اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات24
تعداد شماره‌ها859
تعداد مقالات7,646
تعداد مشاهده مقاله13,578,486
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله11,684,906
Barkhordari, Sajjad, Azimi, Naser Ali. (1399). The Impact of Governance Quality on Improving Innovative Activities in Selected MENA Countries. , 9(2), 509-525. doi: 10.22099/ijes.2021.37925.1690
Sajjad Barkhordari; Naser Ali Azimi. "The Impact of Governance Quality on Improving Innovative Activities in Selected MENA Countries". , 9, 2, 1399, 509-525. doi: 10.22099/ijes.2021.37925.1690
Barkhordari, Sajjad, Azimi, Naser Ali. (1399). 'The Impact of Governance Quality on Improving Innovative Activities in Selected MENA Countries', , 9(2), pp. 509-525. doi: 10.22099/ijes.2021.37925.1690
Barkhordari, Sajjad, Azimi, Naser Ali. The Impact of Governance Quality on Improving Innovative Activities in Selected MENA Countries. , 1399; 9(2): 509-525. doi: 10.22099/ijes.2021.37925.1690

The Impact of Governance Quality on Improving Innovative Activities in Selected MENA Countries

Iranian Journal of Economic Studies
مقاله 9، دوره 9، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 18، اسفند 2020، صفحه 509-525    اصل مقاله (999.42 K)
نوع مقاله: Research Paper
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22099/ijes.2021.37925.1690
نویسندگان
Sajjad Barkhordari* 1؛ Naser Ali Azimi2
1Faculty of Economics, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2Department of Economics of Science and Technology, National Research Institute for Science Policy (NRISP), Tehran, Iran
چکیده
Moving towards a knowledge-based economy is an important factor for developing countries. Achieving this goal requires improving different pillars such as innovation. Governance quality is a key factor to create innovation pillars and improve innovative activities. In this paper, we describe the impact of governance quality on improving innovation in selected MENA countries during 2009-2018. We used an empirical model and panel data method to describe the relationship between governance quality and innovative activities by considering control variables such as inflation, domestic credit provided by the financial sector (%GDP), the net inflow of foreign direct investment (FDI), and trade (%GDP). Empirical results indicate that the governance quality has a positive and significant effect on the performance of innovation in MENA countries. The positive effect of the governance quality sub-indices indicates that an improving institutional environment is necessary to stimulate innovation activities. The results also show that trade in MENA a country not only harms but also discourages innovative activities. According to empirical results, we propose that improving governance quality concentrated on government effectiveness and control of corruption is essential for innovative activities in MENA countries.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Governance Quality؛ Innovation؛ MENA Countries؛ Trade
مراجع

Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (1990). A model of growth through creative destruction.
NEBR, Working Paper, 3223.
Andres, A. R., Asongu, S. A., & Amavilah, V. (2015). The impact of formal
institutions on knowledge economy. Journal of the Knowledge Economy,
6(4), 1034-1062.
Arin, K. P., Huang, V. Z., Minniti, M., Nandialath, A. M., & Reich, O. F. (2015).
Revisiting the determinants of entrepreneurship: A Bayesian approach.
Journal of Management, 41(2), 607-631.
Ayrikyan, A., & Zaman, M. (2012). Creating an innovation ecosystem:
Governance and the growth of knowledge economies. Boston University.
Pardee Center Research Report.
Baldwin, C., & Von Hippel, E. (2011). Modeling a paradigm shift: From producer
innovation to user and open collaborative innovation. Organization Science,
22(6), 1399-1417.
Bekana, D. M. (2020). Does governance quality promote innovation in SubSaharan Africa? An empirical study across 37 countries. Innovation and
Development, 10(1), 21-44.
Bosma, N., & Schutjens, V. (2011). Understanding regional variation in
entrepreneurial activity and entrepreneurial attitude in Europe. The Annals of
Regional Science, 47(3), 711-742.
Chandra, D. S., & Yokoyama, K. (2011). The role of good governance in the
knowledge-based economic growth of East Asia–A study on Japan, Newly
Industrialized Economies, Malaysia and China. Graduate School of
Economics, Kyushu University.
Crescenzi, R., Gagliardi, L., & Iammarino, S. (2015). Foreign multinationals and
domestic innovation: Intra-industry effects and firm heterogeneity. Research
Policy, 44(3), 596-609.
Dullien, S. (2016). A question of strategy: What characterizes top growth
performers? In Rethinking Development Strategies after the Financial Crisis
(pp. 9-20). United Nations.
Erdal, L., & Göçer, İ. (2015). The effects of foreign direct investment on R&D
and innovations: Panel data analysis for developing Asian countries.
Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 749-758.
Giannetti, M., & Simonov, A. (2004). On the determinants of entrepreneurial
activity: Social norms, economic environment, and individual characteristics.
Swedish Economic Policy Review, 11(2), 269-313.
Grilo, I., & Thurik, R. (2004). Determinants of entrepreneurship in Europe. ERIM
Report Series Reference No. Papers on Entrepreneurship, Growth and
Public Policy 2004-30, Max Planck Institute of Economics,
Entrepreneurship, Growth and Public Policy Group.

آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 378
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 386


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب