| تعداد نشریات | 24 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 935 |
| تعداد مقالات | 8,388 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 16,988,540 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 14,377,079 |
The effects of host plants on the feeding indices and chemical activities of elm leaf beetle, Xanthogaleruca luteola (Muller) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) | ||
| Iran Agricultural Research | ||
| مقاله 11، دوره 35، شماره 1، شهریور 2016، صفحه 81-87 اصل مقاله (253.89 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Full Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22099/iar.2016.3697 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| H. Yazdanfar* 1؛ M. GhodskhahDariaii2؛ J. JalaliSendi1 | ||
| 1Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Guilan, Guilan, I.R. Iran. | ||
| 2Department of Forestry, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Guilan, Guilan, I.R. Iran. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| ABSTRACT- Elm leaf beetle (ELB), Xanthoga leruca luteola (Muller), is considered as one of the most important and destructive phytophagous pests of Ulmus species in the north of Iran. In the current study, the effects of three host plants including Ulmus carpinifolia, U. carpinifolia var. umbraculifera, and Zelkova carpinifolia, on feeding indices and biochemical processes of ELB were examined under controlled conditions (25 ± 2 °C; 14:10 LD; 65% RH). The results showed that the highest efficiency of conversion of ingested food (ECI) (23.11±1.36 %) and efficiency of conversion of digested food (ECD) belonged to U. carpinifolia (79.9±4.12 %) and the lowest to Z. carpinifolia (p≤0.05). Relative growth rate (RGR) and approximate digestibility (AD) in U. carpinifolia var umbraculifera and U. carpinifolia were similar to each other. The highest consumption index (CI) belonged to U. carpinifolia var. um braculifera and the lowest to Z. carpinifolia (1.93±0.029, 1.47±0.054), respectively (p≤0.05). Significant differences were found among enzymatic activities of acid (ACP) and alkaline phosphatases (ALP), aspartate aminotransferases (AST and ALT) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in the haemolymph of X. luteola larvae reared on three different host plants. The highest activities of LDH (33±0.58), AST (10074.7±25.25) and ALT (1053.75±5.6) were found in larvae fed on U. carpinifolia (p≤0.05). Also, the highest amount of protein and triglyceride (TAG: 126.5±0.866) was found in larvae fed on U. carpinifolia. The results show that all enzymatic activities significantly decreased on Z. carpinifolia compared with other host plants (p≤0.05). These results indicated that U. carpinifolia is the most appropriate host plant for larvae of X. luteolaas evidenced by the highest nutritional indices as well as activities of enzymatic component in intermediary metabolism. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Keywords:؛ Elm leaf beetle؛ Nutritional indices؛ Intermediary metabolism؛ Host plant | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abaei, M. (1999). Iran'snon-fruit trees and shrubsand forestpests. Publicationofresearch, education and agricultural extension, Tehran, Iran.
Andreeva, E.M. (2010). What can nutritional indices tell us about gypsy moth larvae (Lymanteria dispar L.)? PesticPhytomed. (Belgrade), 25, 71-77.
Ansari, M.S., Hasan, F., & Ahmad, N. (2011). Influence of various host plants on the consumption and utilization of food by Pierisbrassicae (Linn.) Bulletin of Entomological Research, 102, 231-237.
Arbab, E., Jalali, J., & Sahragard, A. (2001). Laboratorystudy ofthe biology ofthe pest Xanthogaleruca Luteola Muller. Journal of Entomological Society of Iran, 21(2), 85–73.
Awmack, C.S., & Leather, S.R. (2002). Host plant quality and fecundity in herbivorous insects. Annual Review of Entomology, 47, 817–844.
Barbehenn, R.V., Haugberg, N., Kochmanski, J., Menachem, B., & Miller, C. (2014). Physiological factors affecting the rapid decrease in protein assimilation efficiency by a caterpillar on newly- mature tree leaves. Physiological Entomology, 39, 69-79.
Batista Pereira, G.L., Petacci, F., Fernandes, B.J., Correa, A.G., Vieira, P.C., Fatima Da Silva, M., & Malaspina, O. (2002). Biological activity of astilbin from Dimorphandra mollis against Anticarsia gemmatalis and Spodoptera frugiperda. Pest Management Science, 58, 503-507.
Behdad, A. (1988). Pests anddiseasesof foresttrees and shrubsand ornamental plantsin Iran, Neshad publication, Isfahan.
