| تعداد نشریات | 24 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 874 |
| تعداد مقالات | 7,803 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 14,218,003 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 12,164,653 |
Effect of sowing date and plant density on seed yield and yield attributes of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) genotypes | ||
| Iran Agricultural Research | ||
| مقاله 13، دوره 40، شماره 2، خرداد 2022، صفحه 121-133 اصل مقاله (1.33 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22099/iar.2022.42563.1475 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Barakatullah Rabbani1؛ Godarz Karimi1؛ Mahmud Khoramivafa* 1؛ Mohsen Saeidi1؛ Pardis Boroomandan1؛ Mahmoud Bagheri2؛ Leila Zarei1 | ||
| 1Department of Production Engineering and Plant Genetics, Razi University, Kermanshah, I. R. Iran | ||
| 2Seed and Plant Improvement Institute, Agriculture Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, I. R. Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) is world-renowned for its nutritional and health benefits and its adaptability to different environments. Despite some research on quinoa cultivation, determining the appropriate planting date and density for different genotypes and regions needs to be studied. The main objective of this study was to determine the effects of planting date and planting density on quinoa seed yield in climatic conditions of Kermanshah. In this regard, field experiments were conducted during two growing seasons (2019-2020) at the research farm of Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran. The experiments were conducted as split-plot factorial in randomized complete blocks design with three replications. Three sowing dates (March 15th, April 15th, and May 15th) were assigned to the main plots, two planting densities (40 and 60 plants m-2), and three genotypes including Titicaca, Q29, and Red Carina as subplots. The results showed that the highest seed yield (2179.72 and 2267.39 kg ha-1) were achieved on April 15th, 2019 and May 15th, 2020, respectively. Sowing dates of April 15th in 2019 and May 15th in 2020 with a plant density of 60 plants m-2 and Titicaca genotype had the highest seed yield for quinoa in Kermanshah climatic conditions. The results showed that panicle length and biological yield had a positive and significant correlation with grain yield in all studied planting dates. There was a positive and significant correlation between grain yield and grain weight per plant, 1000-grain weight, and biological yield at both densities. The path analysis revealed that panicle length had the highest positive direct effect on seed yield followed by 1000-seed weight on the first sowing date in 2019 and 2020, while biological yield and panicle length had the highest positive direct effect on seed yield on the second and third sowing dates, respectively. This experiment showed that genotypes and planting dates are the most determining factors affecting quinoa growth, development, and yield compared with planting densities. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Agronomic traits؛ Correlation؛ Path analysis؛ Temperate climate | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Algosaibi, A.M., Badran, A. E., Almadini, A.M. & El-Garawany, M. M. (2021). The effect of irrigation intervals on the growth and yield of quinoa crop and its components. Agricultural Sciences, 7, 144-154. Altuner, F., Oral, E., & Kulaz, H. (2019). The impact of different sowing-times of the quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) and its varieties on the yield and yield components in Turkey-Mardin ecology condition. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 17, 10105-10117. Awadalla, A., & Morsy, A. S. (2017). Influence of planting dates and nitrogen fertilization on the performance of quinoa genotypes under Toshka conditions. Egyptian Journal of Agronomy, 39, 27-40. Bascuñán-Godoy, L., Sanhueza, C., Pinto, K., Cifuentes, L., Reguera, M., Briones, V., Zurita-Silva, A., Álvarez, R., Morales, A., & Silva, H. (2018). Nitrogen physiology of contrasting genotypes of Chenopodium quinoa Willd. (Amaranthaceae). Scientific Reports, 8, 1-12. Casini, P. (2019). Seed yield of two new quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) breeding lines as affected by sowing date in Central Italy. Acta Agriculturae Slovenica, 113, 51-62. Ciriello, M., Formisano, L., El-Nakhel, C., Kyriacou, M. C., Soteriou, G. A., Pizzolongo, F., Romano, R., De Pascale, S., & Rouphael, Y. (2021). Genotype and successive harvests interaction affect phenolic acids and aroma profile of Genovese basil for pesto sauce production. Foods, 10, 278. