| تعداد نشریات | 24 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 929 |
| تعداد مقالات | 8,346 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 16,803,845 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 14,117,960 |
Assessing the Alignment among Learners’ Language Needs, Course Objectives, and Classroom Practice in an EFL Communicative Course | ||
| Teaching English as a Second Language Quarterly | ||
| مقاله 1، دوره 41، شماره 4، بهمن 2022، صفحه 1-22 اصل مقاله (450.57 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Farvah Amin؛ Mohammad Rahimi* | ||
| Department of Foreign Languages and Linguistics, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| A needs analysis (NA) study was carried out to determine how well course objectives and actual classroom activities aligned with the English language needs of learners enrolled in a communicative EFL course in Iran. Brown’s (2016) NA framework was adapted with a focus on the democratic and discrepancy view of NA. A case study design utilizing triangulation of data collection was employed to collect and analyze both quantitative and qualitative data. A questionnaire, classroom observations, and post-observation interviews were among the methods used to collect information from 143 learners and 10 teachers. The questionnaires were quantitatively analyzed using frequency counts, percentages, and one-way repeated measures ANOVA analyses to identify learners'' language needs. The qualitative dimension of the study provided a complete picture of course objectives and classroom activities and tasks. The results of the questionnaire showed that the majority of learners agreed that all general English skills were fundamental to communicating in English and ranked speaking skill, followed by writing, as the most needed skills. Also, a review of course objectives indicated that the learning objectives of the English course aligned with learners’ English language needs. However, according to classroom observations and post-observation interviews, classroom goals were not focused on attaining communicative tasks and activity objectives. In fact, teachers’ teaching objectives did not meet the learners'' communicative needs and were limited to teaching four skills at comprehension, grammatical, and lexical levels. Misalignment between assessment tasks and course objectives was reported as one of the contributing factors. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Communicative Language Teaching؛ Classroom Practice؛ EFL Learners’ Needs؛ CLT؛ TBLT | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Alemi, M. & Mesbah, Z., (2013). Textbook evaluation based on the ACTFL standards: The case study of Top-Notch series. The Iranian EFL Journal, 9, 162-71.
Alizadeh, I & Hui, S. K. F. (2018). Exploring language learners’ perception of the effectiveness of an English Language Teaching (ELT) program in Iran. Cogent Education, 5(1), 1–19.
Aslrasouli, M. (2012). Challenging One-Size-Fits-All Approach in ESP Material Design: Insights from Iran & India. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 1374–1382.
Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (2010). Language testing in practice. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press
Balint, M. (2004). Assessing students’ perceived language needs in a needs analysis. Available from http://www.paaljapan.org/
Basturkmen, H., Loewen, S., & Ellis, R. (2004). Teachers’ stated beliefs about incidental focus on form and their classroom practices. Applied Linguistics, 25 (2), 243-272.
Bax, S. (2003) The end of CLT: a context approach to language teaching. ELT Journal 57(3), 278-87.
Biggs, J. (2003). Aligning teaching and assessing to course objectives. Teaching and learning in higher education: New trends and innovations, 2 , 13-17.
Bowen, G. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9, 27-40.
Brown, J. D. (2009). Foreign and second language needs analysis. In M. H. Long & C. J. Doughty (Eds.), The handbook of language teaching (pp. 269-293). Oxford: Blackwell.
Brown, J. D. (2016). Introducing needs analysis and English for specific purposes. Abingdon, England: Routledge.
Bryfonski, L., & McKay, T. H. (2019). TBLT implementation and evaluation: A meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research, 23(5), 603-632.
Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press
Busch, D. (2010). Pre-service teacher beliefs about language learning: The second language acquisition course as an agent for change. Language Teaching Research, 14(3), 318–337.
Cane, N. A. (2005). EFL examination washback in Japan: Investigating the effects of oral assessment on teaching and learning (Unpublished Master’s thesis). University of Manchester, Manchester.
Cowling, J. D. (2007). Needs analysis: Planning a syllabus for a series of intensive workplace courses at a leading Japanese company. English for Specific Purposes, 26, 426-442
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Fifth edition. Los Angeles: SAGE.
Curtain, H., & Dahlberg, A. (2004). Languages and children: Making the match (3rd ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.
