الف. فارسی
- سلطانی، اصغر؛ شریف، مصطفی؛ رکنیزاده، رسول (1390). بررسی دیدگاه اعضای انجمنهای علمی کشور درباره ویژگیهای ماهیتی علم. دانشور رفتار (تربیت و اجتماع)، سال هفدهم، شماره42، 314-293.
- کریمی، محمدحسن؛ مزیدی، محمد؛ مهرمحمدی؛ محمود (1386). نقد و بررسی کتاب علوم پایه اول راهنمایی تحصیلی از منظر فلسفه علم. مجله علوم اجتماعی و انسانی دانشگاه شیراز، سال بیست و ششم، شماره 52، 136-111.
ب. انگلیسی
- Akcay, B. (2007). The influence of the history of science course on pre-service science teachers’ understanding of the nature of science concepts. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Iowa.
- Al-Saidi, A. M. (2004). The influence explicit versus implicit instructional approaches during a technology-based curriculum on students’ understanding of nature of science (NOS). Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of South Carolina.
- Dagher, Z., Brickhouse, N., Shipman, H., & Letts, W. (2004). Howsome college students represent their understandings of the nature of scientific theories. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 735–755.
- Eisner, E. W. (1984). No easy answers: Joseph Schwab's contributions to curriculum. Curriculum Inquiry, 14 (2), 201-210.
- Eisner, E. W. (2002). The educational imagination (3rd edition). Columbus: Merrill Prentice Hall.
- Hogan, K. (2000). Exploring a process viewof students’ knowledge about the nature of science. Science Education, 84, 51–70.
- Ibrahim, B., Buffler, A., & Lubben, F. (2009). Profiles of Freshman Physics Students’ Views on the Nature of Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(3), 248-264.
- Kattoula, E. H. (2005). Conceptual change in pre-service teachers’ views on nature of science when learning a unit on the physics of waves. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, GeorgiaStateUniversity.
- Kimball, M. E., (1968) .Understanding nature of science: A comparison of Scientists and science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2)1), 110-120.
- Laugksch, R. (2000). Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview. Science Education, 84, 71–94.
- Laugksch, R., &Spargo, P. (1999). Scientific literacy of selected South African matriculant entering tertiary education: A baseline study. South African Journal of Science, 95, 427–432.
- Leach, J., Millar, R., Ryder, J., & Se´re´, M.-G. (2000). Epistemological understanding in science learning: The consistency of representations across contexts. Learning and Instruction, 10, 497–527.
- Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of science: past, present and future. In: Abell, S. K., and Lederman, N.G. (eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 831-879). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
- Lederman, N.G. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 331–359.
- McComas, W. F., Clough, M. P., &Almazroa, H. (2002). The role and character of the nature of science in science education. In: W. F., McComas (ed.), The nature of science in science education rationales and strategies. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 3-39.
- McComas, W., F., Clough, M.P., & Almazroa, H. (1998). The role and character of the nature of science and science education. Science & Education, 7, 511–532.
- Mortimer, E. (1995). Conceptual change or conceptual profile change? Science & Education, 4, 267–285.
- Oliva, P. F. (2005). Developing the curriculum (6thed.). New York: Pearson education Inc.
- Ornstien, A. g. & Hunkins, F. P. (2004). Curriculum: foundation, principles, and Issues (4th Ed.).New York: Pearson Education, Inc.
- Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2003). What ‘‘ideas-about-science’’ should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 692–720.
- Pomeroy, D. (1993). Implications of teachers’ Beliefs about nature of science: Comparison of the beliefs of scientists, secondary science teachers and elementary teachers. Science Education, 77(3), 261-278.
- Ryan, A. G., & Aikenhead, G. S. (1992). Students’ perceptions about the epistemology of science. Science Education, 76, 559-580.
- Ryder, J., & Leach, J. (2000). Interpreting experimental data: The views of upper secondary school and university science students. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 1069–1084.
- Ryder, J., Leach, J., &Driver, R. (1999). Undergraduate science students’ images of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 201–219.
- Se´re´, M.-G., Fernandez-Gonzalez, M., Gallegos, J.A., Gonzalez-Garcia, F., De Manuel, E., Perales, F.J., & Leach, J. (2001). Images of science linked to labwork: A survey of secondary school and university students. Research in Science Education, 31, 499–523.
- Sullivan, T. J. (2001). Methods of social research. New York: Harcourt Inc.
- Taba, H. (1971). Curriculum development: Theory and practice. New York: Harcourt Publishers Ltd.
- Tao, P., K. (2003). Eliciting and developing junior secondary students’ understanding of the nature of science through peer collaboration instruction in science stories. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 147–171.
- Tsai, C., C. (1999).Laboratory exercises help me memorize the scientific truths: A study of eight graders’ scientific epistemological views and learning in laboratory activities. Science Education, 83, 654– 674.
- Tsai, C., C., & Liu, S., Y. (2005). Developing a multi-dimensional instrument for assessing students’ epistemological views towards science. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 1621–1638.
- Tyler, T. W. (1969). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Vanderlinden, D. W. (2007). Teaching the content and context of science: The effect of using historical narratives to teach the nature of science and science content in an undergraduate introductory geology course. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Iowa State University.
|