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10020278 Dakhili, S., Abdolalizadeh, L., Hosseini, S. M., Shojaee-Aliabadi, S., & Mirmoghtadaie, L. (2019). Quinoa protein: Composition, structure, and functional properties. Food Chemistry, 299, 125-161. Dao, A., Alvar-Beltr, an, J., Gnanda, A., Guira, A., Nebie, L., & Sanou, J. (2020). Effect of different planting techniques and sowing density rates on the development of quinoa. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 16, 1325-1333. Dewey, D. R., & Lu, K. H. (1959). A correlation and path coefficient analysis of components of crested wheat grass seed production. Agronomy Journal, 51, 515–8. Eisa, S. S., Abd El Samad, E. H., Hussin, S. A., Ali, E. A., Ebrahim, M., González, J. A., Ordano, M. A., Erazzú, L. E., El Bordeny, N. E., & Abdel-Ati, A. A. (2018). Quinoa in Egypt-plant density effects on seed yield and nutritional quality in marginal regions. Middle East Journal of Applied Sciences, 8, 515-522. Granado-Rodríguez, S., Vilariño-Rodríguez, S., Maestro-Gaitán, I., Matías, J., Rodríguez, M. J., Calvo, P., & Reguera, M. (2021). Genotype-dependent variation of nutritional quality-related traits in quinoa seeds. Plants, 10(10), 2128. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10102128 Haghi, Y., Boroomandan, P., Moradin, M., Hassankhali, M., Farhadi, P., Farsaei, F., & Dabiri, S. (2012). Correlation and path analysis for yield, oil, and protein content of soybean (Glycine max L.) genotypes under different levels of nitrogen starter and plant density. Biharean Biologist, 6, 32-37. Hamza, A., Usman, K., Malik, M.W.I., Saad, M., Ghulam, S., Khan, Z., & Ullah, A. (2021). Response of quinoa genotypes to sowing dates and sowing methods under the agroclimatic condition of Dera Ismail Khan, KP Pakistan. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science Journal, 67, 1-11. Hinojosa, L., González, J. A., Barrios-Masias, F. H., Fuentes, F., & Murphy, K. M. (2018). Quinoa abiotic stress responses: A review. Plants Journal, 7, 106. DOI: 10.3390/plants7040106 Hirich, A., Choukr, R., & Jacobsen, S. E. (2014). Quinoa in Morocco – effect of sowing dates on development and yield. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 20, 371-377. Hunter, M. C., Sheaffer, C. C., Culman, S. W., & Jungers, J. M. (2020). Effects of defoliation and row spacing on intermediate wheatgrass I: Grain production. Agronomy Journal, 112, 1748-1763. Hussain, M. I., Muscolo, A., Ahmed, M., Asghar, M. A., & Al-Dakheel, A. J. (2020). Agro-morphological, yield, and quality traits, and interrelationship with yield stability in Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) genotypes under saline marginal environment. Plants Journal, 9, 1763. Doi: 10.3390/plants9121763. Hussain, S., Khaliq, A., Bajwa, A., Matloob, A., Areeb, A., Ashraf, U., Hafeez, A., & Imran, M. (2017). Crop growth and yield losses in wheat due to little seed canary grass infestation differ with weed densities and changes in environment. Planta Daninha 35. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582017350100073 Isobe, K., Sugiyama, H., Okuda, D., Murase, Y., Harada, H., Miyamoto, M., Koide, S., Higo, M., & Torigoe, Y. (2016). Effects of sowing time on the seed yield of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) in South Kanto, Japan. Agricultural Sciences, 7, 146-153. Jahanbkhsh, S., Khajoei-Nejad, G., Moradi, R., & Naghizadeh, M. (2020). Effect of planting date and salicylic acid on some quantitative and qualitative traits of quinoa as affected by drought stress. Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences, 13, 1149-1167. (In persian) Lavini, A., Pulvento, C., Andria, R., Riccardi, M., Choukr‐Allah, R., Belhabib, O., & Jacobsen, S. E. (2014). Quinoa’s potential in the Mediterranean region. