معیار ارزیابی نتایج حاصل از مطالعات و پژوهش‌های علمی در نظام حل و فصل اختلافات سازمان تجارت جهانی، داوری های سرمایه گذاری و مقررات داوری ایران

Bourgeois, H.J (1997) "GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement Practice in the Field of Anti-Dumping Law", in E-U Petersmann (ed), International Trade Law and the GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement System, London; Boston: Kluwer Law International.

Grando, Michelle T. (2010) Evidence, Proof, and Fact-Finding in WTO Dispute Settlement, Oxford University Press.

Gruszczynski, Lukasz & Werner, Wouter (2014) Deference in International Courts and Tribunals - Standard of Review and Margin of Appreciation, Oxford University Press.

Henckels, Caroline (2015) Proportionality and Deference in Investor-State Arbitration: Balancing Investment Protection and Regulatory Autonomy, Cambridge University Press.

Scott, Joanne (2007) The WTO Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures: A Commentary, Oxford University Press.

Burke-White, William W & von Staden, Andreas (2010) “Private Litigation in a Public Law Sphere: The Standard of Review in Investor-State Arbitrations, The Yale Journal of International Law, Vol. 35, pp. 283-346.

Burke-White, William W & Von Staden, Andreas (2010) “The Need for Public Law Standards of Review in Investor-State Arbitrations”, in Stephan Schill (ed), International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law, Oxford University Press.

Chen, Tsai-fang (2012) “The Standard of Review and the Roles of ICSID Arbitral Tribunals In Investor-State Dispute Settlement”, Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal, Vol. 5, pp. 23- 43.

Choudhury, Bamali (2008) “Recapturing Public Power: Is Investment Arbitration’s’ Engagement of the Public Interest Contributing to the Democratic Deficit?”, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, Vol. 41, pp.775-832.

Cottier, Thomas & Oesch, Matthias (2003)“'The Paradox of Judicial Review in International Trade regulation: towards a comprehensive framework, Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, pp. 287-306.

Davey, William J. (2001) “Has the WTO Dispute Settlement System Exceeded its Authority? A Consideration of Deference Shown by the System to Member Government Decisions and its Use of Issue-avoidance Techniques”, Journal of International Economic Law, Vol. 4, Isssue. 1, pp. 79-110.

Desmedt, G. Axel (1998) “Hormones: ‘‘Objective Assessment’’ and (or as) Standard of Review”, Journal of International Economic Law, Vol. 1, pp. 695-98.

DiMascio, Nicholas & Pauwelyn, Joost (2008) “Nondiscrimination in Trade and Investment Treaties: Worlds Apart or Two Sides of the Same Coin?”, American Journal of International, Vol. 102, pp. 48-89.

Ehlermann, Claus-Dieter & Lockhart, Nicolas (2004) “Standard of review in WTO law”, Journal of International Economic Law, Vol. 7, Isssue. 3, pp. 491-521.

Epps, Tracey (2012) “Recent Developments in WTO Jurisprudence: Has the Appellate Body Resolved the Issue of an Appropriate Standard of Review in SPS cases?”, University Toronto Law Journal, Vol. 62, pp. 201-227.

Fukunaga, Yuka (2012) “Standard of Review and Scientific Truths in the WTO Dispute Settlement System and Investment Arbitration”, Journal of International Dispute Settlement, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 559-576.

Gillman, Eric (2011) “Making WTO SPS Dispute Settlement Work: Challenges and Practical Solutions”, Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business, Vol. 31, Issue. 2, pp. 439-477.

Jane, Tarun (2006) Standard of Review of DSB in Anti-Dumping Disputes, Supreme Court of India; London School of Economics & Political Science (LSE); National Law University Jodhpur (NLUJ)

Lathrop, Coalter G. (2010) “International Decision: Government of Sudan v. Sudan People’ Liberation Movement/Army (Abyei Arbitration), Arbitral Tribunal July 22, 2009”, The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 104, pp. 66-73.

