| تعداد نشریات | 24 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 851 |
| تعداد مقالات | 7,575 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 13,413,809 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 11,580,479 |
The Role of Post-listening Vocabulary-focused Activities and Multimedia Presentation on Receptive and Productive Vocabulary Development | ||
| Teaching English as a Second Language Quarterly (Formerly Journal of Teaching Language Skills) | ||
| دوره 39، شماره 2، آبان 2020، صفحه 89-119 اصل مقاله (341.99 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22099/jtls.2020.37659.2850 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Salva Kazemipour khabbazi* ؛ Ali Akbar Ansarin | ||
| University of Tabriz | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Designing appropriate materials and activities to enhance vocabulary learning is one of the primary goals of language courses. Among the claims about efficient pedagogical tasks is the Involvement Load Hypothesis (Laufer & Hulstijn, 2001) according to which vocabulary development is contingent on the amount of cognitive process a task involves. Building on the previous research on this hypothesis, this study seeks to explore the extent to which three post-listening tasks of different involvement loads along with single-versus dual-mode glosses affect receptive and productive vocabulary learning of advanced English as a foreign language (EFL) learners. The participants (n = 204) listened to an expository text while twenty lexical items were presented through text-only or text-plus-picture glosses. Subsequently, they were assigned to one of the task type groups (sentence writing, gap-fill, and paragraph writing). Paribakht and Wesche’s (1997) Vocabulary Knowledge Scale was employed as the pre and post-tests. The results pointed to the efficacy of dual-mode over single-mode glosses concerning both receptive and productive vocabulary learning. The sentence writing task produced the highest scores in the vocabulary tests, whereas the gap-fill and paragraph writing tasks did not significantly differ. Hence, the results only partially confirmed the Involvement Load Hypothesis. The current study corroborates other studies verifying the modality effect on vocabulary learning and suggests that task type is a significant factor in EFL vocabulary learning. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Single-mode glosses؛ Dual-mode glosses؛ Task involvement load؛ Receptive vocabulary development؛ Productive vocabulary development | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abraham, L. B. (2008). Computer-mediated glosses in second language reading comprehension and vocabulary learning: A meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(3), 199–226. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09588220802090246
Acha, J. (2009). The effectiveness of multimedia programs in children’s vocabulary learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40, 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00800.x
Akbulut, Y. (2007). Effects of multimedia annotations on incidental vocabulary learning and reading comprehension of advanced learners of English as a foreign language. Instructional Science, 35, 499–517. http://doi:10.1007/s11251-007-9016-7
Al-Seghayer, K. (2001). The effect of multimedia annotation modes on L2 vocabulary acquisition: A comparative study. Language Learning & Technology, 5(1), 202–232. https://doi.org/10125/25117
Austin, K. A. (2009). Multimedia learning: cognitive individual differences and display design techniques predict transfer learning with multimedia learning modules. Computers & Education, 53, 1339–1354.
Bao, G. (2015). Task type effects on English as a Foreign Language learners' acquisition of receptive and productive vocabulary knowledge. System, 53, 84–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.07.006
Boers, F., Warren, P., He, L., & Deconinck, J. (2017). Does adding pictures to glosses enhance vocabulary uptake from reading? System, 66, 113–129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1356335
Boers, F., Warren, P., Grimshaw, G., & Siyanova-Chanturia, A. (2017). On the benefits of multimodal annotations for vocabulary uptake from reading. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(7), 709–725. http://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1356335
Brünken, R., Plass, J. L., & Leutner, D. (2004). Assessment of cognitive load in multimedia learning with dual-task methodology: auditory load and modality effects. Instructional Science, 32, 115–132. http://doi:10.1023/B:TRUC.0000021812.96911.c5
Brunyé, T. T., Taylor, H. A., Rapp, D. N., & Spiro, A. B. (2006). Learning procedures: The role of working memory in multimedia learning experiences. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 917–940. http://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1236
Çakmak, F., & Erҫetin, G. (2017). Effects of gloss type on text recall and incidental vocabulary learning in mobile-assisted L2 listening. ReCALL, 30(1), 24–47.DOI: http://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344017000155
Chun, D. M., & Plass, J. L. (1996a). Effects of multimedia annotations on vocabulary acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 80(2), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1996.tb01159.x
Chun, D. M., & Plass, J. L. (1996b). Facilitating reading comprehension with multimedia. System, 24(4), 503–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(96)00038-3
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Cottam, M. E. (2011). The effects of visual and textual annotations on Spanish listening comprehension, vocabulary acquisition and cognitive load (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Arizona, USA: Arizona State University. Retrieved from http://www.learntechlib.org/p/118131
Eckerth, J., & Tavakoli, P. (2012). The effects of word exposure frequency and elaboration of word processing on incidental L2 vocabulary acquisition through reading. Language Teaching Research, 16, 227–252. http://doi:10.1177/1362168811431377
File, A., & Adams, R. (2010). Should vocabulary instruction be integrated or isolated? TESOL Quarterly, 44, 222–249. http://doi:10.5054/tq.2010.219943
Ginns, P. (2005). Meta-analysis of the modality effect. Learning and Instruction, 15, 313–331. http://doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.001
Gyselinck, V., Jamet, E., & Dubois, V. (2008). The role of working memory components in multimedia comprehension. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 353–374. http://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1411
Hazrat, M. (2015). The roles of working memory components in vocabulary knowledge. International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, 4(2), 58-67. http://doi:10.18488/journal.23/2015.4.2/23.2.58.67
He, X. (2019). The effect of glossing on incidental vocabulary acquisition in the learning of Chinese as a second language. Global Chinese, 5(1), 25-43. https://doi.org/10.1515/glochi-2019-0002
Huang, S., Willson, V., & Eslami, Z. (2012). The effects of task involvement load on L2 incidental vocabulary learning: A meta-analytic study. The Modern Language Journal, 96, 544–557. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01394.x