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 200, 344- 360. Lazaridi, E., Papadopoulos, G. K., & Bebeli, P. J. (2020). Andean lupin phenology and agronomic performance under different planting dates in a Mediterranean climate. Agronomy, 10, 3-20. Mahmoud, A. H. (2017). Production of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) in the marginal environments of the south Mediterranean region: Nile Delta, Egypt. Egyptian Journal of Soil Science, 57, 329-337. Mirzaie, A., Mohammadi, K., Parvini, S., Khoramivafa, M., & Saeidi, M. (2020). Yield quantity and quality of two linseeds (Linum usitatissimum L.) cultivars as affected by sowing date. Industrial Crops and Products, 158, 112947. Nagib, S., Gahory, A., & Hassan, A. (2020). Productivity and quality of quinoa yield (chenopodium quinoa, willd) as affected by planting date and plant spacings. Scientific Journal of Flowers and Ornamental Plants, 7, 541-548. Nurse, R. E., Obeid, K., & Page, E. R. (2016). Optimal planting date, row width, and critical weed-free period for grain amaranth and quinoa grown in Ontario, Canada. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 96, 360-366. Öktem, A., Öktem, A. G., & Birden, Ö. F. (2021). Impact of sowing dates on forage value of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) under semi-arid conditions. International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research, 5, 171-182. Präger, A., Munz, S., Nkebiwe, P. M., Mast, B., & Graeff-Hönninger, S. (2018). Yield and quality characteristics of different quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) cultivars grown under field conditions in Southwestern Germany. Agronomy, 8, 197. Pulido-Bosch, A., Rigol-Sanchez, J. P., Vallejos, A., Andreu, J., Ceron, J., Molina-Sanchez, L., & Sola, F. (2018). Impacts of agricultural irrigation on groundwater salinity. Environmental Earth Sciences, 77, 1-14. Ramesah, K. (2016). Evaluatıon of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) at different dates of sowing and varied crop geometry in semi-arid regions of Telangana (Master’s thesis, College of Agriculture Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, India). Saba J., Tavana, Sh., Qurbanian, Z., Shadan, E., Shekari, F., & Jabbari, F. (2018). Canonical correlation analysis to determine the best traits for indirect improvement of wheat grain yield under terminal drought stress. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 20, 1037–1048. Scherf, K. A., (2019). Immunoreactive cereal proteins in wheat allergy, non-celiac gluten/wheat sensitivity (NCGS), and celiac disease. Current Opinion in Food Science, 25, 35-41. Sharma, V., Chandra, S., Dwivedi, P., & Parturkar, M. (2015). Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) is a nutritional healthy grain. International Journal of Advanced Research, 3, 725–736. Shoman, A. (2018). Effect of sowing dates and Nitrogen on productivity of Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) at Desert Areas. Journal of Plant Production, 9, 327-332. Sosa‐Zuniga, V., Brito, V., Fuentes, F., & Steinfort, U. (2017). Phenological growth stages of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) based on the BBCH scale. Annals of Applied Biology, 171(1), 117-124. Temel, S., & Yolcu, S. (2020). The effect of different sowing time and harvesting stages on the herbage yield and quality of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 25, 41-49. Timsina, J. (2018). Can organic sources of nutrients increase crop yields to meet global food demand? Agronomy, 8, 214. Van Minh, N., Hoang, D. T., Van Loc, N., & Long, N. V. (2020). Effects of plant density on growth, yield, and seed quality of quinoa genotypes under rain-fed conditions on red basalt soil regions. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 14, 1977-1982. Wang, N., Wang, F., Shock, C. C., Meng, C., & Qiao, L. (2020). Effects of management practices on quinoa growth, seed yield, and quality. Agronomy Journal, 10, 1-15. Xia, H., Wang, L., Xue, Y., Kong, W., Xue, Y., Yu, R., Xu, H., Wang, X., Wang, J., & Liu, Z. (2019). Impact of increasing maize densities on agronomic performances and the community stability of productivity of maize/peanut intercropping systems. Agronomy Journal, 9, 150. Zulkadir, G. (2021). The agroecological impact of different sowing dates and row spacing applications in quinoa (chenopodium quinoa willd.). Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 19, 751-762. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 693 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 892 |
||