اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات24
تعداد شماره‌ها859
تعداد مقالات7,631
تعداد مشاهده مقاله13,515,231
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله11,637,813
Jafarimehr, Esmaeil, sahabi, bahram, Heydari, Hassan. (1399). Is the Presence of Women on the Branch Credit Committee Important? Evidence from an Iranian Private Bank. , 10(1), 245-264. doi: 10.22099/ijes.2022.41316.1771
Esmaeil Jafarimehr; bahram sahabi; Hassan Heydari. "Is the Presence of Women on the Branch Credit Committee Important? Evidence from an Iranian Private Bank". , 10, 1, 1399, 245-264. doi: 10.22099/ijes.2022.41316.1771
Jafarimehr, Esmaeil, sahabi, bahram, Heydari, Hassan. (1399). 'Is the Presence of Women on the Branch Credit Committee Important? Evidence from an Iranian Private Bank', , 10(1), pp. 245-264. doi: 10.22099/ijes.2022.41316.1771
Jafarimehr, Esmaeil, sahabi, bahram, Heydari, Hassan. Is the Presence of Women on the Branch Credit Committee Important? Evidence from an Iranian Private Bank. , 1399; 10(1): 245-264. doi: 10.22099/ijes.2022.41316.1771

Is the Presence of Women on the Branch Credit Committee Important? Evidence from an Iranian Private Bank

Iranian Journal of Economic Studies
مقاله 12، دوره 10، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 19، خرداد 2021، صفحه 245-264    اصل مقاله (1.19 M)
نوع مقاله: Research Paper
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22099/ijes.2022.41316.1771
نویسندگان
Esmaeil Jafarimehr* ؛ bahram sahabi؛ Hassan Heydari
Faculty of Management and Economics, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده
Recent financial literature argues that there are gender differences between men and women, impacting financial decision making and performance. This paper, using data related to micro-loans of an Iranian private (commercial) bank between 2012 and 2018, investigates the effects of the characteristics of the members of the branch credit committees (BCCs), especially gender, on loan quality. Because, the dependent variable (loan quality) is a discrete ordinal variable and based on the Brant test’s result the proportional odds assumption was violated, the generalized ordinal logit model was used. The results of this paper show that increasing the presence of women in BCC improves the quality of micro-lending. Based on the literature and related studies, a potential explanation for these results is that increasing the number of women in the BCC improves the compliance of the decision-making and lending processes with the credit guidelines and recommendations, increases the BCC risk aversion, and reduces the agency problem by improving monitoring in the BCC. Moreover, the results also show that the quality of micro-lending management by BCCs with a higher average age is poorer than that of a younger BCC, and the higher education of the BCC members improves micro-lending quality.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Gender differences؛ men؛ women؛ branch credit committee (BCC)؛ loan quality
مراجع

Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact
on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2),
291-309.
Agnew, J. R., Balduzzi, P., & Sunden, A. (2003). Portfolio choice and trading in
a large 401(k) plan. American Economic Review, 93(1), 193-215.
Beck, T., Behr, P., & Guettler, A. (2013). Gender and banking: Are women better
loan officers? Review of Finance, 17(4), 1279-1321.
Becker, G. S. (1962). Investment in human capital: A theoretical analysis. Journal
of Political Economy, 70(5), 9-49.
Bellucci, A., Borisov, A., & Zazzaro, A. (2010). Does gender matter in bank-firm
relationships? Evidence from small business lending. Journal of Banking and
Finance, 34(12), 2968-2984.
Burke, R. J. (1997). Women on corporate boards of directors: A needed resource.
Journal of Business Ethics, 16(9), 37-43.
Carter, S., Shaw, E., Lam, W., & Wilson, F. (2007). Gender, entrepreneurship,
and bank lending: The criteria and processes used by bank loan officers in
assessing applications. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(3), 427-
444.
Cole, S., Kanz, M., & Klapper, L. (2015). Incentivizing calculated risk taking:
Evidence from an experiment with commercial bank loan officers. Journal
of Finance, 70(2), 537-575.
Croson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender difference in preferences. Journal of
Economic Literature, 47(2), 448-474.
Darity, W. A., & Mason, P. L. (1998). Evidence on discrimination in employment:
Codes of color, codes of gender. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(2),
63-90.
Eckel, C. C., & Grossman, P. J. (2008). Differences in the economic decisions of
men and women: Experimental evidence. Handbook of Experimental
Economics Results, 1(4), 509-519.
Egan, M. L., Matvos, G., & Seru, A. (2017). When harry fired sally: The double
standard in punishing misconduct. NBER Working Paper Series [No. 23242],
National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge, MA, March.
Filippin, A., & Crosetto, P. (2016). A reconsideration of gender differences in risk
attitudes. Management Science, 62(11), 3085-3105.
Fu, V. (1998). Estimating generalized ordered logit models. Stata Technical
Bulletin, 8(44), 27-30.
Gneezy, U., Niederle, M., & Rustichini, A. (2003). Performance in competitive
environments: Gender differences. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(3),
1049-1074.
Greene, W. H., & Hensher, D. A. (2010). Modeling ordered choices: A primer.
Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 

آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 528
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 334


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب