Reading Performance of Iranian EFL Learners in Paper and Digital texts

Abraham, P. (2000). Skilled reading: Top-down, bottom-up. Boston: SABES/World Education Retrieved from http://sabes.org/resources/publications/fieldnotes/vol10/f02abrah.htm#top

Ackerman R. (2009). The subjective feeling of comprehension and remembering accompanying text learning on-screen.In Y. Eshet, A. Caspi, S.  Eden, and N. Geri (Eds.). Learning in the Technological Era IV: Proceedings of the 2009 Chais Conference on Instructional Technologies.

Al- Amir, S. S. (2009). Computer-based testing vs. paper-based testing: Establishing the comparability of reading tests through the evolution of a new comparability model in a Saudi EFL context (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Essex, Colchester, England .

Alderson, J. C. (2000). Technology in Testing: the present and the Future. System, 28(4), 593-603.

Armitage, U.Wilson, S. and Sharp, H. (2004).  Navigation and ownership for learning in electronic texts: An experimental study. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 2(2), 19–29. Retrieved from http://www.ejel.org/volume-2/vol2-issue1/issue1-art17.htm

Auman, S. (2002).High School Students' Decisions to Read Print or Electronic Text: Learning Outcomes and Preferences. (Master's Thesis).University of North Carolina.

Ayersman, D. J., & Reed, W. M. (1995). Effects of learning styles, programming, and gender on computer anxiety. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 28(2), 148-161.Retrievedfrom http://www.scinet.cc/articles.

Baker, R., Bernard, M. & Riley, S. (2002). Reading online news: A comparison of three presentations formats, Usability News, 4(2).

Barnett, M. (1989).  More than meets the eye: Foreign language reading theory and practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: CAL & Prentice-Hall.

Boo, J. (1997). Computerized versus paper-and-pencil assessment of educational development: Score comparability and examin preferences. (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of Iowa, USA.

Brady, L. & Phillips, C. (2003). Aesthetics and usability: A look at color and balance. Usability News, 5.1[On-Line]. Retrieved from  http:// psychology.Wichitaedu/surl/ usabilitynews/51/aesthetics.htm

Brantmeier, C. (2001). Second language reading research on passage content andgender: Challenges for the intermediate level curriculum. Foreign Language Annals, 34, 325-333.

Brantmeier, C. (2002). Second language reading strategy research at the secondary and university levels: variations, disparities, and generalizability. The Reading Matrix, 2(3). Retrieved from http://www.readindmatrix.com/articles/brantmeier/article.pdf

 Brantmeier, C. (2003). Does gender make a difference? Passage content and comprehension in second language reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 15 (1), 1-24.

Brantmeier, C. (2004). Gender, violence-oriented passage content and second language reading comprehension. The Reading Matrix, 4 (2), 1-19.

Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching (4^thEd.). NY: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

Brown, G. J. (2001). Beyond print: reading digitally. Library Hi Tech, 19, 399.

Bugel, K., &Buunk, B. (1996). Sex differences in foreign language text comprehension: The role of interests and prior knowledge. Modern Language Journal, 80 (1), 15-31.

Bus, A. G. & Neuman, S. B. (Eds.) (2009). Multimedia literacy development. Routledge, New York.

Carrell, P.L., Devine, J. & Eskey, D. (Eds.). (1998). Interactive approaches to second language reading. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Chang, S. L. & Ley, K. (2006).Learning strategy to compensate for cognitive overload in online learner use of printed online materials. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 5(1), 104-117.

Chartier, R. (1995). Forms and meanings: Text, performances, and audiences from codex to computer. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Chavez, M. (2001). Gender in the language classroom. New York: McGraw Hill.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ Erlbaum.

Cole, M., & Engestrom, Y. (1993). A cultural historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon, (Ed.). Distributed cognitons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Connell, D., & Gunzelmann, B. (2004,  March). The next gender gap: why are so many boys floundering while so many girls are soaring? Instructor, 14-17.

Darnton, R. (2009). The case for books: Past, present, and future. New York, NY: Public Affairs.

Dillon, A. (1992). Reading from paper versus screens: A critical review of the empirical literature. Ergonomices, 35(10), 1297-1326.

Dyck, J. L., & Smither, J. A. (1994). Age differences in computer anxiety: The role of computer experience, gender, and education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 10(3), 239-248.

Evans, M. A., Charland, A. R. & Saint-Aubin, J. (2009). A new look at an old format: Eye-tracking studies of shared book reading and implications for eBook and eBook research. In G. Bus, & S. Neuman (Eds.). Multimedia and Literacy Development (pp. 89-111). Routledge: New York.

Farhady, H., Ja'farpour, A. J., & Birjandi, P. (1994). Functional testing. In M. Zohrabi (Ed.). Testing language skills: From theory to practice (p. 283). Tehran, Iran: The center for studying and compiling university books in humanities (SAMT).

Foderato, L. (2010, November 19).  In a digital age, students still cling to paper textbook. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/20/nyregion/ 20 textbooks.html.

Gay, L. R. (1996). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application.  Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.

Grabe, W. (1991). Current developments in second language reading research. TESOL Quarterly, 25(3), 375-406.

Grabe, W. (2004). Reading in a second language. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Green, T.  & Maycock, L. (2004).  Computer- Based IELTS. Research Notes, (18), pp. 3-6. 

Grimshaw, S., Dungworth, N., McKnight, C., & Morris, A. (2007). Electronic books: children’s reading and comprehension. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38 (4), 583–599.

