| تعداد نشریات | 24 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 851 |
| تعداد مقالات | 7,575 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 13,413,777 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 11,580,469 |
Comparison of the effects of Written Corrective Feedback and Task-complexity Manipulation on the Grammatical Accuracy of EFL Learners’ Writing | ||
| Teaching English as a Second Language Quarterly (Formerly Journal of Teaching Language Skills) | ||
| مقاله 6، دوره 37، شماره 4، خرداد 2019، صفحه 167-194 اصل مقاله (460.83 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22099/jtls.2019.33549.2688 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Sedigheh Vahdat* 1؛ Niloofar ِDaneshkhah2 | ||
| 1Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Iran | ||
| 2Petroleum University of Technology | ||
| چکیده | ||
| This study compared the effects of teacher-provided written corrective feedback and manipulation of resource-directing dimensions of task cognitive-complexity along +/- Here and Now condition on the grammatical accuracy of Iranian EFL learners’ writing products. There were 45 participants in the study who were randomly assigned to three experimental groups. All the participants were first given a prompt for the pre-test of writing, and then each group received its own intervention (direct written corrective feedback, indirect written corrective feedback, and task manipulation) for four sessions during four weeks. Subsequently, all the groups took the pre-test prompt of writing for their post-test performance after which the data were collected for the statistical analyses and fed into SPSS. The findings of the study confirmed the significant effects of direct written corrective feedback on increasing the grammatical accuracy of learners’ writings. There were implications, then, based on the results, highlighting the role of meaningful context of task application in the classroom. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Written corrective feedback؛ Task manipulation؛ Grammatical accuracy؛ Direct feedback؛ Indirect feedback | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abdollahzadeh, S., & Fard Kashani, A. (2011). The effect of task complexity on EFL learners' narrative writing task performance. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 8(2), 1-28.
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Mahwah, NJ Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bitchener, J. (2012). Written corrective feedback for L2 development: Current knowledge and future research. TESOL Quarterly, 46(4), 855-860.
Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(3), 267–296.
Chen, S., Nassaji, H., & Liu, Q. (2016). EFL learners’ perceptions and preferences of written corrective feedback: A case study of university students from Mainland China. Asian- Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 1(5). doi:10.1186/s40862- 016-0010-y
Daneshkhah, N., & Alibabaee, A. (2017). The role of increasing task cognitive-complexity in quality of L2 writing and learners’ distribution of metacognitive sub-processes. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, 4(3), 95-118. Daneshvar, E., & Rahimi, A. (2013). Written corrective feedback and teaching grammar. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 136, 217-221.
Dawn Sia, P. F., & Cheung, Y. L. (2017). Written corrective feedback in writing instruction: a qualitative synthesis of recent research. Issues in Language Studies, 6(1), 61-80.
Ellis, R. (2009). Task-based research and language pedagogy. In K. Van den Branden, M. Bygate, & J. M. Norris (Eds.), Task-based language teaching: A reader (pp.109-130). Philadelphia/ Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ellis, R., &Yuan, F. (2004). The effects of planning on fluency, complexity, and accuracy in second language narrative writing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 59-84.
Ellis, R., Erlam, R. & Loewen, S. (2006). Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 339–368.
Elwood, J. A., & Bode, J. (2014). Student preferences vis-à-vis teacher feedback in university EFL writing classes in Japan. System, 42, 333-343.
Eslami, E. (2014). The effects of direct and indirect corrective feedback techniques on EFL students’ writing. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 445-452.
Fakhraee Faruji, L., & Ghaemi, F. (2017). Task complexity manipulation and accuracy in writing performance. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 35(4), 103-132.
Farjadnasab, A. H., & Khodashenas, M. R. (2017). The effect of written corrective feedback on EFL students’ writing accuracy. IJREE, 2(2), 30-42.
Ferris, D. R. (1995). Student reactions to teacher response in multiple-draft composition classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), 33-53.
Ferris, D. R. (2006). Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long- term effects of written error correction. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (pp. 81–104). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Ferris, D. R., & Helt, M. (2000). Was Truscott right? New evidence on the effects of error correction in L2 writing classes. Paper presented at the American Association of Applied Linguistics Conference. Vancouver, BC, March, 11–14.
Ferris, D. R., & Roberts, B. (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 161–184.
Ferris, D.R. (2010). Second language writing research and written corrective feedback in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 181–201.
Flower, L. S. & Hayes, J. R. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. W. Gregg, & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp.31-50). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Flower, L. S. & Hayes, J. R. (1981). Plans that guide the composing process. In C. H. Frederiksen, & J. F. Dominic (Eds.), Writing: The nature, development and teaching of written communication (pp. 39 - 58). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Galbraith, D. (1999). Writing as a knowledge-constituting process. In M. Torrance, & D. Galbraith (Eds.) Knowing what to write (pp. 139-160). Amsterdam, NL: Amsterdam University Press.
Gass, S. (1997). Input, interaction and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Gunawardena, M. (2014). Developing effective pedagogies of grammar: The two-in-one approach. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 8(3), A113-A123.
Han, Y., & Hyland, F. (2015). Exploring learner engagement with written corrective feedback in a Chinese tertiary EFL classroom. Journal of second language writing, 30, 31-44.
Hartshorn, K. J., Evans, N. W., Merrill, P. F., Sudweeks, R. R., Strong-Krause, D., & Anderson, N. J. (2010). Effects of dynamic corrective feedback on ESL writing accuracy. TESOL Quarterly, 44, 84–109.
Horbacauskiene, J., & Kasperaviciene, R. (2015). Learners’ preferences towards corrective feedback in writing assignments in tertiary education. Explorations in English Language and Linguistics, 3(2), 70-83.