Mason, Josephine K. (2009) “Arbitral & Judicial Decision: The Role of Ex Aequo et Bono in International Border Settlement: A Critique of the Sudanese Abyei Arbitration”, American Review of International Arbitration, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 519- 538.

Pauwelyn, Joos (2002) “The Use of Experts in WTO Dispute Settlement”, International & Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 51, pp. 325-364.

Peel, Jacqueline (2012) “of Apples and Oranges (and Hormones in Beef): Science and the Standard of Review in WTO Disputes under the SPS Agreement”, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 61, pp. 427-458.

Pietrowski, Robert (2006) “Evidence in International Arbitration”, Arbitration International, Vol. 22, Issue. 3, pp. 373-404.

Schill, Stephan W. (2012) “Deference in Investment Treaty Arbitration: Reconceptualizing the Standard of Review Trough Comparative Public Law”, Society of International Economic Law (SIEL), 3rd Biennial Global Conference, pp. 1- 27.

Schill, S. W. (2012) “Deference in Investment Treaty Arbitration: Re-conceptualizing the Standard of Review”, Journal of International Dispute Settlement, Vol. 3, Issue. 3, pp. 577-607.

Straus, Michael (1986) “The Practice of the Iran-U.S. Claims Tribunal in Receiving Evidence from Parties and from Experts”, Journal of International Arbitration, Vol. 3, pp. 53- 69.

Teitelbaum, Ruth (2010) “A Look at the Public Interest in Investment Arbitration: Is It Unique? What Should We Do About It?”, Berkeley Journal of International Law Publicist, Vol. 5, pp. 54-62.

Wang, Wei (2017) “The Non-Precluded Measure Type Clause in International Investment Agreements: Significances, Challenges, and Reactions”, ICSID Review, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 447–456.

Vadi, Valentina & Gruszczynski, Lukasz (2013) “Standards of Review in International Investment Law and Arbitration: Multilevel Governance and the Commonweal”, Journal of International Economic Law, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp. 613-633.

Van Harten, Gus & Loughlin, Martin (2006) “Investment Treaty Arbitration as a Species of Global Administrative Law”, European Journal of International Law, Vol. 17, pp. 121-150.

Wagner, Markus (2011) “Law Talk v. Science Talk: The Languages of Law and Science in WTO Proceedings”, Fordham International Law Journal, Vol. 35, pp. 150-200.

Zlepting, Stefan (2002) “The Standard of Review in WTO Law – An Analysis of Law, Legitimacy and the Distribution of Legal and Political Authority”, European Integration Online Papers, Issue. 5, pp. 427-457.

 

Documents & Reports

Appellate Body Report (20 October 1998), Australia—Measures Affecting Importation of Salmon, WT/DS18/AB/R, adopted 6 November 1998 [Appellate Body, Australia—Salmon]

Appellate Body Report (16 October 2008), Canada—Continued Suspension of Obligations in the EC—Hormones Dispute, WT/DS321/AB/R, adopted 14 November 2008 [Appellate Body Report, Canada—Continued Suspension].

Appellate Body Report (12 March 2001), European Communities—Measures Affecting Asbestos and Asbestos-Containing Products, WT/DS135/AB/R, adopted 5 April 2001.

Appellate Body Report (16 January 1998), European Communities—Measures Concerning Meat and Meat Products (Hormones), WT/DS26/AB/R, WT/DS48/AB/R, adopted 13 February 1998 [Appellate Body Report, EC—Hormones].

Appellate Body Report (26 November 2003), Japan—Measures Affecting the Importation of Apples, WT/DS245/AB/ R, adopted 10 December 2003 [Appellate Body Report, Japan—Apples].

Appellate Body Report (4 October 1996), Japan—Taxes on Alcoholic Beverages, WT/DS8/AB/R, WT/DS10/AB/R, WT/DS11/AB/R, adopted 1 November 1996.

Appellate Body Report (21 December 2011), Philippines – Taxes on Distilled Spirits, WT/DS396/ AB/R, WT/DS403/AB/R, adopted 20 January 2012.

Appellate Body Report (24 July 2001), United States—Anti-Dumping Measures on Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Products from Japan, WT/DS184/AB/R, adopted 23 August 2001.

