| تعداد نشریات | 24 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 851 |
| تعداد مقالات | 7,575 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 13,413,765 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 11,580,455 |
The or That: Definite and Demonstrative Descriptions in Second Language Acquisition | ||
| Teaching English as a Second Language Quarterly (Formerly Journal of Teaching Language Skills) | ||
| مقاله 4، دوره 34، شماره 1، مرداد 2015، صفحه 83-114 اصل مقاله (973.52 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22099/jtls.2015.3527 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Mohammad Javad Rezai* 1؛ Razie Alishvandi2 | ||
| 1Assistant Professor at Yazd University | ||
| 2M.A., TEFL / Yazd University | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Since Heubner's (1985) pioneering study, there have been many studies on (mis) use/ non-use of articles by L2 learners from article-less and article languages. The present study investigated how Persian L2 learners of English produce and interpret English definite descriptions and demonstrative descriptions. It was assumed that definite and demonstrative descriptions share the same central semantics of 'uniqueness', although they differ in the domain relative to which uniqueness is computed. While the book denotes the unique book in the discourse, that book denotes the unique book in the immediately salient situation. Persian has demonstratives and is partially marked for specificity, while English encodes definiteness. Persian L2 learners, due to lack of an equivalent for English definite marker 'the' in their language, use demonstratives as one of the compensating mechanisms to encode definiteness in definite descriptive contexts. A forced-choice elicitation production task and a picture-based comprehension task were used to examine Persian L2 learners' ability to distinguish definite and demonstrative contexts. The L2 learners were able to acquire both definite and demonstrative descriptions, but were more target-like regarding demonstratives than definite descriptions. The variability in choosing articles and demonstrative adjectives in one specific context (e.g. applying both the and that in contexts specific to the only or that only) shows that Persian EFL learners equate the demonstrative ān with both the and that. This also indicates that L1 transfer may determine the L2 learners' choices. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| articles؛ definiteness؛ demonstratives؛ descriptions؛ determiners؛ semantics؛ L1 transfer | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Adger, D. (2003). Core Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Bardovi-Harlig, K. & Bofman, T. (1989). Attainment of syntactic and morphological accuracy by advanced language learners. Studies in Second Language Acquistion, 11, 17-34. Bickerton, D. (1981). Roots of Language. Ann Arbor: Kharoma Press. Bitchener, J., Young, S., & Cameron, D. (2005). The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14, 191-205. Bruge, L. (2002). The positions of demonstratives in the extended projection principle. In G., Cinque (Ed.), Functional Structures in DP and IP, the Carthography of Syntactic Structures.Vol. 1, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Darzi, A. & Rezai, Sh. (2010). The null word in Persian Language. Linguistic Research, 2, 57-73. Goad, H. & White, L. (2004). Ultimate attainment of L2 inflection: Effects of L1 prosodic structure. In S. Foster-Cohen, M., Sharwood Smith, A., Sorace & M. Ota (Eds.), EUROSLA Yearbook 4 (pp.119-145). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Haghshenas, A., Samei, H., Samai, S. M., & Tabatabai, A. (2008). Persian Grammar. Tehran: Samt. Hawkins, J. (1978). Definiteness and indefiniteness. London: Croom Helm. Hawkins, J. (1984). A note on referent identifiability and co-presence. Journal of Pragmatics, 8, 649–59. Hawkins, J. (1991). On (in) definite articles: Implicatures and (un) grammaticality prediction. Journal of Linguistics, 27, 405–42. Heim, I. (1982). The semantics of definite and indefinite Noun Phrases. (Unpublished doctoral thesis), University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA. Heim, I. (1991). Artikel und definitheit [Articles and definiteness]. In A. Stechowand & D. Wunderlich (Eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of contemporary research (pp.487-535). Berlin: De Gruyter. Huebner, T. (1983). A longitudinal analysis of the acquisition of English. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma. Huebner, T. (1985). System and variability in interlanguage syntax. Language Learning, 35, 141-63. Ionin, T. (2003a). Article semantics in second language acquisition. MIT Press: MA. Ionin, T. (2003b). The interpretation of 'the': A new look at articles in L2-English.In Proceedings of the 27th Boston University Conference on Language Development. (pp.346-57). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press. Ionin, T. (2006). This is definitely specific: specificity and definiteness in article systems. Natural Language Semantics, 14, 175–234. Ionin, T., Baek, S., Kim, E., Ko, H., & Wexler, K. (2012). That's different form the: definite and demonstrative descriptions in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 28(1), 69-101. Ionin, T., Ko, H., & Wexler, K. (2004). Article semantics in L2-acquisition: The role of specificity. Language Acquisition, 12, 3–69. Ionin, T., Zubizarreta, M., & Maldonado, S. (2008). Sources of linguistic knowledge in the second language acquisition of English articles. Lingua, 118, 554-576. Ionin, T., Zubizarreta, M., & Philippov, V. (2009). Acquisition of article semantics by child and adult L2-English learners. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12, 337-361. Jarvis, S. (2000). Methodological rigor in the study of transfer: identifying L1 influence in the interlanguage lexicon. Language Learning, 50, 245-309. Kamp, H. (1981). A Theory of Truth and Discourse Representation. In J. Groenendijk, T. Janssen, & M. Stokhof, (Eds.), Formal Methods in the study of language (pp.277-322). Amesterdam: Mathematical Centre. Khanlari, P. (1998). Persian Grammar. Tehran: Tous. Kharma, N. (1981). Analysis of the errors committed by Arab university students in the use of the English definite/indefinite articles. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 19, 331-345. Khayampour, A. (2007). Persian grammar. Tabriz: Setoude. King, J. (2001). Complex demonstratives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Ko, H., Ionin, T., & Wexler, K. (2005). Adult L2-learners lack the Maximality presupposition, too! In Proceedings of the 1st Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition in North America. Hawaii, US. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics. Ko, H., Provic, A., Ionin, T., & Wexler, K. (2008). Semantic universals and variation in L2 article choice. In Proceedings of the 9th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 9), (Ed.), By Slabakova, R., Rothman, J., Kempchinsky, P., & Gavruseva, E., 118-129. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceeding Project. Lazard, G. (1992). A Grammar of Contemporary Persian. (S.A. Lyon, Trans.), New York: Mazda Publishers. Leung, Y. K. I. (2001). The initial state of L3A: Full Transfer and Failed Features? In Proceedings of the 4th Second Language Research Forum the Past, Present and Future of Second Language Research (pp.55-75). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press. Mahootian, Sh. (1999). Persian Grammar from a Typological Perspective. Tehran: Markaz. Master, P. (1987). A cross-linguistic interlanguage analysis of the acquisition of the English article system. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). UCLA, Los Angeles, CA. Master, P. (1997). The English article system: Acquisition, function, and pedagogy. System, 25(2), 215-232. Meshkatoddini, M. (2000). Persian Grammar (Based on Transformational Theory). Mashhad: Ferdowsi University Murphy, S. (1997). Knowledge and production of English articles by advanced second language learners. (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Texas, Austin. Parish, B. (1987). A new look at methodologies in the study of article acquisition for learners of ESL. Language Learning, 37, 361-83. Quirk, R. & Greenbaum, S. (1990). A Student Grammar of English. London: Longman. Rezai, M.J. & Jabbari, A.A. (2010). Acquisition of definiteness feature by Persian L2 learners of English. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 2(2), 123- 154. Roberts, C. (2002). Demonstratives as definites. In van Deemter, K. & R. Kibble (Eds.), Information sharing (pp.89–136). Stanford, CA: CSLI. Roberts, C. (2003). Uniqueness in definite noun phrases. Linguistics and Philosophy, 26, 287–350. Robertson, D. (2000). Variability in the use of the English article system by Chinese learners of English. Second Language Research, 16, 135–72. Russell, B. (1905). On denoting. Mind, 14, 479–93. P. Martinich, (Ed.), (2001). The Philosophy of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Trenkic, D. (2000). The acquisition of English articles by Serbian speakers. (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. Trenkic, D. (2007). Variability in L2 article production: Beyond the representational deficits vs. processing constraints debate. Second Language Research, 23, 289–327. Trenkic, D. (2008). The representation of English articles in second language grammar: Determiners or adjectives? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11, 1–18. Tsimpli, I. M. & Dimitrakopoulou, M. (2007). The interpretability hypothesis: evidence from Wh-interrogatives in L2 acquisition. Second language Research, 23, 215-242. White, L. (2003). Fossilization in steady state L2 grammars: Implications of persistent problems with inflectional morphology. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6, 128-141. Wolter, L. (2006). That’s that: The semantics and pragmatics of demonstrative noun phrases. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). UCSC, LA. Young, R. (1996). Form-function relations in articles in English interlanguage. In R. Bayley, & R. Preston (Eds.), Second language acquisition and linguistic variation (pp.135-75). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2,460 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 2,180 |
||