Bessey, O.A., Lowry, O.H., & Brock, M.J. (1946). A method for the rapid determination of alkaline phosphatase with five cubic millimetersofserum. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 164, 321-329.
Bosu, P.P., & Wagner, M.R. (2008). Anatomical and nutritional factors associated with susceptibility of elms (Ulmus spp.) to the elm leaf beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 101(3), 944-954.
Grabstein, E.M., & Scriber, J.M. (1982). Hostplant utilization by Hyalophora cecropia as affected by prior feeding experience. Entomologia Experimentaliset Applicata, 32, 262-268.
Jalali, J.A., Arbab, A., & Aliakbar, A. (2005). The efficacy of Aqueous plant extracts of wormwood and dwarf elder against elm leaf beetle Xanthogaleruca luteola Mull. (Col.: Chrysomelidae), Agricultural Science, 15, 115–120.
Khatamsaz, M. (1990). Flore of Iran. Ulmaceae family, No. 4. Research Institute of forestry and range management, Tehran, Iran. Ministry of Agriculture, Press.
KhaliliMahani, M., Hatami, B., & Seyedoleslami, H. (2003). Host preference of three elms and hackberry for elm leaf beetle, Xanthogaleruca luteola (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Forest Ecology and Management, 186(1-3), 207–212.
King, J. (1965). The dehydrogenases or oxidoreductases. Lactate dehydrogenase. In: D. Van Nostrand (ED.), Practical clinical enzymology.- Van Nostrand Company Ltd., London.
Lazarevic, J., & PericMataruga, V. (2003). Nutritive stress effects on growth and digestivephysiology of Lymantria dispar larvae. Yugoslav Medical Biochemistry, 22, 53-59.
MardaniTalaee, M., Rahimi, V., & Zibaee, A. (2014). Effects of host plants on digestive enzymatic activities and some components involved in intermediary metabolism of Chrysodeixis chalcites (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Journal of Entomological and Acarological Research, 46, 96-101.
Miller, F., & Ware, G. (1999). Resistance of elms of the Ulmus davidiana complex to defoliation by the adult elm leaf beetle (Coleoptera:Chrysomelidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 92(5), 1147–1151.
Nathan, S.S., Chung. P.G., & Murugan, K. (2005). Effect of biopesticides applied separately or togetheron nutritional indices of the rice leaf folder Cnaphalocrocis medinalis. Phytoparasitica, 33, 187-195.
Nation, J.L. (2008). Insect physiology and biochemistry, 2nd ed. CRC press, London.
Reinhold, J.G. (1953). Standard methods of clinical chemistry, 1, 88.
Richmond, W. (1973). Preparation and properties of cholesterol oxidase from Nocardia sp. And itsapplication to enzymatic assay of total cholesterol in serum. Clinical Chemistry, 19, 1350–1356.
Sabeti, H. (1999). Iranian Forests, Trees and Shrubs. University of Science and Industry. 753-775. (In Persian).
Shekari, M., JalaliSendi, J., Etebari, K., & Zibaee, A. (2008). Effects of Artemisia annua L. (Asteracea) on nutritional physiology and enzyme activities of elm leaf beetle, Xanthogaleruca luteola Mull. (Coleoptera: Chrysomellidae). Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 91, 66–74.
Sheppard, C.A., & Friedman, S. (1990). Influence of host plant, foliar phenology and larval dietaryhistory on Lymantriadispar larval nutritional indices. Entomologia Experimentaliset Applicata, 55, 247-255.
Thomas, L. (1998). Clinical Laboratory Diagnostic, first ed., TH Books Verlasgesellschaft, Frankfurt.
Waldbauer, G.P. (1968). The consumption and utilization of food by insects, in: J.W.L.Beament, J.E. Treherne, V.B. Wigglesworth (Eds.), Advances in Insect Physiology, London and New York, Academic Press.
Yazdanfar, H., & GhodskhahDaryaei, M. (2016). The effects of leaf mineral compounds on biology and survival of Xanthogaleruca Luteola Miller. (Coleoptera: chrysomelidae). Jouranalof Plant Protection, (in press)
Zibaee, A., & JalaliSendi, J. (2011). A juvenile hormone analogue, Pyriproxifen, affects some biochemical components in the hemolymph and fat bodies of Eurygasterin tegriceps Puton (Hemiptera: Scutelleridae). Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 100, 289-298. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2,680 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,526 |
||