| تعداد نشریات | 24 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 929 |
| تعداد مقالات | 8,346 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 16,803,032 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 14,117,375 |
تأثیر رویکرد آموزشی تدریس بازی برای فهم (TGFU) بر یادگیری مهارت های ورزشی دانش آموزان دورۀ اول متوسطه در درس تربیت بدنی | ||
| مجله مطالعات آموزش و یادگیری | ||
| مقاله 9، دوره 11، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 76، شهریور 1398، صفحه 163-182 اصل مقاله (760.57 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22099/jsli.2019.5342 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| مهدی محمدی* 1؛ امید سلیمانی بالاوی2؛ جعفر جهانی3؛ مریم شفیعی4؛ فرهاد دریانوش5 | ||
| 1دکتری تخصصی برنامه ریزی درسی، دانشیار و عضو هیئت‌علمی دانشگاه شیراز | ||
| 2دانشجوی دکتری تخصصی برنامه ریزی درسی | ||
| 3دانشیار بخش مدیریت و برنامه‌ریزی دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روان‌شناسی دانشگاه شیراز | ||
| 4استادیار بخش مدیریت و برنامه‌ریزی آموزشی دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روان‌شناسی دانشگاه شیراز | ||
| 5دانشیار بخش تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی دانشگاه شیراز | ||
| چکیده | ||
| تربیت بدنی در آموزش و پرورش همیشه به عنوان سکویی در نظر گرفته می‌شود که فراگیران در آن تجارب و مهارت‌های تمرینی خود را در ورزش‌های مختلف و فعالیت های فیزیکی گسترش می‌دهند. هدف پژوهش حاضر، تأثیر رویکرد آموزشی «تدریس بازی برای فهم» (TGFU) بر مهارت های ورزشی دانش آموزان در درس تربیت بدنی در دورۀ اول متوسطه بود. روش پژوهش شبه آزمایشی، طرح پیش آزمون - پس آزمون با گروه شاهد بود. جامعۀ آماری پژوهش شامل دانش آموزان دورۀ اول متوسطه در شهر ارومیه بودند که از بین آن ها دو کلاس از مدارس مناطق متوسط شهر انتخاب شدند و به صورت تعیین تصادفی در دو گروه آزمایش و شاهد قرار گرفتند. برای ارزیابی عملکرد دانش آموزان در فوتبال، از آزمون مهارت فوتبال و فرم مشاهدۀ عملکرد میچل، اسلین و گریفین، استفاده شد. پس از محاسبۀ روایی و پایایی ابزار، برای تحلیل سؤالات از تحلیل کواریانس استفاده شد. نتایج پژوهش نشان داد تفاوت معنی داری بین مهارت های شش گانۀ دانش آموزان گروه آزمایش و گواه پس از آموزش با رویکردهای متداول و TGFU وجود دارد. بر اساس نتایج، می توان دریافت با تأکید بر ارزش‌های تدریس متمرکز بر یادگیرنده و برنامۀ مبتنی بر رویکرد تاکتیکی TGFU می توان به توانمندسازی دانش آموزان در مهارت های ورزشی کمک شایانی کرد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| تدریس برای فهم؛ مهارت های ورزشی؛ تربیت بدنی؛ دانش آموزان؛ دورۀ متوسطه | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
نوروزی سید حسینی، ابراهیم و نوروزی سید حسینی، رسول.(1396). تأثیر روش آموزشی TGFU بر انگیزش خودمختاری و یادگیری سرویس والیبال در دانشآموزان نوجوان. نشریۀ رفتار حرکتی، (29)9، 198-183. Alison, S., & Thorpe, R. (1997). A comparison of the effectiveness of two approaches to teaching games within physical education. A skills approach versus a Games for Understanding Approach. The British Journal of Physical Education, 28(3), 9-13.
Australian Sports Commission. (2005). Active after school communities. Communityapproach training program. Canberra: ASC.
Balakrishnan, M., Shabeshan, R., & Salleh, M. (2011). Effect of Teaching Games for Understanding. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 77, 961-963.
Bryan, C. L., & Solmon, M. A. (2012). Student motivation inphysical education and engagement in physical activity. Journal of Sport Behavior,35, 267–285.
Bunker, D., and Thorpe, R. (1982). A model for the teaching of games in secondary schools. Bulletin of Physical Education, 18 (1), 5 – 8.
Bunker, D., & Thorpe, R. (1986b). From theory to practice. In R. Thorpe, D. Bunker, & L. Almond (Eds.), Rethinking games teaching (pp. 11-14). Loughborough, England: University of Technology.
Butler, J. I. (2005). TGfU pet-agogy: old dogs, new tricks and puppy school. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 10(3), 225-240.
