| تعداد نشریات | 24 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 886 |
| تعداد مقالات | 7,900 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 14,905,578 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 12,668,234 |
Planting scenarios for maize cropping under drought conditions | ||
| Iran Agricultural Research | ||
| مقاله 3، دوره 36، شماره 1، تیر 2017، صفحه 17-24 اصل مقاله (438.83 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Full Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22099/iar.2017.3882 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Seyed Mehdi Nassiri* 1؛ A.R. Sepaskhah2؛ R. Jafari1؛ M.M. Maharlooei3 | ||
| 1Department of Biosystems Engineering, College of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, I. R. Iran | ||
| 2Department of Water Engineering, College of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, I. R. Iran | ||
| 3Department of Mechanical Engineering of Biosystems, College of Agriculture, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman I. R. Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| ABSTRACT Water management is an essential concept for water intensive crop such as maize dealing with water shortage under drought conditions. Maize production is ranked after wheat and barely in Fars province, Iran. Therefore, the present study was conducted to investigate the effects of planting methods by conventional and modified planters on maize growth and yield at different irrigation regimes under semi-arid conditions. Irrigation treatments were full and deficit irrigation (100 and 80% of crop evapotranspiraton (ETc), respectively), and planting methods of on-bed and in-furrow bottom. Experiments were conducted and analysed in a split plots design (planting methods as a main plot and irrigation as a sub-plot) with three replications. Though planting methods did not significantly affect the yield; total dry matter yield increased by 3.7% for in-furrow bottom planting as compared with that obtained in on-bed planting. Water productivity (WP) was significantly affected by irrigation treatments. Maximum WP for total dry matter was obtained at 80% of ETc and in-bottom of furrow planting by 4.6 kg m-3. Considering the soil moisture content during the growing season, planting in-furrow bottom and deficit irrigation as 80% of ETc is recommendable for drought conditions. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Key words: Deficit irrigation؛ Maize؛ Planting method؛ Planter؛ water productivity | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Allen, R.G., Pereira, L.S., Raes, D., & Smith, M. (1998). Crop evapotranspiration: Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56. UN-FAO, Rome, Italy.
Amer, K.H. (2010). Corn crop response under managing different irrigation and salinity levels. Agricultural Water Management, 97, 1553-1563.
Anonymous. (2013). Iran agriculture statistics report. Ministry of Agriculture. http:// www.maj.ir/ portal/Home/ Default.aspx? CategoryID=20ad5e49-c727-4bc9-9254-de648a5f4d52. (Visited on June 2013).
Anonymous. (2015). FAOSTAT. http:// faostat3. fao.org/ browse/ Q/QC/ E. (Visited on Dec. 2015)
Du, T., Kang, Sh., Sun, J., Zhang, X., & Zhang, J. (2010). An improved water productivity of cereals under temporal and spatial deficit irrigation in north China. Agricultural Water Management, 97, 66-74.
Emam, Y. (2007). Cereal crops. 3rd edition. Shiraz: Shiraz University Press. (In Persian).
English, M.J., & Nuss, G.S. (1982). Designing for deficit irrigation. Journal of Irrigation and DrainageEngineering, 108(2), 91-101.
Hargreaves, G.H., & Samani, Z.A. (1984). Economic consideration of deficit irrigation. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 129(1), 1-10.
Jaliliyan, A., Shirvani, A.L., Nemati, A., & Saheli, J. (2001). Effect of deficit irrigation on production and economics of sugar beet in Kermanshah district. Sugar Beet, 16(1), 1-14.
Kang, Sh., Shi, W., Cao., H., & Zhang, J. (2002). Alternate watering in soil vertical profile improved water use efficiency of maize (Zea mays L.). Field Crops Research, 77, 31-41.
Ko, J., & Piccinni, G. (2009). Corn yield responses under crop evapotranspiration-based irrigation management. Agricultural Water Management, 96, 799-808.
Li, Q.S., Willardson, L.S., Deng, W., Li, X.J., & Liu. C.J. (2005). Crop water deficit estimation and irrigation scheduling in western Jilin province, Northeast China. Agricultural Water Management, 71, 47-60.
