On Anthropomorphism in Technology-Enhanced Language Learning: Does Modality Matter in Agent-Based Multimedia Instruction on L2 Idioms?

Abel, B. (2003). English idioms in the first language and second language lexicon: A dual representation approach. Second Language Research, 19(4), 329-358.

Allen, L. K., Crossley, S. A., Snow, E. L., & McNamara, D. S. (2014). L2 writing practice: Game enjoyment as a key to engagement. Language Learning & Technology, 14(2), 124-150. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/issues/june2014/allenetal.pdf

Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (2005). The split-attention principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 135–147). UK: Cambridge University Press.

Babaie, H. (2008). On the effects of help options in MCALL programs on the listening comprehension of EFL learners. TELL Journal, 2(6), 27-47.

Boers, F., Demecheleer, M., & Eyckmans, J. (2004). Cross‐cultural variation as a variable in comprehending and remembering figurative idioms. European Journal of English Studies, 8(3), 375‐388.

Bryant, F. B., & Yarnold, P. R. (1995). Principal components analysis and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. In L. G. Grimm & R. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding multivariate statistics (pp. 99-136). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Cambridge University Press. (2013). Cambridge IELTS 9: Authentic examination papers from Cambridge ESOL. New York: Cambridge.

Cameron, L., & Low, G. (1999). Metaphor. Language Teaching, 32(1), 77-96.

Carlotto, T., & Jaques, P. A. (2016). The effects of animated pedagogical agents in an English-as-a-Foreign-Language learning environment. Journal of Human Computer Studies, 90,1-32.

Cassell, J., & Thorisson, K. (1999). The power of a nod and a glance: envelope vs. emotional feedback in animated conversational agents. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 13(4), 519- 538.

Chapelle, C., & Mizuno, S. (1989). Student’s strategies with learner-controlled CALL. CALICO Journal, 7(2), 25-47.

Chen, Y., C., & Lai, H., L. (2013). Teaching English idioms as metaphors through cognitive-oriented methods: A case in an EFL writing class. English Language Teaching, 6(6), 13-20.

Clarebout, G., Elen, J., Johnson, W. L., & Shaw, E. (2002). Animated pedagogical agents: An opportunity to be grasped? Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 77(3), 267-286.

Collentine, K. (2001). Learner autonomy in a task-based 3d world and production. Language Learning & Technology, 15(3), 50-67.

Corbeil, G. (2007). Using the French tutor multimedia package or a textbook to teach two French past tense verbs: Which approach is more effective? CALICO Journal, 24(2), 313-330. Retrieved from https://calico.org/html/article_647.pdf

Dai, J., Raine, B. R., Roscoe, R., Cai, Z., & McNamara, D. S. (2011). The Writing-Pal tutoring system: Development and design. Journal of Engineering and Computer Innovations, 2(1), 1-11.

Duffy, M. C., & Azevedo, R. (2015). Motivation matters: Interactions between achievement goals and agent scaffolding for self-regulated learning within an intelligent tutoring system. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 338-348. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.041

Dunsworth, Q., & Atkinson, R. K. (2007). Fostering multimedia learning of science: Exploring the role of an animated agent’s image. Computers and Education, 49(3), 677-690.

Ergül, E., & Koç, M. (2013). The role of animated agents in web-based distance education. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 83, 1016-1022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.189

Graesser, A. C., Person, N., Harter, D. (2001). Teaching tactics and dialog in AutoTutor. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12, 257-279.

Grant, L. E. (2003). A corpus-based investigation of idiomatic multiword units. (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database.

Gulz, A., & Haake, M. (2006). Design of animated pedagogical agents - A look at their look. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(4), 322-339.

Heidig, S., & Clarebout, G. (2011). Do pedagogical agents make a difference to student motivation and learning? A Review of Empirical Research. Educational Research Review, 6, 27-54.

Heift, T. (2007). Learner personas in CALL. CALICO Journal, 25(1), 1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1558/cj.v25i1.1-10

Hongpaisanwiwat, C., & Lewis M. (2003) Attentional effect of animated character. In M. Rauterberg, M. Menozzi, & J. Wesson (Eds.), Human-computer interaction-INTERACT '03 (pp. 423-430). Nieuwe Hemweg, Amsterdam: IOS Press.