Casey, A., & Hastie, P. (2011). Students and teacher responses to a unitof student-designed games. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy,16(3), 295-311.
Chatzipanteli, A., Digelidis, N., Karatzoglidis, C., & Dean, R. (2015). Promoting students’ metocognitive behavior in physical education through TGFU. Am J Educ Stud, 1(2), 28-36.
Chhin, S. (2015). Understanding the Cultural Relevance of Physical Education and Health from the Perspective of Female High School Graduates from Diverse Backgrounds. Faculty of Kinesiology and Recreation Management, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg.
Chow, J. Y., Davids, K., Button, C., Shuttleworth, R., Renshaw, I., & Araújo, D. (2007). The role of nonlinear pedagogy in physical education. Review of Educational Research, 77(3), 251-278.
Dania, A., Kossyva, I., & Zounhia, K. (2017). Effects of a teaching games for understanding program on primary school students' physical activity patterns. European Journal of Physical Education and Sport Science, 3(2), 81-94.
French, K.E., Werner, P.H., Rink, J.E., Taylor, K., and Hussey, K. (1996). The effects of a 3-week unit of tactical and skill instruction on badminton performance in ninth grade students. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 15 (4) 418 – 438.
Georcki, J, J. (2004). Over –the-line: An alternative striking / fielding game for understanding. Teaching elementary physical education, 15(3),21-24.
Ginsburg, K. R. (2007). The importance of play in promoting healthy child development and maintaining strong parent-child bonds. Pediatrics, 119(1), 182–191.
Ght, R. (2008). Complex Learning Theory - Its epistemology and its assumptionabout learning: Implications for physical education. Journal of Teaching inPhysical Education, 27, 21-37.
Gordon, B. (2008). Teaching games for understanding: A teaching approach for all teachers. New zeland physical educator,41(2),17-19.
Griffin, L., & Patton, K. (2005). Two decades of teaching games for understanding: Looking at the past, present, and future. In L. Griffin & J. Butler (Eds.), Teaching games for understanding: Theory, research, and practice(pp. 1-18). Windsor: Human Kinetics.
Griffin, L., Brooker, R., & Patton, K. (2006). Working towards legitimacy: Two decades of teaching games for understanding. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 10(3), 213-223.
Harrison, J., Blakemore, C., Richards, R., Oliver, J., et al (2004). The Effects of Two Instructional Models – Tactical and Skill Teaching – on Skill Development and Game Play, Knowledge, Self Efficacy, and Student Perceptions in Volleyball. The Physical Educator, 61(4), 186 – 199.
Hodges, M., Wicke, J., & Flores-Marti, I. (2018). Tactical Games Model and Its Effects on Student Physical Activity and Gameplay Performance in Secondary Physical Education. Physical Educator, 75(1), 99-115.
Harvey, S. (2006). Effects of teaching games for understanding on game performance and understanding in middle school physical education (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Oregon State University, USA.
Hopper, T., & Bell, R. (2000). Let’s put the play back into the game: Net/wall games. Geneva Park, Ontario: CAHPERD/OPHEA national conference.
Hopper, T., & Kruisselbrink, D. (2002). Teaching games for understanding: What does it look like and how does it influence student skill learning and game performance[ElectronicVersion]. AVANTE from http://www.educ.uvic.ca/Facultv/thopper/WEB/articles/Advante/TGFUmotorlear n.pdf.
Hu, B. Y., Li, K., De Marco, A., & Chen, Y. (2015). Examining the quality of outdoor play in Chinese kindergartens. International Journal of Early Childhood, 47(1), 53–77.
Jarrett, K., Eloi, S., & Harvey, S. (2014). Teaching Games for Understanding (TGFU) as a positive and versatile approach to teaching adapted games. European Journal of Adapted Physical Activity, 7(1), 6-20.
Launder, A. G. (2001). Play Practice: The Games Approach to Teaching and CoachingSports. Illinois: Human Kinetics.
Lemus, I. L., Práxedes, A., & del Villar Álvarez, F. (2016). Effect of an intervention teaching program, based on TGFU model, on the cognitive and execution variables, in the physical education context. European Journal of Human Movement, (37), 88-108.
Light, R. (2003a). Light up the sport with Game Sense. Sports Coach, 26 (2); 33-35.
Mandigo, J. L., & Holt, N. L. (2000). The inclusion of optimal challenge in teaching games for understanding. Physical and Health Education Journal, 66(3), 14-19.
Metzler, M. W. (2000). Instructional models for physical education. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Mitchell, S., Griffin, L., & Oslin, J. (2006). Teaching sport concepts and skills-: A tactical games approach. Champaign IL.: Human Kinetics.
