| تعداد نشریات | 24 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 851 |
| تعداد مقالات | 7,575 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 13,413,722 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 11,580,441 |
Contribution to the molecular systematics of the genus Capoeta from the south Caspian Sea basin using mitochondrial cytochrome b sequences (Teleostei: Cyprinidae) | ||
| Molecular Biology Research Communications | ||
| مقاله 1، دوره 5، شماره 2، شهریور 2016، صفحه 65-75 اصل مقاله (494.37 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22099/mbrc.2016.3608 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Halimeh Zareian1؛ Hamid Reza Esmaeili* 2؛ Adeleh Heidari3؛ Majidreza Khoshkholgh3؛ Hamed Mousavi-Sabet3 | ||
| 1Ichthyology Research Laboratory, Department of Biology, College of Sciences, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran | ||
| 2Department of Biology, College of Sciences, Shiraz University | ||
| 3Department of Fisheries, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Guilan, Sowmeh Sara,Guilan, Iran. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Traditionally, Capoeta populations from the southern Caspian Sea basin have been considered as Capoeta capoeta gracilis. Study on the phylogenetic relationship of Capoeta species using mitochondrial cytochrome b gene sequences show that Capoeta population from the southern Caspian Sea basin is distinct species and receive well support (posterior probability of 100%). Based on the tree topologies obtained from Bayesian and Maximum Likelihood methods, three main groups for the studied Capoeta were detected: Clade I) Capoeta trutta group (the Mesopotamian Capoeta group) including closely related taxa (e.g. trutta, turani, barroisi) characterized by having numerous irregular black spots on the dorsal half of the body. This clade was the sister group to all other Capoeta species and its separation occurred very early in evolution possess, so we considered it as Old Evolutionary Group. Clade II) comprises highly diversified and widespread group, Capoeta damascina complex group (small scale capoeta group), the Anatolian-Iranian group (e.g. banarescui, buhsei, damascina, saadii), characterized by small scales and plain body (absence of irregular black spots on the dorsal half of the body, except in some juveniles) with significantly later speciation event so called Young Evolutionary Group. Clade III) Capoeta capoeta complex group (large scale capoeta group, the Aralo-Caspian group) comprises very closely related taxa characterized by large scales and plain body (absence of irregular black spots on the dorsal half of the body) distributed in Aralo-Caspian water bodies (capoeta, ekmekciae, heratensis, gracilis, sevangi) that has been recently diverged and could be considered as Very Young Evolutionary Group. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Phylogenetic relationship؛ Evolutionary History؛ Capoeta Gracilis؛ Caspian Sea basin | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
1. Blanc MP, Banarescu J, Gaudet L, Hureu JC. European Inland Water Fish. A Multilingual Catalogue. FAO, Fishing News Ltd, London, England 1971; 187 pp.
2. Howes GJ. Systematics and biogeography: An overview. [In:] Winfield IJ, Nelson JS (eds) – Cyprinid Fishes: Systematics, biology and explanation. Chapman & Hall, London 1991: 1-33.
3.Eschmeyer,WN, Fricker. Catalog of Fishes: Genera,Species References.2015 http://resercharchive.calacademy.org/research/ichthyology/catalogy/fishcatmin.asp.Electroniv version accessed 01.10.2015.
4. Banarescu PM. The freshwater fishes of Europe. 5. Cyprinidae 2. Part I. Rhodeus to Capoeta. Aula Wiesbaden 1999.
5. Geldiay R, Balik S. Freshwater Fishes of Turkey. Ege University Publications: Izmir, Turkey 1996; 532 pp.
6. Bektas Y, Çiftçi Y, Eroğlu O, Beldüz AO. Genetic discrimination of two Capoeta species in northeastern Anatolia, using mitochondrial 16S rRNA gene. Zool Middle East 2011;53:61-70.
7. Levin BA, Freyhof J, Lajbner Z, Perea S, Abdoli A, Gaffaroğlu M, Özulug M, Rubenyan HR, SalnikovVB, Doadrio I. Phylogenetic relationships of the algae scraping cyprinid genus Capoeta (Teleostei: Cyprinidae). Mol Phylogenet Evol 2012;62:542-549.
