگلیسی به عنوان زبان خارجی | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Aaronson, D., & Scarborough, H. S. (1976). Performance theories for sentence coding: Some quantitative evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2(1), 56–70. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.2.1.56
Alsadi, H. Z. (2018). A Psycholinguistic Study on the Comprehension of Passive Voice by Children NativeSpeakers of Jordanian Arabic. European Journal of Educational and Development Psychology, 6(5), 1-11.
Ambridge, B., Bidgood, A., Pine, J. M., Rowland, C. F., & Freudenthal, D. (2016). Is Passive Syntax Semantically Constrained? Evidence from adult grammaticality judgment and comprehension studies. Cognitive Science, 40(6), 1435-1459.
Carrithers, C. (1989). Syntactic complexity does not necessarily make sentences harder to understand. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18(1), 75-88.
Chomsky, N., (1981). Knowledge of Language: Its Elements and Origins. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 295(1077), 223-234.
Christianson, K., Hollingworth, A., Halliwell, J. F., & Ferreira, F. (2001). Thematic roles assigned along the garden path linger. Cognitive Psychology, 42(4), 368–407.
Dąbrowska, E., & Street, J. (2006). Individual differences in language attainment: Comprehension of passive sentences by native and non-native English speakers. Language Sciences, 28(6), 604-615.
Dittmar, M., Abbot‐Smith, K., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2014). Familiar verbs are not always easier than novel verbs: How German pre‐school children comprehend active and passive sentences. Cognitive science, 38(1), 128-151.
Ferreira, F. (2003). The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 47(2), 164–203.
Ferreira, F., Bailey, K. G. D., & Ferraro, V. (2002). Good-enough representations in language comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(1), 11–15.
Ferreira, F., & Clifton, C. (1986). The independence of syntactic processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 25(3), 348–368.
Ferreira, F., & Çokal, D. (2016). Sentence processing. In Neurobiology of language. Academic Press.
Ferreira, F., & Henderson, J. M. (1990). Use of verb information in syntactic parsing: Evidence from eye movements and word-by-word self-paced reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(4), 555.
Ferreira, F., & Henderson, J. M. (1991). Recovery from misanalyses of garden-path sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 30(6), 725–745.
Fillmore, C. J. (1968). The case for case. In E. Bach, and R. T. Harms (Eds.), Universals of linguistic theory. New: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1-88.
Fodor JA, Bever TG, & Garrett M. (1974). The Psychology of Language: An Introduction to Psycholinguistics and Generative Grammar. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Frazier, L., & Clifton, C., Jr. (1996). Construal. The MIT Press.
Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. (1982). Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 14(2), 178–210.
Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. (1990). Taking on semantic commitments: Processing multiple meanings vs. multiple senses. Journal of Memory and Language, 29(2), 181–200.
Gehrke, B., & Grillo, N. (2009). How to become passive. In K. K. Grohmann (Ed.), Explorations of phase theory: Features and arguments. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 231–268.
Gough, P. B. (1965). Grammatical Transformations and Speed of Understanding. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 4(2), 107-111.
Grimshaw, J. (1990). Argument structure. The MIT Press.
Grodzinsky, Y. (1990). Theoretical perspectives on language deficits. The MIT Press.
Hoeks, J. C., Vonk, W., & Schriefers, H. (2002). Processing coordinated structures in context: The effect of topic-structure on ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 46(1), 99–119.
Horne, A., Zahn, R., Najera, O. I., & Martin, R. C. (2022). Semantic Working Memory Predicts Sentence Comprehension Performance: A Case Series Approach. Frontiers in psychology, 1945.
Howcroft, D. M., & Demberg, V. (2017). Psycholinguistic Models of Sentence Processing Improve Sentence Readability Ranking. In EACL (1), 958-968.
IELTS 15. (2020). General Training Student's Book with Answers with Audio with Resource Bank. Authentic Practice Tests. Cambridge Press. ISBN: 9781108781626.
Jackendoff, R. (1990). Semantic structures. The MIT Press.
Jovanovic, N. (2018). The Comprehension of the Passive Voice by Different Populations and the Effects of Structural Priming on this Process. (Doctoral thesis). University of Potsdam (GER)
Johns, B. T., & Jones, M. N. (2015). Generating structure from experience: A retrieval-based model of language processing. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 69(3), 233.
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1971). Comprehension of negation with quantification. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 10(3), 244-253.
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87(4), 329–354.
Khatib, M., & Jannati, S. (2015). Comprehension Strategy Instruction and Iranian High School EFL Learners' Reading Anxiety and Reading Comprehension. Issues in Language Teaching, 4(2), 79-57.
Khodadady, E. Alavi, M. Pishghadam, R. & Khaghaninezhad, M. S. (2012). Teaching General English in Academic Context: Schema-Based or Translation-Based Approach? International Journal of linguistics, 4(1), 56-65.
Khaghaninezhad, M. S. & Kaashef, F. Applying cooperative language learning techniques in Iranian ELT context. International journal of language learning and applied linguistics world, 5(3), 238-246.
