Metadiscourse Strategies and Citation Patterns as Resources of Authorial Identity in Research Articles across International/Local Journals and Applied Linguistics Subdisciplines

Abdi, R. (2011). Meta-discourse strategies in research articles: A study of differences across subsections. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 3(1), 1-16.

Abdi, R., Tavangar, M., & Tavakoli, M. (2010). The cooperative principles in discourse communities and genres: A framework for the use of meta-discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 46(6), 1669-1679.

Abdollahzadeh, E. (2011). Poring over the findings: Interpersonal authorial engagement in applied linguistics papers. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(1), 288-297.

Afros, E., & Schryer, C. F. (2009). Promotional (meta) discourse in research articles in language and literary studies. English for Specific Purposes, 28(1), 58-68.

Basturkmen, H. (2012). A genre-based investigation of discussion sections of research articles in  Dentistry and disciplinary variation. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(2), 134- 144.

Biber, D. (2006). Stance in spoken and written university registers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5(2), 97-116.

Bitchener, J. (2010). Writing an Applied Linguistics thesis or dissertation: A guide to presenting empirical research. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Charles, M. (2003). “This mystery. . .”: A corpus-based study of the use of nouns to construct stance in theses from two contrasting disciplines. Journal of English for Academic Purposes,  2(4), 313-326.

Charles, M. (2006). The construction of stance in reporting clauses: A cross-disciplinary study of theses. Applied Linguistics, 27(3), 492-518.

Crismore, A. (1989). Talking with readers: Meta-discourse as rhetorical act. New York: Peter Lang.

Crismore, A., & Abdollahzadeh, E. (2010). A review of recent meta-discourse studies: The Iranian  Context. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 9(2), 195-219.

Crismore, A., Markkanen, R., & Steffensen, M. (1993). Meta-discourse in persuasive writing: A study of texts written by American and Finnish university students. Written Communication, 10(1), 39-71.

Dahl, T. (2004). Textual meta-discourse in research articles: A marker of national culture or of academic discipline? Journal of Pragmatics, 36(10), 1807-1825.

Flowerdew, L. (1997). Interpersonal Strategies: investigating inter-language corpora. RELC Journal, 28(1), 72-88.

Gao, Y., Li, l., & Lu, J. (2001). Trends in research methods in applied linguistics: China and the west. English for specific purposes, 20(1), 1-14.

Gillaerts, P., & Van de Velde, F. (2010). Interactional meta-discourse in research article abstracts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(2), 128-139.

Harwood, N. (2005). We do not seem to have a theory. The theory I present here attempts to fill this gap: Inclusive and exclusive pronouns in academic writing. Applied Linguistics, 26(4), 343-373.

Hewings, A., Theresa, L., & Vladimirou, D. (2010). Who’s citing whose writings? A corpus-  based study of citations as interpersonal resource in English medium national and English medium international journals. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(2), 102-115.

Hirvela, A., & Belcher, D. (2001). Coming back to voice: The multiple voices and identities of mature multilingual writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(1-2), 83-106.

Hu, G., & Cao, F. (2011). Hedging and boosting in abstracts of applied linguistics articles: A comparative study of English- and Chinese-medium journals. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(11),  2795-2809.

Hunston, S., & Thompson, G. (Eds.). (2000). Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the  construction of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hyland, K. (1998). Persuasion and context: The pragmatics of academic metadiscourse. Journal   of Pragmatics,30(4),437-455.

Hyland, K. (I999a). Disciplinary discourses: writer stance in research articles. In C. Candlin & K. Hyland (Eds.). Writing: Texts, processes and practices (pp.99-121). London: Longman.

Hyland, K. (1999b). Talking to students: meta-discourse in introductory textbooks. English for Specific Purposes, 18(1), 3-26.

Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing.  London: Longman.

Hyland, K. (2001). Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles. English  for Specific Purposes, 20(3), 207-226.

Hyland, K. (2002). Authority and invisibility: authorial identity in academic writing.  Journal of Pragmatics, 34(8), 1091-1112.

Hyland, K. (2005a). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse.  Discourse Studies, 6(2), 173-191.

Hyland, K. (2005b). Meta-discourse: Exploring interaction in writing. London: Continuum.

Hyland, K. (2010). Community and Individuality: Performing Identity in Applied Linguistics. Written Communication, 27(2), 159-188.