Hassaskhah, J. (2013). Using Conjoint Methodology to Address Textbook Needs: A Case of Iranian EFL Context. International Journal of Technology and Educational Marketing (IJTEM), 3(1), 1-14.

Higgins, J., Russell, M. & Hoffmann, T. (2005). Examining the effect of computer-based passage presentation on reading test perfprmance. The Jounral of technology, Learning, and assessment, 3 (4), pp. 5-34.

Imamikia, P.  (2009). Impact of web-based reading lessons on EFL students' reading comprehension, motivation and autonomy (Unpublished master’s thesis). Azzahra University, Tehran, Iran.

James, F. F. (2008). The electronic book and PDA: Looking beyond the physical codex. Retrieved  from http://www.scinet.cc/articles.

Joly, M. C.R. A., Capovilla, A. S.G, Bighetti, C, Neri, M. L., & Nicolau, A. F. (2009). Reading comprehension of freshmen students: Comparing printed and digital texts. International Conference on multimedia and ICT in Education. Retrieved on November 25, 2008, from http://www.formatex.org.

Kerr, M. A., & Symons, S. E. (2006). Computerized presentation of text: Effects on children’s reading of informational material. Reading and Writing, 19, 1-19.

Lee, J.F., & VanPatten, B. (2003). Directions for language learning and teaching: Making communicative language teaching happen. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Leso, T., & Peck, K. L. (1992). Computer anxiety and different types of computer courses. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 8(4), 469–478.

Liu, Z. (2008). Paper to digital: Documents in the information age. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.

Liu, Z., & Luo, L. (2001). A comparative study of digital library use: Factors, perceived influences, and satisfaction. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 37(3), 230–236.

Machovec, G. S. (1996). Books on the World Wide Web: Issues and trends. Information Intelligence, 16(6-7), 1-6.

McKenna, M.C., Kear, D.J., & Ellsworth, R. A. (1995). Children’s attitudes toward reading: A national survey. Reading Research Quarterly, 30(4), 934–956.

Mangen, A.  (2008). Hypertext fiction reading: Haptics and immersion. Journal of Research in Reading, 31(4): 404–419.

Mayes, D. K., Sims, V. K., & Koonce, J. M. (2001). Comprehension and workload differences for VDT and paper-based reading. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 28, 367–378.

Noam, E. M. (1999). Will books become the dumb medium? Educom Review, 33(2). Retrieved from http://192.52.179.128/web/pubs/review.

Noyes, J. M., & Garland, K. J. (2003). VDT versus paper-based text: Reply to Mayes, Sims and Koonce. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 31(6(, 411-423.

O'Hara, K., & Sellen, A. (1997). A comparison of reading paper and on-line documents.  Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing system (pp. 22-27). New York: ACM.

Oxford, R. L., Felkins, R. Z., Hollaway, G., & Saleh, A. (1996). Telling their stories: language learners use diaries and  re-collective studies. In R. Oxford (Ed.). Language learning strategies around the world: cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 19-34). Honolulu: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center. 

Oxford, R. L., Park-Oh, Y., Ito, I., Sumrall, M. (1993). Learning a language by satellite: What influences achievement. System, 21, 31-48.

Ozuru, Y., Dempsey, K & McNamara, D. S. (2009).Prior knowledge, reading skill, and text cohesion in the comprehension of science texts. Learning and Instruction, 19, 228-242.

Pae, T. (2004). Gender effect on reading comprehension with korean EFL learners. System, 32(3), 265-281.

Perfetti, C.A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.

Reinking, D. (2005). Multimedia learning of reading. In R.E. Mayer (Ed.). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 355-373). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Rice, G. (1994). Examining constructs in reading comprehension using two presentation modes: Paper vs. computer. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 11, 153–178.

Roebuck, R. (1998). Reading and recall in L1 and L2: A sociocultural approach. Stamford. Connecticut: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

Rosén, M. (2001). Gender differences in reading performance on documents across countries. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(1), 1-38.

Rumelhart, D. E. (1977). Toward an interactive model of reading. In S. Dornic (Ed.). Attention and performance IV. New York, NY: Academic Press.

Sellen, A. J., & Harper, R. H. R. (2001). The myth of the paperless office. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Shen, L. B. (2006). Computer technology and college students’ reading habits .Chian-Nan Annual Bulletin, 32, 559-572.

Smith, N. B. (2002). American reading instruction (Special ed.). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

Stanovich, K. (1990). Concepts of developmental theories of reading skill: Cognitive  resources, automaticity, and modularity. Developmental Review, 10, 72-100.

Terry, A. A. (1999, November).  Demystifying the e-Book -- What is it, where will it lead us, and who's in the game? Against the Grain, 11, 18-21. Retrieved from http://www.against-the grain.com/ATG_AnaEbook.html.

Tierney, J. E. (2005). Reading strategies and practices (Sixth Ed.). Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.

Van Den Broek, P., Kendeou, P. & White, M. J. (2009). Cognitive processes during reading: Implications for the use of multimedia to foster reading comprehension. In G. Bus & S. Neuman (Eds.). Multimedia and Literacy Development (pp 57-74). Routledge: New York.

Wastlund, E., Reinikka, H., Norlander, T., & Archer, T. (2005). Effects of VDT and paper presentation on consumption and production of information: Psychological and physiological factors. Computers in Human Behavior, 21,377-394.

Wayne, J. C. (2003). Relationship between text display method and college student short-term Knowledge Retention during Self-Study (Doctoral dissertation). East Tennesse State University.

Young, D. J., & Oxford, R. (1997). A gender-related analysis of strategies used to process input in the native language and in a foreign language. Applied Language Learning, 8, 43-73.