THE GENERIC STRUCTURE OF ACKNOWLEDGMENTS IN PERSIAN DISSERTATIONS | ||
| Teaching English as a Second Language Quarterly (Formerly Journal of Teaching Language Skills) | ||
| مقاله 1، دوره 34، شماره 4، خرداد 2016، صفحه 1-28 اصل مقاله (222.06 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22099/jtls.2016.3580 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Minoo Alemi1؛ Atefeh Rezanejad* 2 | ||
| 1Islamic Azad University, Tehran-west Branch, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Acknowledgments are vital since students/researchers can demonstrate their genuine appreciation through them and more importantly shape their (local/global) academic identity. In line with this significance, the present study examined the move patterns of 503 Persian dissertation acknowledgements from two major universities in Iran, from 1981 to 2014 and from sixteen various disciplines including soft and hard science disciplines. Overall, 65,323 words were analyzed. By and large, a careful examination and analysis of the corpus indicated that Iranian university students follow a three-tier moves pattern in writing a dissertation acknowledgments, namely a “Framing move” (including six micro steps), a main “Thanking move” (consisting of nine micro steps), and a “Closing move” (containing four micro steps). Moreover, the results indicated that the longest and shortest acknowledgments were 986 and 4 words respectively. The results also indicated that there was a significant difference in the complexity of acknowledgments in hard and soft science disciplines. The results of this study can hold valuable implications for both university students and professors who aspire an appropriate, coherent, and to the point display of scholarly competence and academic identity. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Generic structure؛ Persian؛ dissertation acknowledgments | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Afful, J. B. A., & Mwinlaaru, I. N. (2012). Sub-disciplinary variation and rhetoric in dissertation acknowledgements written by education students: The case of the University of Cape Coast, Ghana. In Domwin, D., K., & Moses, K., K. (Eds.), National development through language education (pp.79-111). Cape Coast: Cape Coast University Press. Al-Ali, M. N. (2010). Generic patterns and socio-cultural resources in acknowledgments accompanying Arabic PhD dissertations. Pragmatics, 20(1), 1-26. Alemi, M., Eslami, R, Z., & Rezanejad, A. (2015). Iranian Non-native English Speaking Teachers’ Rating Criteria Regarding the Speech Act of Compliment: An Investigation of Teachers’ Variables. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 6(3), 21-49. Bunton, D. (2002). Generic moves in Ph.D. thesis Introductions. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic discourse (pp. 57-75). Abingdon: Routledge. Castleton, B. (2006). Frequency and function of religiously-based expressions. In J. A. Morrow (Ed.), Arabic, Islam, and the Allah Lexicon (pp.71-111). Lewiston, New York: Edwin Mellen Press. Cheng, W. (2012). A contrastive study of master thesis acknowledgements by Taiwanese and North American students. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 2(1): 8-17. Cronin, B. (1995). The scholar’s courtesy: The role of acknowledgment in the primary communication process. London: Taylor Graham. Cronin, B., McKenzie, G., & Stifler, L. (1992). Patterns of acknowledgments. Journal of Documentation, 48(2), 107–122. Gesuato, S. (2004). Acknowledgments in PhD dissertations: The complexity of thanking. In Torsello, C. T., Grazia Busà, M., & Gesuato, S. (Eds.) Lingua inglese e mediazione linguistica. Ricerca e didattica con supporto telematico (pp. 273–318). Padova: Unipress. Giannoni, D., S. (2002). World of gratitude: A contrastive study of acknowledgement texts in English and Italian research articles. Applied Linguistics, 23(1), 1-31. Halleck, G. B., & Connor, U. M. (2006). Rhetorical moves in TESOL conference proposals. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5, 70-86. Hatipoğlu, Ç. (2007). (Im) politeness, national and professional identities and context: Some evidence from e-mailed “Call for Papers”. Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 760 -773. Hyland, K. (2002). Genre: Language, context, and literacy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 113-135. Hyland, K. (2003). Dissertation acknowledgements: The anatomy of a Cinderella genre. Written Communication, 20, 242-268. Hyland, K. (2004). Graduates’ gratitude: The generic structure of dissertation acknowledgements. English for Specific Purposes, 23, 303-324. Hyland, K., & P. Tse (2004). ‘I would like to thank my supervisor': Acknowledgements in graduate dissertations. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 259-275. Jalilifar, A., & Mohammadi, M. J. (2014). Cross-Cultural Investigation into Generic Structure of Dissertation Acknowledgements in English and Persian: Reflections on Politeness Strategies. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 6(1), 23-47. Karakas, Ö. (2010). A cross-cultural study on dissertation acknowledgments written in English by native speakers of Turkish and American English (Doctoral dissertation, Middle East Technical University). Koley, S., & Sen, B. K. (2013). Acknowledgements in research papers in electronics and related fields: 2008-2012. SRELS J. Inf. Manag., 50(5), 265-270. Lasaky, F., G. (2011). A contrastive study of generic organization of doctoral dissertation acknowledgements written by native and non-native (Iranian) students in applied linguistics. MJAL, 3(2), 175-199. Mohammadi, M. J. (2013). Do Persian and English Dissertation Acknowledgments Accommodate Hyland’s Model: a Cross-Linguistic Study. International Journal of Academic Research in Business & Social Sciences, 3(5). Nicolaisen, J. (2002). Structure-based interpretation of scholarly book reviews: A new research technique. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science, 123-135. Posteguillo, S. (1999). The schematic structure of Computer Science research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 18, 139-160. Rattan, G., K. (2014). Acknowledgement patterns in DESIDOC journal of library & information technology. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 34(3), 265-270. Rezanejad, A., & Rezaei, S. (2013). Academic dishonesty at universities: The case of plagiarism among Iranian language students. Journal of Academic Ethics, 11(4), 275-295. Rowley-Jolivet, E. (2002). Visual discourse in scientific conference papers: A genre-based study. English for Specific Purposes, 21, 19-40. Salager-Meyer, F., Alcaraz-Ariza, M. A., Briceno, M. L., & Jabbour, G. (2011). Scholarly gratitude in five geographical contexts: A diachronic and cross-generic approach of the acknowledgment paratext in medical discourse (1950–2010). Scientometric, 86, 763-784. Sharifian, F. (2005). The Persian cultural schema of shekasteh-nafsi: A study of compliment responses in Persian and Anglo-Australian speakers. Pragmatics & Cognition, 13(2), 337-361. Swales, J., M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Swales, J., M. (1996). Occluded genres in the academy. In E. Ventola & A. Mauranen (Eds), Academic writing: Intercultural and textual issues (pp. 45-58). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Thompson, P. (2001). A pedagogically motivated corpus-based examination of PhD theses: Macrostructure, citation practices and uses of modal verbs. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Reading. Tiew, W., S., & Sen, B., K. (2002). Acknowledgement patterns in research articles: A biblimetric study based on journal of natural rubber research 1986-1997. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 7(1), 43-56. Yang, W. H. (2012). A genre analysis of PhD dissertation acknowledgements across disciplinary variations. LSP Journal, 3(2), 51-7 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 3,161 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 5,588 |
||