MajnooniHeris, A., ZandParsa, S., Sepaskhah, A.R., & KamgarHaghighi, A.A. (2007a). Evaluation of MSM model and its application for prediction of water requirement, planting date and forage production of maize. Journal of Crop Production and Processing, 10(3), 83-96. (In Persian).
MajnooniHeris, A., ZandParsa, Sh., Sepaskhah, A.R., & KamgarHaghighi, A.A. (2007b). Comparison of MSM model for prediction of potential evapotranspiration of maize with FAO methods. Journal of Science and Technology in Agriculture and Natural Resources, 11(41), 29-42. (In Persian).
Naroua, I., Sinobas, L.R., & Calvo, R.S. (2014). Water use efficiency and water productivity in the Spanish irrigation district “Rio Adaja”. International Journal of Agricultural Policy and Research, 2(12), 484-491.
Nassiri, S.M., Sepaskhah, A.R., & Maharlooei, M.M. (2016). The effect of planting methods on maize growth and yield at different irrigation regimes. Iran Agricultural Research, 35(1), 27-32.
Quattar, S., Jones, R.j., Crookston, R.K., & Kajeiou, M. (1987). Effect of drought on water relations of developing maize kernels. Crop Science, 27, 730-735.
Sepaskhah, A.R., Azizian, A., & Tavakoli, A.R., (2006). Optimal applied water and nitrogen for winter wheat under variable seasonal rainfall and planting scenarios for consequent crops in a semi-arid region. Agricultural Water Management, 84, 113-122.
Sepaskhah, A.R., & Khajehabdollahi, M.H. (2005). Alternate furrow irrigation with different irrigation intervals for maize. Plant Production Science, 2(5), 592-600.
Sepaskhah, A.R., & Parand, A. (2006). Effect of alternate furrow irrigation with supplemental every furrow irrigation at different growth stages on the yield of maize (Zea mays L.). Plant Production Science, 194, 415-421.
Shabani, A., Sepaskhah, A.R., & KamgarHaghigi, A.A. (2013). Response of agronomic components of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) as influenced by deficit irrigation, water salinity and planting method. International Journal of Plant Production, 7(2), 313-340.
Song, Z., Guo, J., Zhang, Z., Kou, T., Deng, A., Zheng, C., Ren, J., & Zhang, W. (2013). Impacts of planting systems on soil moisture, soil temperature and corn yield in rainfed area of Northeast China. European Journal of Agronomy, 50, 66-74.
Wang, T.C., Wei, L., Wang, H.W., Ma, S.C., & Ma, B.L. (2011). Responses of rainwater conservation, precipitation-use efficiency and grain yield of summer maize to a furrow-planting and straw-mulching system in northern China. Field Crops Research, 124, 223-230.
ZandParsa, S., & Sepaskhah. A.R. (2001). Optimal applied water and nitrogen for corn. Agricultural Water Management, 52, 73-85.
ZandParsa, S., Sepaskhah, A.R., & Rownaghi, A. (2006). Development and evaluation of integrated water and nitrogen model for maize. Agricultural Water Management, 81, 227-256.
Zhang, J., Sun, J., Duan, A., Wang, J., Xiaojun, S., & Liu, X. (2007). Effects of different planting patterns on water use and yield performance of winter wheat in the Huang-Huai-Hai plain of China. Agricultural Water Management, 92, 41-47.
Zhang, X., Ma, L., Gilliam, F.S., Wang, Q., & Li, C. (2012). Effects of raised-bed planting for enhanced summer maize yield on rhizosphere soil microbial functional groups and enzyme activity in Henan Province, China. Filed Crops Research, 130, 28-37.
Zhou, L.M., Li, F.M., Jin, S.L., & Song, Y. (2009). How two ridges and the furrow mulched with plastic film affect soil water, soil temperature and yield of maize on the semiarid Loess Plateau of China. Field Crops Research, 113, 41-47. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2,456 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 2,659 |
||