Hyland, F. (1998). The impact of teacher written feedback on individual writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7, 255–286.
Hyland, F., & Hyland, K. (2006). Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Hyland, K. (2013). Student perceptions of hidden messages in teacher written feedback. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 39(3), 180-187.
Ishikawa, T. (2006). The effect of manipulating task complexity along the (Here- and-Now) dimension on L2 written narrative discourse. In C. M. Garcı´a Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp.136-156). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Kim, Y., & Emeliyanova, L. (2019). The effects of written corrective feedback on the accuracy of L2 writing: comparing collaborative and individual revision behavior. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168819831406 Kuiken, F. & Vedder, I. (2008) Cognitive task complexity and written output in Italian and French as a foreign language. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(1), 48-60.
Learning Express LLC. (2003). 501 writing prompts. United States of America, NY: LearningExpress LLC.
Lee, I. (2008). Student reactions to teacher feedback in two Hong Kong secondary classrooms. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(3), 144-164.
Lee, I. (2008). Understanding teachers’ written feedback practices in Hong Kong secondary classrooms. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(2), 69-85.
Li, s., & Roshan, S. (2019). The association between working memory and the effects of four different types of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 45, 1-15.
Loewen, S., Li, S., Fei, F., Thompson, A., Nakatsukasa, K., Ahn, S., & Chen, X. (2009). Second language learners' beliefs about grammar instruction and error correction. The Modern Language Journal, 93(1), 91-104.
Long, M. H. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective, 2(1), 39-52.
Long, M. H. (1996). The role of linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie and T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). San Diego: Academic Press.
Michigan State University. (2007). Technical Writing Guide. Retrieved from: www.egr.msu.edu/age/bewritingguideV2.0.pdf
Muller, A., & Gregoric, C., & Rowland, D. R. (2017). The impact of explicit instruction and corrective feedback on ESL postgraduate students’ grammar in academic writing. Journal of Academic Language & Learning, 11(1), A125-A144.
Naylor, H., & Murphy, R. (2007). Essential Grammar in use supplementary exercises. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Norris, J. M. & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50(3), 417-528.
Norris, J. M., & Manchón, R. M. (2012). Investigating L2 writing development from multiple perspectives: Issues in theory and research. In R. Manchón (Ed.), L2 writing development: Multiple perspectives (221-244). Boston/Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Nunan, D. (2004). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ong, J. (2014). How do planning time and task conditions affect metacognitive processes of L2 writers? Journal of Second Language Writing, 23, 17-30.
Ong, J., & Zhang, L. J. (2010). Effects of task complexity on the fluency and lexical complexity in EFL students’ argumentative writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19, 218- 233.
Ong, J., & Zhang, L. J. (2013). Effects of the manipulation of cognitive processes on EFL writers’ text quality. TESOL, 47, 375-398.
Poulos, A., & Mahony, M. J. (2008). Effectiveness of feedback: The students’ perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(2), 143-154.
Reid, J. (2001). Advanced EAP writing and curriculum design: What do we need to know? In T. Silva & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.), On second language writing (pp.143-160). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Robinson, P. (2001a). Task complexity, cognitive resources, and syllabus design: A triadic framework for examining task influences on SLA. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 287-318). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Robinson, P. (2001b). Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 22, 27-57.
Robinson, P. (2003). The cognition hypothesis, task design, and adult task-based language learning. Second Language Studies, 21, 45–105.
Robinson, P. (2007). Re-thinking-for-speaking and L2 task demands: The cognition hypothesis, task classification, and sequencing. Plenary address at the Second International Conference on Task-Based Language Teaching, University of Hawai’i.
Ruiz-Funes, M. (2015). Exploring the potential of second/foreign language writing for language learning: the effects of task factors and learner variables. Journal of Second Language Writing, 28, 1-19.
Saeli, H. (2019). Teachers’ practices and students’ preferences: grammar-centered written corrective feedback in Iran. Research in English Language Pedagogy, 7(1), 46-70.
Said, K., & El Mouzrati, A. (2018). Investigating teacher written corrective feedback as a formative assessment tool. Arab World English Journal, 9(4), 232-241.
Shak, J., & Gardner, S. (2008). Young learner perspectives on four focus-on-form tasks. Language Teaching Research, 12(3), 387-408.
Sheen, R. (2003). Focus on form-a myth in the making? ELT Journal, 57(3), 225-233.
Sheen, Y & Ellis, R. (2011). Corrective feedback in language teaching. Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning. 2. 593-610.
Sheen, Y. (2007). The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners’ acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly, 41, 255–283.
Tan, K. E., & Manochphinyo, A. (2017). Improving grammatical accuracy in Thai learners’ writing: comparing direct and indirect written corrective feedback. Journal of Asia TEFL, 14(3), 430-442.
Truscott, J. (1996) The Case against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes. Language Learning, 46, 327-369.
Westmacott, A. (2017). Direct vs. indirect written corrective feedback: student perceptions. Ikala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 22. 17-32.
Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S., & Kim, H.Y. (1998). Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy, & complexity. Honolulu: Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center, University of Hawaii at Manoa.
Yahyazadeh Jelodar, Z., & Farvardin, M. T. (2019). Effects of collaborative tasks on EFL learners’ writing productions. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 389-406.
Zohrabi, M., Torabi, M. A., & Baybourdiani, P. (2012). Teacher-centered and/or student- centered learning: English language in Iran. English Language and Literature Studies, 2(3), 18-30. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,200 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,266 |
||