| تعداد نشریات | 24 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 903 |
| تعداد مقالات | 8,081 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 15,203,322 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 12,847,689 |
Exploring the Conceptions of Academic Reading Comprehension by Iranian Graduate Students of Applied Linguistics | ||
| Teaching English as a Second Language Quarterly | ||
| مقاله 1، دوره 37، شماره 2، مهر 2018، صفحه 1-32 اصل مقاله (589.52 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22099/jtls.2019.32055.2628 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Mahmood Reza Atai1؛ Mohammad R. Hashemi2؛ Hassan Nejadghanbar* 3 | ||
| 1Kharazmi University | ||
| 2Department of Foreign Languages Kharazmi University | ||
| 3Department of Foreign languages, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Although the importance of reading in higher education as an index of success has been highlighted, the metacognitive knowledge or beliefs of graduate students have remained under-researched. This qualitative study reports on a study that, first, examines how graduate students of applied linguistics conceive of academic reading and academic readers in their graduate programs; second, what factors they believe can contribute to the development of those self-conceptions; and, third, if there was the possibility of adding a course on academic reading to their MA programs, how they would judge the advantages and disadvantages of such a course. In so doing, in-depth interviews were conducted with 31 graduate students at eight different universities. The findings revealed considerable changes in the participants' conceptions as the result of taking part in their graduate programs. They attributed those self-conceptions to their efforts and struggles as well as their teachers' help and guidance. Their perceptions of an academic reading course were positive. Pedagogical implications are discussed. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Metacognitive knowledge؛ beliefs؛ academic reading؛ academic literacy؛ graduate students | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abbott, R. (2013). Crossing thresholds in academic reading. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 50(2), 191-201.
Alhaqbani, A., & Riazi, M. (2012). Metacognitive awareness of reading strategy use in Arabic as a second language. Reading in a Foreign Language, 24(2), 231–255.
Auerbach, E. R., & Paxton, D. (1997). "It is not the English thing": Bringing reading research into the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 31(2), 237–261.
Brantmeier, C., & Dragiyski, B. (2009). Toward a reliable measure of metacognitive reading strategies with advanced L2 learners. In C. Brantmeier (Ed.), Crossing languages and research methods: Analyses of adult foreign language reading (Vol. 7, pp. 47–72). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Benson, M. J. (1991). University ESL reading: a content analysis. English for Specific Purposes, 10(2), 75–88.
Carrell, P. L., Gajdusek, L., & Wise, T. (1998). Metacognition and EFL/ESL reading. Instructional Science, 26(1-2), 97–112.
Cotterall, S., & Murray, G. (2009). Enhancing metacognitive knowledge: Structure, affordances, and self. System, 37(1), 34–45.
Cox, S, R., Friesner, D, L., & Khayum, M. (2003). Do Reading Skills Courses Help Underprepared Readers Achieve Academic Success in College? Journal of College Reading and Learning, 33(2), 170-196.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dabarera, C., Renandya, W. A., Zhang, L, J. (2014). The impact of metacognitive scaffolding and monitoring on reading comprehension. System, 42, 462–473.
Dhieb-Henia, N. (2003). Evaluating the effectiveness of metacognitive strategy training for reading research articles in an ESP context. English for Specific Purposes, 22(4), 387–417.
Dreyer, C., & Nel, C. (2003). Teaching reading strategies and reading comprehension within a technology-enhanced learning environment, System, 31(3), 349-365.
Eskey, D. (2005). Reading in a second language. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research on second language teaching and learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 563-580.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: a new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34 (10), 906–911.
Grabe, W. (2004). Research on teaching reading. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 44–69.
Grabe, W. (2008). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hamdan, A. R., Ghafar, M. N., Sihes, A. J., & Atan, S. B. (2010). The cognitive and metacognition reading strategies of foundation course students in the Teacher Education Institute in Malaysia. European Journal of Social Sciences, 13(1), 133–144.
Hirvela, A. (2004). Connecting reading and writing in second language writing instruction. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Horwitz, E.K., (1987). Surveying student beliefs about language learning. In: Wenden, A., Rubin, J. (Eds.), Learner Strategies in Language Learning (pp. 119–129). Prentice Hall, London.
Hyland, K. (2003). Genre-based pedagogies: A social response to process. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12 (1), 17–29.
Jafari, S. M., & Shokrpour, N. (2012). The reading strategies used by Iranian ESP students to comprehend authentic expository texts in English. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 1(4), 102-113.
Karbalaei, A. (2010). A Comparison of the Metacognitive Reading Strategies Used by EFL and ESL Readers. The Reading Matrix, 10 (2), 165-180.
Kalaja, P., Barcelos, A.M.F. (Eds.), 2003. Beliefs about SLA: New Research Approaches. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Lea, M, R., & Street, B, V. (2006). The "Academic Literacies" Model: Theory and Applications, Theory Into Practice, 45(4), 368-377.
Lillis, T. (2003). Student writing as academic literacies: Drawing on Bakhtin to move from critique to design. Language and Education, 17, 192–207.
Malcolm, D. (2009). Reading strategy awareness of Arabic-speaking medical students studying in English. System, 37(4), 640-651.
