اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات24
تعداد شماره‌ها851
تعداد مقالات7,575
تعداد مشاهده مقاله13,413,708
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله11,580,438
Sayadi, Mohammad. (1399). Economic Analysis of Feed-in Tariff Policy in Iran’s Electricity Generation: Fresh Results from a Real Options Model for Solar Energy Promotion. , 10(1), 103-124. doi: 10.22099/ijes.2021.41043.1764
Mohammad Sayadi. "Economic Analysis of Feed-in Tariff Policy in Iran’s Electricity Generation: Fresh Results from a Real Options Model for Solar Energy Promotion". , 10, 1, 1399, 103-124. doi: 10.22099/ijes.2021.41043.1764
Sayadi, Mohammad. (1399). 'Economic Analysis of Feed-in Tariff Policy in Iran’s Electricity Generation: Fresh Results from a Real Options Model for Solar Energy Promotion', , 10(1), pp. 103-124. doi: 10.22099/ijes.2021.41043.1764
Sayadi, Mohammad. Economic Analysis of Feed-in Tariff Policy in Iran’s Electricity Generation: Fresh Results from a Real Options Model for Solar Energy Promotion. , 1399; 10(1): 103-124. doi: 10.22099/ijes.2021.41043.1764

Economic Analysis of Feed-in Tariff Policy in Iran’s Electricity Generation: Fresh Results from a Real Options Model for Solar Energy Promotion

Iranian Journal of Economic Studies
مقاله 6، دوره 10، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 19، خرداد 2021، صفحه 103-124    اصل مقاله (1.04 M)
نوع مقاله: Research Paper
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22099/ijes.2021.41043.1764
نویسنده
Mohammad Sayadi*
Department of Energy Economics & Resources, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده
Given the 95% share of electricity generation from non-renewable energies, implementing effective policies to motivate electricity generation from sustainable energy resources is essential. Since the current Feed-in Tariff (FiT) policy increases the government’s expenditures to support renewable energies, a real options (RO) model is proposed to estimate solar power generation incentive subsidy. Moreover, establishing a carbon emission trading (CET) scheme under uncertainty is proposed, and sensitivity analysis is conducted for the project value, threshold value, and subsidy. Our results show that establishing a CET market could significantly reduce the economic costs of achieving renewable energy promotion goals. Based on the net present value (NPV) and RO criteria, in the case “with the possibility of CET,” the amount of incentive subsidy that should be paid to electricity generation from a solar project (case of a 5 kW plant) are 37.49 and 42.42 million Rials/kW, indicating 20% and 12% reduction compared to the base case (without the possibility of CET), respectively. The results also indicate that more electricity price volatility can increase the incentive subsidy while enhancing the market price of electricity can slightly decrease the required subsidy, which triggers solar investment. 
کلیدواژه‌ها
Renewable Energy؛ Carbon Emission Trade؛ Real Options؛ Energy Transition؛ CO2 Emission
مراجع

Aghahosseini, A., Bogdanov, D., Ghorbani, N., & Breyer, C. (2018). Analysis of
100% renewable energy for Iran in 2030: Integrating solar PV, wind energy
and storage. International Journal of Environmental Science and
Technology, 15(1), 17-36.
Ahmad Ludin, N., Ahmad Affandi, N. A., Purvis-Roberts, K., Ahmad, A.,
Ibrahim, M. A., Sopian, K., & Jusoh, S. (2021). Environmental impact and
levelised cost of energy analysis of solar photovoltaic systems in selected
asia pacific region: A cradle-to-grave approach. Sustainability, 13(1), 396.
Ahmad, S., Tahar, R. M., Muhammad-Sukki, F., Munir, A. B., & Rahim, R. A.
(2015). Role of feed-in tariff policy in promoting solar photovoltaic
investments in Malaysia: A system dynamics approach. Energy, 84, 808-815.
Alizamir, S., de Véricourt, F., & Sun, P. (2016). Efficient feed-in-tariff policies
for renewable energy technologies. Operations Research, 64(1), 52-66.
Boyle, P., Broadie, M., & Glasserman, P. (1997). Monte Carlo methods for
security pricing. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 21(8-9), 1267-
1321.
Brandt, A. R., Millard-Ball, A., Ganser, M., & Gorelick, S. M. (2013). Peak oil
demand: The role of fuel efficiency and alternative fuels in a global oil
production decline. Environmental Science & Technology, 47(14), 8031-
8041.
Bretschger, L. (1998). How to substitute in order to sustain: Knowledge driven
growth under environmental restrictions. Environment and Development
Economics, 3(4), 425-442.
Campoccia, A., Dusonchet, L., Telaretti, E., & Zizzo, G. (2014). An analysis of
feed’in tariffs for solar PV in six representative countries of the European
Union. Solar Energy, 107, 530-542.
Chaharsooghi, S., Rezaei, M., & Alipour, M. (2015). Iran’s energy scenarios on a
20-year vision. International Journal of Environmental Science and
Technology, 12(11), 3701-3718.
Chen, W., Zeng, Y., & Xu, C. (2019). Energy storage subsidy estimation for
microgrid: A real option game-theoretic approach. Applied Energy, 239, 373-
382.
Cheng, B., Dai, H., Wang, P., Zhao, D., & Masui, T. (2015). Impacts of carbon
trading scheme on air pollutant emissions in Guangdong Province of China.
Energy for Sustainable Development, 27, 174-185.
Ciarreta, A., Espinosa, M. P., & Pizarro-Irizar, C. (2017). Optimal regulation of
renewable energy: A comparison of Feed-in Tariffs and Tradable Green
Certificates in the Spanish electricity system. Energy Economics, 67, 387-
399.
Diabat, A., Abdallah, T., Al-Refaie, A., Svetinovic, D., & Govindan, K. (2012).
Strategic closed-loop facility location problem with carbon market trading.
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 60(2), 398-408. 

آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 415
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 460


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب