| تعداد نشریات | 24 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 930 |
| تعداد مقالات | 8,347 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 16,810,145 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 14,121,624 |
Comparison of the effect of probiotic, prebiotic, salinomycin and vaccine in control of coccidiosis in broiler chickens | ||
| Iranian Journal of Veterinary Research | ||
| مقاله 9، دوره 20، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 66، 2019، صفحه 51-54 اصل مقاله (171.93 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Short paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22099/ijvr.2019.5143 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| A. R. Behnamifar1؛ Sh. Rahimi* 2؛ M. M. Kiaei3؛ H. Fayazi4 | ||
| 1Ph.D. Student in Poultry Science, Department of Poultry Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Department of Poultry Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 3Department of Animal & Poultry Health & Nutrition, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 4Graduated from Faculty of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Background: Coccidiosis is the most common parasitic disease in poultry, ionophore antibiotics are preferred drugs for controlling this disease. However, prolonged use of ionophores will result in Eimeria deformation and resistance to these drugs. Aims: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of probiotic and prebiotic, that is used to boost digestive system health, with salinomycin and vaccine in controlling coccidiosis. Methods: A completely randomized design, including 6 treatments, 4 replications and 20 birds in each experimental unit was applied. All experimental groups except negative control were challenged with suspension containing a mixture of three common species in Iran by oral inoculation in the crop at 28 days of age. Results: The results showed that the reduction of oocyst excretion was significant in coccidiostat (salinomycin), vaccine (Livacox® T), and probiotic (Primalac®) compared to the positive control group (P<0.05). Also, in the intestinal tract injuries, there was a significant reduction between the vaccine and salinomycin compared to the positive control group only in the cecum section (P<0.05). The effect of treatments on performance index (PI) was investigated and it was found that the best performance between infected groups was for salinomycin and vaccine groups (P<0.05). Conclusion: Finally, it can be concluded that probiotic and prebiotic are not effective in controlling coccidiosis and its complications like vaccine and salinomycin. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Prebiotic؛ Probiotic؛ Salinomycin؛ Vaccine؛ Coccidiosis | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Allen, PC and Fetterer, RH (2002). Recent advances in biology and immunobiology of Eimeria species and in diagnosis and control of infection with these coccidian parasites of poultry. Clin. Microbiol. Rev., 15: 58-65.
Dalloul, RA; Lillehoj, HS; Shellem, TA and Doerr, JA (2003). Enhanced mucosal immunity against Eimeria acervulina in broilers fed a Lactobacillus-based probiotic. Poult. Sci., 82: 62-66.
Dalloul, RA; Lillehoj, HS; Tamim, NM; Shellem, TA and Doerr, JA (2005). Induction of local protective immunity to Eimeria acervulina by a Lactobacillus-based probiotic. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis., 28: 351-361.
Demirulus, H; Eratak, S and Kara, K (2006). Effect of salinomycin on broiler performance. Pak. J. Biolo. Sci., 9: 104-106.
Elmusharaf, MA; Bautista, V; Nollet, L and Beynen, AC (2006). Effect of a mannanoligosaccharide preparation on Eimeria tenella infection in broiler chickens. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 5: 583-588.
Elmusharaf, MA; Peek, HW; Nollet, L and Beynen, AC (2007). The effect of an in-feed mannanoligosaccharide preparation (MOS) on a coccidiosis infection in broilers. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 134: 347-354.
Johnson, J and Reid, WM (1970). Anticoccidial drugs: lesion scoring techniques in battery and floor-pen experiments with chickens. Exp. Parasitol., 28: 30-36.
Kitandu, A and Juranova, R (2006). Progress in control measures for chicken coccidiosis. Acta Vet. Brno. 75: 265-276.
Lee, KW; Lillehoj, HS; Jang, SI; Lee, SH; Bautista, DA; Ritter, GD; Lillehoj, EP and Siragusa, GR (2013). Comparison of live Eimeria vaccination with in-feed salinomycin on growth and immune status in broiler chickens. Res. Vet. Sci., 95: 110-114.
Lillehoj, HS and Lillehoj, EP (2000). Avian coccidiosis. A review of acquired intestinal immunity and vaccination strategies. Avian Dis., 408-425.
Lillehoj, HS; Min, W and Dalloul, RA (2004). Recent progress on the cytokine regulation of intestinal immune responses to Eimeria. Poult. Sci., 83: 611-623.
Loddi, MM; Nakaghi, LSO; Edens, F; Tucci, FM; Hannas, MI; Moraes, VMB and Ariki, J (2002). Mannanoligo-saccharide and organic acids on intestinal morphology integrity of broilers evaluated by scanning electron microscopy. In: Proceedings of 11th European Poultry Science Conference. Bremen, Germany. Sept, 6-10.
Najafi, R; Shojadoost, B; Modirsanei, M; Mansoori, B and Rahbari, S (2009). Effect of concomitant use of probiotic and coccidiosis vaccine in experimental coccidial infection of broiler chickens. J. Vet. Res., 64: 33-40.
Pourali, M; Kermanshahi, H; Golian, A; Razmi, GR and Soukhtanloo, M (2014). Antioxidant and anticoccidial effects of garlic powder and sulfur amino acids on Eimeria-infected and uninfected broiler chickens. Iran. J. Vet. Res., 15: 227-232.
Taherpour, K; Moravej, H; Taheri, HR and Shivazad, M (2012). Effect of dietary inclusion of probiotic, prebiotic and butyric acid glycerides on resistance against coccidiosis in broiler chickens. J. Poult. Sci., 49: 57-61.
Williams, RB (2002). Anticoccidial vaccines for broiler chickens: pathways to success. Avian Pathol., 31: 317-353. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2,358 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,086 |
||