Mitchell, S. A. (1996). Improving invasion game performance. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 67(2), 30-33.
Muthoni, G. (2018). School factors influencing the frequency of teaching of physical education in lower primary classes in Laikipia county, Kenya. http://ir-library.ku.ac.ke/handle/123456789/18825.
Nathan S, Haynes J. (2013). A move to an Innovative Games Teaching Model: Style E Tactical (SET). Asia-Pacific Journal of Health, Sport and Physical Education, 4(3), 287-30
Oslin, J., & Mitchell, S. (2006). Game-centered approaches to teaching physical education. In David Kirk, Doune Macdonald & Mary O'Sullivan(Eds).The handbook of physical education, 627-651. Sage: London.
Puciato, D., Rozpara, M., & Borysiuk, Z. (2018). Physical Activity as a Determinant of Quality of Life in Working-Age People in Wrocław, Poland. International journal of environmental research and public health, 15(4), 623.
Pilus, A. M., Amin, M. N. M., & Muhammad, N. (2017). The effect of sport technology on student-athletes’ Petanque Skill Performance. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 12(17), 6591-6596.
Ronglan, L. T. (2014). Elite sport in Sacandinavian welfare states: legitimacy under pressure? International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 7(3), 1-19.
Sheridan C. L., & Radmacher S. A. (1992).Health psychology: Challenging the biomedical model. Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
Salen, K., Tekinbaş, K. S., & Zimmerman, E. (2004). Rules of play: Game design fundamentals. MIT press.
Siedentop D (1994). Sport education: Quality PE trhough positive sport experiences. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics
Siedentop, D. (1998). Introduction to physical education, fitness, and sport (3rd ed.). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield
Slavin, R. E. (1984). Research methods in education: A practical guide. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Smith, J. (2007). ''Ye'Ve Got to 'Ave Balls to Play this Game Sir!'' Boys, Peers and Fears: The Negative Influence and School - Based 'Cultural Accomplices' inConstructing Hegemonic Masculinities'. Gender and Education 19 (2), 179-198.
Stephen A, Bruce R; & Jill perrone (1991). Student-Athletes Perception of High School Sport Participation, Journal of Research Quarterly of Exercise and Sport, 5, (4) 123-127.
Thomas, K. (1997). Game Sense: What About Technique? Sport educator, 9(2): 32-35.
Thorpe, R., & Bunker, D. (1982). From theory to practice: Two examples of an “understanding approach” to the teaching of games. Bulletin of Physical Education, 18, 9-16.
Thorpe, R. D. (1990). New direction in games teaching. In N. Armstrong (Ed.), New direction in Physical Education, 9(1), 79-100. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Todorovich; J., Ryan, S., Todorovich, S. W. (2008). A Dynamic-Rules Game for Teaching Striking-and-Fielding Game Tactics, Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance; May/Jun 2008; 79, 5; Health Module.
Turner, A. P., & Martinek, T. J. (1992). A comparative analysis of two methods for teaching games (technical approach and game centered (tactical focus) approach). International Journal of Physical Education, 29(4), 15-31.
Usman, Y. E.., Superyatna, W., & Yunitaningram, E. (2015). Model Pembelajaran Teaching Game for Understanding (TGFU) Terhadab Hasil Jump Shoot Bola Basket. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 1(1), 1-7.
Wang, L., & Ha, A. (2013). Three groups of teachers’ views, learning experiences, and understandings of teaching games for understanding. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 18(3), 336-350.
Wang, M., & Wang, L. (2018). Teaching Games for Understanding Intervention to Promote Physical Activity among Secondary School Students. BioMed Research international, https://www.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2018/3737595
Webb, P. I., Pearson, P. J., & Forrest, G. (2006). Teaching Games for Understanding (TGFU) in primary and secondary physical education. International Conference for Health, Physical Education, Recreation, Sport and Dance, 1st Oceanic Congress, Wellington, New Zealand.
Werner, P., Thorpe, R., & Bunker, D. (1996). Teaching games for understanding: Evolution of a model. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 67(1), 28-33.
Wilson, G. (2002). A framework for teaching tactical game knowledge. JOPERD,73(1), 21-26.
Wright, S., McNeill, M, Fry, J., & Wang, J (2005) Teaching teachers to play and teach games. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 10 (1): 6182
Zhang, M. (2017). Relationships between pretend play and cognitive development in early childhood education. ASubmitted thesis in In the Department of Curriculum and Instruction, University of Victoria.
Žuffová, Z., & Zapletalová, L. (2015). Efficiency of Different Teaching Models In Teaching Of Frisbee Ultimate. Acta Facultatis Educationis Physicae Universitatis Comenianae, 55(1), 64-73. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,605 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,747 |
||