| تعداد نشریات | 24 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 859 |
| تعداد مقالات | 7,646 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 13,578,486 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 11,684,906 |
Peer/Teacher Technology-Enhanced Scaffolding through Process Approach and Iranian EFL Learners’ Vocabulary Knowledge: A Probe into Self-regulation | ||
| Teaching English as a Second Language Quarterly (Formerly Journal of Teaching Language Skills) | ||
| مقاله 6، دوره 38، شماره 3، دی 2019، صفحه 189-223 اصل مقاله (507.53 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22099/jtls.2020.34379.2717 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Saeedeh Mansouri1؛ Davood Mashhadi Heidar* 2 | ||
| 1PhD Candidate, Department of English, Tonekabon Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tonekabon, Iran | ||
| 2Assistant Professor, Department of English, Tonekabon Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tonekabon, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| The present study aimed at investigating the effect of peer and teacher scaffolding through a process approach in a technology-enhanced environment on vocabulary learning among high and low self-regulated learners. Participants of the study were 120 English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners who were selected based on their scores on a sample copy of the Oxford Placement Test (OPT). The participants were divided into three groups each consisting of 40 learners. One group of the participants received peer scaffolding; the second group was exposed to teacher scaffolding via the Telegram app based on process approach principles, while the third group served as the control group. The control group received conventional vocabulary teaching in such a way that the Telegram app was not employed. The learners in the control group were also provided with vocabulary exercises in the vocabulary book (English Vocabulary in Use). Data were collected through a sample copy of OPT, a vocabulary test, and a self-regulation questionnaire. The results of a one-way ANOVA revealed that both peer and teacher scaffolding significantly affected vocabulary learning. However, there was no significant difference between peer and teacher scaffolding in terms of their effects on vocabulary learning. The results of a two-way ANOVA indicated that the main effect of treatment on vocabulary learning was significant; however, there was no statistically significant difference between the effects of the two treatment modalities on students’ vocabulary learning. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Peer Scaffolding؛ Process Approach؛ Self-regulation؛ Teacher Scaffolding؛ Vocabulary Acquisition | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Ahmadi Safa, M., &Rozati, F. (2016). The impact of scaffolding and non-scaffolding strategies on EFL learners' listening comprehension development. The Journal of Educational Research, 110 (5), 447-456.
Agustín-Llach, M. P. (2015). Maximizing incidental vocabulary acquisition in Spanish as a foreign language. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 5(3), 262-276.
AlipourMadarsara, F., Youhanaee, M., &Barati, H. (2015). Intentional vs. incidental vocabulary learning through games by young EFL Persian speakers. International Journal of Research Studies in Educational Technology, 4(1), 23-24.
AmiriSamani, E., &Khazayie, S. (2017). Scaffolding low-intermediate adult EFL learners to write. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 4(2), 216-230.
Arast, O., &Gorjian. B. (2016). The effect of listening to comic strip stories on incidental vocabulary learning among Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Learning, 2(1), 1-7.
Bouhnik, D., & Deshen, M. (2014). WhatsApp goes to school: Mobile instant messaging between teachers and students. Journal of Information Technology Education, 13, 217–231.
Brown, C., & Payne, M. E. (1994). Five essential steps or processes in vocabulary learning. Paper presented at the TESOL 1994, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Brown, M., Castellano, J., Hughes, E., & Worth, A. (2012). Integration of iPads into a Japanese university English language curriculum. The JALTCALL Journal, 8(3), 197-209.
Calvo, R., Arbiol, A., & Iglesias, A. (2014). Are all Chats suitable for learning purposes? A study of the required characteristics. Procedia Computer Science, 27(3), 251–260.
Carver, C. S., &Scheier, M. F. (1990). Origins and functions of positive and negative affect: A control-process view. Psychological Review, 97(1), 19-35.
Chan, T. W., Roschelle, J., Hsi, S., Kinshuk, Sharples, M., et al. (2006). One-to-one technology-enhanced learning: An opportunity for global research collaboration, Research and Practice in Technology-Enhanced Learning, 1(1), 3-29.
Decarrico, J. S. (2001). Vocabulary learning and teaching. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 285-299). Boston: Heinle&Heinle.
De Guerrero, M.C.M. &Villamil, O. S. (2000). Activating the ZPD: Mutual scaffolding in L2 peer revision. The Modern Language Journal, 84(1), 51-68.
Do digovic, M. (2005). Vocabulary profiling with electronic corpora: A case study in computer-assisted needs analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(5), 443-455.
Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Ebrahimi, S, Hajebrahimi, S, Nikfallah, A, Sari-Motlagh, & Shakiba, B. (2016). Lifelong learning in practice: The age of discussion through social media. European Urology, 69(6), 1162-1163.
Ertürk, Z. O. (2016). The Effect of glossing on EFL learners’ incidental vocabulary learning in reading. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232(4), 373 – 381.
Garrett, N. (2009). Computer-assisted language learning trends and issues revisited: Integrating innovation. The Modern Language Journal, 93(8), 719-740.