Dehnad, A. & Bagherzadeh, R. & Bigdeli, S. & Hatami, K. & Hosseini, F. (2010). Syllabus revision: a needs analysis Study. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1307–1312.
Ennis, M. J. (2020). Motivating Learners by Meeting Their Needs: The Introduction of a Business English Track at the Unibz Language Centre. Online Submission.
Eslami Rasekh, A., Esmaeli, S., Ghavamnia, M. and Rajabi, S. (2010). ‘Don’t judge a book by its cover: Textbook evaluation in the EFL setting’. The Journal of International Social Research, 3(14), 448-461.
Eslami, Z. (2010). Teachers’ Voice vs. Students’ Voice: A Needs Analysis Approach to English for Acadmic Purposes (EAP) in Iran. English Language Teaching,. 3(1), 3-10.
Flowerdew, Lynne. (2013). Needs analysis and curriculum development in ESP. In Brian Paltridge & Sue Starfield (eds.), The handbook of English for specific purposes, 325–346. Chichester: Wiley.
Foster, P., & Hunter, A.M. (2016). When it’s not what you do but the way that you do it. In: B. Tomlinson (Ed.), SLA research and materials development for language learning (pp. 280–298). London: Routledge.
Ganji, M., Ketabi, S., & Shahnazari, M.T. (2018). English teacher training courses in Iranian private language institutes: Issues and options Issues in Educational Research, 28(2), 367-384
Gholami, J., Sarkhosh, M., & Abdi, H. (2016). An exploration of teaching practices of private, public, and public-private EFL teachers in Iran. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 18(1), 16-33.
Graham, S., Santos, D., & Francis-Brophy, E. (2014) Teacher beliefs about listening in a foreign language. Teaching and Teacher Education, 40, 44–60.
Graves, K. (2007). Designing Language Courses. Canada: Newbury House.
IBM Corp. Released 2019. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp
Iranmehr, A., Davari, H. (2018). English Language Education in Iran: A Site of Struggle between Globalized and Localized Versions of English. Iranian Journal of Comparative Education, 1(2), 94-109.
Iwai, T., Kondo, K., Limm, S. J. D., Ray, E. G., Shimizu, H. I. S. A. A. K. I., & Brown, J. D. (1999). Japanese language needs analysis. Available at: http://www.nflrc.hawaii.edu/Networks/NW13/NW13.pdf.
Kelishadi, A. A., & Sharifzadeh, A. (2013). An evaluation of Top-Notch series. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 4(4), 60-73.
Khany, Reza; Tarlani-Aliabadi, Hasan (2016). Studying power relations in an academic setting: Teachers'' and students'' perceptions of EAP classes in Iran. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 21, 72–85.
Littlejohn, A. (1998). The analysis of Language teaching materials: Inside the Trojan horse. In Tomlinson, B. (Ed.), Materials development in Language teaching (pp. 190-216). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Long, M. H. (2005). Methodological issues in learner needs analysis (pp. 19-76). In M. H. Long, (Ed.), Second language needs analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Maniruzzaman, M., & Hoque, M. E. (2010). How does Washback Work on the EFL Syllabus and Curriculum? A Case Study at the HSC Level in Bangladesh. Language in India, 10(12).
Mazdayasna, G. & Tahririan, M. H. (2008). Developing a profile of the ESP needs of Iranian Students: The case of students of nursing and midwifery. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7, 277-289.
McKay, S. L., & Brown, D. J. (2016). Teaching and assessing EIL in local contexts around the world. Routledge.
Mehrdad, A. G. (2012). A subjective needs assessment of EGP students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 546- 554.
Mirhosseini, S.A. and Khodakarami, S. (2015). “A glimpse of contrasting de jure-de facto ELT policies in Iran”, in Kennedy, C. (Ed.), English Language Teaching in the Islamic Republic of Iran: Innovations, Trends and Challenges, British Council, London, pp. 23-34.
Mohammadi, V., & Mousavi, N. (2013). Analyzing needs analysis in ESP: A (re) modeling. International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences, 4(5), 1014-1020.
Munby, J. (1978). Communicative Syllabus Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Norris, J. (2009). Task-based teaching and testing. In M. H. Long & C. J. Doughty (Eds.),
Norris, J. (2016). Language Program Evaluation. The Modern Language Journal, 100(S1), 169–189. doi:10.1111/modl.12307
Nunan, D. (1988). Principles for designing language teaching materials. Guidelines: A periodical for classroom language teachers, 10(2), 1-24.