Mann, S, J., (2000). The student’s experience of reading. Higher Education, 39(3), 297–317.
McGrath, L., Berggren, J., & Mezek, S. (2016). Reading EAP: Investigating high proficiency L2 university students' strategy use through reading blogs. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 22, 152-164.
Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. (2004). Investigating the strategic reading processes of first and second language readers in two different cultural contexts. System, 32(3), 379-394.
Mokhtari, K., & Perry, B. (2008). Using Rasch analysis to calibrate students’ metacognitive awareness and use of reading strategies. In K. Mokhtari & R. Sheorey (Eds.), Reading strategies of first- and second-language learners: See how they read (pp. 67–84). Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon Publishers.
Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. A. (2008). The impact of reading purpose on the use of reading strategies. In K. Mokhtari & R. Sheorey (Eds.), Reading strategies of first- and second language learners: See how they read (pp. 85–98). Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon Publishers.
Negretti, R., & Kuteeva, M. (2011). Fostering metacognitive genre awareness in L2 academic reading and writing: A case study of pre-service English teachers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20 (2), 95–110.
Ohata, K., & Fukao, A. (2014). L2 learners’ conceptions of academic reading and themselves as academic readers. System, 42, 81–92.
Öz, H. (2007). Understanding metacognitive knowledge of Turkish EFL students in secondary education. Novas Royal, 1(2), 53–83. http://www.novitasroyal.org/Oz.html.
Paris, S. G., & Jacobs, J. E. (1984). The benefits of informed instruction for children’s reading awareness and comprehension skills, Child Development, 55(6), 2083–2093.
Paris, S., Lipson, M., Wixon, K. (1983). Becoming a strategic reader. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8(3), 293–316.
Pintrich, P. R. (2002). The role of metacognitive knowledge in learning, teaching, and assessing. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 219–225.
Plano Clark, L., & Creswell, J. W. (2014). Understanding research: A consumer’s guide (2nd Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Shokrpour, N. & Fotovatian, S. (2009). Effects of consciousness-raising of metacognitive strategies on EFL students' reading comprehension. ITL – International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 157, 75-92.
Serra, M. J., & Metcalfe, J. (2009). Effective implementation of metacognition. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.). Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 278–298). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Sheorey, R., & Mokhtari, K. (2001). Differences in the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among native and non-native readers. System, 29 (4), 431–449.
Snow, C. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in Reading Comprehension. Rand Corporation.
Glaser, B. and Strauss, A.L. (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine.
Taraban, R., Rynearson, K., & Kerr, M. S. (2000). Metacognition and freshman academic performance. Journal of Developmental Education, 24, 12–20
Tavakoli, H. (2014). The Effectiveness of Metacognitive Strategy Awareness in Reading Comprehension: The Case of Iranian University EFL Students. The Reading Matrix, 14 (2), 314-336.
Tavakoli, P. & Hasrati, M. (2015). MA TEFL programmes in Iran: change in a globalized era. In C. Kennedy, (Ed.) English language teaching in the Islamic Republic of Iran: Innovations, trends, and challenges (pp. 139150). London: The British Council.
Victori, M. (2004). Eliciting and fostering learners’ metacognitive knowledge about language learning in self-directed learning programs: A review of data collection methods and procedures. Barcelona: Autonomous University of Barcelona.
Victori, M., (1999). An analysis of writing knowledge in EFL composing: a case study of two effective and two less effective writers. System, 27(4), 537–555.
Victori, M., Lockhart, W., (1995). Enhancing metacognition in self-directed language learning. System, 23(2), 223–234.
Wen, Q. F. (2003). The successful way of learning English. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
Wenden, A., (1986). What do second language students know about their second language learning? A second look at historical student accounts. Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 186–201.
Wenden, A., (1998). Metacognitive knowledge and language learning. Applied Linguistics, 19(4), 515–537.
Wenden, A. (1999). An introduction to metacognitive knowledge and beliefs in language learning: beyond the basics, System, 27(4), 435–441.
Wenden, A. (2002). Learner development in language learning. Applied Linguistics, 23(1), 32–55.
Woods, D. (2003). The social construction of beliefs in the language classroom. In P. Kalaja, & A. M. F. Barcelos (Eds.), Beliefs about SLA: New research approaches (pp. 201–229). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Yüksel, İ., & Yüksel, İ. (2012). Metacognitive Awareness of Academic Reading Strategies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 894 – 898.
Zare, P. (2013). Exploring reading strategy use and reading comprehension success among EFL Learners. World Applied Sciences Journal, 22(11), 1566-1571.
Zhang, L. J., & Wu, A. (2009). Chinese senior high school EFL students’ metacognitive awareness and reading-strategy use. Reading in a Foreign Language, 21(1), 37–59.
Zhang, L. J., Gu, Y. P., & Hu, G. (2008). A cognitive perspective on Singaporean bilingual children’s use of reading strategies in learning to read in English. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(2), 245–271.
Zhang, L. & Seepho, S. (2013). Metacognitive Strategy Use and Academic Reading Achievement: Insights from a Chinese Context. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 10(1), 54-69. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,512 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,539 |
||