Ghaemi, F., & Seyed Golshan, N. (2017). The Impact of Telegram as a Social Network on Teaching English Vocabulary among Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners. International Journal of Media and Communication, 1(1), 23-29.
Ghanbari, M., &Marzban, A. (2014). Effect of extensive reading on incidental vocabulary retention. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116(40), 3854 – 3858.
Ghobadi, S., & Taki, S. (2018). Effects of Telegram stickers on English vocabulary learning: Focus on Iranian EFL learners. Research in EnglishLanguage Pedagogy, 6(1), 139-158.
Hamberger, E., (2014). Why Telegram has become the hottest messaging app in the world. The VERGE. Retrieved 2019 from https://www.theverge.com /2019/2/25/5445864/telegram-messenger-hottest-app-in-the-world.
Harraqi, M. (2017). Review of Aida Walqui’s scaffolding instruction for English language learners: A conceptual framework.American Journal of Arts and Design, 2(3), 84-88.
Heidari Tabrizi, H., & Onvani, N. (2018). The impact of employing the telegram app on Iranian EFL beginners’ vocabulary teaching and learning. Applied Research on English Language, 7(1), 1-18.
Kaplan, A., M., & Haenlein, M., (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53 (1), 58-68.
Khaddage, F. & Lattemann, C. (2013). iTeach We Learn Via Mobile Apps "a Case Study in a Business Course". In R. McBride & M. Searson (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2013--Society for Information Technology &Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 3225-3233). New Orleans, Louisiana, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
KhajehKhosravi, S. (2017). The effect of symmetrical scaffolding on the reading comprehension of Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Psychological and Brain Sciences, 2(4), 95-99.
Knight, S. (1994). Making authentic cultural and linguistic connections. Hispania, 77, 289-294.
Mashhadi Heidar, D., & Kaviani, M. (2016). The Social impact of Telegram as a social network on teaching English vocabulary among Iranian intermediate EFL learners (Payam Noor Center). Journal of Sociological Studies of Youth,7(23), 65-76.
Meara, P. (1980). Vocabulary acquisition: A neglected aspect of language learning. Language Teaching and Linguistics Abstracts, 13, 221-246.
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
O'Dowd, R. (2007). Online intercultural exchange: An introduction for foreign language teachers. England: Multilingual Matters.
Schmitt, N. (2008). Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 12 (3), 329-363.
Skehan, P. (2003). Focus on form, tasks, and technology. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 16(5), 391-411.
Steel, C. (2012). Fitting learning into life: language students’ perspectives on benefits of using mobile apps. In M. Brown, & M. Hartnett, (Eds.), Proceedings of ASCILITE 2012, 25-28 November (pp. 875-880). Ascilite: New Zealand.
Stockwell, G. (2013). Technology and motivation in English language teaching and learning. In E. Ushioda (Ed.), International perspectives in motivation: Language learning and professional challenges(pp. 156-175). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Toscu, S. (2013). The impact of interactive whiteboards on classroom interaction in tertiary level English as a foreign language class (Unpublished master’s thesis). Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey.
Vivienne, W. (2016). With Telegram, A reclusive social media star rises again. Fortune. Retrieved November, 2019 from: http://fortune.com/telegram-pavel-durov-mobile-world-congress.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Walters, J. M. (2004). Teaching the use of context to infer meaning: A Longitudinalsurvey of L1 and L2 vocabulary research. Language Teaching, 37(4), 243-252.
Warschauer, M., &Meskill, C. (2000). Technology and second language learning. In J. Rosenthal (ED.), Handbook of undergraduate second language education(pp. 121-134). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Wiebe, G., &Kabata, K. (2010). Students' and instructors' attitudes toward the use of CALL in foreign language teaching and learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(3), 221-234.
Wilkins, D. A. (1972). Linguistic in language teaching. London: Edward Arnold Publishers.
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem-solving. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry & Allied Disciplines, 17 (2), 89-100.
Wu, J. (2011). Study on college students’ utilization of vocabulary learning strategies. Fudan Forum on Foreign Languages and Literature, 84-89.
Zhang, H., Song, W., & Burston, J. (2011). Reexamining the effectiveness of vocabulary learning via mobile phones. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 10(3), 203-214.
Zheng, L. (2016). The effectiveness of self-regulated learning scaffolds on academic performance in computer-based learning environments: A meta-analysis. Asia Pacific Education, 17(22), 187–202.
Zou, B., & Li, J. (2015). Exploring mobile apps for English language teaching and learning. In F. Helm, L. Bradley, M. Guarda, & S. Thouesny (Eds.), Critical CALL - Proceedings of the 2015 EUROCALLConference (pp. 564-568). Padova: Italy.
Zumbrunn, S., Tadlock, J., & Roberts, E. D. (2011). Encouraging Self-Regulated Learning in the Classroom: A Review of the Literature. Metropolitan Educational Research Consortium (MERC), Virginia Commonwealth University. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 898 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 816 |
||