8. Coad BW. Freshwater Fishes of Iran 2015; Retrieved from http://www.briancoad.com (accessed on 17 July 2015).
9. Alwan N. Systematics, taxonomy, phylogeny and zoogeography of the Capoeta damascina species complex (Pisces: Teleostei: Cyprinidae) inferred from comparative morphology and molecular markers (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Frankfurt University: Frankfurt, 2010; 264 pp.
10. Reshetnikov YS, Shakirova FM. Zoogeograficheskii analiz ikhtiofauny srednei Asii po spiskam presnovodnykh ryb [Zoogeographical analysis of the ichthyofauna of Central Asia by lists of freshwater fish]. Voprosy Ikhtiologii 1993;33:37-45.
11. Turan C. Molecular systematics of the Capoeta (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) species complex inferred from mitochondrial 16S rDNA sequence data. Acta Zool Cracov 2008; 51A:1-14.
12. Bianco PG, Banarescu PM. A contribution to the knowledge of the Cyprinidae of Iran (Pisces, Cypriniformes). Cybium 1982;6:75-96.
13. Holčík J, Jedlička L. Geographical variation of some taxonomically important characters in fishes: the case of the bitterling Rhodeus sericeus. Environ Biol Fish 1994;41:147-170.
14. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual (2nd ed.). Colad Spring Harbor, Ny: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 1989; 1626 pp.
15. Schmidt TR, Gold JR. Complete sequence of the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene in the cherryfin shiner, Lythrurus roseipinnis (teleostei, Cyprinidae). Copeia 1993; 3:880–883.
16. Perdices A, Carmona JA, Fernandez-Delgado C, Doadrio I. Nuclear and mitochondrial data reveal high genetic divergence among Atlantic and Mediterranean populations of the Iberian killifish Aphanius iberus (Teleostei, Cyprinodotidae). Heredity 2001; 87: 314–324.
17. Hall TA. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucl Acid S 1999;41:95-98.
18. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 2003;19:1572-1574.
19. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985;39:783-791.
20. Galtier N, Gouy M, Gautier C. Sea view and phylo-win, two graphic tools for sequence alighnmemnt and molecular phylogeny. Comput Appl Biosci 1996;12: 543-548.
21. Abdoli A. The inland water fishes of Iran. Iranian Natural and Wildlife Museum, Tehran, 2000; 378 pp. [in Persian]
22. Esmaeili HR, Coad BW, Gholamifard A, Nazari N, Teimory A. Annotated checklist of the freshwater fishes of Iran. Zoosyst Rossica 2010;19:361-386.
23. Karaman MS. Süßwasserfische der Türkei. 7. Teil. Revision der kleinasiatischen und vorderasiatischen Arten des Genus Capoeta (Varicorhinus, Partim). Mit Hamburg Zoology Mus Inst 1969;66:17-54.
24. Berg LS. Presnovodnye ryby Irana i sopredel’nykh stran. Trudy Zoologicheskogo Instituta Akademii Nauk SSSR 1949;8:783-858.
25. Doukakis P, Birstein VJ, Ruban GI, Desalle R. Molecular genetic analysis among subspecies of two Eurasian sturgeon species, Acipenser baerii and A. stellatus. Mol Ecol 1999;8:117-127.
26. Tinti F, Piccinetti C. Molecular systematics of the Atlanto-Mediterranean Solea species. J Fish Biol 2000;56:604-614.
27. Hrbek T, Stolting KN, Bardakci F, Kucuk F, Wildekamp RH, Meyer A. Plate tectonics and biogeographical patterns of the Pseudophoxinus (Pisces: Cypriniformes) species complex of central Anatolia, Turkey. Mol Phylogenet Evol 2004;32:297-308.
28. Faria R, Weiss S, Alexandrino P. A molecular phylogenetic perspective on the evolutionary history of Alosa spp. (Clupeidae). Mol Phylogent Evol 2006;40:298-304.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 4,403 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 8,134 |
||