Kiparsky, P. (2013). Towards a null theory of the passive. Lingua, 125(1), 7-33.
Levin, A. (2010). The Ultimate Word List - ENGLISH: 10,000 Most Commonly Used Words Paperback. Safah Press, LLC.
MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1994). The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review, 101(4), 676–703.
Maratsos, M. P., & Abramovitch, R. (1975). How children understand full, truncated, and anomalous passives. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14(2), 145–157.
Maratsos, M., Fox, D. E., Becker, J. A., & Chalkley, M. A. (1985). Semantic restrictions on children's passives. Cognition, 19(2), 167-191.
Messenger, K., Branigan, H. P., McLean, J. F., & Sorace, A. (2012). Is young children’s passive syntax semantically constrained? Evidence from syntactic priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 66(4), 568–587.
Miller, G. A., & McKean, K. O. (1964). A chronometric study of some relations between sentences. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 16(4), 297-308.
Mohamadi, R., Kazemi-Dastjerdi, M., Minaei, A., & Jenabi, M. S. (2016). The Comprehension of Active and Passive Sentences in Persian Typically Developing Children Aged 48-71 Months. Journal of Modern Rehabilitation, 10(2), 80-85.
Pandelaere, M., & Dewitte, S. (2006). Is this a question? Not for long. The statement bias. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(4), 525-531.
Paolazzi, C. L., Grillo, N., Alexiadou, A., & Santi, A. (2019). Passives are not hard to interpret but hard to remember: evidence from online and offline studies. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(8), 991-1015.
Paolazzi, C. L., Grillo, N., Cera, C., Karageorgou, F., Bullman, E., Chow, W. Y., & Santi, A. (2022). Eyetracking while reading passives: an event structure account of difficulty. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 37(2), 135-153.
Phillips, C., & Schneider, D. (2000). Grammatical search and reanalysis. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 308-336.
Rayner, K., Carlson, M., & Frazier, L. (1983). The interaction of syntax and semantics during sentence processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 358-374.
Rayner, K., Kambe, G., & Duffy, S. A. (2000). The effect of clause wrap-up on eye movements during reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 53A(4), 1061–1080.
Roberts, L. (2012). Individual differences in second language sentence processing. Language Learning, 62(Suppl 2), 172–188.
Salomon E. (1914). Motorische Aphasie mit Agrammatismus und sensorisch-agrammatische Störungen [Motor aphasia with agrammatism and sensory-agrammatic disorders]. European Neurology, 35(3), 246–259.
Sanford, A. J. (2002). Context, attention and depth of processing during interpretation. Mind & language, 17(1‐2), 188-206.
Savin, H. B., & Perchonock, E. (1965). Grammatical structure and the immediate recall of English sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 4(5), 348-353.
Sinclair, D. A., Mills, K., & Guarente, L. (1997). Accelerated aging and nucleolar fragmentation in yeast sgs1 mutants. Science, 277(5330), 1313-1316.
Slobin, D. I. (1966). Grammatical transformations and sentence comprehension in childhood and adulthood. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 5(3), 219-227.
Steinhauer, K., Alter, K., & Friederici, A. D. (1999). Brain potentials indicate immediate use of prosodic cues in natural speech processing. Nature Neuroscience, 2(2), 191–196.
Stella, M., & Engelhardt, P. E. (2022). Use of Parsing Heuristics in the Comprehension of Passive Sentences: Evidence from Dyslexia and Individual Differences. Brain sciences, 12(2), 209.
Street, J. A., & Dąbrowska, E. (2014). Lexically specific knowledge and individual differences in adult native speakers’ processing of the English passive. Applied Psycholinguistics, 35(1), 97-118.
Tajeddin, Z. (2013). Scaffolding comprehension and recall gaps: Effects of paratextual advance organizers. Issues in Language Teaching, 2(1), 125-148.
Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M., & Sedivy, J. C. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268(5217), 1632-1634.
Traxler, M. J., Corina, D. P., Morford, J. P., Hafer, S., & Hoversten, L. J. (2014). Deaf readers’ response to syntactic complexity: Evidence from self-paced reading. Memory & Cognition, 42(1), 97-111.
Trueswell, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Kello, C. (1993). Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: Separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(3), 528–553.
van Boxtel, W., & Lawyer, L. (2021). Sentence comprehension in ageing and Alzheimer's disease. Language and Linguistics Compass, 15(6), e12430.
Volpato, F., Verin, L., & Cardinaletti, A. (2016). The comprehension and production of verbal passives by Italian preschool-age children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37(4), 901-931.
Warren, P. (2013). Introducing psycholinguistics. Cambridge University Press.
Winitz, H. (2020). Comprehension Strategies in the Acquiring of a Second Language. Springer International Publishing.
Wright, P. (1969). Transformations and the understanding of sentences. Language and Speech, 12(3), 156-166. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 231 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 221 |
||