| تعداد نشریات | 24 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 877 |
| تعداد مقالات | 7,848 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 14,535,493 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 12,270,758 |
A Sociological Study of Beyhaqi History Applying Robert Putnam’s Theory of Social Capital | ||
| Persian Literary Studies Journal | ||
| مقاله 1، دوره 6، شماره 9، شهریور 2017، صفحه 1-22 اصل مقاله (245.17 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Papers | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22099/jps.2017.26133.1070 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Amir Pourrastegar1؛ Bahee Hadaegh* ؛ Marjan Daraee2 | ||
| 1Department of Persian Literature | ||
| 2foreign languages and linguistics, faculty of letters and humanities, shiraz university,shiraz | ||
| چکیده | ||
| The topic in question is concerned with the sociological aspect of literature referring to Iran’s literary and historical experience. The basis of sociological criticism is built on the premise that literary works are the products of social life and that a comprehensive understanding of a work without considering its social aspects is impractical. To reach a better, more scientific, and more precise understanding of Abul Fazl Beyhaqi’s social depiction, the social capital theory has been employed by the authors of this article. What is depicted in Mas‘ud Ghaznavi's age is revenge, demotion and distrust. Putnum's theory of social capital is studied from three aspects: social trust, social cooperation and interaction, and social support. It is then applied to the story of "Busahl Zuzani’s plot against Khwᾱrazm Shah Altuntᾱsh”. In conclusion, there appears some causes which, by creating mistrust, negative interaction, and demotion, decrease safety and social capital and this is clarified as only a counter-social capital in this adventure.By analyzing Robert Putnam’s social capital theory and applying it to one of the most important part of Beyhaqi History, “Busahl’s plotagainst Altuntᾱsh” as an example, it is evident that the three major principles of this theory as social cooperation (individuals’ link and relations), cooperative norms and social support, social trust are clarified in a reversed negative way. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| social capital؛ Putnam؛ Beyhaqi History | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
A. A. Dastgheyb, Darᾱyene-ye naghd, Tehran: Art domain of Islamic Propagation Organization, 1387/2008.
Abul Fazl Mohammad Ibn Hossein. Beyhaqi, Tᾱrikh-e Beyhaqi, ed. A. A. Fayyᾱz, Mashhad: Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, 1375/1996.
A. H. Zarrinkub, Ashnᾱi ba naghd-e adabi , Tehran: Sokhan, 1380/2001.
A. Q. Foruzᾱni, Ghaznavian az peydᾱyesh tᾱ forupᾱshi, Tehran: Samt, 1384/2005.
C. E. Bosworth, Ghaznavid History, tr. H. Anusheh as Tᾱrikh-e Ghaznaviᾱn, Tehran: Amir Kabir, 1378/1999.
E. Nozari, Tᾱrikh-e ejtemᾱ‘i-ye Iran az ᾱghᾱz tᾱ Mashrutiyat, Tehran: Khojaste, 1388/2009.
F. Fukuyama, Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity, New York: Free Press, 1995.
F. Vahidᾱ, S. Kalᾱntari and A. Fᾱtehi, “Rᾱbete-ye sarmᾱye-ye ejtemᾱ‘I bᾱ hoviyyat-e ejtemᾱ ‘i-ye dᾱneshjuyᾱn” , Research Magazine of Isfahan University, (1383/2004).
H. Sotudeh, Jᾱme‘e shenᾱsi dar adabiyᾱte-e fᾱrsi , Tehran: Ava-ye nur, 1378/1999.
J. Coleman, Foundations of Social Theory. tr. Manuchehr Saburi as Bonyᾱd hᾱ-ye nazariye-e ejtemᾱ‘i, Tehran: Nashr-e Ney, 1377/1998.
J. Field, Social Capital, tr. Jalal Mottaqi as Sarmᾱye-ye ejtemᾱ‘i, Tehran: M’oassese-ye ᾱli-ye pazhuheshi-ye tamin-e ejtemᾱ‘i, 1385/2006.
J. Matini, “Simᾱ-ye Mas‘ud Ghaznavi dar tᾱrikh-e Beyhaqi”, Yᾱd nᾱme-ye Abul Fazl Beyhaqi, Mashhad: Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, (1386/2007), pp. 530-607.
L. Goldman, an Introduction to Sociology of Literature, (A collection of essays). tr. Mohammad Ja’far Puyandeh as Darᾱmad-i bar jᾱme’e shenᾱsi-e adabiyᾱt , Tehran: Cheshmeh Press, 1381/2002.
L. Goldman, Society, Culture, Literature, tr. and Compiled by Mohammad Ja‘far Puyande as Jᾱme‘e, farhang, adabiyᾱt, Tehran: Cheshmeh Press, 1376/1997.
L. Lowenthal, “Jᾱme‘e shenᾱsi-e adabiyᾱt”, Iran Sociology Magazine 1 (1948), pp. 117-136.
M. A. Eslami Nodushan, “Jahᾱn bini-e Abul Fazl-e Beyhaqi”, Yᾱd nᾱme-ye Abul Fazl-e Beyhaqi, (1386/2007), pp. 303-345.
M. Azkiᾱ, and Gh. Ghaffᾱri, “Barresi-ye ertebᾱt-e e‘temᾱd va moshᾱrekate-e ejtemᾱ ‘i dar navᾱhi-ye rustᾱee-ye shahr-e kᾱshᾱn”, Nᾱme-ye ‘olum-e ejtemᾱ῾i17 (1380/2001), pp. 3-31.
M. Dabirsiᾱqi, Gozide- ye tᾱrikh-e Beyhaqi, Tehran: Join-stock Company of pocket books, 1369/1990.
M. Khalili, “Sarmᾱye- ye ejtemᾱ῾i dar tᾱrikh-e Beyhaqi”, Magazine of Mashhad Faculty of Literature and Human Science 41, no.1 (1387/2008), pp. 152-171.
M. Kosari, Ta῾ᾱmollᾱt-i dar jᾱme῾e shenᾱsi-ye adabiyᾱt,Tehran: Bᾱz, 1379/2000.
M. R. Shafi῾i Kadkani, Moosiqi-e sh῾er, Tehran: Nashr-e Agᾱh, 1370/1991.
N. Lin, Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
R. D. Putnam, “Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital”. Journal of Democracy 6 (1995), pp. 65-78.
R. Escarpit, The Sociology of Literature. tr. Morteza Katbi, Tehran: Samt, 1374/1995.
R. Sa῾ᾱdat, “Takhmin-e sath va tozi ῾e sarmᾱye-ye ejtemᾱ῾i-e ostᾱn hᾱ” , Fasl nᾱme-ye refᾱh-e ejtemᾱ῾i, Sixth year, (1385/2006), pp. 173-195.
R. Wellek, Theory of Literature, tr. Parviz Mohajer and Zia Movahhed as Nazariye-ye adabiyat , Tehran: Academic and Cultural, 1373/1994.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,052 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,099 |
||