Appellate Body Report (16 October 2008), United States – Continued Suspension of Obligations in the EC – Hormones Dispute, WT/DS320/AB/R, adopted 14 November 2008 [Appellate Body Report, US— Continued Suspension].

Appellate Body Report (27 June 2005), United States—Countervailing Duty Investigation on Dynamic Random Access Memory Semiconductors (DRAMS) from Korea, WT/DS296/AB/R, adopted 20 July 2005.

Appellate Body Report (22 December 2000), United States—Definitive Safeguard Measures on Imports of Wheat Gluten from the European Communities, WT/DS166/AB/R, adopted 19 January 2001 [Appellate Body Report, US—Wheat Gluten].

Appellate Body Report (1 May 2001), United States—Safeguard Measures on Imports of Fresh, Chilled or Frozen Lamb Meat from New Zealand and Australia, WT/DS177/AB/R, WT/DS178/AB/R, adopted 16 May 2001.

Appellate Body Report (8 October 2001), United States—Transitional Safeguard Measure on Combed Cotton Yarn from Pakistan, WT/DS192/AB/R, adopted 5 November 2001.

Panel Report (12 June 1998), Australia—Measures Affecting Importation of Salmon, WT/DS18/R and Corr.1, adopted 6 November 1998.

Panel Report, Guatemala – Definitive Anti-Dumping Measures on Grey Portland Cement from Mexico (Guatemala – Cement II), WT/DS156/R, adopted 17 November 2000, DSR 2000: XL, 5295.

Panel Report (15 July 2003), Japan—Measures Affecting the Importation of Apples, WT/DS245/R, adopted 10 December 2003.

Panel Report (15 August 2011), Philippines—Taxes on Distilled Spirits, WT/DS396/R, WT/DS403/R, adopted 20 January 2012.

Panel Report (15 November 2010), Thailand—Customs and Fiscal Measures on Cigarettes from the Philippines, WT/DS371/R, adopted 15 July 2011.

Panel Report, European Communities—Measures Affecting the Approval and Marketing of Biotech Products, WT/DS291/R, WT/DS292/R, WT/DS293/R, Add.1 to Add.9, and Corr.1, adopted 21 November 2006.

Panel Report (18 August 1997), European Communities— Measures Concerning Meat and Meat Products (Hormones), Complaint by Canada, WT/DS48/R/CAN, adopted 13 February 1998 [Panel Report, EC—Hormones (Canada)]

Panel Report (18 August 1997), European Communities—Measures Concerning Meat and Meat Products (Hormones), Complaint by the United States, WT/DS26/R/USA, adopted 13 February 1998 [Panel Report, EC—Hormones (US)].

 

Awards

Award (27 June 1990), Asian Agricultural Products Ltd v Republic of Sri Lanka, ICSID Case No ARB/87/3.

Award (20 October 2010), Alpha Projektholding GMBH v Ukraine, ICSID Case No ARB/07/16.

Award (2 August 2010), Chemtura Corporation v Canada.

Award (8 June 2009), Glamis v US.

Award (20 June 2009), Saipem SpA v Bangladesh, ICSID Case No ARB/05/7.

Award II (30 April 2004), Waste Management v. Mexico.

Decision on Jurisdiction and Liability (14 January 2010), Lemire v. Ukraine.

Final Award (15 November 2004), GAMI Investments v Mexico.

Final Award on Jurisdiction and Merits (3 August 2005), Methanex Corporation v United States.

Final Award (22 July 2009), The Government of Sudan v The Sudan People’s Liberation Movement/Army.

ICJ Judgment (12 November 1991), Case Concerning the Arbitral Award of 31 July 1989 (Guinea-Bissau v Senegal).

Partial Award (13 November 2000), S.D. Myers, Inc v The Government of Canada.

Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona S.A. and Vivendi universal S.A. v Argentine Republic ICSID Case No. ARB/03/19 - Order in Response to a Petition for Transparency and Participation as Amicus Curiae of May 19, 2005.