Johnson, A. M., Ozogul, G., & Reisslein, M. (2014). Supporting multimedia learning with visual signalling and animated pedagogical agent: moderating effects of prior knowledge. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(2), 97-115.

Johnson, J., & Rosano, T. (1993). Relation of cognitive style to metaphor interpretation and second language proficiency. Applied Psycholinguistics 14, 159-175.

Johnson, W. L., Rickel, J. W., & Lester, J. C. (2000). Animated pedagogical agents: Face-to-face interaction in interactive learning environments. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 41, 41-78.

Laborda, J. G. (2010). Contextual clues in Semi-direct interviews for computer assisted language testing. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 3591-3595.

Liew, T.-W., Tan, S.-M., & Jayothisa, C. (2013). The effects of peer-like and expert-like pedagogical agents on learners’ agent perceptions, task-related attitudes, and learning achievement. Educational Technology & Society, 16(4), 275–286.

Massaro, D. W., & Cohen, M. M. (1994). Visual, orthographic, phonological, and lexical influences in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1107-1128.

Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2^nd Ed.). NY: Cambridge University Press.

Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (1998). A split-attention effect in multimedia learning: Evidence for dual processing systems in working memory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 312-320.

Moreno, R. (2006). Learning in high-tech and multimedia environments. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 63-67.

Nippold, M. A., & Duthie, J. K. (2003). Mental imagery and idiom comprehension: A comparison of school-age children and adults. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 788-799.

Noma, T., & Badler, N. I. (1997). A virtual human presenter. Proceedings of the IJCAI Workshop on Animated Interface Agents: Making Them Intelligent. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.

Ozogul, G., Johnson, A. M., Atkinson, R. K., & Reisslein, M. (2013). Investigating the impact of pedagogical agent gender matching and learner choice on learning outcomes and perceptions. Computers & Education, 67, 36-50.

Paivio, A., & Walsh, M. (1993). Psychological processes in metaphor comprehension and memory. In A. Ortony. (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 307-328). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Pallant, J. (2013). SPSS survival manual (5^th Ed.). NY: Open University Press.

Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, televisions, and new media like real people and places. University Press, Stanford, California.

Ryu, J., & Baylor, A. (2005). The psychometric structure of pedagogical agent persona. Tech., Inst., Cognition and Learning, 2, 291-314.

Sahimi, S. M., Zain, F. M., Kamar, N. A. N., Samar, N., Rhman, Z. A., Majid, O., Luan, W. S. (2010). The pedagogical agent in online learning: Effects of the degree of realism on achievement in terms of gender. Contemporary Educational Technology, 1(2), 175-185.

Sklar, E., & Richards, D. (2010). Agent-based systems for human learners. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 25(2), 1–25.

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Sweller, J. (2005). Implications of cognitive load theory from multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 19-30). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Sweller, J. (2010). Element interactivity and intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review, 22(2), 123-138.

Toyoda, E. (2001). Exercise of learner autonomy in project-oriented CALL. CALL-EJ Online, 2(2), Retrieved from http://callej.org/journal/2-2/toyoda.html

Van der Meij, H., van der Meij, J., & Harmsen, R. (2015). Animated pedagogical agents’ effects on enhancing student motivation and learning in a science inquiry learning environment. Education Tech Research Dev, 63, 381-403.

Vasiljevic, Z. (2015). Effects of etymology and pictorial support on the retention and recall of l2 idioms. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 12(1), 35-55.

Veletsianos, G., & Miller, C. (2008). Conversing with pedagogical agents: A phenomenological exploration of interacting with digital entities. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(6), 969-986.

Yılmaz, R., & Kılıç-Cakmak, E. (2012). Educational interface agents as social models to influence learner achievement, attitude and retention of learning. Computers & Education, 59, 828-838.

Yung, H. I., & Pass, F. (2015). Effects of cueing by a pedagogical agent in an instructional animation: A cognitive load approach. Educational Technology & Society, 18(3), 153-160.