Hyland, K. (2011). The presentation of self in scholarly life: Identity and marginalization in academic homepages, English for Specific Purposes, 30(4) , 286-297.

Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2004). Meta-discourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics, 25(2), 156-177.

Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2009). ‘The leading journal in its field’: evaluation in journal descriptions. Discourse Studies, 11(6), 703-720.

Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2012). “She has received many honors”: Identity construction in article bio statements. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(2), 155-165.

Jalilifar, A.R. (2011). World of Attitudes in Research Article Discussion Sections: A Cross-  Linguistic Perspective. Journal of Technology & Education, 5(3), 177-186.

Jalilifar, A.R. (2012). Academic attribution: citation analysis in master’s theses and research articles in applied linguistic. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 23-41.

Jalilifar, A. R., & Hoseini Marashi, M. (2011). Authorial presence in single-authored research  article introductions in English and Persian: A cross-disciplinary and cross-linguistic study, ESP Across Cultures, 8, 65-88.

Khedri, M., Heng, C.S., & Ebrahimi, S.F. (2013). An exploration of interactive meta-discourse  markers in academic research article abstracts in two disciplines, Discourse Studies, 15(3), 319-331.

Kim, L.K., & Lim, J.M.H. (2013). Meta-discourse in English and Chinese research article  introductions, Discourse Studies, 15(2), 129-146.

Lewin, B. A. (2005). Contentiousness in science: The discourse of critique in two sociology journals. Text, 25, 723-744.

Li, T., & Wharton, S. (2012). Meta-discourse repertoire of L1 Mandarin undergraduates writing  in English: A cross-contextual, cross-disciplinary study. English for Academic Purposes,  11(4), 345-356.

Mansourizadeh, K., & Ahmad, U. K. (2011). Citation practices among non-native expert and novice scientific writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10(3), 152-161.

Martinez, I. A. (2003). Aspects of theme in the method and discussion sections of biology journal articles in English. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2(2), 103-123.

Matsuda, P. K., & Tardy, C. M. (2007). Voice in academic writing: The rhetorical construction of author identity in blind manuscript review. English for Specific Purposes, 26(2), 235-249.

McGrath, L., & Kuteeva, M. (2012). Stance and engagement in pure mathematics research articles: Linking discourse features to disciplinary practices. English for Specific Purposes,  31(3), 161-173.

Mur Duenas, P. (2011). “I/we focus on…:”A cross-cultural analysis of self-mentions in business management research articles, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6(2), 143-162.

Nwogu, K.N. (1997). The medical research paper: structure and functions. English for Specific Purposes, 16(2), 119-138.

Parkinson, J. (2011). The discussion section as argument: The language used to prove knowledge claims. English for Specific Purposes, 30(3), 164-175.

Pecorari, D. (2006). Visible and occluded citation features in postgraduate second-language writing. English for Specific Purposes, 25(1), 4-29.

Petric, B. (2007). Rhetorical functions of citations in high- and low-rated master’s theses. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6(3), 238-253.

Rubio, M. (2011). A pragmatic approach to the macro-structure and metadiscoursal features of  research article introductions in the field of Agricultural Sciences. English for Specific  Purposes, 30(4), 258-271.

Sheldon, E. (2009). From one I to another: Discursive construction of self-representation in English and Castilian Spanish research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 28(4), 251- 265.

Shooshtari, Z. G., & Jalilifar , A. R.(2010). Citation and the construction of sub-disciplinary knowledge. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 2(1), 45-66.

Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Swales, J.M. (2002). On models in applied discourse analysis. In C.N. Candlin (Ed.). Research and Practice in Professional Discourse (pp. 61-77). Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong Press.

Swales, J. (2004). Research genres: Exploration and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tang, R., & John, S. (1999). The ‘I’ in identity: Exploring writer identity in student academic writing through the first person. English for Specific Purposes, 18(1), 23-39.

Thompson, P. (2005). Points of focus and position: Inter-textual reference in PhD theses. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4(4), 307-323.

Thompson, P., & Tribble, C. (2001). Looking at citations: using corpora in English for academic purposes. Language Learning & Technology, 5(3), 91-105.

Vande Kopple, W. J. (1985). Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse. College Composition and Communication, 36, 82-93.

Warchal, K. (2010). Moulding interpersonal relations through conditional clauses: Consensus- building strategies in written academic discourse. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(2), 140-150.

White, H. D. (2004). Citation analysis and discourse analysis revisited. Applied Linguistics, 25(1), 89-116.