Inan, F. A., Crooks, S. M., Cheon, J., Ari, F., Flores, R., Kurucay, M., & Paniukov, D. (2013). The reverse modality effect: Examining student learning from interactive computer-based instruction. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(1),123–130. http://doi:10.1111/bjet.12129
Jones, L. C. (2007). Effects of collaboration and multimedia annotations on vocabulary learning and listening comprehension. CALICO Journal, 24(1), 33–58. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v24i1.33-58
Jones, L. C., & Plass, J. L. (2002). Supporting listening comprehension and vocabulary acquisition in French with multimedia annotations. The Modern Language Journal, 86(4), 546–561. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00160
Jung, J. (2016). Effects of glosses on learning of L2 grammar and vocabulary. Language Teaching Research, 20(1), 92–112. doi: 10.1177/1362168815571151
Kim, Y. (2011). The role of task-induced involvement and learner proficiency in L2 vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning, 61, 100–140. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00644.x
Kozan, K., Erçetin, G., & Richardson, J. C. (2015). Input modality and working memory: Effects on second language text comprehension in a multimedia learning environment. System, 55, 63–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.09.001
Laufer, B. (2003). Vocabulary acquisition in a second language: Do learners really acquire most vocabulary by reading? Some empirical evidence. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 59 (4), 567–587. http://doi: 10.3138/cmlr.59.4.567
Laufer, B. (2005). Focus on form in second language vocabulary learning. EUROSLA Yearbook, 5, 223–250. https://doi.org/10.1075/eurosla.5.11lau
Laufer, B., & Hulstijn, J. (2001). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: The construct of task-induced involvement. Applied Linguistics, 22, 1–26. http://doi: 10.1093/applin/22.1.1
Lenders, O. (2008). Electronic glossing - is it worth the effort? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(5), 457–481. http://doi: 10.1080/09588220802447933
Mayer, R. E. (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 31–48). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E. (Ed.). (2014). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43–52. http://doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3801_6
Min, H. T. (2008). EFL vocabulary acquisition and retention: Reading plus vocabulary enhancement activities and narrow reading. Language Learning 58(1), 73–115. http://doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00435.x
Mohsen, M. A., & Balakumar, M. (2011). A review of multimedia glosses and their effects on L2 vocabulary acquisition in CALL literature. ReCALL, 23(2), 135–159. http://doi: 10.1017/S095834401100005X
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Harlow: Longman.
Nation, I. S. P. (2013). Learning vocabulary in another language (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Paribakht, S., & Wesche, M. (1997). Vocabulary enhancement activities and reading for meaning in second language vocabulary development. In J. Coady, & T. Huckin (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition: A rationale for pedagogy (pp. 147–200). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Phillips, D. (2015). Longman preparation course for the TOEFL iBT test. White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.
Ramezanali, N., & Faez, F. (2019). Vocabulary learning and retention through multimedia glossing. Language Learning & Technology, 23(2), 105–124. https://doi.org/10125/44685
Rassaei, E. (2017). Computer-mediated textual and audio glosses, perceptual style, and L2 vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 22(6), 657–675. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168817690183
Sadeghi, K., Khezrlou, S., & Modirkhameneh, S. (2017). Calling Iranian learners of L2 English: Effect of gloss type on lexical retention and reading performance under different learning conditions. Journal of Research in Reading, 40(S1), S66–S86. http://doi.I:10.1111/1467-9817.12088
Schmidt-Weigand, F., Kohnert, A., & Glowalla, U. (2010). A closer look at split visual attention in system- and self-paced instruction in multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 20(2), 100–110. http://doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.011
Schmitt, N. (2008). Review article: Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 12, 329–363. http://doi: 10.1177/1362168808089921
Schmitt, N. (2010). Researching vocabulary: A vocabulary research manual. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Sweller, J. (2005). Implications of cognitive load theory for multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 19–30). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sweller, J. (2010). Element interactivity and intrinsic, extraneous and germane cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9128-5.
Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. New York: Springer.
Tabbers, H. K. (2002). The modality of texts in multimedia instructions: Refining the design guidelines. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Heerlen: Open University of the Netherlands. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1820/1025.
Tabbers, H. K., Martens, R. L., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2004). Multimedia instructions and cognitive load theory: Effects of modality and cueing. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709904322848824
Türk, E., & Erçetin, G. (2012). Effects of interactive versus simultaneous display of multimedia glosses on L2 reading comprehension and incidental vocabulary learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27, 1–25. http://doi: 10.1080/09588221.2012.692384
Vidal, K. (2011). A comparison of the effects of reading and listening on incidental vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning, 61(1),219–258. http://doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00593.x
Webb, S. (2010). Using glossaries to increase the lexical coverage of television programs. Reading in a Foreign Language, 22(1), 201–221.
Webb, S., & Kagimoto, E. (2009). The effects of vocabulary learning on collocation and meaning. TESOL Quarterly, 43(1), 55–77.
Wouters, P., Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2009). Observational learning from animated models: Effects of modality and reflection on transfer. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34, 1–8. http:// doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.03.001
Yang, Y., Shintani, N., Li, S., & Zhang, Y. (2017). The effectiveness of post-reading word-focused activities and their associations with working memory. System, 70, 38–49. http://doi:10.1016/j.system.2017.09.012
Yeh, Y., & Wang, C. (2003). Effects of multimedia vocabulary annotations and learning styles on vocabulary learning. CALICO Journal, 21(1), 131–144. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/97205/ | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 567 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 710 |
||