Önder-Özdemir, N. (2018). Needs analysis. In J. I. Liontas (Ed.), The TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching (pp. 711-716). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
Powers, S. W., & Butler, B. (2006). Investigating connections between teacher beliefs and instructional practices with struggling readers. Reading Horizons, 47(2), 121-157.
Rahimi, M. (2009). The role of teacher’s corrective feedback in improving Iranian EFL learners’ writing accuracy over time: is learner’s mother tongue relevant? Reading and Writing, 22(2), 219–243.
Rashidi, N., & Bahrmai, M. (2012). An in-depth evaluation of intermediate Top Notch. Journal of studies in Learning and Teaching English, 1(2).
Razmjoo, A. & Riazi, M. (2006a). Do high schools or private institutes practice communicative language teaching? A case study of Shiraz teachers in high schools and institutes. The Reading Matrix, 6(3), 340-361.
Razmjoo, A. & Riazi, M. (2006b). On the teaching methodology of Shiraz EFL institutes. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities of Shiraz University, 23(1), 58-70.
Riazi, AM, & Razavipour, K (2011). (In) Agency of EFL teachers under the negative backwash effect of centralized tests. International Journal of Language Studies, 5(2), 263-282
Richards, J. & T. Farrell (2005). Professional development for language teachers: strategies for teacher learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. C. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Sadeghi, K., Ghaderi, F. (2018) English education in Iran. In: Liontas J (ed.) The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com
Sadeghi, K., & Richards, J. C. (2015). Teaching spoken English in Iran’s private language schools: issues and options. English Teaching: Practice & Critique, 14(2), 210–234. doi:10.1108/etpc-03-2015-0019
Safari, P., & Rashidi, N. (2015). A Critical Look at the EFL Education and the Challenges Faced by Iranian Teachers in the Educational System. International Journal of Progressive Education, 11(2). 14-28
Saif, S. (2006). Aiming for Positive Washback: A Case Study of International Teaching Assistants. Language Testing, 23(1), 1–34.
Sardabi, N, & Kusha, M. (2016). New perspectives in PROSPECT: an assessment of strengths and weaknesses of Iranian second year junior high school textbooks. Research in English Language Pedagogy, 16(2), 57–70.
Saslow, J. M., Ascher, A. (2006). Top Notch: English for today’s world. London: Pearson Longman
Saslow, J., & Ascher, A. (2012). Summit (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Pearson Education.
Sato, K., & Kleinsasser, R.C. (2004). Beliefs, practices and interactions of teachers in a Japanese high school English department. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20 (8), 797-816.
Seedhouse, P. (1995). Needs analysis and the General English classroom. ELT Journal, 49(1), 59–70. doi:10.1093/elt/49.1.59
Spada, N., & Fröhlich, M. (1995). The communicative orientation of language teaching observation scheme (COLT). Sydney, Australia: MacMillan.
Stoller, L. F., Horn, B., Grabe, W., & Robinson, S. M. (2006). Evaluate review in materials development. Journal of English for Academic Purposes.
Tavakoli, P. (2015). Connecting research and practice in TESOL: A community of practice perspective. RELC Journal, 46, 37–52.
Tomlinson, B. (2016). Current issues in the development of materials for learners of English as an international language (EIL). In English Language Teaching Today (pp.53-66). Springer, Cham.
Walsh, S. (2002). Construction or obstruction: Teacher talk and learner involvement in the EFL classroom. Language teaching research, 6(1), 3-23.
Watanabe, M. (2013). Willingness to communicate and Japanese high school English learners. JALT Journal, 35(2), 153–172.
West, R. (1994). Needs analysis in language teaching. Language Teaching, 27(1), 1-19.
Yassin, A. A., Razak, N. A., & Maasum, N. R. M. (2019). Investigating the Need for Computer Assisted Cooperative Learning to Improve Reading Skills Among Yemeni University EFL Students. International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments, 9(2), 15–31.
Zhang, L., & Rahimi, M.(2014). EFL learners’ anxiety level and their beliefs about corrective feedback in oral communication classes. System, 42, 429–439. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 776 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 920 |
||